NO JUSTICE ON THE JUSTICE FORUM - NOR WILL THERE EVER BE

Broho wrote:Neeley, it is shameful.  

I don't suppose this thread will last too long someone will "tell Teacher"...but can I just ask?

The recent pm warning received by, let's see I'm guessing most, if not all, McCann supporters ref snidey or provocative comments etc. Was the same pm issued to antis such as  Stephen, faithfully, Luz, Anne, Redblossom, C. Edwards ?

I have to say this forum does seem rather biased in favour of anti McCanns.

I haven't been here long but I have noticed that pros back up their claims and usually provide links.

Antis make posts etc and do not provide official or genuine sources for much of it but claim it is true.

And some on here have made rude, xenophobic comments or digs...and I never see them reprimanded.

If pros continued to be censored and antis allowed to post their idea of the "truth" - what's the point of this section?

Or maybe we should do what others do a report every post that annoys us 8-)(--)

John
Senior Editor
Executive Member
****

Posts: 5649
Site Moderator
Justice 4 John Lamberton

Re: Do you think we are to blame
« Reply #17 on: Today at 03:09:18 PM »

Quote from: imustpointout on Today at 02:56:38 PM
I don't think "we" (as in forums or forum posters) have had any influence one way or another over the years.

The main thing "we" have done - is argue in a very tiny corner of the internet with those who don't have the same opinion.

Actually some people might think that but I can tell you that is not the case. Cyberspace and the real world are not as far apart as you might think.

We have information and requests coming in all the time from behind the scenes. Only last night a person of interest contacted us and we were glad to help him.

imustpointout

Re: This forum is turning into the 3as and we all know what happened to that...
« Reply #2 on: Today at 11:13:28 AM »

Quote from: carlymichelle on Today at 11:10:23 AM
truth hurting s bit today is it??

So you will be happy if this forum is closed down because of your libel?

John
Senior Editor
Executive Member
****

Posts: 5675
Site Moderator
Justice 4 John Lamberton

Re: It is claimed that Oakley's Report and e-fits were suppressed for 5 years?
« Reply #587 on: Today at 10:58:43 PM »

Quote from: Benita on Today at 10:52:30 PM
I don't agree ..why should they feed posters obsessions ?

They have got some very serious questions to answer now that it has been revealed that the e-fits which Kennedy commissioned on their behalf were held back.

Online Angelo222
Senior Moderator
Hero Member
****

Posts: 1803
View Profile Personal Message (Online)

Re: Former Ocean Club employee killed in tractor accident now in the frame!
« Reply #137 on: Today at 01:13:03 PM »
Quote
I read today that the McCanns are calling this latest discovery that tractorman could have been involved in Madeleines abduction as pure speculation. No surprises there then since if Madeleine is dead the cash cow disintegrates.

But on the bright side it would get them off the hook!!
« Last Edit: Today at 01:15:45 PM by Angelo222 »

Petra Johnson The Dogs came from the UK , only brought in for one reason & one reason only !
Both SY & the Portuguese Police suspected foul play already .
Long before Kate's pants , T shirt etc etc & any sniffing around .
Before GA's book , before any of the K&G circus !
Do you know why ?
Because there was NO EVIDENCE of ABDUCTION .
It's really that simple

S HANCOCK says:
Much to my amazement, the following post which I used on the jf, has been removed.

'Job vacancy notice

Title: Evil Abductor

Essential characteristics: swarthy, foreign

The following characteristics are not required but will be an advantage to any candidate: ugly, severe skin problems, Roma background, illegal immigrant, dead

Applications with photo (or photofit if applicable) to Scotland Yard, FAO Andy Redwood.

Don't call us, we'll call you. '

It has been referred to as 'offensive material'.

Perhaps the admin there should note it is still here....................

As Watcher said earlier, what has taken place in the newspapers as regards so called abductors, is a level way above this innocuous post

Online new person
Newbie
*
Posts: 13
Newbie

Re: The partial footprint found outside children's bedroom window.
« Reply #20 on: Today at 09:04:32 PM »
Just call john (The fraudster)

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/shamed-police-officer-hit-with-200k-1115751

A FORMER cop who stole more than £400,000 from his elderly aunt and cheated his own brother has been ordered to pay back £200,000.

John Lamberton, 57, persuaded 75-year-old widow Annie Paul to hand over her portfolio of stocks and shares to him.

His actions left Annie, who treated him like a son, short of cash in her last years – and meant his brother never got his rightful inheritance from her estate when she died in 1998.

Yesterday, Lamberton, who fled to Spain to cheat justice but was brought back to Britain and jailed for seven years in 2005, was told he must pay back £200,000 under proceeds of crime legislation.

After the hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court, Lindsey Miller, head of the Crown Office’s Serious and Organised Crime Division, welcomed the ruling.

She said: “This was a despicable crime and a breach of trust carried out by John Lamberton against members of his own family.

“He betrayed his own brother and the wishes of his aunt, to whom he claimed to be very close.

“He pretended to be a loyal nephew but his later actions revealed he had designs on her fortune. We are satisfied that this £200,000 confiscation order represents the amount of money available to us at this time.

“The message is a clear one. Fleeing from Scotland and investing in property abroad does not protect criminals.”

Lamberton, who worked for the former Royal Ulster Constabulary in Derry, moved the shares into an offshore account in his own name within a few weeks of persuading his aunt to sign them over.

He then told the pensioner, from Bo’ness, West Lothian, that he had invested the money, which she inherited from her millionaire farmer husband, poorly.

At Lamberton’s trial in 2005, Lord Hardie told him: “This was a gross breach of trust placed in you by an elderly relative. Elderly people must be protected from the avarice of people such as you.

“As a result, she was deprived of a substantial income and complained about a lack of funds.”

Lamberton’s sentence was reduced to five years on appeal.