4 posters

LET US HAVE A POLL ....

Sykes: Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17

Post n°1

LET US HAVE A POLL ....

Sykes Fri Jun 06, 2014 7:03 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

But 21 (72%) agree with the proposition that "Both Jane Tanner and Martin Smith were working to a script and neither actually saw anyone" (no Tannerman, no Smithman)

In what alternate universe is 21 72% of 81?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Anyway, all 21 were probably Bennett socks, except for yoyo agreeing with its master.

Sykes

Sykes: Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17

Post n°2

HE'S CERTIFIABLE - STARK RAVING MAD

Sykes Fri Jun 06, 2014 7:31 pm

e: SMITHMAN 2 - What can account for the 17 remarkable similarities between Tannerman and Smithman?
Post Tony Bennett Today at 7:13 pm

whatliesbehindthesofa wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:

But 21 (72%) agree with the proposition that "Both Jane Tanner and Martin Smith were working to a script and neither actually saw anyone" (no Tannerman, no Smithman)

21 out of 80 people who voted.

ETA - updating as we speak - that's 21 out of 81 people.

True, but then you've entirely missed my point.

The 59 (now 60) who have voted 'some other reason' do not appear to have a clear idea what any 'other reason' may be. Even the articulate russiandoll cannot formulate a clear explanation for us for why she agrees that there are 17 similarities which demand an explanation. For all I know, the 60 people who voted 'some other reason' may have 60 differing explanations for these 17 remarkable similarities.

Which puts my explanation - "Both Jane Tanner and Martin Smith were working to a script and neither actually saw anyone" - with 21 votes, way ahead of the next most popular explanation (with only 5 votes)