WELL, WELL, WELL, SHE HAS FINALLY SURFACED.

I've just glanced at this, and can see she has wasted her journey.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

“Martha? I’m stepping out on the balcony for a smoke. Hey, Martha, come here! What the hell is that man doing at that window? You see right there? He’s busting in the window? Martha, go call the police! Hey, he’s crawling in flat….must be planning to steal…oh, my god, Martha! Tell the police he’s carrying out a child! I’m running downstairs! Maybe I can stop him!”

Yes, you are looking at Apartment 5A, the very apartment the McCanns were renting on May 3rd, 2007. The time is 10 pm on February 12, 2012. The photo was taken from the third floor of the building across the street. There was some shrubbery along the left wall of the parking lot that has been removed but the view of the McCanns door and window would not have been obscured. The lights on the buildings and in the streets turn the building into a veritable fishbowl (some claim massive lighting improvement since that day but I have heard that it has not changed much). What idiot would think breaking in the window at Apartment 5A or carrying a child out of that window or even the door next to it would be a terribly bright idea? One thing kidnappers know is there are enough human fish in the sea that one doesn’t have to abduct someone under such risky conditions.

The next picture shows the front side of the apartment building with close-up of the window of Apartment 5A. I am standing in the doorway. Can you see how bright it is at night?

This picture shows the corner where Jane Tanner sees a man cross the street coming from the apartment, child in his outstretched hands. If you were an abductor, would you be comfortable choosing to walk out in the open, across the well-light street with three people on it? Would you at least think walking the other direction hugging the wall might be a bit smarter, maybe cut down your chances of being seen?

Robert Murat, the only other Arguido (suspect) in the case, lived on a couple blocks down the way in the direction Jane Tanner claimed the man carrying a child was walking. But, Robert Murat was a known individual in town and many people in Praia da Luz own places here or rent for a long period of time and return year after year. Would someone who knows people might recognize him walk down well-lit streets - his facetotally exposed – straight to his own house? He would have to have an IQ far below 70 to think this would be clever.

If anyone took a child from the apartment, it would be smarter to walk the opposite way of the man Jane Tanner claims to have seen. Here you can see the wall I just mentioned that he could walk very close to and be out of sight of anyone looking down from the tall apartment building across the street. Even more intelligent would be for an abductor to leave the back of the apartment by the sliding glass doors and hurry down the enclosed path which leads up to the parking area at the front of the apartment and go out at the end of the street and onward to the darker end of the road. It is exactly this path that leads to the Smith sighting.

Praia da Luz is a very cozy, brightly lit, off-the-main road very small and charming resort town. No sex ring is going to choose this location to target children. A child sex predator might lurk about here but he would be wiser abducting a child from the outskirts of the town or in pretty much any other nearby village. There are some darker side streets further to the edge of the town that a predator or someone carrying a child would be a bit less visible . Apartment 5A would rank pretty much at the bottom of any abductor’s list of places to grab a kid. The only reason someone would remove a child from 5A would be of necessity. Then he would never take the route Jane Tanner claimed she saw the man carrying a child.

More on the most likely route one would take to carry Madeleine from Apartment 5A in my next blog.

A comment from the poster - There's loads of pics on the site which are of no value whatsoever.

1. She has taken them in a rather chilly February, not at the start of the holiday season in May.

2. She hasn't done her homework - the lighting was improved BECAUSE of Madeleine's abduction. When ******** went to PDL, she made a point of remarking on how DARK the area was.

3. Is she completely, totally stupid? How long does she think it would take for the abductor to let himself in the main door, pick up a child and walk out again?

Sadly, 5a was one of the LEAST safe locations in the resort, as it was at ground level, on a corner site - some 'profiler' she is.

Oh, and it might not be a good idea to go on about Murat being recognised, under the circumstances. One or two issues there that have never quite been cleared up.

If this is the best she can do, she needn't have bothered. Still, she's eaten a lot, met lots of forkers, and no doubt will wring another potboiler out of this nonsense.

Basically, she is saying that it's unlikely anyone would dare to take a child and carry her away from her apartment. Yet she theorises that Gerry McCann did precisely that!

Why are we even paying this woman's theories any attention? She is completely hopeless. All she's doing is desperately trying to find some McCann dun it theory with credibility.

Is this woman completely inept?

She is saying that an "intelligent" abductor would leave by the patio doors and head off along the path at the complex side of the apartments. Complete disregard for the fact that Jez Wilkins and Gerry McCann were standing just a few yards from the back entrance to the apartment.

THEY MIGHT HAVE SEEN HIM

An "intelligent" abductor would cover his bases. Much safer to leave by the front on the side away from the complex and out of the view of the McCanns and their friends

I really am dumbfounded by this poor quality of analytical thinking. I have been really criticial of her profiling so far, but had mainly attributed that to the misinformation she was working from. However, she is really proving her ineptitude now.

Praia da Luz is a very cozy, brightly lit, off-the-main road very small and charming resort town. No sex ring is going to choose this location to target children.

With loads of holiday makers with loads of CHILDREN

Real profilers disagree with her on this. It is a fact that parents are less likely nowadays to let their children wander out of sight. This makes it harder for paedos to find a victims as a result. Where BETTER than a holiday resort where there are lots of children and parents are relaxed?

I do hope that this appalling display of investigative analysis will be a wake up call to anyone who held this woman in any regard at all.

I know *someone* who is going to be delighted that she has made a fool of herself yet again. Someone who will be saying

"Thank you for that Pat Brown - Media Criminal Profiler - The gift that keeps on giving..."

The woman is a buffoon. Basically, she is saying that no abductor would attempt this, yet she proposes Gerry McCann did! Not only does she have him capable of superhuman feats of speed, he's now got a cloak of invisibility?

When I read her "profiler", the contradictory statements astonished me. It was like her thinking was in a complete fog. I put this down to rushing to capitalise on Kate's book success. But clearly she just thinks in a fog.

This is what comes of being a one woman show. She is self taught. No-one has ever tested her or trained her on the job.

She should be glad that the mainstream media aren't picking this up because it's an embarassment.

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
My, my, aren't some upset about that "enlightening" photo from across the street. I guess they didn't realize there was such a view. #McCann

Isn't that where all the cigarette butts were found? The ones the PJ didn't bother collecting because there were too many of them?

She's a complete idiot, and would be well advised to get the first plane out of Portugal before she digs herself in any deeper.

