there's the cause of her delusions , its well known that cannabis can cause paranoia . and she ended up in care as a child cos her mother lost her marbles .
5 posters
HUTTON HAS TOTALLY AND UTTERLY LOST IT
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
there's the cause of her delusions , its well known that cannabis can cause paranoia . and she ended up in care as a child cos her mother lost her marbles .
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
Her brain must be fried like eggs by now.
Last edited by Broho on Fri Mar 14, 2014 4:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From Myths with thanks.
tigerloaf: Hutton is the kind of old woman who used to be laughed at when she went around the community talking to herself about her woes.
Now she has the chance to post her lunatic views of the world for more people to see and the number of people laughing at her while she rocks on the arm of her chair are counted in thousands.
If it wasn't for the fact that she is venting her phlegm at the parents of a missing little girl and accusing them (not simply asking questions as she lied) of horrendous crimes, then she could be pitied for her inability to cope properly with information and with life in general.
Her abuse of others is probably a result of her bitterness at the way she was treated by the courts for her time-wasting attempts to get compo from the authorities for things which she quite possibly imagined happened to her. Its perfectly clear that she has no grasp of reality in the McCann case so we can never be certain that anything she wrote in her book was real either. Her modus operandi consists of muddled understanding, pure exaggeration and outright lies in the McCann case. We really have to ask if the same is true of her own life story.
And as for her crude comments about me, well such crudity shows us just what kind of foul mind she really has, doesn't it? I enjoy seeing people like Hutton expose their nastiness, their low standards and their idiocy in such comments as that one. They just don't seem to have the intelligence to understand that they are damaging their own reputations by their crass smuttiness. The anti-McCann forums and FB pages abound in members whose crude language, smutty (sometimes bordering on the pornographic) comments and images disgusts the rest of society. They just don't realise how perverted they look to others and Hutton who pretends to having standards looks more foolish even than those who are simply proud of the filth they wallow in.
Jayelles: Spot on Tiger. Only the goons were impressed by Hutton's embarassing playground tantrum yesterday. Normal, decent people won't have been too impressed with her talk of physical violence, cats crawling out of armpits and hysterical rants comparing a father trying to find his missing child with Hitler and world domination.
At the end of the day, if the McCanns' efforts to find their little girl annoys Hutton that much, she has the option to NOT go out of her way to obsessively hunt out every site online where they are being discussed.
That's what normal people tend to do. There's a tv personality whom I really cannot stand. When he comes on, I quickly change channel. I cannot imagine hunting down programmes that he is in, or spending 24/7 online seeking out discussions about him.
Tigerloaf: What people like Hutton don't seem to realise is that this is their legacy. Their smut, their idiocy, their bile, their hatred, their foul comments about others, their online harassment of the parent's of a missing child is online not for a matter of hours or days but for years and perhaps even decades. Their children, their grandchildren and their neighbours will all be aware of what they are like, how nasty they have been.
No matter what they say about me, I know one thing for certain. I have not posted anything disgusting but Hutton and her friends among the anti-McCanns have, I have never posted obscenity or crude remarks or condoned such things but she has and she is quite willing to maintain online friendships with anti-McCann who post the most extreme pornographic comments and images.
She may believe that people think she is eccentric and she may be proud of that connotation. Others see her more accurately as a blight on society with her hateful blogging and spite-ridden posts.
She may be happy as a lonely old woman sitting in her little apartment with no family around her. She may even find that her online activity is some kind of surrogate social life and her online contacts could not care less how obscene or eccentric she appears. They will not have to deal with her in person. I enjoy the company of my family and friends whose close contact supports me at all times and involves real social encounters where I would be ashamed to be seen in the way she seems to be happy to be seen and who would guide me from such behaviour. I genuinely pity those like her whose social life appears to be so limited and in the end so fake.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
An excellent comment from another forum with thanks:
Re a comment in the article in the link above " delusions of grandeur that he “owns this hospital” and worked as a “successful rap artist ...."
Rosalind Hutton was apparently under some kind of delusion that having a few fluff pieces and letters published in the local rag entitled her to describe herself as a journalist.
She really should give up the drugs before they completely rot her brain.
Why anyone takes seriously the insane comments posted by these people whose inspiration comes from cannabis is quite beyond me. Would they allow such drug use in their own homes?
I wonder did Sonia Poulton know that Rosalind Hutton is a pothead space cadet with bipolar disorder? I wonder would knowing that have made any difference to the publicity-seeking woman's decision about having Hutton on her show?
