Someone is trying to get the Hounders to grasp actual law, as opposed what they imagine is law - especially Portuguese law.
And one of them has just told a flat out lie.
The only thing in the files that says that is the discredited half-time report by convicted torturer Tavares de Almeida.
And that is precisely why Amaral is in such trouble.
I do wonder if the haters and hounders actually know the first thing about the case. They don't seem to have read and UNDERSTOOD the police files, the Archiving Dispatch, and the 2008 report preceeding it, by senior Portuguese police officers.
NONE of these agree with Amaral or his torturer chum.
And one of them has just told a flat out lie.
Oh no, they don't.Re: McCanns v Amaral trial is NOT LIBEL!
Post BlueBag Today
Where?OxfordBloo wrote:
2/ Called the McCann guilty.
He gave an opinion that the evidence points to death and concealment of a body.
Which it does.
The published files say the same.
The only thing in the files that says that is the discredited half-time report by convicted torturer Tavares de Almeida.
And that is precisely why Amaral is in such trouble.
I do wonder if the haters and hounders actually know the first thing about the case. They don't seem to have read and UNDERSTOOD the police files, the Archiving Dispatch, and the 2008 report preceeding it, by senior Portuguese police officers.
NONE of these agree with Amaral or his torturer chum.