Even other forkers think it's rubbish;

mccannexposure hardlinemarxist
just read @ProfilerPatB 's blog entry......I could say 'what a let down'...but I won't, it's on par with what I expected!. #mccann

Yes - sloppy, prejudiced, riddled with inaccuracies - and it is glaringly obvious Brown still hasn't read the files.

Still, all grist for her next potboiler.

Oh, and what is with all that hysterical carp about Martha or someone?

A real profiler like Dayle Hinman wouldn't just make stuff up like that.

Back to sleep, everyone.

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
"A Picture Worth One Thousand Words" has supporters of the abductor theory in a tizzy.

Falling about laughing, more like. If she had bothered to read the official police files, then she would know she has made a total t*t of herself YET AGAIN.

Brown really is a bl**dy idiot. Look at her picture which is supposed to show Madeleine couldn't have been abducted...
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

If she had bothered to read the police files, she would have seen statement after statement about how DARK the area was - the bright lights simply were not there in May 2007.

At ground level, on the corner - 5a could scarcely have been in a more vulnerable spot.

Where's Dayle Hinman when you need her?

Oh, so she has made the whole 'Martha' business up?

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
Hahaha...does a fictionalized scenario have to be spelled out to these dolts? #McCann

Jeez, what a waste of space she is - no professional would pull moronic stunts like that to point-score.

It is also extremely insulting to Madeleine McCann; the people criticizing Brown for this poor show have taken the time and trouble to read and understand the police files.

She has been too arrogant to do so, preferring instead to invent fictional characters to suit her own 'theory'.

Nice watching her showing herself up, though.

Reconstruction?

Has she managed to get all the holidaymakers back in PDL that were there on the night of the 3rd May 2007?

Has she managed to turn what was the Tapas Bar back into a Tapas Bar after it became a Pizzeria?

Has she managed to gain access to not just Apartment 5A but all the apartments that the McCann’s friends were staying at?

Has she managed to get the waiters, Jez Wilkins, the McCanns and their friends to return to Portugal to help?

Has she been able to get the Smith family back in PDL so that they can try to recall their movements on the night of the 3rd May 2007 and who they saw?

Has she managed to speak to Mr George Burke/Brooks who saw a couple with a child in the early hours of the morning of the 4th May 2007 at Lagos Marina acting suspiciously?

Has she managed to get the Police involved in doing this reconstruction? And I don’t mean that cop who was kicked off the case either.

Well you see until she manages to do those things listed above, her reconstruction is about as useful as a chocolate teapot. And her findings hold no credibility whatsoever.

So the long awaited blog post has finally arrived. On repeatedly being questioned about the man on the balcony having a fag, watching the window of apartment 5A,whilst Martha is in the apartment along with being asked for a link to the statement of this gentleman having this cigarette where he states that nobody broke into the window of the children’s bedroom, Pat Brown finally concedes that her first blog post is a FICTIONAL SCENARIO.

Hahaha…does a fictionalized scenario have to be spelled out to these dolts? #McCann
37 minutes ago via webReplyRetweetFavorite
@ProfilerPatB
PAT BROWN

As I said, reconstruction my ass.

Oh Pat by the way you are providing an excellent scenario supporting the theory that someone could have been watching that apartment and was a look out for the person who was abducting Madeleine. And an excellent scenario that they used that apartment to keep Madeleine until the coast was clear to move her. Which would account for the time delay between Jane Tanner seeing the abductor and the Smiths seeing the abductor.

And what an exhibition she has made of herself.

Hasn't she just That big light on the apartment block simply WAS NOT THERE in May 2007; the police photos speak for themselves.

If she had studied the police files she would have known that.

Oh well, who cares? It's just as sloppy, unprofessional and worthless as we expected it would be.

ProfilerPatBPAT BROWN
My, my, aren't some upset about that "enlightening" photo from across the street. I guess they didn't realize there was such a view. #McCann

Does she seriously think that she is the first person to realise that block is there? As I recall, that block was the scene of some interest, as there were strange marks outside it.

Oh look, what's this on this aerial view?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Looks like Brown wasn't the first to discover it after all...

I knew she would make a fool of herself, but I genuinely didn't expect a trainwreck like this.

She may have got away with crap like this on blogradio, impressing trailer trash, but it doesn't quite cut it in this situation, does it?

So Pat Brown found an ideal advantage point to watch Apartment 5A. So did she ascertain whether that apartment was rented out during the week of the McCann's holiday? If so, did she ascertain whether statements were taken by occupants? Did she find out who had access to keys if no-one was renting or using apartment? Did she ask for the lighting in the street to be switched off as it was in 2007?

The answer is one big fat NO.

All she did was create a Martha who made her partner smoke on the balcony whilst keeping an eye on Apartment 5A and took a few snaps that are totally irrelevant because the lighting has changed since the McCanns stayed in Apartment 5A.

So, what has Brown acheived so far?

Well, for one, she has reminded everyone how easy it would be to abduct a child from the ground floor, corner apartment on a dark street.

And she has also demonstrated how pointless 'reconstructions' are if they are not done in precisely the same circumstances, with the same weather and lighting, as the original event.

Pity Gonc nixed having a reconstruction only days later, isn't it?

Hello Pat!

Some argue that you as an American do not have any interest in the case as it involved no American(s) and did not occur in the US.

I beg to differ: is it not so that Federal legislation would be involved because of the dissemination of information on national tv (Oprah!) and involving the FBI in producing the age progression pictures? And this apparently not for the sole purpose of finding Madeleine but also of collecting cash from unsuspecting US citizens?

Is there a US lawyer in the house, who could shed some light on this?

Keep up the good works!

Portia
February 13, 2012 7:46 AM

And this is the caliber of audience that she is playing to.

They can't seem to grasp facets of British law, so I can understand how this carp has been spouted.

I am sure the PJ appreciated Brown telling them that there is an apartment block facing 3a

Pity Brown didn't bother to read the files, isn't it? If she had, she would have known that some of the residents gave witness statements.

From an anti-McCann poster -

Correct me if i'm wrong please, but is picture
2, the snap that shows Jane Tanner's sighting
displaying the wrong direction?
I think its showing 'town' direction, looking down
ways towards the beach direction. Instead, IMO
it should be looking the other way with 5a on the
left. Again, apologies if im wrong

He's right - Brown is looking in totally the wrong direction:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Even the anti-McCanns know there is something wrong...

I am confused by the photo's Marxman. What we could do with is little plan of the streets/buildings the a mark showing where which photo was takeen and the direction it was taken in - to be thorough!

Not worth the effort, dear, Brown has screwed up big-time. Best thing she could do is get the first plane back to the States and never say the word 'McCann' again - unless it is in an apology.

