From Myths with thanks.
Comment re above: This £95,000 is not new. It is older news that has been repeated in a new article about K+G having 'hope' that Britains new prime minister will support the search for Madeleine.
These anti Mccann trolls never check details and facts before they acts. So stupid!
Frances Gallagher
Open Letter To Theresa May
Dear Theresa May
Having only just read that you are to further fund the search for Madeleine with another £95,000, I wonder if you've ever stopped to think about the other parent/s/guardians of other missing children and adults? How must they feel when they see millions upon millions of pounds are still being thrown at this case, year after year, yet ordinary folk have to use their own funds (if they have them) or else just sit and grieve or worry about what might have become of their loved one.
Madeleine has been missing for over nine years. Throughout the Portuguese police investigation they confronted Kate with CONCRETE FACTS that she was complicit in the disappearance of Madeleine. A DNA match that was proven to be a COMPLETE match to Madeleine was fudged the second time around. a FUND (Limited company) was set up by solicitors in London within a few days of Madeleine's disappearance. Gerry was busy organising concerts and events months in advance. Kate refused to answer police questions. The McCanns and their friends refused to do a reconstruction. They tried to say that the EVRD were unreliable but they had been successful in 200+ cases. On their return from Portugal the McCanns sought the services of extradition lawyers. Hardly the behaviour of innocent parents is it?
There are now thousands more people waking up to what appears to be the greatest scam/whitewash of all time, being played out before our very eyes. Where does Madeleine fit in to all this? Why have the parents not been questioned properly? Whay have they all not been made to go back to Portugal to do a reconstruction? Why is Maddie a National Security case? Public funds are being spent on this charade and I believe we all have a right to know why this case is still being funded after nine years when the solution lies in the Portuguese police files. As Goncalo Amaral once said, "All that has happened since 2007 has been just for show".
This little girl deserves justice, not burying under mountains of lies. Do what's right and bring this case to it's rightful end, for Madeleine's sake. MJ
Comment re above: This £95,000 is not new. It is older news that has been repeated in a new article about K+G having 'hope' that Britains new prime minister will support the search for Madeleine.
These anti Mccann trolls never check details and facts before they acts. So stupid!
Pamela Gurney
I see AbScab (Abduction or Scam forum) have posted an open letter one of their kind sent to Theresa May when she granted OG a further £95k to continue on with the investigation for a quarter.
In the body of the letter it states, in a very mean way, that the composer felt Madeleine should not have had this amount of money spent on trying to find the poor darling when other children's parents have to fund their own investigation & searches.
Well I don't know where they get these ideas from but certainly the UK police do fund extensive inquiries into any missing child or person come to that, but children they give more importance to because a teen or adult may have left home of their own volition.
Madeleine was 3, almost 4, when she went missing on foreign soil. I think that deserves money being dedicated to getting the answers as it may not only find her but safeguard other children in the future or indeed find others trafficked by the same people as Madeleine was trafficked by IMO.
The composer of the said letter will just get eyes rolled or eyebrows raised upon reading the contents he/she submitted to May because he/she goes on to say the PJ confronted Kate & Gerry with CONCRETE evidence against them ...oh no they didn't!
And again this person has misunderstood the validity of what was said by Grime about his dogs capabilities. Grime never once stated he had taken them out on 200 crime cases because the whole of UK dog handlers had not had that number between them. What Grime was referring to was the success rate in the controlled tests with certain items such as pork etc. I think ACPO would perhaps dispute those claims as well but that is my opinion on the matter.
I believe I am right in stating that in the years Grime was a police dog handler and the cases he was involved with, his dogs only ever came up trumps once....1 body found. So not that wonderful really?
And yet FG who has been on the groups longer than I have and who admins that most vicious of platforms simply posts it up. Is she deliberately doing so to make the author of the letter look foolish?
