CRISTOBELL/HUTTON'S LATEST HATE-FILLED RAMBLINGS PART 2

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

RICHARD D HALL - CHARLATAN OR FOOL - Guest Blog

JJ says

Richard D Hall - Charlatan or Fool?

Anyone with a reasonable grasp of this case will know Bennett provided Richard D Hall with much of his “research” and Hall has repeated it parrot fashion.  By doing so he has lost all credibility because he has many of the basic core facts completely and utterly wrong.

It does not matter how many views he has had, Hall is either very gullible or a person intent on deliberate misinformation.

Lets take an erroneous core fact about Robert Murat, as an example there are many to choose from.

Bennett has written time and time again that by the end of 2007 the tapas 7 had all changed their minds about seeing Robert Murat outside 5a on the 3rd May

RDH states in his film that  by the end of 2007 they were all singing from the same hymn sheet and had changed their minds about RM (around 51mins in his film 4 Buried by Mainstream Media)

So how does Bennett, Hall or anyone else explain in April 2008 (note the date) that Fiona Payne and Rachel Oldfield gave Rogatory interviews to the Leicestershire Police where both stated Murat was outside 5a, on 3rd May.

Both Payne and Oldfield stated “Murat came up to me and shook me by the hand and said my name is Robert Murat”. No mistake, no uncertainty.

According to Bennett and Hall, these statements never happened, but it is in the PJ files for all to read.

What this shows clearly is that members of the tapas 7 intended to implicate Murat, whatever it took and this is what Bennett/Hall do not want placing under a spotlight.

So pages and pages of guff over the Smiths, but nothing on Fiona Payne or Rachel Oldfield

Why, would be a good question?

So I would like to ask the following and I am sure Rosalinda will give RDH the right of reply:

Did RDH do his own research?

If not from where did he get it?

Did RDH check this research with other independent sources?

Did he know of the Rogatory interviews?

Did he read them?

Has he met Clarence Mitchell in a professional or private capacity?

Can RDH/Bennett or anybody else produce a single document which shows FP and RO have retracted their statements made in April 2008?

If he cannot, will he apologise for misleading people and edit or withdraw his claims?

RDH has made many similar type claims casting aspersions on Murat and the Smith family amongst others, based on ill founded research.  Will he withdraw any accusation he cannot support as a fact, backed by official sources.

Many of his claims are polar opposite to information given by GA in his book and the PJ in their official files, so is he implying they are wrong and his and Bennetts research is correct?

Where did he get the specific information that the tapas group all retracted their id of Murat by the end of December 2007.

Bennett and Hall work the same way copious volumes of dross with an occasional nugget of interest.

They rely on nobody questioning or checking what they say.

Bennett often writes, “he who writes it should prove it” this however does not, it seems, apply to Bennett or Hall.

Conspiracy lurks around every corner, innuendo, supposition and lies constitute research, unrelenting denigration, to stifle any opposite view whether that is in the form of a word, a blog or rival documentary.

Willing unquestioning disciples hanging on their every word.

Charlatans are people expressing expertise and knowledge which they do not have, they make things up and pass it off as true.

Is there a better description?

These errors have been pointed out to RD Hall and so far he has done nothing to rectify them, however, if RDH is a genuine guy, who has been badly misled he should admit it and come clean.

We all make errors of judgement and we have all at some time, been taken for a fool in the sad tragedy of Madeleine McCann.

Anonymous23 July 2015 at 01:12

To be sung to the tune of Copacabana, by Barry Manilow.

His name was Bennett, he was a moron
A 3-inch parting in his hair, a greasy mac cut down to there
He would dissemble, and bore for Britain
He thought he knew about the law, but his knowledge was so poor
That every pension day, he’s giving half away,
And if he isn’t very careful they’ll be back for more

He’s a halfwit, the Harlow halfwit,
With qualifications in bullshit,
He’s a halfwit, the Harlow Halfwit
With blue ink and passion for taking a thrashing
He’s a halfwit……….. Oh shit, I’m banned!

