NO JUSTICE ON THE JUSTICE FORUM - NOR WILL THERE EVER BE

darthvodka wrote:She is the forum pet, no doubt about it. I also contacted John, months ago to ask why she was still there, I got told she is clever, funny and very sorry when pulled up over her abuse.

I was also told she issues apoligies. Maybe Sadie would comment on that? Did emu apologise profusely to her?

That there is a drunken idiot who posts nothing of any note, except when it's abuse.

It's bomb proof, John won't ban it, not now, not ever.

The forum is just unuseable.

1) First of all, I find it worrying that another poster on here has my name, which is sadie NOT ssadie. I have been using the name sadie on various forums for almost 6 years.

At best this will cause confusions.

Sykes wrote:Hello, ssadie, and welcome.  We have been following what has been happening on Justice which is why we started posting up things from there.  However, one small point, please, all of us read there so we don't need links, thanks.   Do feel free to comment on here as to how posters are treated, which is what we are all about.  We are not a McCann forum though quite a lot of what we post does relate to the case.   Here is where you can air comments on forums such as Justice and say what you think which you would be banned from doing on there.   Sykes.

Offline Outlook
Full Member
***
Posts: 339
Newbie

Re: Why Madeleine ?
« Reply #86 on: Today at 10:44:14 AM »
Quote from: Neeley on Today at 02:10:27 AM
Tragic isn't it that this forum allows members to post the most appalling speculation about the parents of a missing child.

With no proof what so ever.
It is absolutely appaulling. It is just Fantasy Island here.

=========

Outlook
Full Member
***
Posts: 339
Newbie

Re: Why Madeleine ?
« Reply #87 on: Today at 10:47:33 AM »

Quote from: Chinagirl on Today at 02:08:38 AM
Shutting down the Madeleine forum is an excellent idea. Those who have chosen not to support the McCann family have any number of other places on the internet where they can spout their rubbish, their misconceptions and their loathing. The only reason the pro-McCanns post here is to counteract the foregoing and the myths.

Outlook
Full Member
***
Posts: 340
Newbie

Re: Why Madeleine ?
« Reply #98 on: Today at 11:49:53 AM »

Quote from: Chinagirl on Today at 11:01:14 AM
Shona and Outlook:

For crying out loud, it is you two who are part of the team that manages the bloody place! If you hate the members so much, then close the flipping place down!

I do not manage the place.

However, I do like to let the self-rightous Maddie obsessives know that they are detested and regarded as cranks.

They have had 28,000 posts and one one or two posts against them normally provokes them to demented rage that anyone finds their pervy little hobby offensive.

Chinagirl:

Thoroughly offensive comment, Outlook, especially from a so-called "moderator."

Lace:

That is charming!!

This forum is set up to debate isn't it?

I am not obsessive about Madeleine, I have a life.

Why are you here on this forum?

Pervy that is sick and I strongly object to that comment.

You should be banned from further posts.

Outlook:

Mainly to follow other cases but occassionally to wind up the Maddie obsessives. It never takes much. @)(++(*

I do not see much evidence of your other interests apart from Child abduction.

Glad you have reported me. Pervy is a normal english word which people will recognize and 28,000 posts on one topic proves the point.

----

I am not a moderator. They are far more patient than I.

Lace:

You are a very childish person Outlook.

The forum is for discussion about the Madeleine McCann case as the other forums are about the discussion of whatever topic.

It is not an obsession with the majority of people here.

To call posters 'pervy' because there are so many posts on this subject, just shows what sort of person you are.

I think an apology from you would be in order. To all the decent people you have offended.

Mr Moderator
Global Moderator
Executive Member
****

Posts: 2423

Re: Why Madeleine ?
« Reply #80 on: Today at 12:34:36 PM »
This thread is titled "Why Madeleine?". In line with forum policy I am removing all posts which stray from this subject.

I will also be handing out sanctions to any member who has broken forum rules.

darthvodka wrote:Glad to see you ssadie, I am glad to see you here! You won't be in safer hands than our Sykes. I knew emu had never been asked to apologise, admin had already told me she was bomb proof. You and everyone else get warnings, huge percentages just for retailiating and emu, she gets the same, John told me why. Sykes knows.

