BENNETT RIPS HUTTON A NEW ONE

Cristobell Author @RosalindaHu · 3h 3 hours ago
#McCann LOL Plebgate, I'm not going even going to read the shite, read the first few words and boredom kicked in.

Brenda Leyland, how she backed Richard Hall's documentary, how she clashed with 'nit-picker Rosalinda Hutton - 26 tweets on 9th & 10trh August 2014

Post  Tony Bennett Today at 10:09 am
On browsing through Brenda Leyland's tweets for 2014, I came across this remarkable series of tweets on 9th & 10th August last year - less than two months before her life was tragically cut short as a direct result, it would seem, of sustained public exposure of her in the first week of October last year.

The sequence of events is very interesting.

On 1st August, Richard D Hall announced that he had made a 4.3-hour long documentary about the Madeleine McCann case.

On 8th August, the first of 26 video uploads of part or all of his documentary, by 9 different people, was uploaded to YouTube.

It looks from the tweets below as though Brenda Leyland saw most of this documentary on 8th August or the following day, Saturday 9th August.

Her first tweet about Hall's documentary was posted at 7.48pm on 9th August. She described the documentary as 'brilliant' and 'persuasive' and said she'd spent 'most of the morning' sending a link to his film to 'everyone that I know'.

That is a hallmark of a committed campaigner, no matter what is said about some of her very unpleasant tweets.

On Sunday 10th August she is up and about early (7.33am) tweeting about how McCann-sceptics should make this 'the most viewed on the internet'.

But by Sunday lunch-time, discordant voices were heard about Hall's film, none more shrill and aggressive than those from one Rosalinda Hutton (Cristobell).

How Brenda Leyland dealt with her and other critics is set out in a series of tweets below - from 1.59pm to 7.13pm that day.

Hutton's objections seemed to stem from two mild remarks made by Hall, one of them suggesting that there were queries about the 'Smithman' sighting, the other saying he might be making a further film about the role of Robert Murat in the Madeleine McCann case.

For members here, it's interesting to note that the very week in which Hutton began attacking Hall's video was the same one in which she deliberately provoked her suspension here, by attacking other members, and very soon afterwards launched into a bitter attack on CMOMM on her blog. At the same time per personal campaign against me moved up from fourth gear to 'overdrive' (and now seems to be in overdrive-plus).

As for Hutton's self-promotion in attending the anarchy march im London in November, sporting a slogan saying: 'I am Brenda Leyland', I wonder if Brenda herself would have approved, now that we know how she (quite rightly) attacked Hutton for nit-picking criticisms of Hall's film?

So what has happened since Brenda Leyland enthused about Hall's video?

It has been seen by 300,000 on YouTube and by hundreds of thousands more on his website and on his DVDs.

Whereas Hutton has been campaigning relentlessly for 6 months against CMOMM, against myself, and has produced only one action of note, namely dragging all McCann-sceptics into the mud by admitting she was a 'self-obsessed bitch' who enjoyed the 'buzz' of her 'anti-McCann' tweets - giving Rupert Murdoch's Sun and his SKYNews the perfect opportunity to campaign against 'internet trolls' and single out 'anti-McCann' tweeters as the worst offenders.

Hutton fails to promote Hall's video but instead promotes the film-making efforts of Sonia Poulton, with her dubious track record, her promotion of and active involvement in the disastrous Sun spread on 31 January, her point-blank refusal to say who is commissioning her, and her recent appearances on SKYNews.

Hutton and her acolytes have repeatedly claimed that I am working directly for the McCann Team.

I think it's now time for me to ask this question: whose side is Hutton actually on?      

CMOMM has a scrolling banner promoting Hall's documentary and is so far as I know the only Madeleine McCann forum to do so. Yet in other places, CMOMM is abused and criticised. Now why is that?

Finally, Brenda Leyland has left us all a legacy with these tweets on 10th August last year.

She had both Richard Hall and Rosalinda Hutton well and truly sussed.

