Investigation into McCann internet trolls launched by police Part 2

From another forum, with thanks also for the comments.
Sharon Lawrence ‏@5haronl 2h2 hours ago Burnley, North West
Apologies from @skymartinbrunt wont be good enough, he should turn up at Brenda Leylends inquest and tell the truth, the whole truth #McCann

Tina Marie @TrutherDolly · 3h 3 hours ago
.@IWILLNOTGOAWAY We r trying to trace Sgt Kevin Taylor of #Braunstone Police 1st on scene at #BrendaLeyland's death. #McCann #SgtKevinTaylor

Crazy woman Amazon forum -

The stupid pointless dossier that you are so very proud of has resulted in the death of Brenda Leyland, who posed no threat to anyone as far as as I can see. You are so astonishingly dense and shameless, it beggars belief.

Has your dossier resulted in a police investigation? Has the police arrested anyone yet? Has any attempt to kidnap the twins been made? Surely if the threats were perceived to be serious action would have been taken by now? Can't hear the drums and the song and dance yet, can you?

Anyone with the sense they were born with would know not to take hot air spouted on internet forums seriously. For god sake, look at the stupid threats made against Amaral and the digging into his family and private life by some your cronies over the years. Ask yourself what good could ever come of kidnapping the twins and who would seriously do that? And as it was not the McCann family being followed, because they would know about it, what place has such information in a dossier?

The McCanns promoted themselves and their kids like celebrities, so unless they are going to hide themselves away then they and their children will be photographed when seen in public. The papers they sell their stories to are full of such photographs - celebrities and their children and they were happy enough to pose for them when it suited.

Furthermore, what right has your colleagues on STM to publish photographs and personal detail of members of the public, simply because they hold an opposing view to your own? We don't live in a police state yet and I hope you lot get your comeuppance.

Debbie Law ‏@dminnimouse 32 mins32 minutes ago
#mccann so why are STM now Solely invite only ? & who can invite you? Nothing strange going on here then (much)

The Suppressionals ‏@1matthewwright1 4 mins4 minutes ago Wales
Brenda has a son who i suspect will leave no stone unturned #mccann

The Spectator ‏@TheSpectator7 2h2 hours ago
@TheJENReturns So sad that Brenda Leyland did not live to become a grandmother, don't you think? #mccann

Win ‏@winnower1 2h2 hours ago
@CaroleShooter Leyland's family has solid ground for a lawsuit against all involved. IMO Brunt has been instructed to say nothing. #McCann  

Unlike the fools on Twitter, Brunt understands that it is up to the Coroner to decide what happened and respects the rule of law. People like Winnower don't care about the law. They read the files and ignore them, hear the words of police officers from Scotland Yard and then toss them aside as if they know better. They don't. They are amateurs without access to all the information and are simply trying to disguise latent hate with the idiotic pretence of collecting and collating news articles in some kind of mock-up of justice. When Winnower starts to understand two things he or she might start talking sense. First the McCanns are innocent until the legal authorities, not a bunch of ill-informed amateur cranks, find them otherwise. Second, Brunt was doing his job. He wasn't hounding anybody to death. I wonder could Winnower get round to suggesting precisely which law he or she thinks a journalist breaks by asking somebody to explain their actions because that is all Brunt did. And I am pretty sure she is going to find it rather tough to tell us which law that is because there isn't one. You don't have any grounds for a law suit unless somebody did something wrong and Brunt doing his job was not doing anything wrong.

Didn't Bennett claim winnower was behind the stalking of madeleines uncle. Apparently searching all over the internet for anything to do with any relative of the McCann's, and then trying to get them fired by contacting their workplace and their spouses workplace is OK, but when a journalist tries to interview someone who contacted him repeatedly that's wrong. And let's face it, Brenda Leyland wasn't surprised to see brunt was she.

Whatever her personality in RL, Brenda's twitter persona was VILE. Every dispassionate observer who took a look thought so. She lied about so many things, it's clear twitter was an alternative reality for her.