This is a direct word for word copy of BB1s post on the 'forum that dare not speak it's name' so you are either posting individual's posts from other fora without crediting them DCI or you are the aforementioned person in which case you have most certainly not been supporting the McCanns for over six years. So what is it to be, are you thoroughly dishonest or a plagiarist

DCI Did I say it wasn't. If you read the post correctly, the link is at the bottom.
It actually came from mariacpois.blogspot.co.uk, and was copied before being removed, the day before. Also posted on here!

Dishonest, you should know all about that. Did you credit the emailer for the facebook, emails?

darthvodka wrote:Any opportunity to abuse is grabbed with such relish! What on earth is so wrong with that creature that it has to abuse anyone who doesn't agree with it? It's banned from the rest of cyberspace though, so it's at least confined to the one place.

Chinagirl
Re: The breathtaking hypocrisy of those that support the McCanns
« Reply #144 on: Today at 10:05:34 AM »

Quote from: Angelo222 on Today at 09:04:11 AM
But they are liars China, little white or otherwise..it is all a matter of degrees.
Everyone lies and anyone who claims they don't are well...LIARS.

You are evading the issue, Angelo - and you know it.

This forum started out purporting to be a neutral place for both sides of this thorny issue to be debated, and it had some pretty reasonable conditions which it imposed on its members in order to keep the debate civil and credible. One of them was the rule of not bringing here opinion pieces and posts from other forums. In the last few weeks this has gone by the wayside and we now have any number of anti-McCann forum opinions being offered here as "evidence" to support outrageous claims such as the one in this thread.

These opinions have been written by people without credibility in the real world, most of whom don't even write under their real names - just internet pseudonyms, and those whose identities have been established turn out to be non-entities who have little to no authority, experience or insight to speak with acceptable credibility on issues surrounding this case, but whose stance on this matter is clearly prejudiced.

Allowing such rubbish in here has diminished any value this forum could have had.

Quote from: gilet on Today at 03:08:57 PM
So being shocked in your terms is "being aggressive".

No wonder you fail to realise how silly this thread looks and how deplorable it looks that you rush to hero-worship Goncalo Amaral, the disgraced ex cop and how easily you forget little Madeleine McCann.

No it is not right what Amaral is doing.
You really don't get it.
Amaral is accusing the McCanns of heinous criminal behaviour.
The McCanns are trying to stop him from doing that.

You seem to think it is OK for Amaral to accuse people and wrong for those people to challenge him.

SO if I state here that Carlymichelle the Australian killed her baby sister and I keep repeating that and i name you fully and post your picture up and I put up your address etc that is OK? Really? Oh by the way, just like Amaral I won't have any proof of my claims.

Would you not complain to mods?

And if I then wrote a book about it and made a lot of money and you were trashed in the papers in Australia for it, you would simply ignore me? Really?

Would you not sue?

That is all the McCanns are doing or are you too intent on hero-worship of Amaral to realise that?

Quote from: gilet on Today at 02:58:58 PM
I really am shocked that you have posted this thread.

You clearly did totally omit Madeleine McCann from your thinking in your haste to hero worship the disgraceful Goncalo Amaral.

Shame on you.

But the one benefit of this thread is that readers of this forum can see just how low the anti McCanns will go to hero-worship the disgraced cop, Amaral. May this thread stand a long time so that people can see that these antis care absolutely nothing about Madeleine.

C.Edwards
Full Member
***
Posts: 391
Newbie

Re: The breathtaking hypocrisy of those that support the McCanns
« Reply #191 on: Today at 03:20:07 PM »

Quote from: Rachel Granada on Today at 03:02:22 PM
Who's your source, CEdwards? Paiva's wife's hairdresser's cousin's postman's neighbour?

As well documented in the past... two serving police officers, one of whom was - shall we say - closely involved in the early days of the investigation. I'm saying no more than that as there will be too much identification given away for you lunatics to start causing trouble