ANOTHER 'JOURNALIST' HAS CONTACTED THE WORST OF THE ANTIS - SO THEY CLAIM

Truthiness2 » Sat Oct 10, 2015 2:07 pm

Hael wrote:
She insists she has nothing to do with any of this, yet the evidence is mounting.

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL 1h1 hour ago
@RothleyPillow I don't have to get out of anything. It has nothing to do with me. @LoveRandomleigh #McCann
Truth & Justice for Maddie

Of course it is! The 'Hello you' tweet shows she knows that man very, very well. She's one of McBadden's tag team. She detests TB.

And the minute it happened - with nobody even making a connection at all to JCL - she was demanding not to be mentioned in tweets about it. Why? Nobody had linked her at that time, yet she was screaming to have her name removed from tweets about it? There's only one reason imo, she knew it was a disaster and that a plan had gone very wrong.

Hael » Sat Oct 10, 2015 1:48 pm
Besides the ongoing Souster-gate.... Going on her behaviour on Twitter and her relentless campaign against the McCanns, her spreading of misinformation and utter vile tweets...How on God's green earth is this woman allowed to have been in politics?

Rob1 » Sat Oct 10, 2015 2:15 pm
I see that Sal has posted the revelationary post which I was going to search for.  (link at top of this post)

Hael - the name 'Christine' has been mentioned by various people. I do not know if this is the real name or a false clue given by the person herself. Her name could just as easily be Rosemary or Thyme.

She certainly has a sense of self-importance with the boasts of office within the Labour Party. A reputation for creating trouble is justified with the associations she makes on Twitter as well as the 'behind scenes' activities on her forum she administrates. Some of us have seen the screenshots taken from there with the supposed personal information of 'pros' and 'antis' alike contributed for the purpose of cyberstalking and domination.

Joana Morais and Tony Bennett are just two of the victims of this campaign to smear and dominate. The question of 'why?' remains unanswered. 'Who?' may be simpler.

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL 3h3 hours ago
@KRotcepsni You can repeat that forever but it won't change the fact that this very nasty business is nothing to do with me. #McCann

Anthony Bennett
47s47 seconds ago
Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos
For how long @JillyCL have you been plotting with @QUEENdePORTUAL, #MarkSouster & #BrianKennedy? - Tell #McCann followers what your game is

Anthony Bennett
3m3 minutes ago
Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos
#McCann Time for you @JillyCL to come clean about your support for #RobertMurat & your relationships with @SousterRugby & @QUEENdePORTUGAL

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 6m6 minutes ago
So @JillyCL you've unfollowed @QUEENdePORTUGAL today. It would be wise for others to follow suit and avoid her cunning little #McCann games

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL 5m5 minutes ago
@zampos Why don't you mind your own business, you meddling menace. And I suggest you remove the libel about me from your cesspit. #McCann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@ZAMPOS makes a complete dick of himself, yet again
#Soustergate #McCann #infamyinfamyallgotinfamy

Lily Wells Well I've learnt a lot over this, that Isabelle is a Journo...and that Joana didn't get on with Isabelle....

Lily Wells
Lily Wells ...wonder if Isabelle, can get to the bottom of the Souster business if he trust her and are friends

Zora McCartney
Zora McCartney I hope so but wouldn't be surprised if he backs off for good now. Same happened last year. Wasn't quite so public but was enough to spook him for quite a while.

If Mcfaddentroll is a 'journo' then I am an astronaut. And the only thing that game-playing troll is likely to get to the bottom of, is a crack pipe. I am no great fan of Morais, but to give her her due, she realised what a complete fraud McFadden is very quickly.

But not before McFadden had done severe damage to the so-called 'anti' cause - just like the rest of the attention-seeking harpies, egotists and drama queens.

And Souster can't be much of a journalist if he runs away so easily. After all, if he wanted to talk to Bennett, all he had to do was email him.

Souster-Gate - A Question raised in another forum about JillyCL
Post Tony Bennett Today at 10:39 pm

Souster-Gate - A Question raised in another forum about JillyCL.

