CRISTOBELL/HUTTON'S LATEST HATE-FILLED RAMBLINGS PART 2

aiyoyo Yesterday at 10:44 pm

Blog? Do you mean a certain public DIARY wherein a certain somebody airs her dirty linens (about her mental condition and what have you), and records her obsession with a certain male member here?

I have kept well clear from that open sewage-tank because of the odious stench there. The last time (ages ago) that I looked in there, I heard the ferocious barking of the distinctive bitch residing there.

If a certain novice pulp fiction novelist who's burning excessive fuel with her bitterness and maliciousness as if there is no tomorrow, speculates on this place self combusting, let's just say it's patently obvious she is projecting.

Of course she's thick as two bricks not to realize some people over yonder have been leading her by the nose from the outset to suit their purpose. She's the protagonist whose notoriety and notorious artworks they exploit on, to manage/operate a purported free voice sanctuary for Madeleine case, when in fact the forum that condones her notoriety is nothing but an internet cafe (sanctuary) for bitter members to gossip about this place.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 31m31 minutes ago
@SafariSara @fcryan1 So are you Kate, Philomena or Trish? #pervertingthecourseofjustice #longprisonsentence #mccann

Re: Sonia Poulton on Murdoch's SKY News AGAIN - today (4 April 2015)

Tony Bennett wrote:

aquila wrote:  Ms Hutton has changed tack and is now 'writing for pleasure' without the usual need to stick in a couple of personal blogs and then a Tony Bennett hate blog. Ms Hutton is showing exceptional restraint for someone dedicated to trashing Tony Bennett and CMoMM.Er...o no she hasn't changed tack.  

   
Her deep need to attack this ever-popular forum and myself remains entrenched - and this was published today under the title: 'Discussing the McCanns':

Tony Bennett became the unacceptable face of those who did not believe the McCanns.  Taking on the case as investigator, prosecutor, Judge and Jury, he confirmed time and time again, that even the most reasonable of people who dared to question the abduction story were cut from the same hardfaced vigilante cloth as himself and thus we were all treated by the media with the same disdain and contempt.  Most of us had nothing to do with his 'Madeleine Foundation' (a way to steer donations to himself?), or his hounding of the McCann family and their associates but we were all tarred with the same despicable brush.  For the McCanns, Bennett was the gift that kept on giving, he gave them headlines during the quiet periods, provided evidence of harassment in their damages claim against Goncalo Amaral and invoked public sympathy for their cause.  Who could fail to feel sorry for them, Bennett's stalking knows no bounds.   However, the majority of McCann sceptics are nothing like Bennett.  They were drawn to the case through their sympathy for the little girl who's life was taken and who's image has been abused for this past 8 years.

So, most McCann-sceptics good; Tony Bennett bad - and the 'gift that kept on giving' to the McCanns.

She may have forgotten by now about the disastrous 2-page spread in Murdoch's Sun earlier this year in which she boasted of being 'a nasty anti-McCann bitch who gets a buzz out of squishing and attacking McCann supporters'.

At least one kind soul has responded with a defence of me - it wasn't me, honest!

1.   Anonymous 23 August 2015 at 14:12

One of your very best, Christobel...a superb over-view...with the exception of the slagging off...again...of Tony Bennett. He may be irritatingly OTT with his huge lists of important points, and he cannot always see that other people legitimately think differently, but he is doggedly trying to be 'Mr Relentless for Truth' in finding out what really happened...whether to Stuart Lubbock, Lee Balkwell, or Madeleine...and he has suffered for it.

     
candyfloss's forum helpfully has a prominent 'Sticky' page which enthusiastically directs members and guests over there straight to Hutton's blog posts, where they can carry on reading a seemingly continuous stream of anti-CMOMM and anti-Tony Bennett  posts.  

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 11m11 minutes ago
   Misogynists get a hit of dopamine every time they demean a woman - no wonder @zampos loves the bitch word. #gettinghisjollies #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
I didn't criticise the #mccanns when I was unsure because it would have been morally wrong. A concept Bennett and CMoMM will never grasp.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 4h4 hours ago
Err Ladyinred, how dare you assume you know what I believe, like the rest of CMoMM you know sweet FA and assume way too much!