She has now reworded her blog post to take account of criticism about the lighting - but it's done in a very grudging way.

She isn't happy, does not like to be criticized.

The lights on the buildings and in the streets turn the building into a veritable fishbowl (some claim massive lighting improvement since that day but I have heard that it has not changed much).

Instead of writing that she 'has heard' she needs to find the bloody facts - and there is that guy actually giving them to her!!

We all knew she would stuff up, but no-one expected something as AWESOME as this disaster; she'd be well advised to head home tonight after this.

Notice Morais still hasn't updated her blog about Brown? I would think the word has gone round Team Gonc that Brown is making an idiot of herself - and them.

I know Gonc was incompetent, but he did manage to notice the apartment block opposite without waiting for Brown to point it out....

Come on now, be fair and give her a chance. She's well on her way to proving that there was an abduction.

She sure has. Dark, ground floor corner site, with no-one overlooking it - an abductor would be in and out in seconds, unseen.

Is she gonna say the abductor is white or black, 1 or 2 of them, they might have had a car or might not, might be local might not, might have been staking out the apartment or might not have, might have seen the kids at the beach or might not have........................

Isn't that where all the cigarette butts were found? The ones the PJ didn't bother collecting because there were too many of them?

She's a complete idiot, and would be well advised to get the first plane out of Portugal before she digs herself in any deeper.

To start off with, there were trees all around the car park in 2007 and they would have been in leaf. I was there in July 2010 and it was impossible for anyone to have seen the door to 5A or even the widow from those flats opposite. The door is totally tucked away out of sight in a very dark corner. Almost without doubt Madeleine was abducted thru that front door and the abductor got in by using a key. Meaning no fingerprints; the door opening as the key turned

Also with heavy growth of leaves, the street lights could not penetrate the foliage; it was damned dark by that window and positively creepy by the friont door in that deep tucked away alcove. The photograph that Pat displays, shows a different scenaio altogether. Not only is the area now bathed in light from the presently unimpeded street lamps, but also there is light coming from a source above. There was no light from above when we were there. You can see the shadow on the second window back of appartment 5A. This is illuminating the whole of that walkway and reflecting back.

Before the trees were cut down, that walkway was a place that no woman would have walked along at night. The front door corner recess gave me the heebee-jeebies even in daylight. It was out of sight and at the end of a long walled walkway.

The end of this walkway led nowhere except to the hidden front door of 5A. No one passed by; anyone could have loitered there unseen from the flats, or even the pathway along the road. This was because there was the wall along the pathway which, on the flats side was about 4 feet high. There was a difference in ground levels on either side of this wall, and from the car park, the wall looked about 3 feet tall. Even someone parking a car would have been unable to see someone at that front door if they pressed themselves against the side wall.

The front door is deep brown. As you can see it is not visible in any of these photos. To see it you have to go right over to the west of the car park ... where no-one goes cos' it doesn't lead to anywhere!

Someone who visited there 3 months ago commented that that all the foliage had been cut down and it looked different.

Pat Brown. You are talking rubbish.

Also - the road down the side is often painted as some kind of narrow alleyway, which it clearly isn't.

The one place there is very little cover is on that main road.

Brown has been beyond foolish, IMO. Why on earth did she not do the most basic research before she started? It's glaringly obvious she hasn't bothered to read the police files, and person after person has commented on how dark that area is.

***** was there and has described it, as have many others. For her to state otherwise is insanity.

So even after the pitchforkers going "errrrrrrrrrr ummmmmmmm it looked different at the time, Pat" she's resorting to taunting those who disagree. Classy. I mean a professional given hard facts to use in her work and her response isn't "I'll have another think, thanks for that", she goes "Ooooooooh ya don't like it do yas".

A highly respectable, credible an overall unbiased response is that.

No, they will fall back on their old favorite - But they left them alone.

They do like wailing that, because they cannot separate their unreasoning hatred of the McCanns from the need to find Madeleine McCann.

They pretend to care about Madeleine, but they don't really. If they did, they would not make her the subject of their obscene speculations.

If they cared a jot about the child, they would realise that there is not one word they can say to, or about the McCanns, than is worse than the nightmare they have to live with every day. If they cared a jot about the child, they would know that finding her, hopefully alive and well, is more important than wailing, But they left them alone, a dozen times a day.

Yes, thank you, we all know the children were alone when Madeleine was abducted. So what happens now? No effort should be made to find her? No harsh words for the scum that abducted her?

Is beating up her parents more important to them than anything else? Because it sure looks like that is where the forkers' priorities lie.

Shame on them.

Even her own fans know she has made a complete a@se of herself this time.

There should have been 50 page threads about her wonderful detective work by now, and Morais hasn't said a word about Brown for days.

It's the complete dumb ass trailer trash in the US I worry about. If you is on TV, you must be important <rolling eyes>. Just look at the stupid idiots on Facebook that follow her. You can tell many of them are red-neck, uneducated hicks. This is the market she's playing to; not people in the UK who know the case well. She's courting those who will take her word that those evil McCanns are guilty. Trust me, she doesn't even have prove it to the people that follow her.

One only has to read some of the American Forums to know that what you say is true. Some of the posters are every bit as foul as out own home grown bunch. Although there are people like us. Thank God.

This is the kind of market Brown is aiming at:

I just love the fact that the 'abductor' chose an apartment that had shutters brightly lit for all the neighbours to see clearly

It's come out with that idiocy because of her risible blog. If it bothered itself to go and look at the pictures in the police files, it would know the truth.

It would know that Brown has fallen flat on her ar@e because she couldn't be bothered to read the files.

But it won't do anything as demanding as actually reading the police files; it will now go on to repeat Brown's fiction and lies as TROO FACTS.

And wonder why the big, bad, real world isn't in the slightest bit interested in what it has to say, and invent ever-madder conspiraloon 'theories' because the real world isn't interested in its stupidity.

When you think about it it becomes pretty obvious why she went to Portugal. She doesn't actually have to do anything other than spout any old shite.

I WUZ THERE, SO I KNOW. That will be quite enough for her intellectually challenged followers. And then they will pay for her to have another holiday when it's a bit warmer. This will produce another Pamphlet, and that's her Work done for this year. Not to forget all of The Media Shows.

I do hope she isn't going to do something really tacky, like stalking Robert Murat, after the dreadful experience he had the first time.

I wonder if she has been anywhere near The Church? I mean, she'll have to go there, won't she.

You can bet she will go there. Nothing is sacred to this money-grubbing parasite.