I apologise in advance to all forum members and guests who are not interested in the minutiae of this subject, but a matter of interest regarding the tweeter 'JillyCL' has arisen in another forum, where I have been asked a question. And I've decided to answer the question here.

The forum concerned is called 'StopTheMyths', and is pro-McCann. Its stated purpose is to debunk the 'myths' allegedly propagated on here and other McCann-sceptic forums. This forum and the posts made here are frequently pulled apart over there. They are no friends of ours.

However, on this one rare occasion, it seems the two forums have a common interest, namely who is behind 'Souster-Gate'?

They want to know, and so do we.

So far, we have established beyond doubt that Mark Souster's approach was not genuine, for the blindingly obvious reason that he, better than most, must know that the paper he sometimes writes for, Murdoch's Sunday Times, would never in a miliion years publish a McCann-sceptic article.

In his 'Direct Messages' to the forum-owner, Souster directly named his two main collaborators, in order, as 'JillyCL' and Isabelle McFadden. And clearly these two appear to be the main 'plotters', though there may be others involved.

To give 'StopTheMyths' credit where credit is due, they have so far carried out a worthwhile analysis of 'Souster-Gate'. Two posters there, 'catkins' and 'Rob1', have publicly asked me this question: Do I know the real identity of 'JillyCL'?

They ask that because many years ago, she stated that she loathed me, having to to know me through our shared membership of Harlow Constituency Labour Party, of which I was a paid-up member 1985-1997. She claimed I had been 'nearly thrown out' of the party, though she has since admitted hat she left the party years before I did. The alegation is untrue.

For years I have wracked my brain to think who this person might be, and tonight I think I have got the answer.

That's because someone on 'StopTheMyths' posted up these two suggestions:

A. Maybe Bennett knows who she is and she is back tracking now...afraid that he will out her in his normal fashion...This could get very interesting.

B. Perhaps she is lying about knowing him and uses the lie to smear him? She certainly seems to be lying about no involvement with Mark Souster. Who would trust this woman? Only desperate Mccann trolls.

Up to now, maybe naively, I have always believed that I must have inflicted some deep hurt on 'JillyCL', and have many times pondered who she might be. Now, it is as though the fog has suddenly lifted, because someone at 'StopTheMyths' has raised the possibility that the whole Labour Party story was a complete fabrication from the beginning, and therefore a very nasty and deliberate smear.

I never thought I would say this, but for the first and possibly the last time: 'Thank you, StopTheMyths'.

For the record, having published false information about my 'nearly' being expelled from the Labour Party, she added this:

"I loathe the man. IMO he’s an opportunistic, self-seeking, self-publicising fool who will jump on any passing bandwagon as a platform and springboard for to promote his own vile extreme right-wing agenda".

I have also wracked my brains for a possible reason for her vitriolic opposition to me for 6 years or more. The only tjhingI can think of is this. She has routinely insisted that Robert Murat has nothing whasoever to do with this case, whether pre or post Madeleine's disappearance. Whereas I have challenged e.g. his lies when first questioned by the PJ, and raised queries about why the McCann Team and members of the British security services collaborated to make Murat the prime suspect.

Final word, then, on 'JillyCL' from StopTheMyths:

QUOTE:

[JillyCL] certainly has a sense of self-importance with the boasts of office within the Labour Party. A reputation for creating trouble is justified with the associations she makes on Twitter as well as the 'behind scenes' activities on her forum she administrates. Some of us have seen the screenshots taken from there with the supposed personal information of 'pros' and 'antis' alike contributed for the purpose of cyberstalking and domination.

Joana Morais and Tony Bennett are just two of the victims of this campaign to smear and dominate. The question of 'why?' remains unanswered. 'Who?' may be simpler.

UNQUOTE

Postby sal » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:22 pm
Emily Thorne I am livid Zora, I really am that should have been kept confidential and given Mark a chance! He will be hounded now frown emoticon

Marie Smith When did this happen before Zora?