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 8m8 minutes ago
Ladyinred - at a time when donations were pouring in for Madeleine, Bennett set up his 'Madeleine Foundation' - go figure. #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
Cristobell Author retweeted Nikki Plummer
He needs his 'cleverness' to be acknowledged, they all do, and that's what trips them up, lol. #mccann

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton23 August 2015 at 19:05
I agree, Tony Bennett's significance to this case has fizzled out as he becomes increasingly more ridiculous. However, as I get older (and wiser) I am becoming less tolerant, and today Mr. Bennett went one 'nasty bitch' too far.

There are indeed far more interesting aspects to this case, not least the psychological perspective. The dysfunctional characters in this case could fill an entire text book on human behaviour, and it is the study of that behaviour that is closest to my heart. At the age of 14, I set out on a lifelong study to discover what it is that makes people evil, nature, nurture or even need. This case has it all.

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton23 August 2015 at 20:19
So the latest 'Mutton' missive in my spambox came from the disturbed mind of Verdi on CMoMM, lol. No surprises there. Here's a tip Verdi, I will not publish comments that address me as 'Mutton'. It's not funny, not clever and it is completely lacking in imagination. Your misery comes from yourself, neither I, nor anyone else can make you feel better, only you can do that. What I say and do has no bearing on your life, and although I am flattered that you think it does, it is actually more than a little creepy and it only serves to exacerbate the deep feelings of inadequacy that plague you. Get out and about, try to think of something else, even if only for a moment. Baby steps perhaps? But please, don't keep torturing yourself on my account

Verdi (the real one)  Just had a look at that. To whom it may concern, please note it was not this Verdi that she claims to have censured on her latest blog for calling her Mutton. A figment of her rampant imagination or someone taking my name in vain - either way it aint me!

40+ years studying psychology is clearly an epic failure! Back to school for you girlfriend

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 9h9 hours ago
@AdirenM His namecalling is daily and mostly ignored, today it was 1 'nasty bitch' too many. Nothing justifies him going after my family.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 9h9 hours ago
@missjemmima your friend @zampos is no better than greenink, inciting hatred against my son and friend. Why? #madashell #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 10h10 hours ago
@missjemmima @zampos so his stalking and trolling of my family and friends is acceptable? Lets see what police think. #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 10h10 hours ago
@zampos #incitementtohate #maliceaforethought Why have you put picture of my son and friend on your cesspit forum? #trollisillegal #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 10h10 hours ago
@zampos WTF have my family and friends got to do with the #McCann case and justice for Maddie? Cease the stalking, you have been warned.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@boredone12 @TeddyShepherd Why do you think @zampos called it the 'Madeleine Foundation'? #taketheblinkersoff #mccann

Cristobell Author retweeted
Teddy ‏@TeddyShepherd 10h10 hours ago
@boredone12 @RosalindaHu Bennett embezzled funds from the firm of solicitors he worked for & I know personally that he is a liar. #McCann

Cristobell Author retweeted
Teddy ‏@TeddyShepherd 10h10 hours ago
@boredone12 @RosalindaHu Re unpaid account said firm of solicitors
But I settled it directly with Mr Bennett said the client
Oh
Did you now

===============

am ‏@boredone12 9h9 hours ago
@RosalindaHu Do u have proof of @zampos "steering donations" from MF 2 himself? Uv gone down in my estimations now Ros. #cheaptricks #mccann


Cristobell Author
‏@RosalindaHu
@boredone12 @zampos but if I believed the crazed religious zealot I would go back up in your estimation? lol #dreamon #mccann

============
sam ‏@boredone12 10h10 hours ago
@TeddyShepherd seems like a witch hunt to me. We're all on same side yet its tit 4 tat & smears that cant b proven #mccann @RosalindaHu

Cristobell Author retweeted
Teddy ‏@TeddyShepherd 10h10 hours ago
@boredone12 @RosalindaHu Oh but they can. That's the point. The bloke is a thief and a liar. Among many other things. #McCann

============

Cristobell Author retweeted
Teddy ‏@TeddyShepherd 9h9 hours ago
@boredone12 Perhaps it's because I have been the object of Bennett's deliberate lies + a fekcing Creationist trying to take the piss #McCann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
Cristobell Author retweeted Teddy
Now comparing himself to Christ on the cross, 'they know not what they do' nearly choked on that one, lol. #mccann

sam ‏@boredone12 4m4 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu So ur not going to answer about how much u got paid from @TheSun ? #mccann #hypocrit @TeddyShepherd

