tigerloaf » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:08 am
The numpties are bouncing around in their box of froggery at a phenomenal rate at the moment but no matter how high they bounce they cannot dispute two categorical facts.
Richard D Hall is a conspiracy nutter with no journalistic credentials whatsoever, and whose entire opus of blogs and blog videos takes us back to his central point that everybody but him and his cronies is failing to realise that the world is run by ultra-secret groups (more secret even than the incredibly secret Bilderberg group) and that the secret services are interacting constantly with alien life and that the USA has a fleet of inter-planetary spacecraft and even that secret energy weapons that were used to demolish their own Twin Towers on 9/11 and to kill their own people. Hall's turgid videos are not in the main researched by him, though there is a small amount of new stuff, but rely very heavily on the "research" done by Bennett who has been proven to be wrong so frequently and even has a criminal conviction to go with his poor "research" and the likes of Hideho (peless) who has been shown to be wrong in so many of her claims that it is almost funny now. These videos also rely heavily on the claims of the convicted liar, Amaral. Hall's blog gets (we are told by the liar, Tony Bennett) gets about 2,000 hits a day (no indication as to how many individuals that accounts for as almost everybody going to any site makes a whole series of separate hits when doing so). Perhaps over a matter of a few months he might count ten thousand individuals as visitors to his site though I think that is probably very optimistic.
On the other hand, Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan are professional prize-winning journalists with decades of professional journalistic experience and whose books always give meticulous and accurate detail of the research done, sources used, persons interviewed and material studied. There is a great deal of difference between the primary research done by Summers and Swan and the secondary "research" and Googling done by the likes of Bennett, Lizzy Taylor and Richard D Hall.
How many witnesses has Bennett ever bothered to interview? (I am told that on the occasions when he has tried the individuals have shunned him with the longest bargepole that could be mustered. His reputation as a crank goes before him.) How many opportunities has Lizzy Taylor failed to grasp to correct the lies within her flawed videos? Summers and Swan are open to correction and do when necessary correct the material that they produce. Their books sell in their tens of thousands. Their work is serialised to millions. Not really a contest is it? Even Bennett admits they will wipe the floor with Hall over viewing and reading figures.
So I ask Tony Bennett and the other numpties who are still for some reason trying to pretend Hall is on a par with Summers and Swan, who really is going to be listened to by sane members of society? Who is going to reach the vast proportion of the population with their television appearances and with their serialisation in one of the most widely read papers in the world?
And I also ask Tony Bennett and the other numpties who should be believed by sane members of society? The nutty conspiracy theorist with no journalistic credentials, Hall, or the reputable and meticulous researchers, interviewers and evidence gatherers with decades of journalistic experience and references?
And I also point out to Tony Bennett and the other numpties who are in bed with the conspiracy nutter, Hall, and his secret energy weapons and fleet of inter-planetary spaceships that the vast majority of society don't give two hoots about their flawed "research", their disgusting insistence that the rule of law be broken and that two people who have been declared as not being of any interest at all in the search for Madeleine (and against whom there is not a shred of evidence) should be considered guilty without a trial and without evidence.
That is where these morons fail. That is where Summers and Swan will no doubt succeed. They will show that there is evidence pointing to other scenarios than the one which the haters, the hounders, the numpties and the obscene scum they hang out with are blindly fixated on. Summers and Swan have not come to this case in the same way as Bennett, Taylor, Brown, Hutton et al with firmly fixed beliefs about the McCanns which have to be proven but have come to the case to examine ALL the available evidence. Summers and Swan have not been blindly led down a single path by a disgraced, ex-cop whose criminal record proves he is not someone who can be trusted.
I look forward to reading the most definitive account of the case to date, written by authors who have absolutely no axe to grind and who have looked in detail at all the available evidence. And I also look forward to their take on the hate campaign against the parents that the likes of Bennett, Brown, Hutton, Taylor, Butler, McCartney, Hyland, Havern and others have encouraged and led over the years because no book calling itself definitive could fail to comment on such a sick and disgusting aspect of the case of the missing little girl, Madeleine. Once the files were released in 2008 and became available later that year people were able to read for themselves (rather than rely on tabloid sensationalism and Amaral spin) and since then no-one has had any excuse to hound the parents other than ignorance of fact and unwillingness to learn and those excuses are not good enough.