Speak of the devil:

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB

New blog will be up tomorrow. Lots of fascinating things...both "sides" may be surprised with some of my findings. #McCann

I have no interest in your 'findings' Patty The only time I have any interest in you is when you're harming the search for a missing child.

But glad to see you're having a jolly jaunt and amusing your disturbed little mind by playing detective.

You're beneath contempt.

Personally, after yesterday's debacle from her, nothing she conjured up would surprise me. And also personally, I couldn't give a flying one about her 'findings'.

Nothing would surprise me about her "findings". I now think she is capable of any vile "imagined scenario".

ETA - Actually, something would surprise me - Patty admitting she got something wrong. That would floor me (not that she got something wrong, but that she admitted it).

Maybe she's going to admit that Gerry's superhuman feat is ehm... physically impossible?

She is deluding herself if she thinks anyone who supports Madeleine and her family is going to care greatly about whatever she witters about tomorrow; however, with any luck she is going to upset her forker fans.

Which will be most excellent.

Pat Brown dismisses the likelihood of an abductor entering apartment 5A because of overlooking apartments (as indeed she dismisses a sex predator striking at the resort part of Praia da Luz outrigh)t.

Yet we know there were a spate of burglaries there in those very apartments. Does she ignore them?

It seems to me that those apartments were VERY attractive to break & enterers whether it be to steal money/jewellery or a child.

Pat Brown has the advantage of being in Praia Da Luz. She is able to see how things are now and also ask people how things were in 2007. She is meticulous in her work and in her reporting.

And surrounded by a bunch of raving nutters who are as vicious as she is. All in it for their own ends, whatever they may be. To anyone with a grain of logic she has shown how utterly stupid she is, and without even an attempt to look at how things were.

But it doesn't really matter because no one of any import is going to pay any attention to what she has to say. She didn't even try to get anything right.

So what has she accomplished? Absolutely nothing.

What on earth Pat Brown now thinks she is doing is too ridiculous to contemplate. The stupid woman obviously hasn't read The Files, and I really don't care about what she will come up with. No one is seriously interested in the findings of some American idiot who has no idea of how to profile the death of a Skunk, or even if it's dead. Skunks stink if they are dead or alive. Or are we supposed to believe it's dead because it stinks, and because she said so?

Oh no, barely noon and my ribs were sore with laughing already.

She's only gone and changed the first one, due to everyone going [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]at her.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It's been changed throughout, as I discovered when I tried to compare it with the first one, and seems to have grown a paragraph:

It is also worth noting that there is a lack of proper photos and videos from that night or even the next, so we don't know the exact conditions. Furthermore, we cannot trust what photos and videos show us because they can be brightened or darkened according to what the presented of these evidences want the audience to think. Supporters of the abduction theory may want Jane Tanner´s sighting area to be brightened and the window darkened. Nonsupporters of the abduction theory may want Jane Tanner's sighting area to be pitch black and the window sitting in a spotlight. So, we likely will have difficulty in knowning the reality. However, and again, the predator does what is wisest and I still have to say that the front of 5A is not the choice a predator should make when the back door, the supposedly open sliding back door, exists and cuts down on ones visibility leaving the residence and escaping from the area.

Wrong again, there are endless photos and reports on the situation in 2007; that Brown didn't bother to read them or look at the photos is entirely her own fault. Even her hostess Morais is aware that effort #1 was rubbish.

This is like her pretendy 'cease and desist' letter, all over again.

When is she going to realise - she doesn't get to keep rewriting her messes.

She stands by what she writes the first time, or she admits she's wrong and SHUTS UP.

Oh, why bother - best just leave her to dig herself into an ever-deeper hole.

I still have to say that the front of 5A is not the choice a predator should make when the back door, the supposedly open sliding back door, exists and cuts down on ones visibility leaving the residence and escaping from the area.

Why on earth would he go out that way, where he could be seen by anyone in the tapas restaurant, when he could hear Gerry McCann and Wilkins talking in the lane, and had to go the long way round to reach the car park by the front door, which was in virtual pitch darkness?

Woman's an idiot.

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
I DID overlook the trees on the back side of the lot, so please go to my post & read my revised blog post. patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2012/02/crimin… #McCann

Oh, for goodness' sake, it's almost a complete rewrite...

Following her childish invented characters - and why didn't she go the whole hog and call Martha's husband Elmer to be really insulting - this has appeared:

(The above is an imagined scenario for those who are pretended to not understand this...clearly I am just trying to make a point).

Yes, you are looking at Apartment 5A, the very apartment the McCanns were renting on May 3rd, 2007. The time is 10 pm on February 12, 2012. The photo was taken from the third floor of the building across the street. There was some shrubbery along the left wall of the parking lot that has been removed but the view of the McCanns door and window would not have been obscured (I must add since I have been rightly corrected and I have doublechecked the photos at that time, there are trees also lining the back side on the street, it is difficult to say today if one is high up looking down from one balcony or the other, who can see the window). My purpose of this photo was to show that the window and door of 5A was not a location that was as hidden from view as one might think.

===============

I've underlined her alterations - this is what the original said:

Yes, you are looking at Apartment 5A, the very apartment the McCanns were renting on May 3rd, 2007. The time is 10 pm on February 12, 2012. The photo was taken from the third floor of the building across the street. There was some shrubbery along the left wall of the parking lot that has been removed but the view of the McCanns door and window would not have been obscured. The lights on the buildings and in the streets turn the building into a veritable fishbowl (some claim massive lighting improvement since that day but I have heard that it has not changed much). What idiot would think breaking in the window at Apartment 5A or carrying a child out of that window or even the door next to it would be a terribly bright idea? One thing kidnappers know is there are enough human fish in the sea that one doesn’t have to abduct someone under such risky conditions.

============

Some difference, isn't there?

Does she think REAL profilers would keep their jobs for five minutes if they churned out sloppy, unresearched trash like that, changing it every time someone who HAS done their homework points out they are talking nonsense?

She really ought to pack it in now - and get a proper job.

OH FFS!

Original:

The next picture shows the front side of the apartment building with close-up of the window of Apartment 5A. I am standing in the doorway. Can you see how bright it is at night?

Rewrite:

The next picture shows the front side of the apartment building with close-up of the window of Apartment 5A. I am standing in the doorway. Can you see how bright it is at night? (Again that light may be deceptive as it was added , but you can see how exposed the window is on a path people are coming out of their apartments on and at the end of that wall is the entrance from the parking lot, not to mention a full moon shining down on white buildings and light-colored walks). What would Mr. Predator do if he crawled out of the window with a child to find a car pulling in to park right there in the lot? He would be trapped. He still has to walk down that little path, turn right out the opening into the parking lot, come back down along the wall, then cross the parking lot, go out of the parking lot, turn right and walk down to the corner and cross the street - where Jane Tanner supposedly saw him.