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 2m2 minutes ago
@boredone12 @TheSun @TeddyShepherd So who is paying you? #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@boredone12 @TeddyShepherd 55 pages on CMoMM (and rising) on one thread (there are many) slagging me off - a tad OTT? #mccann

sam ‏@boredone12 3h3 hours ago
@RosalindaHu Dont flatter yourself Ros. People are laughing, not in awe of you #mccann @TeddyShepherd

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@boredone12 @TeddyShepherd yeh I know, the plain and ugly bitches in my fourth grade behaved in much the same way ; ) #McCann

Closeby ‏@HoveringCard 10m10 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @boredone12 Look, you should market yours & Poulton's TPV performance to Comedy Gold. How much did The Sun pay you? #mccann

Bugsy ‏@SuppDoc 7m7 minutes ago
@HoveringCard @RosalindaHu @boredone12 An ounce of dope, a pouch of drum and a kit kat chunky. #McCann

Closeby ‏@HoveringCard 3h3 hours ago
@SuppDoc @RosalindaHu @boredone12 Only an ounce of dope? She looks about 200lbs of dope to me. #mccann

====

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 6m6 minutes ago
@HoveringCard @boredone12 Ah, another one to help Miss 50p out. I'm guessing your the BOGOF? #mccann
0 retweets 0 favorites

Closeby
‏@HoveringCard
@RosalindaHu @boredone12 You win something off the bottom shelf. Your own book, under S & S's with the Andrex & Izal. #mccann

Closeby ‏@HoveringCard 15h15 hours ago
@RosalindaHu & talking of non-events where's your & motor-mouth's Poulton's expose then? That has to be the longest "edit" ever #mccann zzzz

Closeby ‏@HoveringCard 15h15 hours ago
@vivienmiss @RosalindaHu << Pot, kettle. Your sole-selling to The Sun makes you worse than Bennett, tarnishing us all as trolls. #mccann

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 August 2015 at 10:47
Many thanks 18:45, I'm not really sure what the members of CMoMM are hoping to achieve by attempting to incite such a frenzy of hatred towards me. It may be that want members of the public to attack me in the street, or as is more likely, they are hoping to push my 'fragile' mind to the point where I will in fact commit suicide. They are more than aware that I suffer from manic depression, my 'madness' is another stick with which to beat me, I suspect they nod off chanting 'go on do it, do it', they want blood, my blood.

Their hatred is of course completely illogical. None of them know me, but their lives it would seem, would be greatly improved if I were no longer around. But just like every person they hate to that extent, my existence or non existence won't make one iota of difference to them personally. They will still be filled with simmering anger, aggression and disappointment with their lives, and will simply turn that gut gnawing resentment onto someone else.

For the first few years it was aimed at Kate and Gerry McCann, and they could justify their behaviour by claiming their campaign was for justice for a little girl robbed of her life. Though, even then, part of them knew that their odious behaviour was unacceptable to most normal people, so they kept their identities hidden. They keep their identities hidden still, almost to the point of paranoia, the shame of exposure terrifies them, their fear of Sonia's documentary is eating them alive and they have nowhere to go with their anger.

Proof positive, undeniable.



Fortunately, I am able to stand back and observe from the perspective of an outsider looking in, I don't feel anger, so much as pity. I have always approached this case from human behavioural perspective, therefore (most of the time) I can look at it logically, because I can see and understand the reasons behind the dysfunctional behaviour.

Bennett however has an agenda that is even more murky than that of his little band of grim reapers. He wants (needs) to be seen as the avenger of Madeleine McCann (or road signs), or heck, anything that will prove once and for all, that he has been chosen by God to lead the people out of Sodom and Gomorra (he has an unhealthy obsession with all things sexually deviant). At the moment he is hanging Christlike on a crucifix, asking his father to forgive us (me especially), 'they know not what they do', he piously opines, but like the McCanns he can be saved by acknowledgment of his good works, and cash, lots of it. He had hoped to tap into the outpouring of generosity the name of Madeleine evoked, 'support me and she will have justice'.

That his delusions are encouraged is troubling, but he will be forgotten quicker than all the wannabe martyrs who have gone before him, he lacks the charisma of his cult leading predecessors, and when push comes to shove, no-one will be joining him on the cross. Just as the world saw through his 'Madeleine Foundation', they can see through him, and as you say 18:45, he will knife all the Judases in the back long before the cock crows.

Anonymous24 August 2015 at 08:45
@Ros 01.31

As you shared the picture publicly it is hardly stalking is it?

"Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton
Shared publicly - Aug 9, 2015

With son and a best pal on the Wright Stuff smile 7/8/15"

https://i.servimg.com/u/f18/14/67/69/80/screen45.png

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 August 2015 at 11:11
I shared my picture on my google profile for my friends and those who follow me, just as people post pictures on Facebook.

I did not give permission for Bennett to use it on his forum, a forum that is actively inciting hatred (and violence?) towards me, and now it would appear, towards my friends and family.

The use of my family and friends on his hate site is more than despicable, the lowest of the low in the social media world. How would he (or you) feel if I were to post pictures of Bennett, his wife and grandchildren on my blog? Would that be acceptable to you?

Have no fears, it is something I would NEVER do, because as even as atheist and libertarian, I have morals and standards - something you and the rest of the grim reapers on CMoMM will never understand.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 16s17 seconds ago
Depressed? Suicidal? Join CMoMM, they help you go all the way. #slicethroughthatartery #goondoit xxxxxxxxhttp://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/discussing-mccanns.html?showComment=1440496043875#c4847425769414738900 … #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 1h1 hour ago
Bennett's agenda is even more murky than that of his little band of grim reapers

Anonymous24 August 2015 at 20:56
Why have you not published my comment that simply said that you posted the photo of your friend and son and therefore it is in the public domain and hence not stalking by bennett?

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 August 2015 at 11:53
It's my blog, I will publish what I want, but meanwhile I will point out yet again how ridiculous you are that you believe you can tell me what I can do, say or publish.

Joseph O'Driscoll ‏@Josephodriscoll 16m16 minutes ago
Miss Mutton confesses to behaving badly at school:
"the plain and ugly bitches in my fourth grade behaved in much the same way" #McCann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 11m11 minutes ago
@Josephodriscoll Were you the spotty oik all the girls laughed at? #suresoundsthatway #mccann

aquila Today at 3:41 pm

Just as in the last episode/drama there is the mention of suicide, being bi-polar etc.

There is also the usual expected tripe and lies but the underlying response is suicide and being bi-polar.

Back to the Sun interview now...the interview arranged by Sonia Poulton which showcased the bi-polar, suicidal, bitch tendencies of anyone who is interested in the case of Madeleine McCann and questions the official line. Remember this was on the back of the death of Brenda Leyland and Sonia does seem to work increasingly more on Murdoch programmes doesn't she?

Poulton has gone missing from Twitter. No longer is Poulton attacking Jim Gamble on Twitter - remember those spats?. There was a little snippet of Poulton showing up to 'interview/tackle' Clarence Mitchell. Nothing came of it - it was hyped up as a teaser and released for public consumption. There was also Poulton showing up at the McCann's door with a camera crew - lots of tweeting about that. There was Poulton showing up at the Coroner's Court and harrassing a member of the public who attended. Lots and lots of tweeting about that. Whoever that woman was, she left by a different exit. Nothing since.

As for Cristobell, she thrives on creating chaos wherever she goes for reason she chooses to reveal at the time to justify things. This latest malarkey is just another repeat of her predictable forumula.

Hutton and Poulton see themselves as victims on the internet. Let me just say, neither of them would turn a hair on their head at being vicious to anyone. There have been threats of exposing people's identities and having people's IP addresses looked into. None of it has anything to do with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann but has an awful lot to do with the protagonists. Hutton used CMoMM to promote her blog, created mayhem, left and continues to create mayhem. Candyfloss is left holding a bi-polar baby with suicidal tendencies now - not that I feel any sympathy.

As someone who doesn't bake cakes (shops sell them) I'm tempted to get out a recipe book to bake a celebratory cake for the Poulton documentary - the documentary that I truly believe has been a fact finding mission, is not a final production and is on sale to the mainstream media who can dissect it as and how they wish.

Phew, that's a long post.

aiyoyo Yesterday at 7:57 pm
Not one bit surprised she is using her mental health condition card to play the victim (again). Seems a recurring theme when the going gets tough for her, even though she left herself wide open.

