McCann tweets journalist told to reveal source

From Myths with thanks to the posters.
scoobydoo » Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:00 am
   

Randomleigh wrote:They talk about how BL was vilified on Skynews on the hour every 15 mins, which they believe led to her death. Well that's not what I watched, I have however been witness to BL vilifying the innocent parents of missing young girl, publicly, day in day over a sustained period of time.

Now BL is dead (apparently by her choice) this vilification she meted out DAILY, is now being dressed up in pretty words by the antis. "Doubts" "questions" "opinions" etc etc. When the reality of her tweets tell an entirely different tale.

Leyland chose to vilify the mccanns continually throughout nearly every day for the last few years, she chose to travel to their home to vilify them to people in their village, she chose to lie about them, gloat at the idea they might be in pain, address spiteful tweets to their children, vilify anyone who stood up for them, vilify witnesses, spread malicious lies about a witness, gloat at the idea the witness was frightened due to the antis actions. She chose to repeatedly contact people like brunt and chose to say on camera that she was entitled to behave like this? And in return she featured for two minutes on an hourly sky report which gave her name and location as well as the nastiest tweets. If she decided her behaviour was so bad that it was better to die than live with everyone knowing about it then why did she actively choose to behave like that?

And what happened to free speech? The antis and other trolls claim they can say what they want in the name of free speech, but also want to use this argument to silence critics. Guess what it doesn't work like that.

Hael:   I feel that this point is always overlooked by the anti's - "she chose". She, who was an adult. She, who had life experience. She, who knew that her actions would have consequences. She, who knew that her behaviour was unacceptable. She STILL CHOSE to continue on that path.

Actions have consequences (whatever they may be). Responsibility and accountability is something those who want to blame her death on Sky or the dossier don't or can't understand.

Harassing, trolling and abusing others under anonymity or usernames doesn't make one exempt from being responsible (acknowledge ones actions) and held accountable (account for ones actions and accept consequences) for what you post on the internet.

catkins » Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:04 pm
From a Facebook/Twitter troll who allegedly thinks the Moors Murderers were more deserving than the McCanns....

Confession first :

Linda Wrafter I will put my hands up, I have tweeted far worse than Brenda, as have lots of others, but why did Brunt and team #mccann single out Brenda ?
19 February at 09:23 · Like · 3

Outright lies second :

Linda Wrafter I totally agree ,Brenda was followed and chosen for being a quite,non aggressive person, they knew she would not kick off on camera and say things the Mcs want hidden as others would do. There are a lot of people on twitter daily, most very strong people who would have soon had Brunt running for the hills, people who in the 2 mins the cameras were on them would make damn sure case facts came out on camera, therefore it would never be aired, Brenda was carefully selected and I'm sure, followed and watched, question is who else was followed ? because Brenda was not just plucked from thin air, think about it folks !!
19 February at 09:15 · Edited · Like · 15

You are a liar Wrafter other nasty bigmouths including...... Laffin/Veni/Sean Hyland and Mel Midgely /Teddyshepherd were approached but they chickened out refused.

Still we shouldn't be surprised....Trolls and lies go hand and hand.

Helium is best known as 'laughing gas' - or the stuff you fill balloons with. It's achieved notoriety more recently because it is often used as a party drug, but it's dangerous.
The deadly rise of 'hippy crack': For celebrities, it's the party drug du jour. Now inhaling laughing gas - is spreading to middle-class living rooms.
Effects can cause strokes, hallucinations, seizures, blackouts, incontinence, stress on the heart.
Such is the ease of availability that it has even infiltrated middle-class living rooms  

David Steel ‏@DaSteelMan 3 mins3 minutes ago
If a gas cannister was taken into the hotel, surely hotel staff and police would have reported this? #McCann

might be a stalker ‏@__StuartB__
@martin_liz @CaroleShooter it might be the cause of death, but inked BL was a good actor , she didn't seem #suicidal on camera. #mccann  

Re: Helium Overdose?
Post Doug abc Today

What?? If that is true, it couldn't be more suspicious. Middle class lady and elaborate inert gas poisoning
couldn't be moe incongruous. It would require specialist paraphernalia, was that at the scene?

.... poor Brenda, what a distressed state she must have been in. Even if she was vulnerable and suffered from depression, what happened with Brunt must have really been the end for her. I must say I wouldn`t have survived such a wicked defamation.

What an absolutely disgraceful headline from that (toilet)Paper.

I really cannot believe how standards have dropped so low in this Country.

Whoever gave the go ahead for that headline can't (imo) have any respect for themselves let alone someone who has died in such tragic circumstances.