A plea from posters:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Isn't it interesting, though, that Brown is clearly reading round the sites that support Madeleine and her parents, to have done such an extensive rewrite?

The forkers just told her she was Very Clever and had Cracked the Case; Stella the hounder was about the only one who tried to point out that she was wrong, and got accused of undermining Patsy for her pains.

Brown seems to have total contempt for the forkers.

Watching Brown squirm:

johnjll jean-luc laffineur
@
@ProfilerPatB Why did the OC add these two strong spotlights if this parking area was considered as clear enough at night and safe?
8 minutes ago

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
@
@johnjll It is political. They didn't add them across the street and I doubt any predator is returning to the exact spot
2 minutes ago

johnjll jean-luc laffineur
@
@ProfilerPatB OK, Pat. But it was pretty dark in this parking area. Several witnesses confirm that point. It's in the files.
22 seconds ago

johnjll jean-luc laffineur
@
@ProfilerPatB Here two photographs showing clearly this spotlight that has been added. i40.servimg.com/u/f40/12/00/06…
1 minute ago

johnjll jean-luc laffineur
@
@ProfilerPatB Pat. No predator would have chosen the other entrance of the A5. Much too risky. Look at it on the site...
4 minutes ago

Is this a 3rd version relating to Jean-lucs tweets?

He would know this and choosing so public a location to abduct a child would be unusual. Finally, it was a full moon night, so the lighting may have been even better than normal (though not necessarily that early, but a predator may not be thinking of that because the night before moonrise was earlier and we don´t even know if he might have not gotten an opportunity - if he did - until two hours later.

She's appalling

My streetlights come on when there's a full bloody moon. The council don't save money and switch them off because the moon is so bright. I don't turn off my lights and read by the moonlight.

The moon like the sun; doesn't illuminate everywhere at once. Buildings cast shadows. Trees, cars all cast dark shadows. Is she new to Earth?

Brown doesn't let little things like the facts, in the form of photographic evidence stand in her way. There she is in PDL, taking photos of the place, proving her theory 4 years later and when even her own point out she's wrong they get pounced on. There is no professionalism there, no self awereness, nothing of use to anyone.

Predators who crawl in and out windows tend to choose windows that look out on dark empty spaces or are nowhere near other buildings. For example, a predator might break in on the back side of an apartment building that has no lights and nothing but a deserted lot behind.


that is about the only thing she's managed to get right so far.

and this :

But the 5A window was on a corner with traffic going by, on a parking lot which people are driving in and out of,

you can't see the door or window from the side road because there is an off-shot there, and you would have to be right on the corner to see the window. She's also talking as if that car park was in central London and had thousands of cars going in and out continiously--absolute start of season, so wasn't really heaving was it?

and this:

It is also worth noting that there is a lack of proper photos and videos from that night or even the next, so we don't know the exact conditions.

It would have been awesome if she'd looked through the files, there are numerous photos from that night in them, is she thick?

Latest update.

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
New blog will be up tomorrow. Lots of fascinating things...both "sides" may be surprised with some of my findings. #McCann
14 Feb

So, what happened to the Awesome new blogpost, then? Or does today's rewrite of the first Awesome post count as the new one?

Oh, she's right you know - everyone has been surprised with her findings. But not in a good way.

Pat's track record working on murder cases is very impressive

Well, yes, it's quite remarkable, really. High spots including 'profiling' two black killers as one white man, the Fort Hood massacre as having nothing to with terrorism despite the killer being linked to Al Quaeda, Breivik and McVeigh slaughtering all those people due to 'mid life crises' despite Breivik being in his early thirties and McVeigh being in his twenties, and being a noose-waver in the howling mob that very nearly sent an innocent man to the death chamber.

And where is the new Awesome Blog?

Brown is only interested in adding weight to her ridiculous "everyone was in it" theory. She is failing miserably. She is so desperate to prove an abductor couldn't have done it because he'd have been seen that she is missing the fact that this argument wcould also be applied to the McCanns. She is also ignoring the fact that Madeleine McCann WAS taken from apartment 5A. I think Brown has got herself tied up into a great big knot! Her minions are hanging on ardently awaiting the "ace" and it ain't coming because Brown is a goon.

Let's face it, she is nearing the end of her two week stay and all she's managed to achieve are photoshoots with two men who are currently defending charges of offences against the search for a missing child and an assortment of long munch and b*tch sessions with forker ghouls who believe in cloned Maddies and government conspiracies. Despite a promise of daily blogs, she has delivered only ONE embarrassingly sloppy "report" whose only accurate content was the date. This resulted in much hilarity on pro forums and world war III breaking out on Haverns as the goons battled out whether to acknowledge Brown's massive FAIL or toe the party line and pretend it didn't happen. Threats of banning took place.

Brown's only other update so far has been to massively edit her first report in an effort to erase/justify some of the goonery. If only she would read the police files, she might decide to massively edit her entire thinking and stick to what she does best i.e. - b*tching about American crime victims on the Nancy Grace Show.

Never mind. She can look forward to Natasha Donn's article in the freebie weekly advertising rag called "Algarve 123". Donn (whom I suspect might be quite young if her somewhat childish comments on Twitter are anything to go by) has her nose so far up Brown's rear-end that it might even be her indecipherable nonsense coming out of Brown's mouth. Now there would be a defence and a half...

Oh, she's turned up...

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Sorry I am so slow blogging on the #McCann case while on the road but who would know it was so hard to get time to think and write!

'On the road'? Didn't stop Jack Kerouak

As for her thinking and writing - why is she trying to change the habits of a lifetime?

From a Patfan:

Hi everyone

I spoke to my daughter who lives on the Algarve and close to Portimao and she said there hasnt been anything on the TV about Pat Brown's visit! She did inform me of the Algarve Resident article which I posted a few days ago.

I find it really strange!

Why on earth would there be? She's a complete nonentity in Europe - and not exactly A-List in the States. Nancy Grace is rather a long way from top drawer, and blogradio is ten a penny.

Why would anyone in Portugal be interested in a middle-aged American woman on a ghoul tour?

Is it true she has been staying with an expat in Porto?

No idea, but there seems to be a dog involved:

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
---plus there is a dog here who refuses to let me type...he loops his head under my arm and pulls my hand away. #McCann

She's posted a pic of a dog's nose; I won't, as it isn't fair on innocent animals. Wait - isn't Porto in the North?