BUT she made the mistake of continuing to post rotten vituperative, accusatory messages, some of them about a witness in the case, long after it had become clear her real name was linked, via Google, to her twitter account - and she was happy to direct them @ members of the press.

She wasn't hounded on twitter in any way that bothered her - she appeared to revel in it.

The sooner everyone accepts this and stops sending the coroner mountains of twitterdrivel the better.

BL wasn't nice on twitter, and anyone can see it for themselves.

Wasn't Brenda really vile about the appearance of the woman she believed she was hounding, and didn't she tweet that she was a prostitute? But now we're all supposed to gasp in horror at the bitchy tweets that Brenda received while she was still alive and tweeting? Nope, if you're going to behave like a vile bitch on twitter then you can fully expect to be on the receiving end of vile tweets by return. Obviously the Numpties don't understand this, but I'm pretty certain the coroner does!

It's all quite pathetic really, for some reason they've deluded themselves into thinking that what's in that dossier, is mainly people moaning about other tweeters throwing insults at them. That's not at all what Sky reported, they reported threats that were so serious that they couldn't even reproduce them in the report. Brunt very clearly pointed out that Leyland did not represent the WORST of them, though some of her tweets were extremely abusive. We have all seen the kind of threats that has been issued, not against other tweeters but against the McCann family, against their children, against their wider family etc. That IS serious, what is NOT serious is a bunch of tweeters being more or less nasty to each other on a hash tag only visited by a limited number of people even on the best of days. I think some of them have finally taken the last step over the line where their reality has merged into some weird fantasy universe that only exist in their increasingly disturbed minds. All IMO of course.

By the time the Inquest occurs, I suspect, the Coroner will have read every single tweet posted by Sweepyface (aka Brenda Leyland) and anything else of a similar nature which the Police may have found on her computer. Just because the haters and numpties ignore her behaviour doesn't, as you say, mean the Coroner will.

And yes, they are ignoring what has been by Brunt said because it doesn't fit their hate agenda. Remind me who knows what is in the dossier, Brunt or the haters and numpties?

They seem to be forgetting that the Police may well be actively investigating the contents of the dossier and there are some among them who are the subjects of that investigation.

I think they also targeted Brenda because she was a nice, quietly-spoken, middle-class lady, i.e. an easy target and less likely to kick off like a chav might

516291666458984448|Sun Sep 28 18:21:40 +0000 2014|@PORTUGALONLINE @LarryPKay #mccann How delightful, as she peddles her arse to strangers, a perfect Shill match= low life misfits
-----
515243467883413504|Thu Sep 25 20:56:30 +0000 2014|@veniviedivici @TeddyShepherd @ThomasBadenRies #mccann Good move, it wd be edited to Buggery, pointless
515242647058120704|Thu Sep 25 20:53:14 +0000 2014|@umweltbuerger @siamesey #mccann Some one said, made me laugh, wish Shills would do a Jonestown
----
514900397140762625|Wed Sep 24 22:13:15 +0000 2014|#mccann Have been engaged today for far too long with Fucktards , always makes me feel have to bathe in Jeyes fluid after
----
514863741469728768|Wed Sep 24 19:47:36 +0000 2014|@TeddyShepherd @RosalindaHu @JimGamble_INEQE #mccann Little shit Jimbo, wont answer any questions, prefers to hide and snipe

Maddie McCann cops quiz British gardener who worked near holiday flats in the resort of Praia da Luz

Nov 16, 2014 00:11 By Matthew Drake

The ex-pat, who still still lives in Portugals' Algarve, is being questioned about his whereabouts between the "critical hours" when little Maddie went missing

A British gardener is ­being questioned about his movements over a critical two-and-a-half-hour per­iod on the night Madeleine McCann disappeared.

The ex-pat, who still lives in Portugal’s Algarve, was working near the apartment where she vanished on May 3, 2007.

This week he has been quizzed by police over his whereabouts between the critical hours of 7pm to 9.30pm, the Sunday People can reveal.

That evening Madeleine’s parents Gerry, 45, and Kate, 46, went for a meal with friends at the Ocean Club resort, Praia da Luz, where they were staying.

