From Myths with thanks to tigerloaf.
tigerloaf » Sun Feb 08, 2015 7:51 pm
I see the shrieky harridan, Sonia Poulton, with the thuggish looking boyfriend, Lee Ryan, who has a penchant for trying to appear macho is now upset that I am asking pertinent questions about her and about the way Sky News has recently used her.
Her problem is that absolutely every single thing I have said about her is the truth. Every question I have asked about her is relevant. And the twit who has given her a name to follow up is as well-informed about my identity as Hutton is about legal cases the McCanns are involved in, ie completely wrong.
Perhaps this shrieky, foul-mouthed woman would, instead of trying to pursue some kind of vendetta against the wrong person, be better occupying her time with answering some of the pertinent questions posed to her.
Incidentally I do have video evidence of her being very shrieky at people if she requires it. And I have already posted full proof of just what an obscene woman she is in a post above this. Perhaps Sonia Poulton thinks it clever and big to use foul comments in her tweets? Perhaps she thinks doing so makes her look more like a journalist? Or perhaps she still hankers after approval from those rapping hoodlums she used to hang around for titbits of information to pad her fluffy anecdotal articles?
When Sonia Poulton gives us a few examples of genuinely researched articles by her then I might consider removing the "so-called" from my comments when referring to her as a "so-called" journalist. Journalism does not consist of submitting anecdotal fluff which is all I can find in her listed portfolio.
Stories such as this which is absolutely typical of the Sonia Poulton ouvre would be far better suited to the £30 for your shocking story pages of cheapo magazines than a newspaper which clearly was having a slow day in this case.
When Sonia Poulton explains why she shamelessly uses her own child as the subject of many of these fluff anecdotal articles, on one occasion leaving no doubt that her own selfish actions may well have damaged the child then she might garner some respect from me.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1290135/I-admit-I-smoked-500-cigarettes-I-pregnant--Sonia-Poulton-reveals-dark-secret.html
...
Like a zombie I walked into an unknown newsagents - I couldn't deal with the questions from my friendly local - and I purchased a pack of ten Silk Cut. Then, I went home, checked I was alone, and lit one up. The high was tremendous and so, for that matter, was the low minutes later. I tried to rationalise my actions.
It wasn't my fault. It was an addiction. My mum had done it and I was alright (wasn't I?). And yet the nagging in my brain told me that my actions were reprehensible. I couldn't escape that. You might think this would stop me. Sadly no.
From that point onwards I had two cigarettes almost every day of my pregnancy, which amounted to my unborn child being subjected to more than 500 cigarettes.
...
When Sonia Poulton explains satisfactorily the hypocrisy of her position that she is allowed to doorstep the McCanns and their children when two police forces have found no evidence of any crime by them because it is a justifiable tool of journalism but Martin Brunt is a figure of hate and an evil man for having doorstepped extremely politely a person who was a proven online abuser and troll and who had previously been in contact with him, then I might find it a bit easier to take her seriously.
When Sonia Poulton openly accepts that her dalliance with the nutcase/fruitloop, Icke, who believes the Queen is a lizard was ill-advised not for financial reasons but for the simple reason that no serious journalist would ever get in bed with such a fantasist then I might take her more seriously.
When Sonia Poulton owns up to Rosalinda Hutton whose vulnerable mental state she was perfectly aware of before handing her over to Murdoch's empire to be chewed up and spit out and exposed to seven million people as a troll and apologises for putting her in this invidious position then I might take her more seriously. After all, were Hutton to do the unthinkable and take her life after the horrendous battering she has received from other sick anti-McCanns then who would be ultimately responsible? Personally, I think Sonia Poulton would be because she knew the state of mind of Hutton, she knew about her mental problems and her reliance on drugs to control them.
When Sonia Poulton stops using the idiotic Lee Ryan with his macho posing as a Jack the Lad with big guns (everybody knows that the bigger the car or gun that a man poses with the smaller a certain part of their anatomy is likely to be) as her thuggish sidekick on Twitter and in real life, then perhaps some people might start to see her as a more serious candidate for the title of journalist. Personally I think her latching onto this serial petty criminal (proven fact) and big-time loser (proven fact) shows that she has a personality deficit but no doubt she will shriek that in this world of free speech I am not allowed to say such nasty things about her and her latest bed mate. Tough, free speech doesn't only apply to shrieky women. I have the right to make a judgement and express it too.
Sonia Poulton is the big "I am" when shouting the questions at people. I saw her on video shouting daft questions at coppers outside the PM's country house. I saw her shouting daft questions in London and chasing round to ask cop after cop who she should be directing questions at. And I saw how upset when her questions were fobbed off she became. She was livid.
But she is the pathetic little wimp when others asked questions for her to answer. She runs away calling the questioner a troll.
So I do not expect Sonia Poulton the so-called journalist to answer anything.
But I think it worth my while pointing out what a hypocritical woman she truly is.
ETA: I have just edited the post I made above to make my points clearer.
But this final thought for the night deserves a post all to itself.
When Sonia Poulton finally dredges up even the tiniest bit of skill at investigative journalism she might realise just how bloody stupid she is going to look pursuing entirely the wrong person in her desperate and sickeningly hypocritical attempt to "out" me.
But as her only sources for this home movie that she is making with her latest bedmate and the chap whose claim to fame is that he filmed pimples being squeezed, are the self-confessed insane anti-McCanns like Hutton, the patently obviously insane anti-McCanns like Synonymph and Rothleypillow, the proven liars like Bennett, the complete nutjobs like Birch, vile criminals like Deborah Butler/Carlisle and so on then I can be pretty certain that they are not going to come up trumps with anything that might actually help her get anywhere near the truth. Not one among them has managed it on any aspect of the McCann case so far so why should this endeavour be the exception. I look forward to watching her and her "researchers" spinning around in vain.
It is hard to find a single article that she has written anywhere which is not simply autobiographical fluff like the two I linked to above. Subject matter for cheapo mags and not real journalism.
And yes, you are right the fact of the matter is that she cannot control herself in many ways.
She could not control her addiction to cigarettes even though she knew she was probably harming her unborn child.
She cannot control her dependence on a certain type of man (the emotionally deficient and frequently abusive type). Even the fact that her father frittered away his inheritance has been mirrored in this latest bedmate who frittered away his lottery win.
She cannot even control her foul mouth even when trying to persuade the world that she has the right to be seen as a real journalist.
She admits to being (and certainly presents as) a very emotionally deficient person with many psychological problems that have never been fully dealt with.
In other words she fits in very well with the anti-McCann haters, large numbers of whom have also described their own psychological and emotional problems.
Such a shame that these people cannot get the medical help they need and instead have to get their buzz from being outrageous online or from resorting to addictive substances. It doesn't surprise me at all that Hutton and Poulton get along so well.
