I think it's time for Syn0nymph to put her money where her mouth is.
She claims to her pals that "100%" I am a medical secretary and grandmother from Glasgow (person was named)
She claims to her pals that "100%" another McCann supporter is a guy who lives in Westminster (person was named)
Now she is claiming to her pals that "100%" the McCann supporter Basil is a former Ocean Club employee & witness to case.
She also claims "100%" that about half a dozen Twitter accounts are owned by the same person.
FInally, she claims that she has reported us all to police and gives the impression that police take her claims seriously.
I challenge Syn to stake her Twitter account on her accusations being 100% accurate and provide the proof of her claims - or retract them. I am happy to have Operation Grange verify my identity as I can easily prove that I am not the person Syn0nymph swears I am.
I propose that if Syn is subsequently proven to be wrong in any of these "100%" claims that she apologise to everyone involved, delete her Twitter account and leave the McCann discussion.
2 posters
JAYELLES OF MYTHS SOCKS IT TO SYNONYMPH/SERENDIPITY
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
hope injustice are pleased with themselves , believing all the bullsh-t stories serennasty spun them about Grime . shows how much judgement they have .
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Jayelles » Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:28 am
I will add to the above that Syn's claims re Jayelles are 100% erroneous, which means that more than likely all her other claims re posters are also a load of bollocks, as are the claims re the police. Sykes
Syn0nymph and her pals (who usually rush to make snide comments about posts here) are noticeable IGNORING my challenge for Syn to STAKE HER TWITTER ACCOUNT on the veracity of her "100%" claims that:-
1. I am a medical secretary granny from Glasgow called J*** M*** (not repeating the woman's name here)
2. Another pro is a bloke from Westminster
3. Basil is a former OC employee and McCann case witness.
She makes her claims with an air of self-importance and hints that her investigations have the seal of approval from police. In fact, she is wrong about all of the above, but her idiot pals are sucking it up and acting out accordingly. As a result, innocent people have been stalked, abused and harassed. How long before some nutter (and there are plenty if those in the anti McCann camp) takes matters into their own hands?
There have been plenty of Lols, "hons" and pissing in pants, but absolutely no hint of a response to a serious challenge for het to put up or shut up.
What is she afraid of? The truth? Being exposed as a malicious stalker, troll and WUM?
And why are none of her pals asking her to prove her claims? Are they "in on it" (i.e the trolling/wummery). Are they afraid of her? Or do they privately consider her a fruitloop who wouldn't know the truth if it asked her to slap it in handcuffs and whup its backside (consenting and in private of course)?
I will happily provide my ID to Operation Grange (on assurance of confidentiality of course) and prove that I am not who she claims "100%" that I am...if Syn is willing to publicly apologise, delete her Twitter account and leave the McCann discussion.
She says she has "proof". Let her provide this "proof". She says she has reported us to police. Let her provide the report numbers for this along with the name, rank and number of the officers she spoke to. She repeatedly tells us she doesn't lie. Prove it.
I hope everyone on Twitter will urge her to step up to this. She cannot be allowed to continue harassing, abusing and threatening people on the basis of the crappiest detection work I have ever witnessed. I know for a fact that she has caused fear and alarm to at least one person as a result of her intimidatory antics. Enough.
I will add to the above that Syn's claims re Jayelles are 100% erroneous, which means that more than likely all her other claims re posters are also a load of bollocks, as are the claims re the police. Sykes
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Jayelles » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:26 pm
Oh good. Babalou has picked up the challenge. Incidentally, this is the same tweep who answered a tweet to Syn0nymph IN THE FIRST PERSON, but denies it is a sock of Syn. I'm inclined to believe its denials although not upon the proof Syn provided (screencaps showing DMs exchanges between the two accounts -not proof the two accounts are not operated by the same person). Babalou seems to me to be considerably more literate than Stalker Syn. I would say that Babalou is someone possibly with a higher education and experience in writing. Syn is just a goon.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Jayelles » Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:12 pm
Syn0nymph @Syn0nymph 59m
@urcrazytoo @TaraTompkins5 @B_balou You my dear can F@ off, nowt to do with you who I spoke to #mccann
So she won't put her money where her mouth is. Funny that....
