NO JUSTICE ON THE JUSTICE FORUM - NOR WILL THERE EVER BE

Off goes the lush again.

She probably does those 2 things herself. The booze to bring herself down from the crack.

Online jeanne darc
Newbie
*
Posts: 15
Newbie
View Profile Personal Message (Online)

Re: Police to release E-fit of new suspect
« Reply #151 on: Today at 05:17:25 PM »
Quote
once again can I politely request that those posters writing in a language which is not their native language, do so if they can be sure of being understood.

we have had ad nauseum elsewhere on the forum and now on this thread il faut vous penser as a way of saying think about it.
The vous is not needed here as penser is not a reflexive verb.
il faut penser or vous devriez penser is what was needed or something more colloquial.

Or you could use vous IL FAUT QUE VOUS plus the verb in the subjunctive, but this is not meant to be a French lesson. Seriously, it is cringeworthy seeing these attempts at being clever which end in an epic fail.

Speaking incorrect French to a person fluent in French and with good English......what's the point ?

And especially embarrassing when the poster is trying to prove that Anne should get her brain in gear !


    She'd spend her time better telling the horrendous Gueddes this. Gueddes is like Del Boy Trotter with an accent.

What's French for, Where's your blog gone ?  

coco wrote:What's French for, Where's your blog gone ?  

Où est votre blog parti?

What's French for:

Mind your pitchfork doesn't knock off one of your horns when you wave it about. Don't step back and put your trotter on your forked tail?

darthvodka wrote:What's French for:

Mind your pitchfork doesn't knock off one of your horns when you wave it about. Don't step back and put your trotter on your forked tail?

Will have to look a few words up in the dictionary for that one, darth!

 

Where's your blog gone?
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qljlDmYHd68

Woke up this morning and my blog was gone!

Lovin' all the replies.    

Rachel Granada wrote:

darthvodka wrote:What's French for:

Mind your pitchfork doesn't knock off one of your horns when you wave it about. Don't step back and put your trotter on your forked tail?

Will have to look a few words up in the dictionary for that one, darth!

 

Mêlez-vous de fourche ne frappent un de vos cornes lorsque vous agitez-il. Ne pas prendre du recul et de mettre votre trotter sur votre queue fourchue?

Zut alors.     

ROFL! Nice one, Sykes!

Rachel Granada wrote:ROFL!  Nice one, Sykes!

I rather like it in Turkish as it sounds rather filthy!

Bu konuda dalga zaman dirgen da boynuzları biri öldürmek değil bak. Geri adım ve çatal kuyruk üzerinde paça koymayın?

Sykes wrote:

Rachel Granada wrote:ROFL!  Nice one, Sykes!

I rather like it in Turkish as it sounds rather filthy!  

Bu konuda dalga zaman dirgen da boynuzları biri öldürmek değil bak. Geri adım ve çatal kuyruk üzerinde paça koymayın?

 

C'est fantastique! I may use that one, Sykes!

Bl**dy hell, not the dogs again.

Quote from: Cariad on Today at 07:47:22 PM
However some research has been done with corpses less than 3 hours old being wrapped in towel and lift on carpet for between 2 and 10 minutes and trained dogs reacting.

http://www.pawsoflife.org/Library/HRD/Oesterhelweg%201998.pdf

I found the PDF!!! ok, time to check out the methodology!!!

Wonderful, what a put down for the poster ripper.      

That reply is brilliant. Well done Benice.

   

I see the poster defacer is still telling barefaced lies on INJustice.

Online Luz
Sr. Member

Re: Scientific Approach
« Reply #1034 on: Today at 04:05:05 PM »
Quote from: John on Today at 03:58:01 PM
Why do you laugh when I suggested that Eddie
reacted to urine on the underground car park wall Luz? Logically speaking it is more likely to be urine than a cadaver.

I laughed because knowing what it took to find a place where there was no possible contamination - that car park had never been used, it was in a recently completed building with no residents and had been thoroughly cleaned up - I imagined Grime or the PJs spraying the walls to leave your alluded residues for the dogs to smell (if they even reacted to such substances).

Earlier, Admin John said he was emailing Grime -

Out of curiosity I will e-mail him and ask him about Eddie's reacting at the wall, he usually replies. If anyone has any other questions for him please pm me.

This was the answer:

there's a nice punchup going on, that cariad forker is boasting about sending nasty pms about davel...

In the interests of full disclosure the post was this:

I'm not worried about what davel thinks.

I am however enjoying making him look like an ar*eh*le :-D

Without the **

How that ended up in your PM box is beyond me, it was a reply to a PM from someone else telling me not to let you constant picking on me get to me.

I sent the above in response. I think it was in relation to the 'evil' posts. And to be quite frank davel you really were being an arse!

As for that not being appropriate language for a young lady, I'm 35 and a woman!
« Last Edit: Today at 04:10:08 PM by Cariad »

Now Stucko's being allowed to post up sh#te by that Thornton troll from danglenumties - the pervy ones .

site's gone right down the toilet .

The sooner they flush it the better.

Admin
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Posts: 988

Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #92 on: Today at 01:44:45 PM »
Sadie. Please amend your last post removing speculative comments about Dr Amaral and then repost it. This forum operates on the basis of evidence and not speculation. Thank you.


Since when ? if theyre going to operate on evidence theyd better remove every single lie from luz and co .

they wont though , not now the forkers are swarming over it like cockroaches .

The last time we heard about cockroaches concerning a site, it was switched off.

Hope it's an omen.

Dhingra
Full Member
***
Posts: 335
Newbie

Agendas
« on: Today at 11:30:31 PM »
I had hoped that the science thread would be considered in an open-minded manner. It hasn't been. Posters only seemed to want to confirm their own opinions and attack their opponents. Well it's your loss as there were possibilities for you to develop your own hypotheses by challenging them. It seems to few wanted to do that.

Furthermore, I don't appreciate having my time wasted so thoroughly. People demanded a hypothesis to discuss and then completely ignored the science again when I provided it. I have better things to do with my time.

I was going to ask Professor Barclay if the recent events affected his views, but I don't know if I can be bothered now.

Most of you have confirmed what I thought at the beginning. Your minds are made up and facts that challenge those opinions are disregarded or minimised. This is exactly why we have such a miserable history of sub-standard investigations and justice miscarrying as often as it does.

Goodbye.