NO JUSTICE ON THE JUSTICE FORUM - NOR WILL THERE EVER BE Part 2

It is foul and disgusting at all levels. This is the nature of the beast in the realms of human psyche. They are ill, and so they think ill. This is not my problem. I can do nothing for them.

I remember me six years ago when I was full to the brim of shock and horror, and to tell the truth I am not much different now. I am just a bit faster on my feet and a bit better versed in my use of the English Language. I no longer care if I use the odd expletive or if I get banned from some poxy Site. Which incidentally always wants me back and posting.

Now it is just an exercise for me. The McCanns don't really need me anymore, thank God. Now I just wait for the right post, and then wipe the floor with them, even if only briefly. And believe me that right post will always come. Today, tomorrow, or next week, some pillock will say something unbelievably stupid. Just go on getting up their noses.

Rachel Granada wrote:Ode to the UK "Justice" forum ....

A resident drunk, a paedo-pitier,
Could the Justice forum get any shittier?
With John at the helm, hovering over the delete button
And Guedes looking like a piece of greasy old mutton

Stuck Record Steve going round and round
Decent debate can no longer be found
An influx of forkers and Justice started to flounder
But Debunker and gilet wiped the floor with the hounders

Bennett got his foot in the door,
But even as blonk he was still a crashing bore
And what of Angelo on the modding panel?
He's thicker than the sludge in the English Channel

Guedes' court reports will bring tears to your eyes
Riddled with omissions, they're a pack of lies

And talking of liars, how about Luz?
Telling all those porkies must give her a buzz

Forkers who break the rules get off scot-free
Yet John gives us warnings with relish and glee.

brilliant Rachel well done ...love it and cant wait to see it on that shitty forum ...  

Now here's another fine mess you all have got me into.


Eleanor,

We are aware that you and Rachel Granada have been posting derogatory comments about this forum on other sites. Under the circumstances therefore we are reviewing your membership.

Regards,
The UK Justice Forum Team.


Erm, how do they know about wot I and Rachel said? As if I care.

might have been Rachel's poem that did it  

coco wrote:might have been Rachel's poem that did it  

Okay. But that is nothing to do with me. Not that I care. But who said I can't express an opinion on another Site?

one of the pets like emu or Chucky probably went crying to the auntie-frauder .

coco wrote:one of the pets like emu or Chucky probably went crying to the auntie-frauder .

Oh! Is this an Open Forum? Golly Gosh. Silly old me. So now they are reduced to monitoring where ever else I post. That will keep them busy.

It will have been The Little Tazzy Devil of course. Horrid little shit.

certain individuals whom we have graciously allowed to join our forum

Bloody hell, who knew they were related to the royals .

Let's hear it for Jeremy Bamber. I am getting really worried about their Evidence against him. And there is Evidence in his favour which is never mentioned on Miscarriages of Justice. So you won't get an unbiased report there.

Unbiased? Where on earth did I get that idea?

now its paedo- pity.

A very good point, there are many paedophiles in this world and most of them are innocent of any crime. Paedophilia is a chronic affliction like any other.

Wikipedia refers to it as is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16 years of age or older typically characterised by a primary or exclusive sexual interest toward prepubescent children.

Consequently, the paedophile is not a criminal unless he acts on those interests and in doing so breaks the Law.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:44:23 PM by Angelo222 »

Sorry guys but some of you have heard this before, but it is very appropriate at the moment.

A friend's son was abducted when he was 9 years old when the family were living in another country. When the police found him he had been tortured, brutally raped and strangled to death. Of course the pedophile was caught and put on trial etc. It made front page news for ages.

Parents were told not to go searching although the father did while the mother stayed home. They were told not to show any emotion in court as the rotten to the core er....."innocent" pedophile would get off on it. I will stop there.

Now, who are these people who call pedophiles innocent? What the hell do they know about the subject? Who do they think they are being so blase about it? Most importantly, what does it say about them?

I hope they rot in hell frankly.

A Chronic Affliction.

Does Angelo know what "Chronic" means? Probably not.