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
I said I would try to blog....some folks apparently have never traveled; one is subject to nonexistent Internet, other people´s schedules...

'Nonexistent internet' - what a whopper!

Portugal is streets ahead of most of Europe - including the UK - with IT stuff.

'Scuse me, but where, exactly, is she 'travelling'? She arrived in the Algarve at the weekend....so what's with the 'travelling'?

Doesn't she fly out from the Capital?

Yes, I think at the beginning of next week.

But here's the thing....she is supposed to be 'investigating' in PDL; she arrived in the Algarve last weekend - so what's with the travelling? Portugal isn't that big a place, after all, and why would she be anywhere except Lisbon/the Algarve?

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
...... plus there is a dog here who refuses to let me type....

Yes, that's it, divert attention onto the dog, so everyone starts exchanging dog stories, instead of wondering what it is you're not telling people.

I say smart dog. It knows written cr@p when it sees it.

Pathetic excuses, IMO - real journos manage to report from war zones under dreadful circumstances. When Alex Crawford was in the middle of the Libyan uprising, she didn't go all girly and say, Sorry, folks I can't report from the road and by the way a dog is licking me.

More likely Brown has been making the most of Portuguese hospitality, with no intention of doing anything as difficult as touching a keyboard; she knew the idiots who hang on her every word would never ask awkward questions.

She shouldn't have had any problem with the internet in Portugal:

WiFi in Portugal
Portugal has a vast network of Wifi Hotspots throughout the country in a variety of locations including train stations, hotels, football grounds, service stations and airports meaning you can log on with your laptop even without plugging in.

The Portuguese government have been improving wifi access for years now, it is one of the best in Europe.

Oh, look at this:

Due to Portugal's geographical size and population spread it is often used by mobile and internet technology companies as a testing ground for new products. As such there are many internet gadgets on the market in Portugal long before they reach the shelves in the United Kingdom

Brown really should have come up with a better excuse; unless she is going to claim that the dog ate her blog next.

ETA link:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Oh she has managed to get to the keyboard

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB
·More
My Two New Portuguese Puppy Friends pic.twitter.com/8exJroGU

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Now that first dog does look photoshopped.

That doesn't look much like a hotel room does it? (I doubt they would let the dogs in).

Those dogs aren't puppies.

Can't these people see she is taking the pi$$ out of them. She says she can't write and think. She was going to keep people updated and keep them in the loop. Have they not sussed on that she is probably going to bring another e-book out that she will charge for, and they have kept her in hospitality in order for her to do it.

I can see it, she will offer to pay her way and people won't want to accept her offer and will say "No Pat is is our pleasure, after all you are doing this for the truth and for Madeleine". Sorry but she is having a bloody cheap holiday and I bet you there is going to be a money in it for her at the end of the day.

Yes I can see it, "My search for Madeleine" by Pat Brown.

Spot on, she's not going to give it away for free not when she can promise 'amazing findings' IF and when they buy her next ebook.

She's had a subsidised holiday, at their expense, and she'll make them pay again to 'get the goods'.

Shameless.

I absolutely agree. We've seen how she makes selective appearances and responses when she wants something from them and how she ignores them or unfriends them when she doesn't need them. Then she changes her mind, needs them again and it's all palsy-walsy once more and they fall for it like a dream.

She has gotten herself a cheap holiday in the Algarve courtesy of a bunch of desperate forkers to whom she "gave hope". It wouldn't surprise me if there had been some sort of selection process for her accommodation offerers.

Her and on the forum are biting their tongues, not wanting to break the party line but their disappointment at there being only one of the promised daily blogs is more than apparent. The fact that it turned out to be such a FAIL has made them all laughing stocks and they are hurting.

Then she promises a "fascinating" update and instead she merely makes corrections to her shambolic article. After a further period of silence, she insults them further by posting photos of a couple of dogs.

These are the only people who have supported this woman. They bought her books, they obligingly gave her great reviews when she asked them to. They obliged again when she asked them to respond to bad reviews and accuse McCann supporters of having made them. They kicked David Bret out of their group when she made them choose between her and him and then she unfriended them anyway.

She plays them for fools and they fall for it every time. Now she is using them to get a cheap holiday. She promised to "search for Maddie" but all we've had in nearly two weeks have been photos of her posing with Bennett and Amaral, a blog article which was so full of garbage that even the thickest forkers wrung their hands in despair, a load of corrections to said article and two doggy pics.

She'll go back to the US, write another book full of "imagined scenarios", this time saying "I was there" and she'll drop her new friends like hot bricks (once they've bought her book).

She claimed she was going to search for Madeleine, but has since bemoaned the fact that it's hard to find time to think and blog when she us at the mercy of other people's schedules! Proof, that this is more of a cheap holiday than work where the job would always come first.

I doubt if there will be any more blog posts. The first one was an absolute disaster, the lighting with different, the trees. She had to do a rewrite on that one and became a laughing stock.

The guy on twitter produced photographs that made hers look just what they were, tourist snaps.

She posed with Bennett, she posed with Amaral, who seems to have only one set of clothing.

She would have got away with this, if it had not been for people who support the McCanns, and for people who believe in facts, stepping in. Can you imagine if she decided to do a ghoul tour of where Baby Lisa went missing? She could post anything up and we would not be any the wiser. We wouldn't know if it was true or not. The files have made her a laughing stock.

But the die-hards can't see that. They will bolster her ego, whilst all the time she is thinking "You bloody fools and planning her next money making venture."

How long will the likes of CNN still employ Nancy Grace, they have already had to pay out $200,000 to the family of a woman who committed suicide after appearing on her show and being interviewed in such a way that this poor mother of a missing child took her own life the very next day. All because of Nancy Grace.

She has now upset the people and fans of Whitney Houston by asking "Who pushed her under the water?" We don't know yet if the family of Whitney will pursue this and seek damages for her statements on national TV.

In the end the likes of Grace will be sent packing... and Brown will fall by the wayside.

Look at her attitude with Joey Ortega, making accusations and having hissy fits. All Brown will be left with is Blogtalkradio and her ramblings from her bedroom. The FBI don't want to know profilers like this, why should they, she gives those accredited profilers a bad name. She is so unprofessional, even in the Casey Anthony case she tweeted the only news she wants to hear is "Casey Anthony dead at 25". Nobody who makes remarks like that would be entertained in the professional world of profiling... profilers have to be unbiased. Pat Brown is not unbiased, whatsoever.