She pointed us towards the 'brilliant', 'humble' Richard Hall.

But away from Hutton

++++++++++++++++++++++++


498194039964172288|Sat Aug 09
19:48:09 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Brilliant Richard, have spent most of the morning sending this link to every one that I know, really persuasive

498371639739179008|
Sun Aug 10
07:33:52 +0000 2014|
#mccann
" Buried by MSM" is going, in K s eyes to make GA s book seem like a bed time story, have sent link 200 times so far

498372263197282304|
Sun Aug 10
07:36:21 +0000 2014|
#mccann  very important now that we all make this the most viewed on the internet ,make waves and capitalise as much as we can

498468729400086530|
Sun Aug 10
13:59:40 +0000 2014|
@blamedandshamed
@cautiousdave
Missing point Dave #mccann  what videos show is tons of anomalies and lies that need investigating

498489536721465344|
Sun Aug 10
15:22:21 +0000 2014|
#mccann  Richard has " put his head over the parapet " very brave man, financed this himself, amazingly well done

498489817479794688|
Sun Aug 10
15:23:28 +0000 2014|
@aintthatso
@RosalindaHu
#mccann
he did, some what cross at nit picking, this is a complex case, impossible to cover all in one swoop

498492484906135552|
Sun Aug 10
15:34:04 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Could you even look at a Barristers brief of a complex case and not find 1 item, under-exposed ? disingenuous to criticise.

498494192805773313|
Sun Aug 10
15:40:51 +0000 2014|
@RothleyPillow
@winnower1
#mccann
I agree, Richard made it clear that he welcomed input, think he would react very well to any suggestions

498495478468972544|
Sun Aug 10
15:45:58 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Richard has in fact put K & G in an invidious situation, haha, ignore & be hypocrite, advertise R Hall and UK will want to see it

498499454966960128|
Sun Aug 10
16:01:46 +0000 2014|
@RothleyPillow
@winnower1
#mccann
In same boat, unsure what he has said, just want to support 100% a brave guy, seen 3 parts so far

498510748130476032|
Sun Aug 10
16:46:38 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Richard Halls mandate, is to bring awareness of the case and the injustice, standing the " test of time " is not the point,

498519298626048000|
Sun Aug 10
17:20:37 +0000 2014|
#mccann  I have always been a staunch ally Ros, I don't agree with you now, seems like inter author rivalry , shame if it is

498519922058993664|
Sun Aug 10
17:23:06 +0000 2014|
#mccann  In a case with a thousand facts, don't damn with faint praise just because of a couple of issues, point them out to him if you want

498520531814322176|
Sun Aug 10
17:25:31 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Richard has highlighted SO MANY signs of mccann guilt that we owe him out thanks

498522612612743168|
Sun Aug 10
17:33:47 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Richard is aware of Carter Ruck, he is not rich, he has invested a lot to make this facts available, he needs our support

498523622554992642|
Sun Aug 10
17:37:48 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Each author Christobel, be it you, Pat Brown or Richard has their own " slant, priorities " may not b yours but R valid  & personal

498524944771608576|
Sun Aug 10
17:43:03 +0000 2014|
@CafeMcCann
yes, but this is very good indeed.

498529292129943552|
Sun Aug 10
18:00:20 +0000 2014|
@RosalindaHu
@greciandream
@winnower1
#mccann
You said it, " In your opinion " not in his, he has more to share, early days.

498529918624739328|
Sun Aug 10
18:02:49 +0000 2014|
@RosalindaHu
@greciandream
@winnower1
#mccann
Your pedantry does you no credit, it makes you appear smug , this video will do great good

498531984793407491|
Sun Aug 10
18:11:02 +0000 2014|
#mccann
Richard Hall could hardly have been more humble and open, when he invites all new facts, what more does one want

498533817762983936|
Sun Aug 10
18:18:19 +0000 2014|
@greciandream
#mccann
I am very disappointed, expected better, poor taste for one " author" to claim superiority. leaves bad taste