Personally, I have sympathy for anyone afflicted by this. But sadly most of them have no desire to control themselves, and don't care about the harm they inflict.

angelo sounds like the kind of sicko that thinks child porn on the internet is OK cos looking at it isn't doing anything wrong .

coco wrote:angelo sounds like the kind of sicko that thinks child porn on the internet is OK cos looking at it isn't doing anything wrong .

Goes to show what a clueless dunce he is on the subject.

I do actually know what I am talking about having tried to help someone like this at one point in my life, until I began to realise that he was using me as some sort of respectability. I was the face of a middle class Do Gooder.

I never did quite give up on him because he had far more problems than just paedophilia. And I am not sorry that I didn't quite give up. But there was no reasoning with him.

He hung himself on my birthday. And I swear to this day that he chose that day to make me feel bad.

It didn't work. I rarely think about him now, not even on my birthday.

Good for you Eleanor. He did the ultimate 'F. You" on you. So glad you got over it.

Broho wrote:Good for you Eleanor.  He did the ultimate 'F. You" on you.  So glad you got over it.

Yes, you are right. But wasn't that silly. It was the one thing guaranteed to turn me off.

He was actually quite a clever man, and sometimes very funny. But with horrendous personal problems. Although I have met some people with worse problems who never behaved as badly as he did.
It is a difficult subject but you can't override that feeling of personal entitlement that he had, to inflict his opinions and ways on others regardless of who he hurt. At the root of it he was a nasty man.

Eleanor1 wrote:Now here's another fine mess you all have got me into.


Eleanor,

We are aware that you and Rachel Granada have been posting derogatory comments about this forum on other sites.  Under the circumstances therefore we are reviewing your membership.

Regards,
The UK Justice Forum Team.


Erm, how do they know about wot I and Rachel said?  As if I care.

A bit late aren't they, I asked for my membership to be deleted hours ago!  

coco wrote:one of the pets like emu or Chucky probably went crying to the auntie-frauder .

My money's on Stuck Record   

coco wrote:now its paedo- pity.

A very good point, there are many paedophiles in this world and most of them are innocent of any crime.  Paedophilia is a chronic affliction like any other.

Wikipedia refers to it as is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16 years of age or older typically characterised by a primary or exclusive sexual interest toward prepubescent children.

Consequently, the paedophile is not a criminal unless he acts on those interests and in doing so breaks the Law.
« Last Edit: Today at 11:44:23 PM by Angelo222 »

Oh my days, I am soooo glad that I have left that disgusting cesspit.

I wonder why Angelo is defending nonces ...

Broho wrote:Sorry guys but some of you have heard this before, but it is very appropriate at the moment.

A friend's son was abducted when he was 9 years old when the family were living in another country.  When the police found him he had been tortured, brutally raped and strangled to death.  Of course the pedophile was caught and put on trial etc.  It made front page news for ages.

Parents were told not to go searching although the father did while the mother stayed home.  They were told not to show any emotion in court as the rotten to the core er....."innocent" pedophile would get off on it.  I will stop there.  

Now, who are these people who call pedophiles innocent?  What the hell do they know about the subject?  Who do they think they are being so blase about it?  Most importantly, what does it say about them?

I hope they rot in hell frankly.

Me too, Broho.

Yes, Rachel, they deserve it.

That place is not even close to being the pits. The pits is too good for them.

Broho wrote:Yes, Rachel, they deserve it.

That place is not even close to being the pits.  The pits is too good for them.

Yes indeedy - and you also have to question the motives of those who defend paedophiles.

you also have to question the motives of those who defend paedophiles.

Absolutely, Rachel. Strange isn't it how most of society consider pedophiles to be repugnant perverts and yet there are those who defend them come hell or high water?

It gets a person thinking really hard about their motives.

Broho wrote:you also have to question the motives of those who defend paedophiles.

Absolutely, Rachel.  Strange isn't it how most of society consider pedophiles to be repugnant perverts and yet there are those who defend them come hell or high water?  

It gets a person thinking really hard about their motives.  

Yes, it does make you wonder what those who defend paedphiles are hiding doesn't it.