So, where are we?

One photo-op with Bennett; one photo-op with Gonc; a blog post that has made her a laughing stock, and two photos of dogs.

Awesome.

I agree that the dogs were a distraction. She said it is difficult to blog and think when she is at the mercy of other people's schedules PROVING that this is a jolly jaunt.

It is all about ghouling and forking and being able to say she "was there" when she writes her "real" book and getting her jaunt on the cheap courtesy of goons who don't care what her credentials are just as long as she is a thorn in the sides of the McCanns.

A professional would put the job first. All we get from Brown is posing, bumbling and when her fans get restless because she isn't delivering the promised daily blog she points at some dogs and says "look over there!"

Says it all really.

Seems the profiler aint daily anymore lol.

She can't give too much away. She's got a book to write. Would you give it away if you could sell it? Well, you probably would but Patty ain't like that, and she's got another holiday to pay for when Gonc's Trial begins.

Actually, make that several holidays as Gonc appears to have several Trials coming up.

So, a new day dawns, and still no Case-Cracking Awesome Blog.

Any more piccies of dogs?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Now as Pat Brown is all for free speech I am sure she won’t mind me voicing what I think.

I think this, Pat Brown saw how her lack of comprehension for the case facts was highlighted with her first post. And therefore she knows that there are going to be people who are going to pick up every fault in her postings. But you see if she posts her postings on a Blog, for the world to see, wouldn’t that make a future book irrelevant, especially if people can read the crux of the matter on the internet.

You see I think Pat Brown is possibly thinking of writing a new e-book, for which she will charge and make money out of, and it will be based on her search for Madeleine McCann. Yes the usual fans will eagerly purchase it and line her pockets. But those people who know the facts will have to purchase it to dispute them. Whichever way it goes, she makes money.

The internet in Portugal, I am told is better than the internet in the USA. So why is she having so many problems in keeping people in the loop? Of course if she is out and about, dining and having lunch with those who are giving her hospitality, then it is obvious she is not spending as much time on her search for Madeleine as she said she would.

And have these people thought, they could be being taken for fools. Yes they are paying for a so-called Profiler to stay in Portugal on the cheap, by offering her a bed, and at the end of the day, she could end up writing another e-book and pocketing not just 50% of the earnings but 100%.

When are the shrooms going to wake up and smell the coffee… Pat Brown is possibly thinking of lining her own pockets on the back of a missing child. Mind you, she won’t be the first to do this will she? And of course remember the news broke that in May 2012 Kate McCann will be releasing a new book about their search for Madeleine and the review being carried out by Scotland Yard.

If Pattie is planning a new e-book, what is the betting that she will go back to Amazon and try piggy back on Kate’s new book, like she tried before?

It's funny watching the goons restraining themselves from saying what they really think in order to keep a united front going.

They must be mortified.

Seriously though, this is the very reason why Media criminal profilers are a danger to criminal investigations. She is going to enormous pains to try and get a McCann did it theory which people will buy into. She has tried her ebook which required the reader to ignore some 20 witness statements and believe that Gerry McCann was capable of a superhuman (i.e. physically impossible) feat. She offered as a motive that they didn't want to get into trouble for leaving their children - when clearly that was rubbish. They all immediately admitted doing that to police.

When Amazon removed her ebook from sale she attempted to capitalise on that saying "Read the book the McCanns don't want you to read..." as if it contained truths which the McCanns wanted buried rather than untruths which were unhelpful to the search for a missing child. The, when she failed to get any itnerest in that, for a while she retreated to lick her wounds. But this is Pat Brown, the woman who cannot admit she is wrong. The woman who admits that several people have in the past urged her to seek help for her obsessive pursuit of people she believed to be guilty of heinous crimes, but who steadfastly refuses to accept that she could possibly be wrong. It was perhaps inevitable that after a period of brooding, she came back with the announcement that she was going to sue those McCanns and that she was going to travel to Portugal to search for Madeleine (and presumably prove they are guilty).

Her arrogance is breathtaking. Even when she got her first "report" so embarrassingly wrong her first reaction was to lash out at her critics with sarcasm laden put downs. Then when it became apparent that even her thickest fans were whispering amongst themselves that Pat had got it totally wrong, she made some grudging edits to her "report" - realising perhaps that this was one bluff she wasn't going to get away with.

I think we'll get another blog update. This one will tell us that her existing "report" was just some initial thoughts but she has collected so much information - so much that she needs to return to the USA and sort it all out. I think she will say that she will provide her "real report" after she has done this.

Whether ithat "report" appears on her blog or in the form of her "real" book about the McCann case, will be anyone's guess. Onoe thing I will say though is that those people who helped her make this trip possible better prepare to have their tweets, email and FB interactions with her tail off as long as their help is no longer required.

PS I've got to laugh at her dissing those people who have criticised her for not producing the promised "daily blog" saying that obviously they have never travelled!

I have done my fair share of work-related travel - occasionally to the States and Canada. Someties I stayed in a hotel, sometimes with colleagues who offered accomodation. However I ALWAYS did the work first and only if there was time left over did I play. Then again, I was and am a professional.

'A dog is nudging me' has to be the worst excuse ever.

Am I dreaming or is this day 7 of her visit to PDL? A whole week in the resort and all she has managed is a picture of a couple of dogs and a blog post that was so full of errors even her own fans had to point them out. Oh and a bit of nastiness on twitter. Not the work of a professional who said she would blog daily is it?

And all those begging tweets brought no actual serious media coverage? Not even Amaral with all his mates on TV got her a prime time slot? Why not? Has he lost his contacts or did even he not think she was worth the bother?

You're not dreaming. This is day 7 since she went to PdL. It has been 11 days since she flew to Portugal.

The forkers are speculating that what she's got is so explosive that she can't post it.

Let's hope they are referring to case materials and not the old Algarve Revenge...

Soon be time for her to pack her pitchfork and go home, then. I am very disappointed ....

Well Brown has lied to everyone including her followers. If they want to ignore that fact, more fool them. And if this rumour about explosive material is what is holding their hopes together again they are being foolish. Its a rumour Pat Brown will love as it will sell her book to more gullible people than her holiday snaps ever will. The problem is that eventually they'll realise that this totally unprofessional amateur has not got the remotest chance of producing any relevant facts that will ever solve any case anywhere. For that she would need to do some real research not socialising with doggies and two-bit blog radio hosts. She has taken them all for a ride and has mocked missing Madeleine McCann in her efforts to cream as much money out of the case as she possibly can.
Her behaviour is despicable.