Being a pothead, stoner, space cadet, treetripper is pretty pathetic at Rosalinda Hutton's age. When a woman in her sixties needs to get high on drugs you know she is a failure in life.
But this particular pothead, Rosalinda Hutton, also claims to suffer from bipolar disorder? I wonder which came first the pot, weed, cannabis which she so desperately craves and whose "highs" she seemingly cannot live without or the bipolar disorder?
An interesting study into cannabis-induced bipolar disorder.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811144/
"'Clinicians agree that cannabis use can cause acute adverse mental effects that mimic psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. "
Re a comment in the article in the link above " delusions of grandeur that he “owns this hospital” and worked as a “successful rap artist ...."
Rosalind Hutton was apparently under some kind of delusion that having a few fluff pieces and letters published in the local rag entitled her to describe herself as a journalist.
She really should give up the drugs before they completely rot her brain.
Why anyone takes seriously the insane comments posted by these people whose inspiration comes from cannabis is quite beyond me. Would they allow such drug use in their own homes?
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
Cristobell Today at 10:13 am
Thank you Canada! smilie I seem to be the only one jumping for joy and drinking champagne (I wish, lol).
The pros are already spinning stories to support the Mccanns' innocence, even if Madeleine had died in the apartment. They are panicking.
revolting old harpy celebrates because a child may have been harmed .
Thank you Canada! smilie I seem to be the only one jumping for joy and drinking champagne (I wish, lol).
The pros are already spinning stories to support the Mccanns' innocence, even if Madeleine had died in the apartment. They are panicking.
revolting old harpy celebrates because a child may have been harmed .
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Do they actually believe this garbage, or do they just regurgitate it to comfort themselves? Hutton should have stopped at 'I think', though evidence suggests 'thinking' is something they are incapable of.R.V. Hutton Author @RosalindaHu
@umweltbuerger @dr_frasiercrane I think libel trial has collapsed. Met clearly not looking for a live 10yr old, no appeals on CW #mccann
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
e: Game over?
Post Cristobell Today at 8:22 pm
There are people on the net, I met 7 years ago when we all began posting about the Madeleine McCann case. They are still around now, and can substantiate my claims, OK?
Now can we return to topic?
funny how no- one had heard of her till she hopped on the bandwagon a couple of years ago .
Post Cristobell Today at 8:22 pm
There are people on the net, I met 7 years ago when we all began posting about the Madeleine McCann case. They are still around now, and can substantiate my claims, OK?
Now can we return to topic?
funny how no- one had heard of her till she hopped on the bandwagon a couple of years ago .
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
Didn't she nick someone's name as well?
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
yoyo:
Cristobel, You do like listening to yourself don't you....going on and on and on and on.... ?
Why not answer question to the point instead of being defensive by attacking ?
As you pointed out correctly this is "Game Over" thread, NOT Cristobel "Take Over' thread if I may be permitted to say so.
P.S. You started this.
newintown:
You obviously didn't read my post Cristobell, which is typical when you're so tied up with yourself. Yes, I know the post is called Game Over, but the whole forum should be renamed "Game Over, because Cristobell's word is final and nobody else can have an opinion".
You are getting very boring and pretentious.
candyflossmod:
I expect many here are getting tired of threads being disrupted - everyone here is entitled to have their say, you may or may not agree, but please discuss the posts and not the poster. As to how many posts people make, what has that got to do with anything? Some days some posters seem to be more prolific than others, doesn't mean they are taking over the forum.
Back to topic please!! No more of this disruption........thanks.
newintown:
I'm distrupting the thread, duhhhhhh!!!!!
Have a word with Cristobell; haven't you noticed she's taken over the whole forum, and is stopping anyone having an opinion other than her own.
I think aiyoyo will agree with me, or haven't you being keeping up to date with the previous pages on this topic, if not read through them.
yoyo:
How convenient of you to evade the question by trying to digress the issue !
You are evading the your claim aren't you ?
Posting about Madeleine case is not the same as 7-long year of campaigning as you put it !
I don't care who you said can come out to substantiate your claim, and until I see them coming out to support your claim showing evidence where and how you campaigned for 7 years, I see this as fob-off-the-question nonsense.
You made the claim you substantiate it ! If you can't, stop misleading people, it's as simple as that.
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
Broho wrote:Didn't she nick someone's name as well?
oh yes , so she did .
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
If she was actively around from 7 years ago she wouldn't have used someone else's name.
How confusing is that.