Canine Truth ‏@K9Truth 2h2 hours ago
@fiorifan @Papa___Rico @SoniaPoulton @PickieHolden There are only 2 ways she could have died from a non self-inflicted helium OD.
#McCann

Inez Shoota! ‏@CaroleShooter 2h2 hours ago
So if it wasn't obvious at the start how Brenda died and it was helium after all, who removed the equipment? #mccann

ann-kristine ‏@fiorifan 2h2 hours ago
@K9Truth @martin_liz @Papa___Rico @SoniaPoulton @PickieHolden Do you think Ms.Leyland carried a tank of Helium into the Hotel? #mccann

You can buy bigger ones from Argos if you're going to be doing a lot of balloon-blowing, but that's what the small ones look like.

The McCann-haters are trying to concoct a huge conspiracy involving lugging enormous hospital-size cylinders around, but personally, I doubt if there is very much to this at all.

I suspect her gear would have been easily found by the police, but the cause of death couldn't be confirmed until after an autopsy/toxicology report had been done.

Given her high-maintenance appearance, and known lifestyle, it's entirely possible that Leyland was a recreational user - Hutton and a few others that are old enough to know better boast about using cannabis, FFS.

Or if she took her own life, the instructions are a mere mouseclick away.

As has been said from the start, the REAL police have her computer/s; what she was googling will be very telling indeed. And the haters need to drop this 'frail pensioner' nonsense; they're creating someone that didn't exist. Leyland travelled all over the world, and had a pretty expensive lifestyle. She seems to have gone to great effort to hide her real age, so for all anyone knows, it was the truth about that coming out that upset her.  

I seem to recall something about Brunt talking to her privately? How do the haters know that he didn't set her straight about one or two things, undo her delusions, and she was overcome with shame when she realised she wasn't a Truthseeker after all?

That she was just part of a nasty, internet lynch mob harrassing and smearing the family of a missing British child?

Thing is, we just do not know at present; there are many possible explanations for her death. One of which is NOT some vast, stupid plot involving 'Team McCann' - whatever the crazies imagine that is.

 catkins » Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:42 am

urcrazy wrote:And now we have yet another petition, signed largely by illiterate people who clearly do not use Greptweet. Otherwise they would know that lovely lady she was not
https://www.change.org/p/richard-desmon ... e_petition

Interestingly a couple of people there are instantly recognisable from twitter, where they tweet a constant stream of lies and libel against people they have heard stories about. No proof mind, just something they got from twitter or a scurrilous blog.

Is Baulch a complete moron?

 "Brenda Leyland has never been proven to be a troll, she had been treated so poorly by the media in the events leading up to her death and it still continues.Her sons feelings have not been taken into consideration and the media are continuously trying to damage her character."

So this idiot thinks that pitchforking trolls who use this woman to try to "score points", use her as the trolls "martyr", deny she ever said anything bad........who infringe upon her familys privacy, and refuse to let Brenda Leyland rest in peace......is ok then?

Good god.....where do they come from !!!

Mobyra » Sun Mar 01, 2015 12:18 pm
Yes, Baulch is an ignorant troll & a complete idiot, she's one of those silly people who still waffles on about the "Huelva" acid baths & how it has to be investigated. Totally oblivious to the fact that any type of establishment producing highly toxic substances are guarded by armed security details in most countries, but especially so in Spain, where they have been dealing with domestic terrorism since the 1950's. Just trying to gain unauthorised access to a place like would most likely lead to you getting shot on the spot, no questions asked. Perhaps the stupid woman could pay for stalker Thompson to take another little trip abroad & try it out for himself?

scoobydoo » Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:36 pm

Brenda Leyland was far worse than the traditional troll. A troll is, or at least was, someone who just tried to get a reaction. That is what Brenda Leyland used to do when she trolled Liz Jones appreciation pages on facebook (according to her posts on another site). What she did to the Mccann family, especially the children, was harassment, and in the case of Amy Tienary and Basil it bordered on intimidation too. This was worse in Amy's case as Amy is a witness in the case, but that did not matter to Leyland who took it upon herself to inform people she knew this witness was a prostitute (peddled her arse was one way Brenda Leyland worded it) and then told people she was amused to hear that the young witness was scared and her workplace was being posted publicly alongside the lies. Sending tweets using the Mccann hashtag alongside to the names of Madeleine's siblings directed at the siblings telling them really really nasty things was beyond the pale especially as it would have been very easy for the twins and their friends to find them since she included their full names by using the Mccann hashtag.

so for the antis, sending nasty messages to children under the age of ten, especially children who have lost a sibling, is not asking a question. Witness intimidation is not asking a question. Telling people you hope someone suffers for their entire life is not asking a question. telling lies about a case and people is not asking a question. Banning papers reporting on your nasty little hobby is not free speech.