They left Madeleine, then three, and their two-year-old twins in their holiday flat about 80 yards away.

The self-employed gardener and handyman was seen by British and Portuguese officers at a ­police station in Faro on Wednesday.

The gardener, who has lived in Portugal for more than a decade, has strongly denied any ­involvement in Mad­eleine’s disappear­ance.

According to the ­official timeline of that night, dad Gerry left the meal to check on the children at apartment 5A at 9.15pm.

Kate raised the alarm at 10pm when she realised Madeleine had gone.

During the original Portuguese police probe, the gardener said he left a bar at the same ­resort at around 7pm that night.

The gardener, who lived with a companion in Praia da Luz until 2006, gave a mouth swab to Portuguese police when he gave his statement in 2007.

In his original interview he denied seeing anything strange at the time of Madeleine’s abduction or having ever seen the family before the abduction.

He has now been identified as one of seven new possible ­suspects – five men and two women – who detectives believe could hold vital information.

A British woman is also ­believed to have been questioned this week by officers from Operation Grange, the fresh Madeleine inquiry ordered by David Cameron three years ago.

Four others are men from Portugal and the seventh is under­stood to be a woman of Central or Eastern European origin.

All of them were ordered to provide fresh DNA samples which will be matched against samples of evidence taken from the resort in Praia da Luz.

Insiders said they will be classed as persons of interest – known as “arguidos” in Portuguese law.

It is understood some of the possible suspects know each other or worked together at the Ocean Club resort.

At least two are believed to have criminal records and some exchanged phone calls on the night Madeleine vanished.

A source said: “Officers from Operation Grange have reviewed several statements given at the time Madeleine went missing and have identified several points they believe still need answering.

"They will interview, re-interview and then review several ­people and their statements and then refocus again at the end of the month.”

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said the force would not officially comment on the continuing investigation.

The developments come two weeks after it emerged that foren­sic experts were unable to find a DNA match for 98 hair strands found during the original police probe.

Scotland Yard ­experts believes these hairs could hold the key to solving the case.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/maddie-mccann-cops-quiz-british-4636949

Time: 19H00
Locale: D.I.C. de Portim'
Entity that presides:
Functionary that executes: Davide Gomes, Inspector

Witness Name: George William James
Occupation: Gardener
Nationality: British

As he does not understand Portuguese, he is accompanied by interpreter, Robert James Queriol Eveleigh Murat.

Because he is asked, George James states that her has been in Portugal for about seven years and that before this lived with his ex-companion, ******, in Praia da Luz.

That he separated from his companion in December of 2006, date upon which he began to reside in his actual address, and where he lives alone, and is not involved in any relationship.

That he has no children, and that the person with which he maintains his closest relationship, is still his ex-companion who resides in what used to be their home .

Clarifies that he worked in the garden centre in Almadena (PlantScape), Lagos, according to what he remembers, between the years 2000 and 2002.

From this point, he was self-emplyed, exercising his functions as gardener in various residences, principally in Praia da Luz.

In relation to the Ocean Club, he does work for this tourist complex as a gardener, receiving
monthly an official invoice. He has worked there for about two years.

He does not care for all the gardens of the Ocean Club, but only for the gardens in block 4 and only the green zone which is found near the exterior or the zone close to the street. He does not look after for the pool-side gardens.

Equally he cleans the steps of this block, and cleans the windows in the stair area. He does not work inside the apartments.

Having been asked, states that he knows the apartment from where Madeleine went missing, but that he never entered that apartment.

He works for the Ocean Club, every week on Wednesdays and always on this day, and that he has never gone to the Ocean Club other than on this day with the exception of the last day of the month when he heads to the principal reception of the OC, which is opened 24 hours and is situated on Rua Direita in Praia da Luz.

That he normally works in the Ocean Club, from 14H00, for about 01H30 to 02H00, and leaves there about 15H30, 16H00.

He goes to work using his ex-companion's car, which is a Citroen C15, white in colour, and for which he does not remember the license plate.