What was she trying to prove and who to though?
At most it is just to a bunch of strangers on internet that she is justifying her sad existence to. How pathetic is that that she feels the need to bank on her mental health condition to solicit pity and buy sympathy votes.  At the same time she expects people just to ignore her recurring malevolent behavior by using her manic depressive, bi-polar conditions as excuse.  So, why is she messing about on the internet posting up tripe and lies if her mental condition is so serious. I just don't get it why she is attaching herself to Madeleine case to post up all this malicious gibberish when she should be under surveillance on controlled internet use if she is bi-polar and can't help her violent mood swing?  Madeleine is just a case she uses to showcase herself.  Pathetic really. There is no excuse for her malice, bi polar or not.

Not surprised SP has gone AWOL either.  After those failed promises to her unquestioning followers, and spats with CM et al, bragging she will show them all her worth, and then nothing materializes. What a massive lost of face not to mention credibility. No wonder she's avoiding twitter.  Even her stooge that self appoint mouthpiece Hutton is keeping shtumm.  I really did hope her film will be given air time, but judging by their silence, it's not realistic hope.

@ Aquila,
Your baking skills will have to come up with a pokementary-design celebratory cake to celebrate the demise of the great future of an epic film err journalist I mean.

Candyfloss isn't left in any situation, she has a choice, she seems to enjoy nursing a bi-polar viper, good of her to mother CB, and good for CB they have each other and deservedly so.

Verdi Yesterday at 22:23
If nothing else she's certainly brought out the best in you guys, straight for the jugular - excellent posts!  I'm a mere fledgling that can't recall the first encounter with the name Cristobell but I do remember the fuss she made when she decided to leave this forum.  The lie about being banned, flying in the face of all who knew otherwise, was despicable, deceitful and totally out of order and that was just for starters.  As is her continued attack against this forum generally, Tony in particular and many other members - no doubt some whose support she coveted in the past.

I distinctly remember at some stage after her latest kindle booklet 'the reluctant dieters guide ...' was plugged, she said that her new found regime had cured her manic depression, as she prefers to call it.  At the time I posted a comment on her blog questioning the claim which she declined to publish - since then all reference to this miracle cure has been deleted.  She must have swiftly realized that she could no longer use it to her advantage if cured !?!

As an aside, earlier today in reply to someone on her blog she says:  "Bennett, like myself is active in the case of missing Madeleine McCann, we put ourselves 'out there',..."

Active in the case of missing Madeleine McCann?  I can't say I've ever seen any evidence of that - I'm sure someone better acquainted with her antics will correct me if wrong.

snook Today at 01:25
I don't believe for one minute Hutton is bi polar in the true clinical sense of the word. What she is is a nasty malevolent woman with a huge ego and overblown sense of her own ability.

That she has a mental illness is not in question and, I'm no expert but I think she is a sociopath. Classic character traits. Loves herself. Loves being lauded and can't take the tiniest bit of criticism yet relishes belittling others and spreading downright lies. I've noticed she will not engage with anyone who tries to reason with her and resorts to insults even when caught out in a bare faced lie.

So far I've seen her brag about having a masters in English.  Being officially one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK. A journalist.  Successful writer and now tells us her revolutionary diet book (. 99p on Amazon)  is being recommended by GPs. This last statement came a week or so after she blogged that she thought her book should be a standard in every doctors surgery.

Her latest relentless attack on Tony, with ever increasing viciousness must have her screeching with delight. She now has all and sundry believing her assertion that he must be working for the Mccanns. What a vile excuse for a woman.

I think her brief acquaintance with Poulton has made her brave and that is why she has upped her attacks. Although she keeps saying 'wait & see' when asked about THE documentary I wouldn't be at all surprised if Poulton has cut her loose and slunk into a dark corner hoping we will forget about her promised 'work of art'.

She has served her purpose to Poulton,  that being I believe, to stir up dissent and make us look barking mad. Linking insanity and distrust of the Mccanns makes good copy for all those bored journalists out there working for the MSM.

I am even more convinced Poulton has been gathering evidence for a troll expose and her goading of Tony may have been a fishing expedition to push him into breaking the law. The pair have fooled so many, Poulton deliberately,  Hutton as her perfect stooge as she already has a penchant for being wicked.

Post  snook Today at 02:08
Just been reading Hutton's comments from yesterday. Am I misinterpreting or has she let the cat out of the bag re Poulton's documentary?  

10. 47 I think, can't link at mo' but it goes along lines of (paraphrased)  ' haters using the excuse for attacking Kate & Gerry because they wanted justice for a child. They can't use this any more and are terrified that Sonia's film is going to expose them '

'they knew their odious behaviour was unacceptable to most people that's why they hid behind anonymity and are now paranoid and terrified of exposure'

Seems Hutton has forgotten she falls into the category of unacceptable behaviour as she so proudly bragged about in the The Sun.