Well she is in deep doodoo because Basil is NOT a former OG employee and witness. Basil is NOT who Syn claims she is. However, Syn has publicly and falsely accused a witness in the McCann case of discussing an open investigation. Syn claims to be in constant contact with Operation Grange & other forces reporting people on Twitter. She is wasting police time with her defective detective work.
I think it's time for all those who have been falsely accused, harassed and abused by this serial troll and stalker to join forces and complain to police about her.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From Myths:
Syn is claiming to be in contact with one witness, grime, and operation grange and is also claiming she has permission to speak for both. This needs reporting especially her claim about the police as people might report things to her.
And now she is trying to track down a witness and intimidate her. Ok she's got the wrong person, but the intention is there.
Jayelles: Yes, but she is FALSELY accusing that witness of talking about the case and the eejit haters believe her (or even if they don't, they are lending support to her publicly). It is utterly irresponsible behaviour, but it's the way they are. They don't do decency. The ineptitude for logic, accuracy and common decency is their trademark.
The very tone of Syn's tweets is an indication of what this woman is about. She stalks, threatens, intimidates and harasses with tweets which drip with saccharin sweetness. All the lols, "hons", "sweeties", smilies, "laters" and "pissing herself" with mirth whilst conducting a campaign of cyberterror against her chosen victims is what which forms her unique brand of "charm". It is completely insincere and it saddens me that some guys fall for it.
Syn is claiming to be in contact with one witness, grime, and operation grange and is also claiming she has permission to speak for both. This needs reporting especially her claim about the police as people might report things to her.
And now she is trying to track down a witness and intimidate her. Ok she's got the wrong person, but the intention is there.
Jayelles: Yes, but she is FALSELY accusing that witness of talking about the case and the eejit haters believe her (or even if they don't, they are lending support to her publicly). It is utterly irresponsible behaviour, but it's the way they are. They don't do decency. The ineptitude for logic, accuracy and common decency is their trademark.
The very tone of Syn's tweets is an indication of what this woman is about. She stalks, threatens, intimidates and harasses with tweets which drip with saccharin sweetness. All the lols, "hons", "sweeties", smilies, "laters" and "pissing herself" with mirth whilst conducting a campaign of cyberterror against her chosen victims is what which forms her unique brand of "charm". It is completely insincere and it saddens me that some guys fall for it.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From another forum, with thanks for the screenshot and the comments.
That's actually hilarious, does the utterly deranged woman not even know that even IF any of the nannies or any other UK person had decided to speak to the press, or in any way go public, police would have HAD nothing to say about it. They have judicial secrecy in PORTUGAL, not in the UK, even though both CPS & police always advice POTENTIAL witnesses not to discuss matters in public, it is NOT a crime to do so. AFAK It is not until a case is being considered by the court, i.e. someone has been ARRESTED that sub-judice kicks in.
If numbskull actually had spoken to police, they would have informed her of this, apart from possibly asking why the silly fool is calling them to accuse innocent people of non-existing crimes. Let alone inform her that it's actually SHE who is committing a crime for attempting to interfere with & intimidate potential witnesses.
That's actually hilarious, does the utterly deranged woman not even know that even IF any of the nannies or any other UK person had decided to speak to the press, or in any way go public, police would have HAD nothing to say about it. They have judicial secrecy in PORTUGAL, not in the UK, even though both CPS & police always advice POTENTIAL witnesses not to discuss matters in public, it is NOT a crime to do so. AFAK It is not until a case is being considered by the court, i.e. someone has been ARRESTED that sub-judice kicks in.
If numbskull actually had spoken to police, they would have informed her of this, apart from possibly asking why the silly fool is calling them to accuse innocent people of non-existing crimes. Let alone inform her that it's actually SHE who is committing a crime for attempting to interfere with & intimidate potential witnesses.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17