Saturday, 8 August 2015
THE TORTOISE, THE HARE AND SMITHMAN

I believe the Smithman sighting is the biggest lead Scotland Yard have - they dedicated almost an entire 'Crimewatch' to it.  That picture of Gerry and Kate being interviewed by DCI Redwood with Smithman in the background is iconic for good reason.  And of course last summer, Operation Grange spent thousands if not millions, digging up areas in the immediate vicinity of Apartment 5A, following the route taken by Smithman.  You can kind of see why anyone desperate to take Smithman out of the equation would now be extremely agitated.

CMoMM as many of us kind of saw coming, has finally self combusted.  History has shown that people don't like it, when you force one opinion down to their throats and exclude all others.  Of course you always get wannabe dictators and tyrants who think they can buck the trend, but it always ends in tears.  Tony might do well to put down his bible, and study ACTUAL history.  'Vini, Vide, Vice' ended with 'et tu Brute'.

Contrary to the volumes of speculation and downright nonsense published by Tony Bennett, Gerry and Kate have deliberately played down and tried to ignore the sighting by the Smith family on the night of 3rd May.  Of the two 'sightings' on the night, they publicised the single sighting by Jane Tanner, rather than the group sighting by the Smith family.  Although the McCanns have held many press and faux police conferences dedicated to the Tanner sighting and Posh Spice look alike in Barcelona, they have NEVER made any appeals regarding the man seen by the Smiths.  For anyone studying this case, that is a huge red light!  In fact, so vague has been Team McCanns coverage of the Smithman sighting, that DCI Redwood introduced it as a huge revelation.

When the Times newspaper published an article claiming that the McCanns suppressed information about 'Smithman', there were further legal challenges and machinations, but essentially The Times were right, and the McCanns' claim that they could not afford to publicise TWO suspects was clearly nonsense.  For 8 years Gerry and Kate have been able to get front page coverage for their every bodily function.  Kate couldn't make love to Gerry, they have been heartened, devastated and on many occasions apoplectic with rage, but they have never had a moment to mention the strongest possible lead to the recovery of their daughter?  Seriously?

The reasons CMoMM are now solely dedicated to establishing that Smithman was NOT Gerry are a mystery, but their tactics are not working.  Absolutely no-one outside their inner clique is buying it - not that it matters one iota.  Tony Bennett fortunately has not now and has never ever, had any influence over the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.  My sympathy is entirely with those on the receiving end of his voluminous letters.  Ditto those on receiving end of letters etc from Team McCann.  Wealth can buy a lot of 'legalspeak' and tie people up in paperwork for years.  Lets hope none of the officers on Operation Grange have been assigned to it.

I have no idea what is going with on Operation Grange, other than an extraordinary, nay, unique investigation, the like of which the entire world has probably never seen before.  30+ top homicide detectives, millions of pounds of public money, 4 YEARS and counting - in search of one small girl. I am not saying one small girl does not deserve such attention, but on a bizarre and disproportionate level, it goes off the scale.

However, I am in fact heartened, if I may borrow the word, that Scotland Yard appear to be working on behalf of Madeleine, though for obvious reasons, they cannot say so.  Their generous contribution to their fellow officer's legal battles with the former suspects, spoke volumes.  I don't discard the words of others who comment on the McCann case, this case has been astonishing on every level.  I would argue that cover ups would be quiet and discreet, which is why we do not know about them. But then again, 'in plain sight' appears to be the current trend, so who knows.

When you discard the elephants, the lion tamers, the flying trapeze and the clowns, there was a tragedy.  A tragedy lost in the obscene rush to profit and capitalise in the aftermath.  Madeleine wasn't mourned, she was turned into a trademark.  Her cute, angelic face covered a thousand billboards, but we never knew who she was.  She didn't grow up, she never will.  As Gerry says she is the innocent victim in all this.

