SOME PERTINENT COMMENTS RE HUTTON AND POULTON FROM AN ANTI FORUM

Vikki Scott

THE LUNATICS HAVE TAKEN OVER THE ASYLUM.

A precognitive statement by Terry Hall if ever there was one. Were The Fun Boy Three to release that single now it would serve as the perfect anthem for what now laughingly passes for debate of the McCann conundrum on Twitter and many other dark recesses of the internet, Facebook included in some cases.
That it is impossible for personalities not to be attacked when 'discussing' a case with such polarised views is something those engaging have to put up with. Casualties of war and all that but what we are witnessing lately has gone beyond name calling and slight ridicule. No, what we witness now is an all out assault to destroy reputations, research and possibly ruin certain peoples lives.
What we are seeing now is verging on apostasy. The investigation into what happened to Madeleine McCann has been abandoned by some in favour of venomous attacks on those who were previously allies to the cause, 'fighting' for the same truth to emerge, namely what was the fate of the little child and at who's hands did she suffer.
There are many theories into what happened to Madeleine but the only certainty is, we don't know, other than she is no longer with us, whether you believe she is dead or being held by a loving family/paedophile ( delete as applicable ) and is lost forever or findable.
There are theories as to what date she met her fate, how she met her fate, the reasons why there seems to be a cover up and why so much assistance is being given to the parents. The theories are endless. Was Tanner lying? Does Smithman exist ? How long was David Payne in the apartment, if at all on that fateful evening on 3 May 2007? What did Kate shout when she gave the alarm and why ? You get the picture. 30,000 documents to pour over yet the pressing priority at the moment seems to be to attack each other in the vilest way possible.
Most people who are sure the parents are responsible for Madeleine's demise are, quite rightly, fighting Goncalo Amaral's corner. Yet many of these same people do not agree with his theory and timeline. Textusa has a faithful following and an enviable number of views of the blog site. Do these two come in for attacks for the crime of not going along 100% with other theories and from the very people who purport to be batting for the same side ? Not very often. Neither are subject to personal attacks by those who ostensibly fight for the same truth even if their theories are questioned, so when I see the disgusting very personal attacks being launched now I have to ask, why and what is the true agenda ? The only people trying to ridicule Amaral and Textusa are those who see it as a life mission to protect Kate and Gerry at any cost and ridicule anyone who cannot see the light of innocence shining from their stricken eyes.
So why are we seeing so called sceptics turning on other sceptics with the gusto that would see them earning rapid promotion within the ranks of Stop The Myths ?
It is no revelation that I have no faith in the much vaunted 'revelatory' documentary everyone is waiting for with baited breath. Nor do I think it is a coincidence that these attacks have gained momentum since the 'alternative' journalist, Sonia Poulton rode into town on the coat tails of the tragic death of Brenda Leyland. Ms Poulton has found a willing ally in one Rosalinda Hutton aka Cristobell,, who already had a reputation for stretching the truth and throwing her toys out of the pram when forum/Facebook group members refused to kneel at the alter of her words of wisdom.
Although I am reluctant to give either a name check it needs to addressed as to why Tony Bennett has now become the target of Ms Poulton's smears.

For months now we have contradictory statement after contradictory statement with regard to her documentary which, thanks to her self promotion, some people think is going to blow the lid off the murky world of McCann. She told us it was going to be aired by mainstream media. Hang on, make that a debut in the USA now. It was going to be screened after Brenda's inquest, no wait, after the conclusion of the trial in Portugal. The only recurring theme throughout has been the teasers telling her panting audience that she has door stepped Kate McCann and others and is going to imminently reveal a personality 'close to McCann' that will shock us'. Still waiting. We have also been made privy to the fact that she has been 'troll' hunting those who have 'defamed' her ( get the theme? ) and that there are many many people who are trying to stop her from producing this masterpiece. Get over yourself Poulton. Richard Hall's videos have had over a million views with, I have no doubt far superior research than your troll fest and without the self promotion that is another recurring theme of this production. I don't doubt this will earn me the accusation that I am working for 'the other side' because anyone who casts doubt on this forthcoming extravaganza is obviously in the pay of the McCanns as how could anyone possibly not slavishly hang on her every word ?
The above not withstanding, say I give Ms Poulton the benefit of the doubt. Each to their own and if the job gets done all power to her. So I have to ask why, with the aid of Hutton and her attack dog with a big gun ( what is they say about men who love guns? ) has she launched an unprovoked attack on Mr Bennett?

