Supremo Tribunal de Justiça Descritivo:
Tabela Homologada
Tabela da Sessão de 31-01-2017 10:00 (1a SECÇÃO)
Recorrente: Kate Marie Healy Mccann
Recorrente: Gerald Patrick Mccann
Recorrido: Gonçalo Sousa Amaral
Matilde Gago As a portuguese citizen I am ashamed of the portuguese supreme court decision . I don't understand that suspects that don't go to trial because lack of evidences can still be considerer guilty. Or "not guilty" but still suspects and submitted, freely, to all sort of accusations. I also don't understand that a public servant after being retired or whatever, can make money using information he had acess while being a public servant. I haven't read the book and I don't inted to read it. I don't know if you are guilty and it is not my job to have an opinion about it.. I only can can imagine the horror of Maddie's vanishing, the horror of the non ending waiting for answers and the horror of being acused. Please acept my full support although nothing can take away the pain you are suffering
This should be taken to the European and EU courts. It is wrong that Portugal can rule that their police can fail to solve a case, can have the final police report state that there is no evidence against a couple and state that what they thought was evidence against them did not turn out to be evidence against them, but that it is ok to accuse them anyway because they have not been proven innocent. Whilst at the same time the Portuguese like all "civilized" countries do not have a system that allows innocence to be proven. Only guilt can be proven simply because their law states that people are innocent unless proven guilt. But Portugal seem to have just gone "meh, thats no fun". I bet it would have been different if the mccanns had accused amaral of being involved, because lets face there is just as much evidence against him.
Give it up Kate and Gerry - come out with your hands held up!
Post by Get'emGonçalo Today at 14:51The tide is turning......!
The worlds media now know the truth.
Put away your 10th anniversary bids
and do the right thing for Madeleine Beth McCann for once in your miserable lives.
Missing children cases are never 'archived' and closed down in any civilised country ... every so often a closed case review results in a renewed effort to find out what may have happened to the individual concerned.
I've always been perplexed that Madeleine's case was archived and the assurance given that it would be reopened if new information came to light.
What chance of that if Ricardo Paiva ... the man left in charge of the case was assiduously filing information about Madeleine as 'not relevant to the inquiry'.
I thought that disgraceful.
After reading the court judgement in Amaral's libel trial ... I now realise I may have been viewing the archiving of Madeleine's case from entirely the wrong perspective.
Undoubtedly the ruling confirms it was the criminal case against Robert Murat and Madeleine' parents which was archived.
Was Paiva actually acting within his remit when failing to file active information concerning a missing child ... photos ~ sightings ~ information about Madeleine from other policing authorities ... because it actually was not relevant to the inquiry.
Was the only interest in a criminal conviction ... and not the child whose fate was concluded by the operational theory decided on the fourth of May.
If so, that must have been a decision and a direction dictated by someone influential in the State ... it could very well explain the orchestration and the closing of the ranks against Madeleine's parents. They have kept her case alive despite the State closing it down.
It would explain a lot.
http://stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=8887&sid=6def027271e6d1c992e95b128a845ce4&start=50If the media wanted to do an interesting article and start an engaging debate, they could do something on fake McCann news. There is plenty to cover there. From the newspapers who got sued for publishing fake information, to those who STILL spread that fake information all over the internet.
They could visit the trolls websites where they could find all that fake news, lies and mis-information and highlight them.
Of course, they would first have to apply themselves and prove their journalistic worth by doing proper research as suggested in the previous posts.
And there are plenty of photoshopped images on the internet that many would view as real (not realise it's fake).
And websites like Jill Haverns forum & associated blogs/websites, whose information has been proven incorrect on many an occasion, but they still continue to peddle it. Posting it on Twitter and Face Book and writing to MP's and other authorities, like Operation Grange and the Portuguese Police trying to convince them that their misinformation is fact.
Unfortunately journalists pick up on this and exacerbate the situation. They could do some good by looking into fake McCann news.