498534432605995009|
Sun Aug 10
18:20:45 +0000 2014|
#mccann
This should not be about egos, people claiming how much better they cd do it, any video like this is to be welcomed

498536175679070209|
Sun Aug 10
18:27:41 +0000 2014|
#mccann sorry to say this Ros, but am cross, if you could do so much better why haven't you ? easy to be arm chair expert

498543501202964481|
Sun Aug 10
18:56:47 +0000 2014|
@greciandream
@RosalindaHu
#mccann
This is not about you Ros, or your dealings with Bennet,  or your theories, its Richards work fgs

498545969836072960|
Sun Aug 10
19:06:36 +0000 2014|
@DaSteelMan
@greciandream
@RosalindaHu
#mccann  
Perhaps poor Richard should have given editorial remit to Ros never mind authors integrity

498547811823403008|
Sun Aug 10
19:13:55 +0000 2014|
@RosalindaHu
#mccann
When you produce the block busting definitive video with ALL the answers, I will bow to your insight, less grandstanding 4 now

HelenMeg Today at 10:22 am
IMO, Ms Hutton has something to prove - to herself. Her quest for recognition (as an author or personality) and views on the Mc Cann case became too intertwined. I steer clear for that reason.
I dont think that she is on the 'side' of the Mc Canns though. Brenda, however, was clearly an intelligent lady and voiced her views with clarity and determination to find justice.

Ladyinred Today at 10:43 am
RH and her fans will be kept busy for the next few days!  Without TB she'd have nothing to write about.

Tony Bennett Today at 10:50 am

   HelenMeg wrote:I don't think that [Ms Hutton] is on the 'side' of the McCanns though...

But one must always look at the effects of a person's actions.

Has she for six months run a relentless campaign against by far the most successful McCann forum on the net?

YES.

Is that in the interests of McCann-sceptics, or the McCanns?

THE MCCANNS.

Has she portrayed herself on a 2-page spread in the Sun as a 'self-obsessed', 'anti-MCcann bitch' who gets a 'buzz' out of attacking her opponents?

YES.

Is that in the interests of McCann-sceptics, or the McCanns?

THE MCCANNS.

Has she repeatedly attacked Richard Hall's film - the most popular and most comprehnsive documentary on the McCann case to date?

YES.

Is that in the interests of McCann-sceptics, or the McCanns?

THE MCCANNS.

And as you know, @ HelenMeg, there are McCann discussion forums on the internet, purportedly McCann-sceptic, which for months have been actively promoting all that she says and does

HelenMeg Today at 11:33 am
I agree that her actions appear to act in favour of the Mc Canns sometimes - I dont think this is deliberate but arises out of her - how to say this nicely ? - stupidity  / ignorance ?

IAmNotMerylStreep Today at 11:34 am

I have said before on this forum that Hutton was a McCann supporter on the AOL messageboards from Day One. She and the other McCann supporters were known as 'attack dogs' because they would attack anyone who didn't believe the McCanns. She was pally with a particularly vicious person called Bev 'Henrydog' - a vile woman - and if you read the comments on Cristobell's blogs you will see they are still very friendly with each other and say they even enjoyed those days.

Hutton is still an 'attack dog'. She and her cronies would attack other posters until they left the AOL messageboards.

Hutton still attacks (some) McCann sceptics to this day.

As TB says: Is that in the interests of McCann-sceptics, or the McCanns?

HelenMeg Today at 11:38 am
I dont know her history - I only know her from the last 12 months or so.  I dont think what she says or how she acts furthers the cause of those of us who seek justice for Madeleine.... she used to post long posts on here and almost promote the 'negligence' myth which used to annoy me greatly.

Tuesday, 24 February 2015
BURIED BY THE MAINSTREAM

There you go Tone, your expose of my officially being an egotist is not getting much interest on your forum, so I will put it here

In a series of tweets last summer, I disagreed with Brenda Leyland about the Richard T. Hall, Buried by the Mainstream videos, her argument being that it was my ego that prevented me from backing and promoting this series of videos that claimed to expose the truth behind the Madeleine McCann mystery.

