PAT BROWN GETTING TRASHED BY HER FORMER FANS

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL 6h6 hours ago
@ProfilerPatB You haven't got a clue what evidence SY & PJ have obtained since the case was reopened. Thus it is only your opinion. #McCann

Bugsy@TheBunnyReturns@JillyCL @ProfilerPatB I believe this tweet could have been shortened to only include the first five words. #McCann

Cheryl MoncrieffePhilip TannMR D JONESChallenge GovernmentJillyCLSeeking justice
11:02 a.m. - 2 May 2016

JillyCL ‏@JillyCL 4h4 hours ago
@TheBunnyReturns She announced & flounced from #McCann over a year ago & now returns to dictate to those who've stuck with it. @ProfilerPatB

Bushmeat Brown:

So, you can't have it both ways. Unless the political tide has massively turned and the McCanns are now being hung out to dry (which I find extremely unlikely), Scotland Yard can only be one of two things: a farce and the McCanns are guilty and are never go to be convicted of a crime or legitimate and the McCanns have been innocent all along.

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
May 3, 2016

PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB 3h3 hours ago
If you are posting nasty tweets, you are one of the trolls that is giving us a bad name in the media. #McCann

Rob1 » Tue May 03, 2016 6:02 pm
I think this woman needs to clear the fog from her head.
What does she think is the point in pushing for an investigation if K+G are guilty of a serious crime? What will they gain if they are guilty? If they had remained silent, many people would have forgotten them by now.
If they are guilty and avoided prosecution by PJ, why beg for a bigger investigation?

The problem with conspiracy theorists is that they always try to make their theory work, not matter how complex or unlikely it becomes. After 4 years, Pat Brown opens her mind a little to the theory that perhaps K+G are innocent and suddenly, the jigsaw pieces connect. She even produces a realistic theory which is supported by the facts, yet still she says 'but this cannot be because I do not think the parents acted correctly, so there must be a high level cover up'. Then she says she would love to know why the Mccanns are protected and have people covering up for them instead of simply considering that her opinion about K+G's behavior was wrong.

This silly woman destroyed much of her credibility because she joins with conspiracy nuts who are recognized as 'vile trolls' by the media and other people. Now she is thinking more deeply and logically about the case, they are attacking her in the way that they attack anyone who supports the Mccann family. She will get no sympathy because she chose these people as her friends despite many warnings from much more intelligent people. I think this makes her a 'fool'.

Rob1 » Wed May 04, 2016 8:59 am
Pat Brown does not like questions!

Stephen Biss What's the general opinion of how they disposed of Madeline's Body in the time frame they had ?
British police proved over 35 years ago that a human body can be burnt to cinders using anthracite coke,but the reenactment took them 1 week.
All I see on this is pure speculation.
· 2 May at 10:23
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Please do not rehash the evidence of the case here.

The Daily Profiler: Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: Find the Body…

· 2 May at 10:34
Stephen Biss
Stephen Biss A comment like that,you are missing the point.

Where is the evidence ?
· 2 May at 10:35
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown I have no idea what point you are trying to make, Stephen.
· 2 May at 10:42
Stephen Biss
Stephen Biss Their is no evidence to prove that her parents where involved,none that I can see anyway.
So,all the would be Perry Mason's are simply speculating.
Get my point ?
· 2 May at 10:44
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Stephen, I have written a book about evidence that supports the theory of the McCann involvement and many blogs about this as well. However, the evidence is not strong enough for prosecution. Clearly, you did not actually read my blog or you would know that is what I am saying.
· 2 May at 10:46
Stephen Biss
Stephen Biss Makes me wonder why you wrote a book about something that has not been proven,when it is only Speculation,and nothing more.
· 2 May at 10:51
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown And that gets you blocked. Some people try to pretend they are having a nice discussion and all they are doing is passive aggressively insulting you.
· 3 · 2 May at 11:05
Jamie O'Rourke
Jamie O'Rourke Stephen Biss money
· 1 · 2 May at 13:31
Brett Hill
Brett Hill She got it wrong over the preachers involvement of in the murder of his wife a few months back. ha ha. Now I know you to don't know what your talking about. over rated.
· 13 hrs
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown Brett, and there you go with slander. I did not say the preacher killed his wife. You read the blog wrong. And you will be blocked for being slanderous and rude.

I remember Pat Brown judged the preacher suspect and she was wrong about him. When his wife's killers were caught, Pat Brown wrote a new post about it and deleted her old ones (but she missed one comment that referred to her original posts and proves what she wrote). She developed suspicions on the preacher because she thought his behaviors were wrong (just like she says Mccann were).
This woman will change her opinion to make it seem she is always correct.

Rob1 » Tue May 03, 2016 6:02 pm
I think this woman needs to clear the fog from her head.
What does she think is the point in pushing for an investigation if K+G are guilty of a serious crime? What will they gain if they are guilty? If they had remained silent, many people would have forgotten them by now.
If they are guilty and avoided prosecution by PJ, why beg for a bigger investigation?

The problem with conspiracy theorists is that they always try to make their theory work, not matter how complex or unlikely it becomes. After 4 years, Pat Brown opens her mind a little to the theory that perhaps K+G are innocent and suddenly, the jigsaw pieces connect. She even produces a realistic theory which is supported by the facts, yet still she says 'but this cannot be because I do not think the parents acted correctly, so there must be a high level cover up'. Then she says she would love to know why the Mccanns are protected and have people covering up for them instead of simply considering that her opinion about K+G's behavior was wrong.

This silly woman destroyed much of her credibility because she joins with conspiracy nuts who are recognized as 'vile trolls' by the media and other people. Now she is thinking more deeply and logically about the case, they are attacking her in the way that they attack anyone who supports the Mccann family. She will get no sympathy because she chose these people as her friends despite many warnings from much more intelligent people. I think this makes her a 'fool'.