He always parks in the area of block 4, and when it is possible, he parks next to the apartment from where the girl went missing, for no particular reason other than habit.

States that the last time he was in the Ocean Club was on Wednesday, before the child went missing or on the 02/05/07.

States that on Thursday, the 3rd of May, 2007, he was working in a garden in, Praia da Luz, for private clients, until 12H00 and after that ate some sandwiches and had a drink next to the ocean. He made the food himself.

On this day around 14H00, he went to another garden situated in Praia da Luz. He left there around 16H00.

After this he headed to Espiche, to the Rainbow (Arco 'is) Bar, and left there around 19H00.

After this he went home to take a shower and had dinner. He left again to return to the Rainbow Bar around 21H30 and stayed there until about 23H30.

At the bar he contacted a British individual whose name is ***** who he knows has a mobile-home and was parked in the Espiche camping site and who left on Monday, 7/05/2007.

States that he is known in the bar.

When asked, he does not remember having seen any strange situation. He does not know anyone from the family of the missing girl and has never seen them.

And nothing more was said'
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GEORGE-JONES.htm

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 23m 23 minutes ago
Will you be interviewed by me @skymartinbrunt for a documentary re: #mccann #brendaleyland and this report:

Canine Truth ‏@K9Truth 2h2 hours ago
@martin_liz @Killdara Does the coroner have the authority to demand sight of the urgent DM that @Jayelles1 sent to @JimGamble_INEQE?
#McCann

PAT BROWN @ProfilerPatB · 17h 17 hours ago
Over 10,000 people have read "We are in the Secret Madeleine McCann Dossier" yet only silence from the media

What do they think the coronor is going to do, announce a new law that makes reporting possible crimes to the police illegal?
There was no snitching, certain people made threats and were reported to the police. It was going to happen, as was one of them being doorstepped. Leyland tweeted brunt directly, and attached her name to the twitter account and to several other places.

Before the antis go on about how wonderful Brenda Leyland let's have a brief recap of her behaviour. Travelled to the McCann's village on several occasions due to her beliefs, lied about the McCann's and the case in general, tweeted nasty messages directed at the twins using their names and the McCann hash tag, tweeted that she wished supporters of the McCann's would kill themselves and she would help, accused a mark Warner nanny of being in the mccanns pay and of being a prostitute ( Leyland refers to this as peddling her a?se on one occasion) and published the woman's work details and the fact the nanny was now in fear and Leyland admitted she found the woman's fear amusing. The actions towards the nanny were beyond the pale, she was actively trying to scare a witness and ruin her career and reputation.

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda
Post Julchen on Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:54 pm

I've been wondering for some time now:
Has her funeral taken place and I've missed it, or if not then why not?

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3
@jontait42 @winnower1 @MontiesPython Huge well done and thank you to those who collated info for Coroner, he can't ignore it. #mccann

Post  greenink211 Today at 1:01 pm JATYK2

It seems that morons such as Sonia Poulton and Rosalinda Hutton need to be reminded of the actual facts about Brenda Leyland. She was NOT A SAINT.

She first came to notice when Martin Brunt asked her a QUESTION. Yes - to Sonia Poulton - that is what he did. He legitimately (according to you) asked her a QUESTION. He asked her to explain her abusive tweeting. Her response was that she was ENTITLED to tweet what she liked.

Brunt tells us that she didn't seem to feel so ENTITLED after reflection and that she was hopeful that her actions would not land her in trouble with the POLICE.

One indisputable fact is that she exposed herself to the media by originally using her own name as the ID for her Sweepyface account. That made it easy for Brunt to track her down as she is the only Brenda Leyland in the area she made it clear she was tweeting from.  You really don't need to even consider the kind of TWADDLE that Sonia Poulton tweets about ISPs and IPs to have got her address. 192.com is your friend when tracing idiots who post abuse using their own names. Just about everybody posting on the ANTI MCCANN FACEBOOK pages can be traced just as easily.  And yes, Brenda Leyland, was using FACEBOOK as well as TWITTER.

