SYKES' TAKE ON - TROLLS ON THE SCAM? JUST WONDERING AND ASKING

A few days ago someone set up a fund on the internet to facilitate a libel miscreant and convicted perjurer pay the fines and interest levied on him after he was found guilty in the latest case brought against him.   However, some interesting discrepancies are rearing their heads - the main one some of the donor names, the problem being that many of these are in fact of those who would never support this.   This has promoted many comments regarding what is going on, with certain statements to the fact that this could well be a scam - the people most intimately involved being well-known internet trolls.   Then the names got wilder and wilder - a senior Swedish policeman; the mother of the missing child (hardly likely to pay anything to the fund as she had, after all, just won the aforementioned libel case); a well-known journalist who 'admitted to being drunk when she wrote a scathing attack on the convicted libeller and the trolls' donated the princely sum of £5;  One of the 'at the front' is a woman who, with her then fiancé, tried to scam a well-known supermarket chain over something she 'claimed' to have swallowed when eating an item puchased in one of their stores.  She and her partner were arrested for trying to extort monies but no charges were made.  More and more names are turning up as the trolls clone anyone who disagrees with them.   The whole thing stinks of something nasty and also shows what idiots these people are - what person in their right minds trolls their own fund?   Yesterday someone posted on the above-mentioned website an out-and-out libellous attack on the editor of the paper that exposed trolls were subsiding the case loser's fines and court costs, threatening court action etc.  The website doesn't seem to be monitoring what is being posted up which is weird, considering their so-called rules. A passing thought - who is monitoring the incoming donations, who is in charge overall and most of all, do the donors realize that a percentage of their offerings is actually being hived off by the website? 5% to be exact plus a processing fee of 3% - don't believe me, go read their Common Questions section on their website. And how come the website allows the donations for a criminal cop, but vetoes an attempt to set up a fund for the charged policemen in the latest cop/black killing?