Zora McCartney About a year ago Marie. Not sure if the tweets still exist or if they were on the tag. But yeah, he first started enquiring around this time last year.

Marie Smith Interesting..thanks...i had a gander on his twitter feed and didn't see anything on it re madeleine til July this year...but that was just his timeline.

Zora McCartney Yeah, I don't think he'd have replied publicly but basically some people got word that he was interested and got in touch to belittle his source for and scared him off. Not a nice episode.

Marie Smith ffs we all want the bloody same thing..this whole faction thing is nuts !!!

Zora McCartney I know *sigh* Bennett publishing his DM though - that's got to cause major embarrassment and scupper any chance of him sticking his neck out any further frown emoticon

Rob1 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:37 am

Rothley Pillowcase™ ‏@RothleyPillow 5h5 hours ago Ealing, London
@SousterRugby I won't put up DMs of isa-gob forwarding your msgs to every fkr on #McCann who's a bit of noise #ShesSuchAnAttentionSeeker :-)

Rothley Pillowcase™ ‏@RothleyPillow 5h5 hours ago Ealing, London
@SousterRugby You backed the wrong horses, didn't you. We've ALL done it! > We've all made tw@ts of ourselves trusting divas on #McCann :-))

Rothley Pillowcase™ ‏@RothleyPillow 5h5 hours ago Ealing, London
@SousterRugby :-) #Pheww Was concerned about you running away like a big Jessie. Unblock me. Save yourself logging in and out eh :-) #McCann

Rob1 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:15 am

Rothley Pillowcase™ ‏@RothleyPillow 24m24 minutes ago Ealing, London
@LoveRandomleigh Would you tell the evil #McCann cult on Stop The Myths I can STOP one myth re @SousterRugby & isa-gob instantly! :-)) 1/2

Rothley Pillowcase™ ‏@RothleyPillow 18m18 minutes ago Ealing, London
@DaSteelManUK SAME #Fb #McCann gang-stalker who blackmails people ALSO infiltrated the not-@zampos forum! #FACT Fwded admin stuff all over!

Rothley Pillowcase™ ‏@RothleyPillow 21m21 minutes ago Ealing, London
@LoveRandomleigh Saw a post by a #Fb #McCann blackmailing gang-stalker who sez @SousterRugby backed off > IT WAS COZ ISA-GOB FWDED HIS MSGS!

So, now Bennett, of all people, is being accused of altering screengrabs,

By hatertrolls that hang around with McFadden, Queen of the fabricated 'screengrab'. Heaven knows what is really going on here, but one or two strands are beginning to stand out.

One strand is the notorious game-playing trolls that circulate round McFadden.

The other is people in the pay of the Murdoch empire. Make of that what you will.

Zora ‏@real_zm_ 3h3 hours ago
@zampos @SuppDoc I don't always agree with your actions Tony but don't believe I've accused you of anything. #mccann

Zora ‏@real_zm_ 3h3 hours ago
@zampos @SuppDoc "hello Hunnybunch" greeting & I haven't even suggested that was your doing as you weren't part of the pm conversation

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 6m6 minutes ago
So, @real_zm_ you & @SuppDoc admit I didn't alter any screenshot, time now to remove all the other false things you've said about me #McCann

Zora ‏@real_zm_ 3h3 hours ago
@zampos @SuppDoc I haven't said anything about you. I think the date format is simply different hence not altered other than to remove...

@ aiyoyo The claims that BK has 'changed sides' and is 'no longer supporting the McCanns' and 'was tricked into supporting them' etc. come from that never-ending source of false rumours and false claims and dirty tricks..


.'The Fabulous One', also known as 'The Queen of Portugal':

As has now been extensively revealed, she has made claims of having many chats to Brian Kennedy. Further, she claims that Kennedy has praised her for being (ahem) 'a powerful speaker'. That may be true, I suspect she might be susceptible to a shovel-load of flattery. There is no other source for this rumour, and, honestly, looking at Brian Kennedy's record in all this, he was powerfully involved in the McCann Team from the 'get-go'. I think that now we know of Brian Kennedy having been friends with Mark Souster for a decade or more, and now that we know for a fact about all The Fabulous One's and JillyCL's mnay tweets to and from Mark Souster, the four of them:- Kennedy, Souster, Fabulous and JillyCL, have been plotting something dark for some time.