'Gerry and I are finishers' Kate once said, and indeed they are.  They have proved it time and time again with their sporting achievements.  Whilst the rest of us start each new year with a list of wholesome resolutions, by January 3rd, we are diving head first into a tub of Hagaan Das and singing 'Little Ole Wine Drinker Me' hic.  Gerry and Kate are made of much sterner stuff, they probably have a list of  'objectives' (carved in stone) rather than drunken aspirations to climb Mount Everest, legalise fun drugs and bring back Flower Power.  Gerry and Kate get things done, they are ruled by their heads, not their hearts, and that combined with an almost martyresque determination, drives them on.  They will not give up, they will not abandon their mission. #imthekingoftheword #drevil #kamakikaze #doyourecant #ouchthatburns

Kate may well come to regret those ill chosen words, Goncalo Amaral too is a finisher, and his is a noble and just cause.  He will settle for nothing less than the truth.  Goncalo, if he will forgive me, is the tortoise to the McCanns' hare, 'don't brag about your lightening pace, Slow and Steady won the race'. (Aesop)

Anonymous9 August 2015 at 05:08
O lecturer in English, mistress of prose, it's Veni Vidi vici. Remember, for the hard of spelling... Google is your friend.

Anonymous8 August 2015 at 18:49

"However, I am in fact heartened, if I may borrow the word, that Scotland Yard appear to be working on behalf of Madeleine, though for obvious reasons, they cannot say so. Their generous contribution to their fellow officer's legal battles with the former suspects, spoke volumes."

Would you care to explain what you mean by that?

Sunday, 9 August 2015
WHERE DID SMITHMAN HIDE THE BODY?

There are only a couple of options if it was you know who - he had only moments to get rid of the body and return to the group. I don't think he would have had time to find an unfamiliar address, knock and/or fumble with keys etc. Finding a secure location on the beach or on wasteland in the local vicinity would have caused the same problems with the time factor - unless a temporary 'hiding spot' was previously known. Whichever way, you look at it, there were massive risks. Once the alarm was raised searchers and dogs would be combing the area.

Some might say, the McCanns were expecting the body to be found. As early as 10.30pm Gerry was discussing paedophile gangs, and Kate was heard to say 'those f**king B'stards' have taken her'. This could be interpreted as an explanation for the condition of the body and anything an autopsy might reveal. The hiding place could not have been that secure, because the body was moved 3 weeks later - prior to the more intensive searches by the specialist team from the UK. Again, huge risks were taken, more areas were contaminated with the smell of cadaver.

The first burial place in my opinion was not premeditated, pre-planned or assisted in by anyone outside of the holiday group - if it had been the parents would not have been dropping hints about paedophile gangs and 'f**king B'stards. The main agenda of the McCanns' campaign is to convince the world Madeleine is alive and well and being treated like a princess. In those early hours I think, there was a very real fear that her body would be found.

There is of course the possibility that Smithman was rushing to meet someone, someone either in a car, or someone he could pass the body too, whose absence wouldn't be missed. This explanation would have required outside assistance, perhaps from someone local or someone known to the group who lived nearby and who was willing to drop everything to rush to their aid. I don't mean 'known' in the Tony Bennett sense, I mean someone who adores you enough to rush out in the night to help you hide your dead daughter's body and face several years in prison themselves. It is quite a big 'ask'.

In any event, whoever the abductor passed the body too, was not knowledgeable enough, or well connected enough, to hide the body in a permanent resting place. And of course, he too, like the original abductor, didn't have a car. He couldn't have, because if he did, he would driven as far away from PDL with his cargo as he could and the question of moving the body again would not have arisen. He most certainly would not have remained in the immediate vicinity digging a hole while a massive search was underway.

However, going with this theory, you can see why the telephone calls and antenna signals are of vital importance. Who did those first calls go to? Had they been from the McCanns to Robert Murat for example, the case could have been wrapped up years ago.

I believe the body was hidden temporarily in the local vicinity (in panic) in a spot that could prove problematic if more intensive searches were carried out. Moving the body was an incredibly risky thing to do - they clearly did not have outside assistance, because they used their own hire car. Had they been in league with the very well connected Robert Murat, alternate cars would I am sure, have been available.

The McCanns are risk takers extraordinaire, they have come this far on a wing and a prayer, everything they have done has involved almighty risks. Perhaps they truly believe they are the 'chosen ones', they certainly appear to be in the grip of the 'God Complex'. Fate has favoured them, they have turned almost every negative into a positive. They lost they daughter, they became Ambassadors for children everywhere. They were criticized by the Media, they shut the media up. They turned a great big whopping lie into the truth. That takes some balls.