I have a good feeling about this. Like others I found the silence from Pat at first frustrating, then worrying. I even wondered the other night if she was ok and was worried she might have been whooshed. Then she blogged about the dogs, Eddie and Keela sprung to my mind straight away, I have no idea why !

Now I see it as a positive. If she were blogging her every move every day I would feel that she does not consider what she is writing of huge importance. The silence might give hope for there in fact being new information, information she might want to share with the right people before blogging.

Or else I am just deluded and looking for hope where there is none.....

It's almost sad; they know they've been sold down the river yet again, but are clinging to the last shreds of forlorn hope.

Here's the thing. There was nothing at all stopping Brown from surfacing once or twice a day just to say, I'm in PDL, or wherever.

But she hasn't even bothered to tweet. She tried to lie her way out of this by moaning about the internet in Portugal, when the reality is that Portugal has just about the best internet provision in Europe.

We've had two photo-ops, a blog entry that made her a laughing stock, a load of excuses and photos of dogs.

Don't ask me difficult questions, just look at the dogs, Aw, puppy, cute!

Yet still they hang on desperately, trying to tell themselves that all will be well as soon as she's back in the States and can - what? Blog freely? Not be distracted by anything in real life?

They really need to face it - when it came right down to it, Brown couldn't cut it.

She has been in contact with quite a few of the antis.

Yup, but can't find time to blog [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

She got her fingers burnt with the first attempt, suddenly realised that unlike most of the cases she pontificates about, she can't get away with talking twaddle on this one because there is so much info in the public domain.

Pity she didnt access some of it herself before she went, the silly media-obsessed old fool.

She must be reading everyone's rude remarks, she has appeared to tweet:

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
"It was nearly always completely deserted, there were very few people in the resort..." Matthew Oldfield (rogatory interview). #McCann

Yes, well, that should Crack the Case. Who knew he said that until Brown tweeted it

Mmmm, profound profiling, thorough investigation, Astute reasoning. Well done Pat Brown

You mean she keeping quiet like wot Scotland Yard and the PIs and The McCanns are doing so as not to alert anyone, like The Abductor.

Nah, she's got a book to sell, and there's no money in giving it away. I should have seen this coming, which I didn't, but no doubt some of you did.

I wait with bated breath for her next book to appear all over The Internet. I wonder what she will do about Copyright.

Well, when someone uploaded her leaflet, she went screaming to the FBI - allegedly

And when the Feebs had stopped laughing, they told her to grow up and get a life

She isn't going to be able to stop her fans spreading it all over The Net. They will all be so keen to discuss it's amazing merits. So if she thinks she's got a money input from us, she is sorely mistaken. Still, she should sell a couple of hundred.

Oooh, I just thought of something. If she says that there was an Abduction does she think we will all go, "Oooh Ahh, she's right you know. Who'd a thought it? Must buy her book."

Frankly, it would not surprise me if that turns out to be her next ploy. She must have worked out that there isn't much money in forking, due to there being so few of them, so she may well do a U-turn.

She will, of course, then expect to be welcomed with glad cries as she turns her back on forkerdom.

Which sadly for her, ain't gonna happen.

Day 12 Update - a quote about how quiet the resort was in 2007.

Which translated means, as the resort was quiet and hardly many people, less chance of an abductor getting caught or being seen.She really is proving there was an abduction and the chances are that it was planned.

Yes and the best part of that is that she doesn't even realise that that's what she is doing.

Did she explain how she got into that apartment from where she took those photos? You know the ones that show how much the place/the view on the apartment has changed since May 2007?

Re: Pat Brown

I can understand why she doesn't want to publicise things but I do find it difficult to believe that the hotels do not have internet or that there are no internet cafes. Even apartments usually have some sort of internet access.

Portugal has some of the best internet access in Europe. Brown's a fibber.

I can forgive most people most things, but not this one. The Pitch Forkers could well have succumbed to mass hysteria and the well know effects of a Cult. Even Bennett could claim care and concern for small children if you really stretch your imagination, at least in the Case of Madeleine McCann.

But Pat Brown is plainly and simply a nasty bitch and a media whore. She knows only too well that she influences the opinions of the disaffected and encourages them to bay for blood. People who could well finish up on Juries.

I refuse to believe that she is stupid because she plainly isn't, and I wouldn't forgive her if actually found Madeleine.
Not that she invades my thought very much at all. She is just a laugh to me.

But she will live to regret this one.

She would probably have got away with this for long enough if her only audience had been a bunch of rednecks who had never been further than the gate of the trailer park.

She can't do it in Europe, where people hop on planes to everywhere from Portugal to Poland for stag/hen parties, and everyone knows about little things like internet access.

She especially can't do it with this particular case, where the actual police files and reports have been in the public domain for nearly four years.

"Don't look at my humiliating foul up- look at the cute puppies..."

Her fans are now "hoping" that what she's found is so explosive that she cannot post it. They are saying that she's best not to give the McCanns any headsup on her findings.

So delusional.

She's heading home the day after tomorrow after her epic fail (which has not gone unnoticed I hasten to add). This who debacle is not going to do her reputation or credibility any good at all. It lets prosepctive customers see exactly how inept she is.

Not all fans of PB then on haverns

applecrumble Today at 6:17 pm
This is all bottox. This Pat Brown is an attention seeker. She is all mouth and no substance. Now she has some pretty PdL pics to add to her next e-pamphlet. It is a money-spinning exercise but now she will state that her poorly researched ‘research’ is backed up by Goncalo Amaral, Tony Bennett and the two large canines, yes the dogs that are never wrong type canines.

It would be laughable if it were not about a missing little British child and Pat Brown is laughing her socks off as evidenced by her stupid role play sitting in Ocean Club 5 years after a crime. What was wrong with taking a vacation to Pdl 5 years ago and at the same time do some sleuthing in readiness for a couple of books for the American market, speaking of which, are the Americans really interested in a missing Brit, really? They turned a blind eye to one of their own, Ms Dugard. (plus many others)

2h PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Profiling is always an ongoing examinations of evidence and possibilities; it isn´t about being for or against. #McCann

That tweet from Pat Brown is quite disgusting. It is an attempt by her to make herself look like a reasonable "professional".

The reality is clear from her persistent abuse of the McCanns though. She has acted like the worst kind of amateur. Whilst in possession of very few of the facts she was wilfully abusing the McCanns from the moment she started commenting on the case. Her cynicism now is disgusting.

Read and remember what you wrote Pat Brown.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And then if you have any decency please explain why you wrote such things while being so IGNORANT of the facts of the case.