We know Brunt did nothing wrong. He simply asked the woman a QUESTION and very properly told her that her abusive tweeting about the McCanns and witnesses could mean she was being investigated herself. As Sonia Poulton keeps reminding us at the moment, it is the ROLE of the journalist to ASK QUESTIONS of people, to GET ANSWERS from people. And as we say on the video Martin Brunt was far more POLITE in his questioning than Sonia Poulton ever is. Just because he asked questions of an ANTI MCCANN OBSESSIVE does not mean that he did anything wrong, though in their very peculiar minds that kind of QUESTION seems not to be allowed.

Another indisputable fact is that she was absolutely and pathetically OBSESSED by the McCanns and that, as Sweepyface, she posted abusively about them. Witnesses also claim that she was wont to visit Rothley and hurl abuse around when doing so.

We also know for certain that she was interfering in the case by abusing and stupidly taking part in the EXPOSING of a witness but as with all Anti McCanns getting things arse over elbow and actually linking the witness in the ONGOING INVESTIGATION to an account that had nothing to do with her. Yes, Brenda Leyland was just as stupid in her obsession and just as nasty as many others.

We know that Brenda Leyland was not just asking QUESTIONS. We can all read the ABUSE and NASTINESS that came from her keyboard. Maybe she felt she was ENTITLED to post her OPINION in that way but she went beyond just being NASTY and was actually INTERFERING in the INVESTIGATION with her attempts to intimidate a witness. FOR THAT ALONE, Brunt was right in his statement that she could have been investigated by the POLICE.

We know from Brunt that Brenda Leyland was worried about the consequences of her actions when they were pointed out to her.

We know from the frenzy of hate towards Brenda Leyland from the Anti-McCanns that she was not being supported by them. She was reviled by them, ridiculed  by them, made the butt of their jokes about how weak she was and how they would have given BRUNT what he deserved as answers (though we also know that so-called tough guys like the pathetic SEAN HYLAND from Scunthorpe were too cowardly to face Brunt).

We know there was one US nasty who threatened Brenda Leyland.

We know from a witness that Brenda Leyland left the village after being photographed openly by an unknown person (probably from the media).

We know that Leyland was estranged from one son whose birthday was apparently the day she died on.

We know that the POLICE will have seized her computers and will have examined them carefully for details of any suicide note or other clue as to her death.

We KNOW that the CORONER will know all of the above as FACT and will not need other pathetic OBSESSED individuals to tell her any of the above.

We all KNOW what happens to the CRAPOLA that the OBSESSED Anti McCanns send to SY. It is laughed at. We all KNOW the same will happen to the CRAPOLA that Winnower and others have collated OBSESSIVELY about this incident from Newspapers, TV and from Blogs. Such CRAPOLA is not what interests real detectives or real Judges or real Coroners. They don't play ONLINE SICKO OBSESSIVE GAMES like Winnower and Sonia Poulton and Rosalinda Hutton. The professionals deal with the real EVIDENCE from the real INVESTIGATION.

All the CORONER has to do is decide HOW Brenda Leyland died and what led to that death.  

So the real QUESTIONS are:

How did Brenda Leyland die? As we already KNOW the POLICE investigation has already suggested there are no suspicious circumstances it leaves, accident or suicide.

If it was an accident, what actually happened? Is there some kind of physical evidence which points to this? Toxicology? Position of the body?

If it was suicide what evidence supports that theory? Was there a note? What was her state of mental health? What led up to the death?

Could the reality of being legitimately exposed as a SECRETIVE and ABUSIVE online individual have led to her being unwilling to face family and friends because of the shame? Could the reality that she could be investigated by the POLICE for her OBSESSIVE nasty tweeting and her clear attempts to INTIMIDATE A WITNESS have led to her being unable to face the public or her family or her neighbours?

Could the fact that she died on the birthday of her ESTRANGED SON who she never spoke to anymore have a bearing on the matter? Was there a family issue which will only have come to light from proper INVESTIGATION by the POLICE and not from the ragbag of CRAPOLA found by assorted ANTI MCCANNS on Google?