I think the most likely explanation is that the holiday party had become familiar with the areas around PDL during the course of their holiday. In their runs and explorations, the chances are they came across a nook, a cranny, or a cave, that would perfectly fit their needs in the short term. A place remembered at a time of desperation, and a place one man could run too, spend seconds doing the deed, and return to the main stage in time for the curtains to rise. And the excavations in the areas around Apartment 5A last summer would seem to support that theory. The second burial place was of course the final one, one in which they had time to plan and a vehicle with which to go further afield.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
To: Cowardly Sykes of JATYK2 - you run a blog using MY work. Write your own stuff ya thieving talentless toad! #mccann  

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
Can't wait to see faces of JATYK2 BB1, Sabot, Lily, Lamplighter, Sykes, all hiding their faces/names and calling me ugly. #mccann

Irisheyes smiling ‏@LoveRandomleigh 3m3 minutes ago
@OlwynMassey @RosalindaHu << fish face has promised MSM

Good Golly Miss Olly ‏@OlwynMassey 3h3 hours ago
@LoveRandomleigh @RosalindaHu fish face????? #McCann

SafariSara ‏@SafariSara 3h3 hours ago
@OlwynMassey @LoveRandomleigh Yup, SHE used it as her twitter avatar, now she WHINES about it. What did she expect???

Irisheyes smiling ‏@LoveRandomleigh 3h3 hours ago
@SafariSara @OlwynMassey she looks like a cheap hooker in that pic

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 4m4 minutes ago

OK SYKES (JATKY2) - your days of stealing my blogs for your cesspit are over. #preparetobeunmasked #nohidingplace #mccann

James Bradley ‏@James_D_Bradley 8h8 hours ago

@RosalindaHu @siamesey @KDMoose my lawyer says your lack of copyright protection means u can't do jack my dear #mccann #legalheavyweight

Dorbi ‏@KDMoose 5m5 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu Ok Linda. do you think it is 'stealing' when Joana Morais reproduces and translates articles on her blog? #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose I am talking about the theft of my work, don't change subject. You #mccanns think you can just TAKE, well you can't! #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose he doesn't produce anything, he steals the work of others and gains advertising revenue from it. #typicalmccannscum #mccann

Dorbi ‏@KDMoose 3h3 hours ago
@RosalindaHu the aimoo forum that Lizzy runs has ads on it. is she 'scum' for this? #mccann @HiDeHo3

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@siamesey @KDMoose He has LIFTED every blog I have written and republished it on his own site. Clear case of theft. #mccann   (Incorrect, I have not bothered with the political ones, or the MeMeMe ones, only those accusing the McCanns of nefarious deeds, Sykes)

Dorbi ‏@KDMoose 3h3 hours ago
@siamesey @RosalindaHu @HiDeHo3 yes, i know all about plagiarism, and this is not what Sykes is doing. lol. he cites Linda as author #mccann

SafariSara ‏@SafariSara 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose RosalindaHu LOL LOL https://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/ Laughing at Mutton is only ONE of many threads. #McCann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@siamesey @KDMoose No probs with that Louise, but he has lifted my work in its entirety and is profiting from it. #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 7m7 minutes ago
@James_D_Bradley @siamesey @KDMoose LOL, my lawyer friends are a tad more upmarket than yours, #sykesindeepshit #mccann

James Bradley ‏@James_D_Bradley 4m4 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @siamesey @KDMoose you know my info is always honest, sound and accurate. You're pissing in the wind sweetie #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 55s55 seconds ago
@James_D_Bradley @siamesey @KDMoose I think the piss running down your leg is distracting you, #scaredmuch lol #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 5m5 minutes ago
@KDMoose @James_D_Bradley @siamesey I was a top legal sec in London for over 20yrs #knowemall : ) #mccann

Dorbi ‏@KDMoose 4m4 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @James_D_Bradley @siamesey who was it said you were 'top'? #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 1m1 minute ago
@KDMoose @James_D_Bradley @siamesey the top legal agency, I was on the front page of their brochure : ) #mccann