It wasn't. It was Richard's use of Tony Bennett's appalling and biased research that pointed the finger at the first arguido Robert Murat via the Smith family who saw a man carrying a child on the night Madeleine disappeared. The implication being that the Smith family were lying to protect their 'friend' Robert Murat. It has of course since been proved that Tony Bennett was in fact investigating the WRONG Smith family, ergo, Video 3 (iirc) of the 4 piece is a load of bollocks. Sorry Richard, but you should have checked.

Whilst there was a lot of good work within the videos, an error of that magnitude destroyed the rest. My sympathy lies with Richard, but I could not in all good conscience, promote the videos, because:

a) They were giving out the wrong information.

b) I consider individuals investigating (stalking) witnesses in a high profile criminal investigation to be fundamentally wrong on every level.

b) I consider publishing the findings of such stalking, ie, the personal, financial and confidential details of potential witnesses for the Crown, on a public message board, morally bankrupt, and if not criminal, then it should be.

c) I do not feign affection. That is, I will only praise that which genuinely impresses me and I'm afraid these videos didn't because I was niggled by the errors and they were far too long. If I say something is brilliant, when it isn't, then that will reflect on my own reputation.

It is appalling now to see Tony elevate Brenda Leyland to sainthood because she became a victim of this case. She wasn't. She was an ordinary woman, no different to most of us, but on occasion she went too far. That sadly, is probably one of the reasons she was selected as the 'example'. I was not a fan, but the only exchange I can recall with her, was our disagreement over the Mainstream videos. And incidentally, why hasn't Tony put my tweets alongside Brenda's? He is showing only half the conversation!

I am sure that if Brenda and I had got to know each other, we would have had much in common but such is the nature of social media, we are all but ships that pass in the night. I was shocked and appalled when Sky News pounced on Brenda, and I tweeted my support for her, because no-one deserved that.

I would be curious however to know Mr. Bennett's views in the aftermath of Sky News, that intervening period before Brenda was found dead. In fact, I would be interested to see the 'views' and 'tweets' of a number of antis at that time, because I had more than a taste of it myself following the Sun article.

For the critics, yes, tis boring having to rebut Mr. Bennett's allegations, and being called an egotist is one of the more amusing and less harmful among them. But it is sickening that he is using Brenda Leyland in this way and that he caused so much damage to the work of Richard T. Hall. If I were Richard, I would edit it to the bone and re-launch it as one video focussing on the truth and avoiding armchair theorists.

Bugsy ‏@SuppDoc 33m33 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @TheCatwoman2 @zampos You've attacked plenty in the past. People are sick of seeing you bleat on about stuff.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 30m30 minutes ago
@SuppDoc @TheCatwoman2 @zampos and you have been elected to speak on behalf of all these people? lol, Let me get my swatter #mccann

Bugsy ‏@SuppDoc 28m28 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @TheCatwoman2 @zampos Were you when you made a spectacle of yourself in the Sun? "Look at me everyone, me, me, me!"

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 24m24 minutes ago
@SuppDoc @TheCatwoman2 @zampos Be grateful I kept my top on smile #nowkissmyarse

Bugsy ‏@SuppDoc 22m22 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @TheCatwoman2 @zampos If they'd offered you page 3 you'd have done it, with a write up to how your tits were portrayed badly.

Cristobell Author
‏@RosalindaHu
@SuppDoc @TheCatwoman2 @zampos Impossible, I have great tits! smile
e
8:57 AM - 24 Feb 2015
*Catwoman* ‏@TheCatwoman2 18m18 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @SuppDoc @zampos I will not let Maddies picture follow that, words have just failed me which doesnt happen very oftenYoure vile

Bugsy ‏@SuppDoc 18m18 minutes ago
@RosalindaHu @TheCatwoman2 @zampos In that case the next time the Sun contact you, I suggest you stick to visual not verbal.