@ Ladyinred I know 'The Rooster' will take this the right way, and not get the hump (because he wants to be here), but 'The Rooster' lives in Spain in Metodo 3-land, close by where Kennedy migrates to his villa in the late spring every year, is a great pal of Kennedy, and is only here to obfuscate. He's good at pretending to be a McCann-sceptic - but not as good as he thinks he is. There were calls for him to be banned, but the forum-owner felt that his 'pretendery' was so obvious that he was harmless.

Hael » Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:45 pm

Rob1 wrote:
People are asking many questions about the background to The Times rugby journalist Mark Souster's 'alleged; private communications with Mccann trolls.

Are the tweets genuine or faked?
If fake, why?
If real. WHY?
Why was Jill Havern the target?
Was Jill Havern a footstep towards Tony Bennett?
There has been much hatred towards Tony Bennett recently, was this a plot to destroy him?
Why would a respectable journalist involve himself with low level Mccann trolls who have a case history of creating false IDs and photoshopping comments (tweets)?
Why would a respectable journalist risk his reputation to write an anti Mccann article with low level trolls as source providers?
What is the connection between Souster and notorious Mccann troll 'Jillycl' that permitted 'intimate' tweet?

Why is a sports journalist/reporter wanting to do an article on the McCanns?
Why is JillyCL denying any involvement when she was mentioned by him?
What is the relationship between JillyCL and McFadden?
What chased Souster off the first time he attempted to assist the anti McCanns with an article on the McCanns?
Why did Souster close, then open then close his Twitter account?

Tony Bennett Yesterday at 10:17 pm

I don't think Mark Souster feels in any way 'persecuted'. What, by a few tweets?

Embarrassed, more like, as he and his mates Isabelle McFadden and JillyCL try to work out how to extricate themselves from a sticky mess entirely of their own creation.

As for Hutton's tweet, that is close to being her lowest and most cringeworthy yet.

I think we all have to bear in mind that she has a constant need to criticise and target people and try to bring them down - because of her very deep inner feelings of inadequacy, sadly caused largely by her mother virtually abandoning her for the high life and all her lovers, as she sets out in her book, Cry and You Cry Alone. True, it was a bad start in life, but others overcome that bad start and move on and up

Tony Bennett Yesterday at 10:51 pm

(to Get'emGoncalo)  She berates you for your supposed actions when, like most of us, we had never heard of her before the editors and producers of Rupert Murdoch's SKY News blasted her all over their news programmes four times an hour for a whole day.

But let's just stop and think for a moment about one fabulous and royal personage who DID harass Brenda Leyland in the final days of her life:

Yes, the self-absorbed one from California, the one who calls herself 'McFabulous' and the 'Queen of Portugal'.

What we do know is that this wicked little trickster (backed and supported on Twitter many times by other 'sisterhood' members Poulton and Hutton) took it upon herself to invent yet another new username for herself - 'kiki' - and a pro-McCann persona to go with it.

And then in the very days before Brunt 'outed' Brenda, McFadden was attacking and 'squishing' (to coin a phrase) Brenda Leyland on her 'sweepyface' Twitter account.

Now then, Hutton, shouldn't you and your friend Poulton be rounding on McFadden after what she did to Brenda - rather than Jill?  

snook Yesterday at 11:52 pm
She doesn't vilify? She's attacking Tony & this forum yet again. Her latest 'addendum' is below contempt. The woman has no self awareness.  She writes that Sky wouldn't target the forum or Tony via Souster yet states that Brenda was specifically stalked and picked as a weak link because of her mental state.

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Brunt informed of her mental condition some hours after the encounter?

Her gospel has it that Neither Tony or the forum make an iota of difference to the outcome of the case yet seems now to be attacking because Souster was going to be the light at the end of the dark tunnel. Why I can't think seeing as her best matey is going to solve the case and see the guilty behind bars.

