More from Myths, with thanks to them and to Tigerloaf, whose comments are in red.
Tigerloaf: Rosalinda / Rosalind / Linda Hutton is either an out and out liar or is so thick she does not actually know what she is talking about. I don't know which it is but it has to be one or the other.
She spent all her time on that ridiculous Sonia Poulton show (yes the presenter woman who had a tanty and stormed off from Icke TV) telling us that she was all sweetness and light and that her expertise on the McCann case was based on fact and not on hate. Indeed she blatantly lied that she could defend everything she said and prove that the pros were the liars. She was shown up in that respect when she was unable to support anything she had said. She was shown to be a liar.
And still she continues to lie and post abusively about the McCanns and others. She simply cannot appreciate how abusive her lies are. Her continuous nasty comments prove she is nothing but scum.
Re: Missing Boy(3)in Edinburgh
Post Cristobell Today at 7:29 pm
I suspect the McCanns have set a bench mark for cases of missing children. So too Casey Anthony. One of Gerry's oft used accusations against the PJ, is that they concentrated too much on himself and Kate instead of looking for the child. A very biased perspective imo, given Gerry's status of arguido, as statistics dictate that parents/family/friends must be eliminated first. That was the error in Madeleine's case I think, and may have been the result of political interference.
A very logical perspective IMO, and one any father would have were he actually to know that neither he nor his wife were involved in the disappearance of his daughter (a possibility which you dismiss out of hand because you seem to think you know better than the Scotland Yard experts and the Portuguse experts who have actually (unlike you) studied all the evidence and had the opportunity to speak to witnesses and check facts out with them. No amount of Googling that you may have done makes you (a complete and utter amateur) more expert than the police or can you not understand that? And your conspiracy theory about political interference, the same theory which the convicted liar, Amaral, uses is nothing more than guesswork. Not a shred of real evidence exists to back it up.
Incidentally, do you recall that on that Poulton show you claimed to "only be asking questions". Well you've demonstrated that to be a lie again because posting your (IMO misguided) opinion about Gerry McCann and then posting your conspiracy theory about political interference is not simply asking questions. It is propagating a theory, one which you cannot support with any evidence.
As for Casey Anthony, she did not report her daughter missing for 3+ weeks. If this little lad has been missing for longer, as it looking to be the case, then of course alarm bells should go off. As I am typing this, the news reports seem to have changed tone, especially as Mikaeel does not seem to have been at his nursery since before Christmas. That Casey Anthony got away with murder I think rests with the death penalty being on the table, something that must have troubled the jurors.
So you think you know better, Ms Hutton, than the jury who unlike you actually sat through the trial and heard all the evidence. You dismiss their considered verdict as the woman simply her getting away with it. Do you not understand how that makes you sound? You have a serious problem with accepting the rule of law don't you? You simply cannot bear that this woman was found not guilty in a court of law because that doesn't fit your preconceptions about her.
I think the police have learned lessons from previous cases. They are fully aware of the way in which the developing case is being scrutinized by the press and the public and the way in which a case of this nature can create a media storm. As yet, we have heard very little, if anything, from the mother and the family. By contrast, within 48 hours of Madeleine's disappearance, the phone lines between Team McCann and the world's media were smoking hot. Priests and lawyers had been demanded and were on hand to assist the devastated family, as too were all their family, friends and bridesmaids - there may even have been T-shirts.
Once again you show your hateful personality and style of writing there. Either you are extremely ignorant and have added the bit about the T-shirts being available within 48 hours because it was in your view true or you have deliberately lied about the matter for the hateful effect you know it would cause. It is not true and I challenge you to demonstrate me wrong on that matter. I know for a fact that you cannot but will offer the challenge so that people can see that I am being fair. Did you lie deliberately about it or are you actually ignorant of the facts?
Looking back on the Karen Matthews case and the case of Tia Sharpe, there were press camped outside the homes of the victims and the neighbours were giving their tuppence worth. I am not sure how soon the candlelight vigils began. That the crowds are not gathering, may of course be the inclement weather but there seems to be a change in the way the case is being handled, almost as if the police are ticking boxes. Just my opinion.
Well your opinion is as usual about as much use to the people who matter in the case (the police and the family) as a wet kipper slapped in their faces. You speak either from a position of ignorance or hate as is your normal style. You are even suggesting that the crowds of local people who have been interviewed (many of them named) and who have spent every possible hour searching with the police for the child simply don't exist. Those who are not ignorant and hateful consider searching to be more vital than vigils at the moment. Your kind of opinion is, to put it bluntly, garbage as it's neither close to the truth nor does it match what people can see for themselves on their televisions.
To use a term I read recently in a detective novel whose central character was Edinburgh based, "You are talking shite!" But everyone who saw you rocking back and forth on the end of your Sofa on your Icke TV performance and blathering on about your being called a hater will know that is nothing new.
ps It is very significant that Hutton refers to the Matthews case as the "Karen Matthews" case. It shows she is more interested in the parent than the child who was actually missing, Shannon. An interesting slip of the fingers there. (IMO).