If this groundbreaking piece is to uncover McCann or indeed their supporters why would 'antis' have a need to fear it?

Verdi Today at 12:22 pm
Very astute observations snooks - I applaud you!

You did however omit to mention the honours degree in humanities, the life-long study of psychology, being a college lecturer, working with the disadvantaged and an assortment of other diverse attributes.

Verdi Today at 3:30 pm

Yes, I think you've hit the nail on the head there snook, I've wondered in the past if that's the reason Tony is singled out by certain people.

There appears to be a small elite group lurking in the shadows trying to destroy,  thus silence, anyone who has genuinely tried to uncover the truth about MBM's disappearance and they all exhibit the same sociopathic traits.  They relentlessly denegrate the likes of this forum,Tony (of course), Joanne Morais, Hi-De-Ho, lazzeri, Richard D Hall - to name but a few.  They also never appear to criticise each other - unless of course we a talking 'one and the same'.

Apart from HR-H and Ms Poulton, I believe the blacksmith is one of the clique, as is the person that writes under the pseudonym nottextusa.  Whether it's just because they like the sound of their own voices or whether it's a concerted effort to protect the McCanns is a matter of conjecture.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 6m6 minutes ago
Madeleine Foundation Constitution - which charity benefited from the remaining funds? xxxxxxhttp://madeleinefoundation.webs.com/constitution.htm … #McCann  

Tony Bennett Today at 12:15 pm

@Verdi wrote:
Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu  5 mins5 minutes ago  
Madeleine Foundation Constitution - which charity benefited from the remaining funds? http://madeleinefoundation.webs.com/constitution.htm … #McCann http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/    

An act of goading?

Maybe not an act of goading, as such.

But I think what it illustrates is that the constant attacks and queries about CMOMM, the Madeleine Foundation and me have become a kind of warfare, being waged by people like Rosalinda Hutton and Chris Roberts - a kind of war of attrition, or guerrilla war, which they hope will wear down their perceived enemies and degrade their will to carry on seeking the truth about what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

They are almost consumed by this war of hatred. But they may have underestimated their chosen targets.

Hutton is referring to the last two paragraphs of the Madeleine Foundation constitution, which she has obviously researched. And due credit to her for the exhaustive lengths she, Poulton and Chris Roberts are going to in an attempt to expose alleged flaws or frauds - the funds of the Madeleine Foundation, whether or not I am lying about paying Carter-Ruck, etc. etc.  You have to hand it to them, they work hard and incessantly at what they do.

I assume that Hutton has posted yet another blog article in which she has queried in effect: 'What has happened to the Madeleine Foundation's funds?'

She has assumed that the Madeleine Foundation is no longer in existence and has been wound up.

Her assumption is false.

The current committee of the Madeleine Foundation are happy for me to say that MF is still very much in existence, and active, with funds in the bank of just over £400. So it hasn't been wound up. If it ever is, I would trust the present Directors to pay any outstanding funds as directed by the Constitution.

Hutton, perhaps you will now tell your readers the truth about this issue. You'll have to bash us with something else now, won't you?

Here is the MF Constitution:

+++++++++++++++++++++++

     
The Madeleine Foundation

C O N S T I T U T I O N


Name

1. The Madeleine Foundation shall be an unincorporated association.

Aims and Objects

2. The aims and objects of The Madeleine Foundation shall be:

a) to make every effort to ensure that Kate and Gerry McCann are prosecuted for their admitted abandoning of their children six nights in a row in Praia da Luz
b) to change the law in whatever way is needed in order to send out a clear message to all parents that leaving young children on their own is never acceptable, and to strive for the adoption of a ‘Madeleine’s Law’ with its key message: “Never leave young children on their own”
c) to pursue - in conjunction with others - the truth about Madeleine McCann’s disappearance on 3 May 2007, and in particular to encourage Kate and Gerry McCann and the friends who were with them in Praia da Luz to tell the truth about Madeleine’s disappearance
d) to investigate the facts behind the extent of British government involvement in this case and the reasons for it
e) to ensure that the media, in particular the British media, report this case accurately and give due weight to the opinions of so many of the general public that the McCanns are withholding the truth about Madeleine’s disappearance
f) to demand a full-scale investigation by the relevant authorities into the activities of the Find Madeleine Fund private trust and to encourage the trustees of that fund to give full particulars about its income and expenditure to the public who have donated so generously to it with the express purpose of finding Madeleine
g) to generally promote the welfare of children, in particular by ensuring that parents are aware of the psychological needs of their children and ensuring that the relevant authorities take appropriate action to safeguard and promote the welfare of children.