She cannot stand that Jill & Tony saw through him and the grubby little plot had been exposed.

Post  Tony Bennett Today at 6:55 am

   @snook wrote:
   Her gospel has it that neither Tony or the forum make an iota of difference to the outcome of the case - yet seems now to be attacking because Souster was going to be the light at the end of the dark tunnel. Why I can't think, seeing as her best matey [Sonia Pou;ton] is going to solve the case and see the guilty behind bars.

But is Sonia Poulton ever going to produce that documentary?

If you look at the screed below, as it is currently on her website, soniapoulton.co.uk, there is surely a bit missing in the list of her current work and interests. (I am not posting the rest of this as it is long, but you can find it on her website or on CMoMM at this link, page 15 (remove xxxx to access the link) xxxxhttp://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11993p140-journalist-from-rupert-murdoch-paper-the-sunday-times-breaks-ranks-and-offers-to-tell-the-truth-about-madeleine-mccann-in-his-newspaper)

Can anyone else find the bit that says:

"Since October 2014, I have been working on a major documentary: 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann: The War of Information". Packed with new revelations and some major shocks, this will expose all the contradictions in the McCanns' official account of events, and explain what really happened to Madeleine McCann. It will also expose how SKY News hounded a Leicestershire woman to death, shaming her as a so-called 'troll' when in  fact her tweets showed that she knew more than most of us what was likely to have happened to Madeleine".

If anyone else does find it, please tell me.

There's no mention either of her sticking a microphone into Iain Duncan-Smith's face and saying: 'You are a mass-murderer'.

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 4h4 hours ago
@abuseofpower SOUSTERGATE message was from @Sousterrugby. He denies it. So who did it? @JillyCL, @real_zm_? My money's on @QUEENdePORTUGAL

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 3h3 hours ago
@abuseofpower So the SOUSTERGATE plotters are @QUEENdePORTUGAL, @JillyCL, @real_zm_ & @Sousterrugby? Anyone else? #WhatWereTheyUpTo? #McCann

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 3h3 hours ago
@abuseofpower Disclosure of all contacts between @QUEENdePORTUGAL @JillyCL @real_zm_ @Sousterrugby & #BrianKennedy would be useful #McCann

The creation, development and growth of THE NASTY NETWORK

Post Tony Bennett Today at 9:41 am

OK, so...

Hutton on Jill and me: 'Scum'
Poulton on CMOMM: 'Cess-pit'
Poulton on me today: 'Crank'

And so the abuse goes on.

Isn't what we see going on here the development over the past 15 months or so of a NASTY NETWORK of individuals who associate primarily to undermine the work being done here by members of CMOMM? - and has nothing whatsoever to do with the main stated purpose of this forum, researching what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

Clearly the Mark Souster episode was another attempt to embarrass and undermine CMOMM, because there is no way on earth he had any hope whatsoever of getting a McCann-sceptic article into 'my' paper, the Sunday Times. Anyone who thinks he did have such a chance is fooling themselves and everyone else.

Whoever sent that Direct Message (come on, will someone own up) was being deceitful, was lying, was attempting to con us here on CMOMM. So they too are part of the NASTY NETWORK trying to destabilise CMOMM. So that includes Isabelle McFadden & JillyCL as more members of the NASTY NETWORK.

But we've now seen more members of this NASTY NETWORK emerge - the people who on FB and Twitter back their heroes Hutton and Poulton - folk like Ben Thompson, Zora McCartney and Paul Rees, all of whom use aggressive and, well, nasty language in their tweets.

You would think all these people in the NASTY NETWORK would be pleased that there exists a forum with thousands of threads of information, research and informed discussion AND has far more guests and members than any other Madeleine McCann discussion forum - with nearly 50 new members having joined in the first 10 days of this month.

It looks on the surface like a simple case of spite, jealousy and envy.

