A Platform For Exposing The Worst Hater Trolls

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


2 posters

    WELL, WELL, WELL, SHE HAS FINALLY SURFACED.

    WM3
    WM3


    Posts : 457
    Join date : 2011-07-14

    WELL, WELL, WELL, SHE HAS FINALLY SURFACED. - Page 2 Empty Re: WELL, WELL, WELL, SHE HAS FINALLY SURFACED.

    Post  WM3 Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:32 pm

    Pat Brown says there are no bombshells. But surprise surprise, she says she "evidence" doesn't support Jane Tanner's sighting and that is exactly what we expected all her to say. After all, she was at enormous pains to disprove Jane Tanner's sighting in her ebook because Jane Tanner's testimony makes a complete nonsense of Pat Brown's "theory" that Gerry McCann callously disposed of his suddenly dead child.

    Let us not forget that Jane Tanner giving an uncannily similar description of the man to the Smiths - whom she never met and whose existence and sighting she did not find out about till much later.

    We've all seen the standard of Pat Brown's logic and investigative skills. I think it would be prudent to question if not simply disregard any claim she makes from now on. She is an absolute DISGRACE and it is shocking that US TV networks allow her air time to voice her opinions and conclusions regarding real people who are caught up in hideous crimes.

    FGS, there is no 'evidence' she can have come by in PDL about the veracity of Jane's sighting that has not been available for the last 5 years. All she can do is rehash the same stuff over and over again, which she could have done from the comfort of her own armchair at home.

    This is farcical.

    If she thinks any more photos of her are "evidence" she's more deluded (or crazy) than any of us thought she is.
    She clearly has no clue what is evidence and what is not. But then she's never really worked with the police on a real case and I can't blame them for it. Who would want to work with such an obsessed biased home-made "profiler"?

    Pat and the US media - there's not a lot of interest. Maybe Nancy Grace will throw her a bone for a few minutes but the case is 5 years old, after that summer 07, there was still some interest but not a huge media interest at all. And there's been other cases in this country that were covered in more explosive ways and were more explosive cases. She isn't going to get some huge tour of the morning shows or anything like that. And truthfully, since the big O (Oprah) brought on the McCanns in an entirely sympathetic way even the magazines that sensationalized the case and reported on the allegations against the McCanns have only printed relatively positive things, like when Kate's book came out and on the anniversary.


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:25 am