Co-operation with others

3. To co-operate with all other organisations and individuals, both official and private, who share all or most of our objectives and have a genuine commitment to establish the truth about Madeleine’s disappearance.

Powers

4. The Madeleine Foundation shall for the purpose of advancing its aims and objects have all such powers as its Board of Directors or its General Meetings shall from time to time decide. See also Paragraph 16.

Membership

5. (a) Membership shall be open to all those aged 16 or over who support the aims and objects of The Madeleine Foundation as set out in Paragraph 2 above.
(b) Membership shall be open to anyone in the world wherever they live

Power to refuse or terminate membership

6. The Board of Directors shall have power to decline membership to an individual without giving a reason, and shall have the power to withdraw a person’s membership for conduct which brings or tends to bring The Madeleine Foundation into disrepute. A person whose membership is withdrawn shall have the right of appeal to the Board of Directors.

Membership fees

(a) The initial membership fee shall be £____ , which shall entitle the member to membership of The Madeleine Foundation until further notice.
(b) membership fees shall be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors

8. The Board of Directors reserves the right, however, to call on members for further membership fees should that prove necessary.

The Board of Directors

9. The members shall at their first meeting elect a Board of Directors of at least four and no more than twelve members to run The Madeleine Foundation.

10. At each Annual General Meeting, a Board of Directors of up to twelve members shall be elected. Postal or e-mail voting will be accepted in the case of those who for whatever reason who are unable to attend the Annual General Meeting.

11. The Board of Directors shall have the power to co-opt up to four additional members of the board, with full voting powers, whose terms of office will last until the next Annual General Meeting.

12. The Board of Directors shall appoint from within their number the following officers:

a) Chairman
b) Vice-Chairman
c) Secretary
d) Treasurer
e) Minutes Secretary
f) Media Relations Officer
g) Webmaster

13. The Board of Directors shall have the following powers:

to replace any officer or member of the Board of Directors if the post or position becomes vacant for whatever reason

to dismiss an officer or member of the Board of Directors for conduct which brings or tends to bring The Madeleine Foundation into disrepute

to co-opt up to four additional members to the Board, with full voting powers, whose terms of office will last until the next Annual General Meeting.

14. The quorum for the Board of Directors shall be three members.

15. Decisions of the Board of Directors will be by majority vote, with the Chairman, or acting Chairman, of the Board having a casting vote, which s/he must exercise in favour of the status quo where applicable.

16. The Board of Directors shall have the power to pay expenses, employ staff, open bank or building society accounts, buy or rent accommodation, appoint trustees and form sub-committees.

Annual and Special General Meetings

17. (a) the first Annual General Meeting shall be held on or before 31 January 2009
(b) Annual General Meetings shall be held annually thereafter.
(c) the date of the Annual General Meeting shall be decided by the Board of Directors
(d) the Secretary of the Board shall give all members at least 21 days’ notice of the time and place of the Annual General Meeting.

18. Any member may move any resolution at the Annual or at a Special General Meeting. Priority shall be given to those who submit resolutions at least 21 days in advance of an Annual or Special General Meeting.

19. The Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer, Media Relations Officer and Webmaster shall present reports at the Annual General Meeting.

20. One tenth of the membership, or the Board of Directors, may requisition a Special General Meeting, giving the reason they wish to hold such a meeting, again giving 21 days’ notice (in the case of one tenth of the membership, such notice to be given to the Secretary).

21. All decisions at General Meetings, including any motion to amend this Constitution, shall be by simple majority vote, with the Chairman or acting Chairman of the Meeting having a casting vote which s/he must exercise in favour of the status quo where appropriate.

Dissolution

22. The Madeleine Foundation may only be dissolved following the proper calling of a Special General Meeting for that purpose.

23. Should The Madeleine Foundation be dissolved for whatever reason, the Board of Directors shall pay any remaining funds into any other organisation which is actively and successfully working for the better care of children by their parents.