And the final question. Will the assorted freaks and OBSESSIVES on #McCann actually accept the ruling of the CORONER or will she be lumped in with the POPE, JIM GAMBLE, GORDON BROWN, TONY BLAIR, GEORGE BUSH, the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, the QUEEN, JUDGE TUGENDHAT and everybody else as being IN ON IT?

Jayelles » Fri Dec 05, 2014 5:28 pm Stop the Myths

We know from the frenzy of hate towards Brenda Leyland from the Anti-McCanns that she was not being supported by them. She was reviled by them, ridiculed by them.  

No she wasn't supported and some of them are now acting like they were best buddies when in fact:-

She was evidently distressed when one of her anti pals called her a "tw*t" a few weeks previously and was ignoring her
She and her pal Izzy were blamed for bringing the antis into disrepute by one of the anti leaders after they trolled an innocent young woman who is a witness in the McCann case and caused her to close her Twitter account
She was subjected to numerous cruel comments by several members of Haverns about appearance and also accused of being a plant
She was described by Pat Brown as "extreme and offensive" in a blog article (this was later revised and toned down after news of her death emerged)

But, I bet the antis didn't include any of the above in their "dossier" to the coroner. Bet their "dossier" comprised of a load of screenshots of pros expressing disgust at the vile behaviour directed towards the family of a missing child, at their cruel lies and misinformation and at their hideous photoshopped images which they collectively describe as "questioning the McCann version of events".

Oh and I bet my "Quite urgent DM" tweet which I sent to Jim Gamble on the FIFTEENTH OF SEPTEMBER would be in any "dossier" sent to the coroner. I don't think any of the defectives have correctly worked out what that was about yet.

Leyland was also divorced, her former husband remarried and the one son she did speak to lived on the other side of the world. She spent all day every day on twitter, Facebook etc but the week before she died she stopped doing this, and suddenly had hour upon empty hour left to fill on top of suddenly having everyone she knew including her sons and ex and his wife knowing what she had done. I can't imagine she was happy for them to see her posts or that they were happy to be associated with her. It must have brought the emptiness of her life into sharp focus as well as a lot of bitter feelings about her ex husband and estranged son. Perhaps she did commit suicide and chose a hotel so her body would be found quickly. Perhaps it was a cry for help and she thought she would be found before it was too late. Perhaps it was just an accident or natural causes even.

Re: Blacksmith
Post PeterMac Yesterday at 10:16 pm

j.rob wrote:

He screamed obscenities at callers to the isolated farm and then returned brandishing an ancient-looking rifle.
Standing among his pigs and surrounded by feral dogs, Mr Marques shouted: "Leave me alone, leave me alone... look at this face, is this the face in the picture?"

IF you were surrounded by McCann supporters and their combined hatred, abuse and vilification, alll recorded for posterity on the internet, screenshots, and WayBack machine, would not YOU shout Leave me alone.
Brenda tried to get away, but her accusers, the McCanns, the McCann extended family, (and we believe we know which person the fat ankles belong to . . .)
Mitchell, the wide Family, Sky, and Brunt, did not leave her alone, and she is now dead.

SHE IS NOW DEAD. read that Pro-McCanns and weep, or rejoice, if that is your personal fetish. we have seen several stange fetishes in the extended family, haven't we . . . .
Hope you are reading this ! Those of you on the 10pm - 6am, shift, put it up on twitter  

tigerloaf » Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:37 am

One thought comes to me from reading that post and it is something that the Police will without doubt consider as part of their enquiries.

A very large number of the numpties, haters and hounders openly acknowledge their own serious mental health and/or drug issues. One of the avenues of investigation will no doubt be whether Brenda Leyland was in fact being treated by any doctor for mental health issues; was she suffering depression, for example? Could such an illness have contributed not only to her death but to her obsessive attitude towards the McCanns?

The way in which the numpties, haters and hounders have hypocritically and idiotically lumped the blame on Martin Grime is absolutely no surprise. While blaming Brunt for going about his job in the most professional manner by asking questions of a proven online abuser, these fools lavish praise on the harridan, Sonia Poulton for the way in which she bullies and hounds people for interviews for her supposed "documentary". The haters are unable to see just how foolish and illogical such blatant hypocrisy proves them to be.