How confusing is that.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
I wonder if Bennett's put yoyo up to this.
Some minor hounder to yoyo:
are you and newinromley on the mccann payroll,it seems you just want to stop the discussion about what happended to maddie
yoyo:
mariola, you are talking out of your bum !
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Post Newintown Today at 8:09 pm
Cristobell wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Cristobell wrote:
I have spent 7 years campaigning for justice for Madeleine. ...........
Really ? How ?
Stay on topic Aiyoyo please, these personal attacks are becoming tedious.
From the posts I've read over the past week or so you seem to have made yourself the administrator of this forum Cristobell. Well in actual fact you seem to have taken over the whole forum with your numerous postings putting people in their place.
I'm not very good at posting and I find it quite daunting, but for any new members I think your attitude over the past week or two would put any new member off from posting.
I think it's about time that admin stepped in and had a word with you before you completely wreck the whole forum with your dogmatic views.
Aiyoyo:
Attack ? WTF!
It was only a question. So you refused to answer a simple question by going in attack mode instead?
Don't mislead people into thinking you were campaigning if you cannot substantiate you claim.
Hutton:
There are people on the net, I met 7 years ago when we all began posting about the Madeleine McCann case. They are still around now, and can substantiate my claims, OK?
Now can we return to topic?
Re: Game over?
Post aiyoyo Today at 9:40 pm
Candyfloss,
Where the fairness ? Are you slipping behind on your role ?
If mariola is allowed to accuse me and another poster of being on mccanns payroll then by virtue of my freedom of expression I should be allowed to defend myself, so why are you deleting my reply to mariola, when you've ignored time wasters who attacked me ?
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
no wonder shes bitter .
Eleanor1- Posts : 38
Join date : 2013-10-26
Who is she? Am I supposed to know?
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
thats the Hutton woman , the one that writes books about how horrid people are to her and claims to have been campaigning against the McCanns for 7 years . Only thing is , no- one had heard of her till a couple of years ago when her book came out .
Eleanor1- Posts : 38
Join date : 2013-10-26
coco wrote:thats the Hutton woman , the one that writes books about how horrid people are to her and claims to have been campaigning against the McCanns for 7 years . Only thing is , no- one had heard of her till a couple of years ago when her book came out .
Oh, Mutton you mean? So she thinks that everyone abuses their children, does she?
But I thought she had a shocking childhood, and her mother was a Drug Addict. Like her.
PS. Did Mutton abuse her own children?
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From that I assume she has been issuing accusations - again.Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE 2h
@RosalindaHu @umweltbuerger & don’t forget you are liable for the accusations you make.
R.V. Hutton Author @RosalindaHu 53 secs
@JimGamble_INEQE @umweltbuerger I've retweeted you Jim, lets keep this out in the open, I haven't made any accusations. #mccann
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
Sounds like it but she would be better off keeping her trap shut.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE 3m
@parapono @RosalindaHu @umweltbuerger they would need 2 b 2 protect the authors. Problem for them is they are not.
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
R.V. Hutton Author @RosalindaHu 3h
@JimGamble_INEQE @parapono @umweltbuerger Once again, I haven't made any accusations, so not sure why threatened? #mccann
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From Mythsd, with thanks.
Good point Clocker! It would be bizarre for him to be publicly repeating the thesis that is the subject of the trial.
I personally think the McCanns have cut and run. We are rapidly approaching the 7th anniversary (no marathons and triathlons this year) - a deadline where a missing person can be pronounced dead for the purposes of probate, although I am not sure if the family have to apply for this or if they can leave it open. And of course this case is further complicated because Madeleine is a Ward of Court, so that decision may rest with the Court rather than the parents.
It is of course ridiculous for the parents to be claiming £250k for a child who hasn't been seen in 7 years but it is a stretch of the imagination to believe it is this issue that is holding everything up. If it were a simple technical issue, the Writ could be amended but if the claim was fraudulent, then it would be a different matter altogether.
Further to the point you made Clocker, it is not only Amaral who is saying publicly that Madeleine is dead, it is has now also been said by DCI Redwood - and its obvious they are not looking for a live child.
Given all the revelations since the libel trial was adjourned, what on earth will the barristers say during their summing up? How can Isabel push forward the claim that Goncalo Amaral's book hindered the search for Madeleine if the parents are now suspects for her murder? And this eerie silence gives us very good reason to believe that they are arguidos and judicial secrecy is in place. Announcing what has happened to the missing trial, may at this point infringe on the judicial secrecy.
|
|
|