This Constitution was adopted on 26 January 2008

Constitution originally drafted by T. Bennett, 18 January 2008

ETA: Two other reminders for the record

1. The Madeleine Foundation's two books were each priced at £3 only - an amount calculated merely to cover costs - and neither made any profit for that reason
2. During 2010 and 2011 the Madeleine Foundation paid a total of just over £1,500 direct to the PGJA Amaral Defence Fund, in three tranches by bank transfer to their bank account

Sunday, 30 August 2015
CMoMM HATERS AND HOUNDERS

Well goodness, gracious me!  On this peaceful, if slightly overcast Bank Holiday Sunday, while the rest of us were enjoying a leisurely breakfast and quality time with our loved ones, the strange anonymous creatures who inhabit Jill Havern's forum were pounding out a seemingly unending stream of hatred towards myself, Sonia Poulton, Blacksmith and now, Chris Roberts.

What is that possesses these creatures, and possession it surely is, they must go to sleep thinking about us, and wake up raring to continue where they left off the night before.  How many ways can you say 'I hate you'? several thousand it would seem, and if you can find others of the same ilk, it can go into days, weeks, months and even years.  Have I got the message they don't like me?  Lol, yeh, kinda.  Can I do anything about it?  Well, no, not really.  As I have pointed out before, my existence or non existence will make no difference whatsoever to their miserable lives.  Hatred is their oxygen, bile is their soul food.  Even if I were to oblige them and respond in the same way as Brenda Leyland, they would merely turn their attentions to someone else.  They started off hating and hounding the McCanns, but the McCanns wouldn't play ball, so they had to find someone else.    

Is Tony Bennett a plant?  Who cares, lol.  If he ever had any credibility. it is long gone, most see him now as the deranged, attention seeking busy body that he is.  His 'work', apart from being total crap, is completely worthless, it matters not one iota in the McCann canon. His theories and conclusions are based on nothing other than his own distorted view of the world around him, his fear of sex and his hatred of women.  

He is not so much a plant as just another troll in a long line of trolls that have plagued this case.  I actually doubt very much that Team McCann want assistance from him in any way, shape or form.  1.  His greed and attention seeking matches theirs, 2. He is a pathological liar who can't be trusted and 3. Seriously, who on earth would employ him?

The Jill Havern forum may once have been a place of interest to those wanting to learn about the mysteries behind the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, but it is now as toxic as the pro McCann sites with only a handful of haters and hounders agreeing with each other and egging each other on. Whilst other forums are discussing whether the missing child will ever receive justice, CMoMM are discussing the evils of my diet book!  All the good posters have left, and anyone brave (or daft) enough to join, is torn to pieces within moments while their chief stalker 'researches' their background and posting history.  It is now nothing more than a den of fear and loathing, in the same category as the death dossier sites JATKY2 and Stop the Myths.  And just like their stable mates, when the time comes, there will no doubt be a lot of document shredding and denial, because anyone attached to it, will have much to be ashamed of.  

My regular readers will no doubt be relieved to know that I am no longer going to comment on the antics of Mr. Bennett or the vile commentary of the disturbed posters on CMoMM.  As interesting as it has been watching their dysfunctional, obsessive behaviour, it is time to move on.

I will continue commenting on the McCann case as I have always done, but like everyone else, I'm bored silly with the drivel spouted by Bennett and his venomous little band of banshees.  They have nothing of interest to say, and nothing to add to the fight for justice for Madeleine, they, like their odious poison pen letters are now consigned to my spam box.  

Sandra30 August 2015 at 20:54
You said in the blog that you weren't going to comment on the forum any more. It doesn't sound from what you've just said that you intend to do that.

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton30 August 2015 at 21:08
I'm bored senseless with their repetitive comments and won't be reading them anymore, nor will I be giving them anymore publicity on my blog.

However, if they think they can lift my blogs for their cesspit and constantly defame me, they are wrong. If and when I strike back, they'll know about it.  

Anonymous30 August 2015 at 21:43
If you don't comment on Bennett and his forum your blog is doomed. IMO.
I'm sure you know that though?

Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton30 August 2015 at 21:54
Get over yourself lol, my readers are interested in the case of missing Madeleine McCann, NO-ONE (other than a handful of psychos on CMoMM) is interested in Bennett.

***Message from Admin and Mods: We request that no further comments are made on the forum about Rosalinda Hutton/Cristobell until further notice - your co-operation would be appreciated. Any comments making reference to her are likely to be deleted. Thank you.