No-one knows the actual cause of Brenda Leyland's death yet. But those who have gone down the route of making her a martyr to their cause have done her no justice at all. They have stolen from her Facebook page, an image of her son, to use as a banner for their hatred of the McCanns. Do they really think she would have wanted that? Is it not bloody well obvious to them that was the very last thing she would have wanted? They have accepted her vile abuse of a witness in the Investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann as part of the hagiography which they now embrace. They have whitewashed over the hate which they unleashed on her for her failure to do the impossible and answer Brunt on air with reasoned arguments - a failure that others among them are not so willing to admit. Till her death there were others among the hate scum who were proudly boasting how they had refused Brunt an interview, then there was silence on the matter from them. They know they failed to answer him and they know the reason. They are cowards and they have no answers to the reasonable questions Brunt was posing. There is, as Brenda Leyland eventually admitted, no entitlement in this society to abuse others. It is illegal and none of the hounders can defend that abuse in public or they would do so. Even their legal guru, the Harlow halfwit failed miserably and was duly sentenced for his utterly feeble attempts to justify his actions.

A woman died in a lonely place in a hotel room in Leicester a few weeks ago. The Coroner will, having seen all the evidence, determine as best anyone can how she died. The fact that Brenda Leyland's abusive online activities had come to light may have caused her to flee her village from shame and may have in some way contributed to her death. As yet we simply do not know.

But one thing is for sure, had she not been an online abuser, had she not played online games attempting to expose the identity of a witness in the case for her own amusement, had she not been encouraged in her online activities by other abusive individuals, then she would not have been exposed for her family and neighbours and the British public to see. To my mind it is the duty of the press to expose vile abusive behaviour of all kinds whether it is by politicians or by little old ladies who pretend to be sweet and neighbourly but are in reality no such thing. There should be no hiding behind a screen of anonymity for those who wish to abuse others and damage their lives in the way that Brenda Leyland was doing. I look forward to each and every one of the nasty online abusers being exposed in the press. If they feel they may not be able to handle such exposure then perhaps they already know that what they are doing is wrong.

516694945034698752|Mon Sep 29 21:04:09 +0000 2014|@siamesey Mod is a total F**ktard, I despise him

516291666458984448|Sun Sep 28 18:21:40 +0000 2014|@PORTUGALONLINE @LarryPKay #mccann How delightful, as she peddles her arse to strangers, a perfect Shill match= low life misfits

Twitter, Facebook and other social media sites provide users with an all-too-easy forum for publishing serious libels and, worse, hate speech. The past year has highlighted the dark side of social media, with people seemingly only too willing to abuse and harass others (often anonymously or using a false name) on the assumption that they will never be brought to account. At its most extreme is the case of Brenda Leyland, the 63-year-old who, having been outed by Sky News over her malicious campaign against the parents of Madeleine McCann, took her own life.

Win ‏@winnower1 33m33 minutes ago
@TandemVipera Brenda was NOT a troll & Adam Tudor can't claim that Brenda took her own life. Cause of death not yet established. #McCann

Denise Thomson ‏@Syn0nymph 2h2 hours ago
@winnower1 @TandemVipera I hope Brenda's family contact him for retraction. Note last link on this image too #mccann  

Peace, Love, Justice ‏@LarryPKay 2h2 hours ago
@carterruck "Brenda Leyland, who over her malicious campaign against the parents of Madeleine #McCann, took her own life."
LIBEL RIGHT THERE

Peace, Love, Justice ‏@LarryPKay 2h2 hours ago
And who the F**K are @carterruck to decide if what #BrendaLeyland wrote is MALICIOUS? #mccann toadies aren't QUALIFIED to JUDGE that, Adam.

Paul Rees Carter Ruck are hubristic twats who believe they rule the country; what can we expect from such emotionally unintelligent throwbacks, really?

Christopher Brooks Someone needs to sue the arse off them, fight fire with fire...toerags..