Cristobell Author
‏@RosalindaHu

@KDMoose Sykes sells advertising on his site, using the work of others to attract visitors, he is a common thief.  #mccann
2:20 PM - 10 Aug 2015

Dorbi ‏@KDMoose 3h3 hours ago
@RosalindaHu @siamesey if he is a thief, then so is Joana, and mccannfiles and Pamalam, and Lizzy #mccann
---

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose @HiDeHo3 Lizzy produces her own work. Sykes produces nothing - he is a parasite. #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose He has feck all on his site other than MY WORK #talentlesslowlifescumbag #mccann

Dorbi ‏@KDMoose 3h3 hours ago
@RosalindaHu now that's not true is it? I've already mentioned one of my pieces he has on there #mccann

Anyone that needs proof that Mutton is as dumb as a sack of hair, just has to look at her gibbers about ads on forums.

Of course there are ads on forums. Because it has to be paid for somehow, and few people can afford to pay for the hosting. Which is why the hosts put ads on forums. Duh.

That she doesn't even seem to know that the money goes to the hosts, is a fair demonstration of just how grossly ignorant she is, and why she is going to land herself in very hot water one of these days.

The wretch gives every impression of being a complete lunatic.   She's done nothing but cause trouble ever since she fetched up on the hounders flogging her mis-mem.

She's crazy - makes malicious, false allegations about anyone she decides to target, then wonders why no-one will give her the time of day. I confess to being a bit sorry for the people on not-not-Bennett's site - she abuses them, too, if they fail to show due deference to her.

Cristobell Author @RosalindaHu
Sykes, you claim you are only stealing my #McCann blogs. Lies. My Reluctant Dieter book and blogs have NOTHING to do with #mccanns 1/2
1 retweet 1 favorite
Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 27m27 minutes ago

2/2  So, Sykes what does my Reluctant Dieter's book have to do with #mccanns?  Why have stolen this for your cesspit?
0 retweets 0 favorites
Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 35m35 minutes ago

Sykes, you claim you are only stealing my #McCann blogs. Lies. My Reluctant Dieter book and blogs have NOTHING to do with #mccanns 1/2

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3m3 minutes ago
@KDMoose @fcryan1 'Ads are unavoidable' ROFPML, they are the choice of the forum owner! #mccann

Free, easy to use forum hosting service.
Create your own free forum at http://yourname.forumotion.com.
Unlimited forum messages and users.
Unlimited image and file uploads (per file restriction: 2MB).
No ads or external branding on your forum.
More than 3000 available forum skins.
Choose between popular forum platforms – phpBB2, phpBB3, punBB and Invision. You can switch them at any moment.
Promote your forum in Forumotion directory of forums.  

James Bradley ‏@James_D_Bradley 2m2 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @KDMoose @fcryan1 I dont get paid for the advertisin on my website or forum, its for from the FOC web space providers #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu
@KDMoose @KRotcepsni @fcryan1 @HiDeHo3 Forum owners must physically add gadgets to allow adverts - do the research. #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose @MissAnderson16 Sykes attracts hits and gets paid for the work he steals from others. That is theft. #parasiticscum #mccann

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose @MissAnderson16 Prove me wrong, Explain how 'forumotion' works so earned income bypasses the hosts/authors.

Re: Twitter (News and important information only please)
Post sallypelt Today at 6:48 pm

I don't know about other members, but over the last few weeks there isn't much, if anything, being reported about the McCann's. As the old saying goes, "the Devil makes work for idle hands". So to keep up the interest during these "quiet times" I decided to click on a link or two, on Twitter. What an eye-opener it has been.

One such link took me to a forum where someone with an id "Sykes" posts. There seems to be a war going on between Sykes and RH. However, I think that Sykes has RH sussed out and is exposing her for the hypocrite that she is. Take this post that RH has posted on Sykes forum:

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3h3 hours ago
@KDMoose @MissAnderson16 Prove me wrong, Explain how 'forumotion' works so earned income bypasses the hosts/authors.

