CHELSEA HOFFMAN PUTS HER OAR IN AGAIN - FEELING UNLOVED, IS SHE?

http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981316554

Elizabeth Smart offered her two cents' on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Now, anyone who has done even basic research of this case is well aware of all of the evidence found in the investigation that alludes to the idea that Maddie died in Portugal. In fact, cadaver and blood dogs hit on spots found only in the vacation apartment inhabited by the McCanns as well as their rental car. In fact, tests run on the evidence found in the McCann rental car showed that Maddie was sedated with drugs with lethal levels. Of course the DNA results only matched the child by 88% but given that the dog scented human cadaver oil, it's rather obvious that the DNA is a match for the missing child and not any of her female relatives who did not vanish.

So for Smart to repeat her same old tired speech about every single high profile missing persons case is just borderline stupid. Is she not aware that there was absolutely no evidence of a "break-in" or "abduction?" Is she not aware of the findings of a specifically trained, world-known cadaver dog?

Madeleine McCann is most likely not alive, and all Elizabeth Smart is doing is falling back on the same phrase she uses for every missing case she's offered her 'expert' analysis on since she became a correspondent. Giving people false hope and continuing the false PR of the McCann family is only further distracting people from the evidence that shows blatantly what may have happened to Madeleine McCann.

 London : United Kingdom | Aug 05, 2013 at 8:08 AM PDT
BY Chelsea Hoffman

The search for Madeleine McCann continues, but all evidence points to the girl's demise, contrary to the wishful thinking of many in the UK. It's no secret that the relationship between UK investigators and the authorities in Portugal is tense, at best, and that's because the detectives in Portugal originally labeled the McCann parents as suspects. Now SY officials are desperately grappling for evidence to compliment their numerous "persons of interest" -- but what will they find in Portugal? Will they actually find something that backs up their own wishful thinking, or will they find that authorities in Portugal had it right all along?

Since the beginning of this case it was made apparent that someone died in the McCann's rental apartment, but Kate and Gerry McCann notoriously played games in the case by bringing doubt to the validity of cadaver dog evidence -- even though it has shown to be greatly reliable in criminal investigations. Kate also refused to answer numerous questions about her daughter's disappearance, and both of them have notoriously refused to take polygraph tests.

Nonetheless, their mindless supporters in the UK have turned them into martyrs, and this case has turned into a dog and pony show of theatrics with so called "Maddy sightings" worldwide to continue perpetuating what could very well be a pack of lies.

Will SY officials bring an end to this international mystery once and for all?

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/15407923-madeleine-mccanns-parents-cant-sue-away-the-evidence-against-them

Madeleine McCann's parents can't sue away the evidence against them

Las Vegas : NV : USA | Sep 02, 2013 at 4:14 AM PDTBY Chelsea Hoffman

Kate and Gerry can't avoid the evidence forever..

The disappearance of Madeleine McCann is the most high profile international disappearance to date -- but the evidence is overwhelming against the parents of the little girl. However, the UK is doing a bang-up job of protecting them to the point of allowing them to sue detectives in Portugal who declared them as suspects. Always concerned about getting money, Kate and Gerry McCann are suing Goncalo Amaral for a hefty sum over his claims that they may have murdered the girl (or were otherwise involved in her disappearance/death).
It's an asinine lawsuit, to be clear, and officials are even encouraging the McCanns to avoid showing up in court -- avoid showing up in a trial that they have initiated. Goncalo Amaral famously made claims that Maddie McCann died in apartment 5A and along with other experts he made sure to produce enough evidence to back his claims up -- but Kate and Gerry didn't stay in Portugal and have notoriously been uncooperative with very basic elements in the investigation.
Amaral is confident that he will be victorious in this lawsuit -- and hopefully he is. The evidence against Kate and Gerry McCann would be enough to lock them up in many other scenarios, but for some reason they are being coddled in the UK as the media pumps out sappy and borderline false reports to sway the public into believing this couple is innocent of wrongdoing. It's shameful and will only add to the time that will pass without Maddie's remains being located.

Sofia de Landerset (AKA Astro) To state that "the evidence is overwhelming against the parents" is extremely irresponsible - and plain wrong, in my opinion. If the evidence against the parents had been overwhelming, the case would have taken a very different course at the end of the summer of 2007. Anyone who writes, like Chelsea Hoffman does, that Mr Amaral claims "that they may have murdered the girl" has either not read the book or is trying to mislead the public. What Ms Hoffman knows to make her state that "the evidence against Kate and Gerry McCann would be enough to lock them up in many other scenarios" is a mystery to me.

Sofia de Landerset The McCanns are not guilty of neglect under the Portuguese law. Intent has to be proved in order to prosecute a neglect case. In fact (and again this is my personal view of the matter) given that it is impossible to state what exactly happened to Madeleine at what time and where, I don't think it is possible to prove that she disappeared as a result of being left alone with her siblings inside an apartment.

Is McCann suspect a diversion from the truth?

Walsall : United Kingdom | Nov 07, 2013 at 5:40 AM PST

BY Chelsea Hoffman  

Madeleine McCann remains missing -- likely dead for many years -- but it looks like there might be some "closure" soon. Of course it may be false closure, but it doesn't look like the UK media is questioning the sudden discovery of a "prime suspect" who looks absolutely nothing like any of the suspect efits/sketches over the course of over six years. Now all of a sudden this Euclides Montiero is being fingered as their guy, just because he was a reported junkie who happened to work at the same resort where Maddie was taken.
Nevermind the fact that there has neveer been confirmed proof of a break in or third-party in the McCann rental apartment, but what evidence do officials think they have against the guy? Reports say that his cellphone pinged near the rental apartment where Maddie disappeared, but isn't that something to be expected of someone who worked at the resort? It seems like a very weak grasp for "evidence" when they are labeling the guy a suspect and their only publicized evidence is cellphone use near his place of work.

The family of Montiero have spoken out against the accusations that he may have taken Madeleine McCann, and that's completely understandable. This man is no longer alive. He cannot defend himself or speak out in any way. It is beginning to look like SY officials are aiming to just end the case quickly, and what better way to bring a speedy end to it by convicting a dead man who can't defend himself?

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/15904804-is-mccann-suspect-a-diversion-from-the-truth