From another forum with thanks also for the comments.
Hutton is putting on a fine display of defending the indefensible on not-Bennett's. She appears to think that non-white children can't be missing children:
That would be the gangs operating in Rochdale and other cities - one can only assume she was too busy pitchforking the McCanns to notice....
Children go missing all over the world and no-one cares - especially not the likes of Mutton and her chums, that don't seem to think trafficked Asian children have any rights. She also trivialises what she describes as child porn. Why call it that, making it sound the same as the 'adult porn' she appears to favour?
Why not call it what it is, images of child abuse - of real children really being abused?
Hutton again:
Hutton is putting on a fine display of defending the indefensible on not-Bennett's. She appears to think that non-white children can't be missing children:
So, she thinks that if Asian children are trafficked and murdered, they aren't missing....go figure. Hutton goes on:In trying to figure out who the victims are, I watched a video of Jim Gamble and he was discussing Missing Children, the charity, and the reason why Madeleine's case has been so unique. He mentioned incredible figures, 100,000 people go missing every years, etc, and he itemised what becomes of them and gives an example of 99 still unaccounted for. This where I become confused. Because of those 99, apparently many are children who have been brought into the country illegally from places like Vietnam and Cambodia and they are being forced to work in marijuana factories, as slaves etc. He then said these are children who fall under the net without parents looking for them, and nameless. Which had me rather confused as to how they form part of the 99 still missing.
When a child goes missing anywhere in the world, the news become global within hours, if not minutes. It is worth looking at the Wiki charts of abductions, to see how rare child abduction really is, the Lindbergh baby is just one page up from Madeleine. There was an horrific case in Belgium, where children were literally being snatched off the streets. It makes chilling reading, and the scandal went right to the heart of the Belgian government, so I accept that paedo gangs do exist, but in Belgium, the entire country was looking for the children who had been abducted. If gangs of paedophiles are operating here in the UK, who are the victims?
That would be the gangs operating in Rochdale and other cities - one can only assume she was too busy pitchforking the McCanns to notice....
Children go missing all over the world and no-one cares - especially not the likes of Mutton and her chums, that don't seem to think trafficked Asian children have any rights. She also trivialises what she describes as child porn. Why call it that, making it sound the same as the 'adult porn' she appears to favour?
Why not call it what it is, images of child abuse - of real children really being abused?
Hutton again:
Worried about something, is she?Clearly hundreds of thousands of people do use their credit cards to watch porn online, and in doing so, they could inadvertently link to sites that could get them arrested. The margins for error are so fuzzy that almost anyone could be incriminated.