How often, on this forum, when members have asked RH to provide the evidence to her sweeping statements, have they been told by her that she's not here to do other people's research, and for them to go and look themselves. Now, nothing rubs me up the wrong way like a liar or a hypocrite, and RH is a hypocrite of the highest order. Take this post by RH on her "blog" when asked to provide the evidence to her claims:

"I do not lay out my research like a GCSE student in search of red ticks, that I leave that to others. I personally find other people's 'research' tedious, but if they feel they have to prove they have done the work, let them crack on".

You couldn't make it up, could you?  

Sallypelt:   You couldn't make it up, could you?
Verdi:     That's just the problem - she does!
Interesting stuff, I thank you for posting.  You can always tell when H-RH is caught out in her seemingly never ending works of fiction, she flounders and abuses and ROFLs and LOLs about all over the place.  In other words loses all manner of self control.

whodunit: It always burns me up when somebody puts forth a theory and then expects everyone to take their word for the facts they assert. No dear, it's up to you to back up what you say, not the other way around. If the person refuses then they shouldn't be surprised when they're left standing all alone with no credibility.  

Note to Sykes:  You claim the money from the advertising on your site goes to the 'main owners' Forumotion.  An out and out lie!  Bloggers and forum owners have the option to have advertising or not.  The idea that you have advertising on your site for the financial benefit of a large, unknown corporation is absurd and you must be the only forum owner on the net who does that.  You have chosen to have advertising on your website, ergo, you have agreed to the conditions and you have physically added the gadgets to enable them.  You are fooling no-one, other than your fellow death dossier compilers on JATKY2 and Stop the Myths.  The amount may well be a pittance, but you are stealing it nonetheless.  The advertisers are attracted to your site based on the work you steal from others.  You are the lowest of the low in the blogger world and I hope, once people realise what you are doing that you receive the contempt you deserve.  

You have removed my Reluctant Dieter's blog and book excerpt, but you still have entire blogs that you have republished without my permission.  That is copyright theft.  As for my diet blog, it may well be of interest to your readers, but you didn't write it, did you?  And you certainly didn't ask my permission to put it on your website.

We bloggers put a lot of time and effort into our work in order to get 'hits' - for us it is a labour of love.  The only 'work' you do, is copying and pasting what we have written, and for this you are receiving advertising revenue.  You have even said in the past that you are putting my blogs on your website to prevent me from getting the 'hits', thereby of course, ensuring that the hits go to you.  By taking my blogs and my hits, you are stealing.  I am not mincing my words here, you are a thief and I am not going to tolerate it any longer.    

You have even said in the past that you are putting my blogs on your website to prevent me from getting the 'hits', thereby of course, ensuring that the hits go to you.

coco wrote:loony off her meds again , is she ?

Post aiyoyo Today at 8:08 pm

@snook wrote:
She's threatening Sykes with legal action now. Apparently he's stealing her magnificent work to create traffic to his site! She is so thick she doesn't realise he posts her stuff ( with links) to ridicule. It's all good tho', she was one of the top 20 legal secretaries in the UK so she has access to the finest legal brains in the country.

Her stupidity and self destruction on fine display..... at this going rate she's heading towards self combustion.

Brought it upon herself with all the drivel she spouts from her backside but she's too bigoted to realise she's hoisted by her own petard.

What will she need? A reputation-damage-limitation-control lawyer?

Go get'em aka Ms Havern:

Nope shame on you Didn't you read her blog correctly aiyoyo? It's CMOMM that's self combusting.

Re: That Sonia Poulton documentary update 8 June: The detailed reponses of 'Tigger', Vikki Scott and Tony Bennett
Post  aiyoyo Today at 8:41 pm

@Verdi wrote:
Just seen this chez Hutton

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu  22 hrs22 hours ago

Still munching that popcorn and laughing BB1? You have all been had and you are too stupid to know it.

She's not referring to the legendary 'documentary' is she?

Nah surely not, it's nigh on 10 months since the original announcement.. tic toc tic toc

She's probably referring to the legendary 'pocumentary' that has been teasingly serialised on the social media.

What exactly did she mean to convey when she said "you have all been had......"?
Has she let the cat out of the bag - that SP has been leading her adoring sheeple down the garden path?   Likely this is another one of her infamous foot in mouth moments.....?

I can smell a Novice Prize for her patched artworks in the wind....