It is no secret that Hutton has made it her life mission to sully his reputation
and research ever since she received a seven day suspension from the forum, The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann, to cool off after one of her ever increasing outbursts. Suspension mind you, not ban as she purported. Bouyed by her 'success' revelling in announcing herself as a bitch who loves to 'squish' in the train wreck of an article in The Sun ( arranged by guess who ), she regaled her adoring public with tales of death threats from Mr Bennett although as with all of her assertions no one has yet see proof of these ridiculous claims but hey, it makes for great copy for the blog.
We get it Cristobell, you don't like Tony. You are playing in the major league now. Out on location, making THE documentary. So why is your new bezzie mate Poulton now attacking Mr Bennett? Why are you two accusing him of being a McCann stooge ? What on earth has this got to do with any search for 'truth'? And why, having forced him to go to the effort of putting his personal details online for your delectation do you respond with 'kiss my a**e' ? Have you any idea how ridiculous you look ?
And not content with that the pair of you continue the attacks on twitter, including, Ms Hutton, our Very own Ben Thomson in your attacks. We get it. No one can compete with you as an 'attractive, articulate woman' That your words are awaited by the online community with baited breath is a given, so it begs the question, what do you hope to achieve and what is YOUR game ? You demand answers yet refuse to answer the most innocuous ones asked of you. You have been proven a liar. Even Poulton wont back you in your assertions against Ben yet still you refuse to apologise. Is it so difficult to admit the world of Cristobell may be wrong sometimes? Still, I understand after all, as you keep reminding us, you are a 'better writer' which is no more tha we expect from a 'lecturer in English' Is there no end to your talents ?

See from where I am sitting, Tony is not the one whoring himself out to Murdoch's Sky whilst purporting to be outraged by the way Brenda was hounded to death by that very organisation. Nor does he or Ben feel the need to ridicule and rubbish other people's work and research. I don't recall Mr Bennett or any other 'anti' McCann group giving house room to the lunatic Birch like Ms Poulton did for a full half hour. Love or loathe Mr Bennett I would put money on the fact that most of us have arrived at our conclusions based on much of the early research done by him. Research most of us have neither the time or inclination to undertake ourselves. I doubt the numbers now awake to thelies of McCann would be any the wiser were it not for Mr Bennett.

Serious researchers are not interested in the identities of those who support the McCanns and are not seeking out ' fat hairy pros' to 'out' in public. Neither of you have any self awareness. You speak of dignity yet engineered a farce at Brenda's inquest. You scream foul at Martin Brunt yet revel in the prospect of doing the very same thing. Indeed, Ms Hutton is now blaming 'anti Mccann' for Brenda's suicide. Indeed, your latest tome tells us how you can see why the MSM are disgusted with anti campaigns and that you have nothing for contempt for us. remind us again which side of the fence you sit or do you need to consult your new found pals over in the pro debate camp ?
Your adoring fans are salivating at the prospect of this forthcoming documentary. I hope they are not disappointed. I'm sure they wont be. Madeleine had become lost in the cesspit of sensationalism and I'm sure most of your adoring fans will be happy when they see you trying to humiliate ordinary men and women who support Kate and Gerry. Yes, some go too far but that statement can be applied to both sides of the argument and all you two are doing are stoking the fire. Credible ournalists don't need to provide a running commentary on their projects. They are judged on results and they certainly don't make personal attacks on anyone who may not agree with their way of working. So what results has Poulton shown to give us faith in this forthcoming expose? I'm still waiting for the 'Unmasking of a Messiah', the 'outing' of David Icke following Ms Poulton 's sudden departure from his TV station. If I recall correctly that was put on hold due to 'legal reasons'. Yet this very same lady tells us she cannot afford a legal team to take on one man who was building a website for her? How odd. Money seems no object for the McCann project? I wonder who is funding it as it is being run past legal now prior to it's outing? Is it surprising that her former colleagues in the alternative media community refer to her as 'controlled opposition ' ?
So I have to wonder, what exactly is your game ? How did Sonia manage to breach the state of the art security system purported to be installed at chez McCann ? How come Clarence hasn't been on the front pages decrying the attack on the vulnerable mother of a missing child? Why do Sky tolerate and pay a woman who purports to denounce them for their support of the McCann family?
Team McCann must be rubbing their hands with glee. To those who can't wait to get pull up the sofa for a evenings exciting viewing, ask yourself, just who is behind it ?

On second thoughts, take no notice of me. After all I'm just another shill, throwing a spanner in the works, trying to destroy all attempts to explain to the world 'The Untold Story of Madeleine McCann'

Update. It seems Ms Poulton is now to be in talks with broadcasters but has no idea when ( or presumably where) it will be aired ? I have to wonder who produces a film, then has the legalities ironed out, not knowing if it will ever be marketable to a wide audience. Must be a money no object production ? Seems rather at odds with previous announcements.

Stop it Vikki. I bet you are one of those dark mysterious individuals who have been plotting to undermine this gem.

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 33m33 minutes ago
#VikkiScott shows why the self-seeking @SoniaPoulton & @RosalindaHu attack the v popular #CMOMM forum re #McCann & me xxxxhttp://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t10803-sonia-poulton-update …

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos 36m36 minutes ago
#VikkiScott has got the nasty @SoniaPoulton & @RosalindaHu well sussed re #McCann, p.46 of this thread xxxxxxxhttp://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t10803-sonia-poulton-update … #TwoHypocrites

Andrew Espeland ‏@AndrewEspeland 2h2 hours ago
@SoniaPoulton Many thanks for the twitlonger. Is the film likely to be on a UK broadcast channel? And may I report your answer on CMOMM?

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 55m55 minutes ago
@AndrewEspeland yes and sure although that particular forum is infested with a bigot and liar.