But maybe with the involvement of McCann Team member Brian Kennedy, Murdoch man Mark Souster and serial con-artist Isabelle McFadden, and Poulton being contactable at sky.com and clearly on some sort of contract with the Murdoch empire, it could be something more sinister than that.

Rob1 » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:13 am
There are many attacks on Tony Bennett now. One in particular is disturbing and perhaps he will seek a lawyer? Certainly he should make a screenshot of the Cristabel tweet implying him as a '#kiddy diddler' (pedophile?) if he makes her angry. False accusations of this nature should always be taken seriously as many are made in revenge, but can sabotage the integrity of those that are genuine. I think this is the same person who made offensive remarks about Brenda and her family. Similar to saying that she killed herself to hurt the Mccanns and to protect some strangers she met online and that her sons should be proud of these actions.

The Mccann debate gets ridiculous now. Very dirty and desperate.

As for Rugbyman, I think he has had a close escape. The exposure of some messages saying he is 'sceptic' and having 'vouching' intimacy with Isabelle McFadden and Jillycl (two loud women who are suddenly shy), is not as big a transgression as it might have developed.

Perhaps his eyes have been opened?

Add this one

Cristobell Author – ‏@RosalindaHu

Criticise my dead mother @zampos and I will tear you to shreds. You have been warned. #uwontlikemewhenimangry #McCann #kiddydiddler
2:25 p.m. - 11 Oct 2015

Chinagirl » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:56 am
Given how often Bennett has himself accused totally innocent people of heinous crimes (McCanns, Murat, David Payne), I find it hard to have any sympathy for him now.

However, Hutton's threat is pretty much beyond the pale, but not surprising given her unsavoury character.

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL 19m19 minutes ago
@Honeyblade1S Hi Honey, please will you knock my name out of your tweets mentioning Bennett or Havern. It has zero to do with me. #McCann

Anonymous11 October 2015 at 21:33
If I remember correctly you (Ros) said that you didn't bother reading bennett's comments anymore and wouldn't be commenting on him anymore!

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton12 October 2015 at 11:02
21:33 Whilst I am able to ignore most of Bennett's attention seeking antics, I will not let him get away with destroying other people's work and hounding people off twitter. The man is a 'troll' in the true sense of the word, in order for HIS 'work' to be the definitive word on the Madeleine case, he must destroy the work of everyone else. 'The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing'. (Edmund Burke).

His collaboration with Richard Hall has not been a success. Just as people don't want to read his rambling sermons, they don't want to watch 4+ hours of videos that take forever to get to the point. If Bennett has invested in these videos and was hoping to make a fortune, then I would imagine he is very disappointed indeed. His Madeleine Fund didn't make him rich either. My sympathies lie with Richard Hall, he has been well and truly hoodwinked.

Bennett fears Sonia's documentary, because, in a nutshell, it will knock the socks off his own. Sonia works in the MSM, and that fact alone consumes him with envy, no-one is asking him onto Sky TV to comment on current affairs. Sonia is popular with the general public, people want to hear what she has to say, Tony has an audience of 2, 3 tops, if his polls on CMoMM are anything to go by.

The current smell of burning martyr that emits from Jill's forum is once again a manufactured product of Bennett's twisted mind. He has interpreted the casual enquiry of a journalist as a fiendish plot to 'get him' devised by none other than Rupert Murdoch himself.

To justify his absurd claim, both he and Jill Havern, are now laying the blame for Brenda Leyland's death at the door of Sky News, the media outlet, rather than at the door of Gerry (I want an example made) McCann and Jim (lets get them all in the dock) Gamble. Once again, he and CMoMM have lost the plot and are focused on shooting the messengers.

Watching twitter these past few days, has been like watching the Brenda Leyland tragedy all over again, as Bennett, Jill Havern and the low lives from Stop the Myths, hound and persecute Mark Souster relentlessly, to the point where they have driven the poor man off twitter. It is a sickening spectacle and one that I won't stand by and watch in silence.

Should add, whilst Bennett and Havern were lifting my tweets in seconds, there was one that they pointedly ignored. I wonder why that was?