Portia wrote:
One would have thought a suicide is a well considered affair; when all other venues have been considered and have been found to be closed

Not something a well educated and mature person would arrive at out of the blue.

Canine Truth ‏@K9Truth Feb 28
@JerryLawton Thanks. Apparently this was in the Daily Star today.http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11042-helium-overdose … Not backed up by the LCC's website.   #McCann

Jerry Lawton @JerryLawton
@K9Truth Not my story I'm afraid. Saw it had been filed by news agency. It gives cause of death but is not full inquest which is next month

Canine Truth ‏@K9Truth Feb 28
@JerryLawton Thanks.Which news agency? #McCann

Jerry Lawton ‏@JerryLawton Feb 28
@K9Truth can't recall - just remember seeing it on the news wires yesterday - I was busy with Jihadi John and Gary Glitter

urcrazy:  The Huelva thing is SO ridiculous - the idea there are 'acid baths' where tourists can turn up with dead bodies and toss them in is laughable.

I suspect the people who make such daft claims never move outside of a 1km radius from their hotel on holiday. A Google of 'the Huelva acid baths' shows a massive, high security industrial complex.
There are acidified streams which might be accessible, but we are talking of a trickle, and not concentrated enough to dissolve a body. It's the sort of sick crap they get off on.

Randomleigh:  Acid baths !?! That's a new one on me. Acid baths, fridges, blue bags, coffins, wasn't there a volcano story too !?!? Good lord they've got some sick imagination. Is Baulch the one "Lenny" on twitter?

She was busy trying to take the moral high ground this morning over something Rebecca Watts father had said and the fuss that was made. Compared it to page 129 in K's book and how nobody bats an eyelid over that. Cept of course the assorted haters, trolls, lowlifes and criminals who go into a frenzy of one handed typing at the very mention of the word "genitals". "Lenny" finds K's words inappropriate especially as she believes the twins will read the book.

It seems hard for the aforementioned scum, to understand that Kate's words on pg 129 are her, opening heart about her deepest, darkest fears regarding her beloved Madeleine. Heartbreaking and yes difficult to read, but an honest and raw account of her nightmare thoughts. Whether the twins will read the book or not is pure speculation and frankly none of anyone's business.

"Lenny" overlooked the true horror that is facing the twins and Madeleine, if she's found, left by the likes of her and her friends all over the internet for eternity. The countless photoshopped images, the lies, the misinformation, the denial of Madeleines right to be treated as missing, her denial to the right of being treated as ALIVE, the threats of violence, the appalling accusations etc etc.

scoobydoo: I don't know why the haters think it is wrong for a mother to be terrified of the physical damage a grown man could do to her toddler. For crying out loud Kate McCann was in her darkest hours faced with the very real prospect that a fully grown man had taken her tiny three year old daughter for sexual purposes. It was very brave of her to write down those fears. But apparently the haters wouldn't give a toss about that, they would be too busy lying on a sofa eating biscuits to demonstrate how they were too distressed to do anything, or else trying to stop the police investigation and publicity out of consideration for the locals of course.

Re: Helium Overdose?
Post LG Today

I don't buy newspapers but this was from a friend who had a copy of the newspaper

Re: Brenda Leyland has died (Sweepyface) RIP Brenda
Post Freedom Today
If it is correct as has been suggested that this poor lady had an existing mental health condition, she was most likely on medication for it.

Not a Hoax
Post LG Today at 12:36 pm

Earlier I spoke to the Daily Star news desk - the article was a "copy and past, of sorts" from "Raymonds News Agency". My request for a copy to be emailed to me was declined.

xxxxxhttp://news-agency.b99.co.uk/derby/raymonds-news-agency/

I received no answer to my calls to the above.

I therefore telephoned LCC. I have emailed them a copy of the article together with some of the vile comments made towards BL. These I have been assured will be put in front of Mrs Mason.

Re: Helium Overdose?
Post LG Today at 13:46

I have done my best, all's we can hope for is that Mrs Mason demands that the Daily Star declare their source.

Re: Helium Overdose?
Post LG Today at 5:03 pm

It would appear that there is a company with a similar name Raymond Press Agency

http://www.endole.co.uk/company/08237306/raymonds-press-agency-limited

Companies House tells us that there are two incarnations of Raymonds Press Agency Limited (perhaps they were News in a previous incarnation(?) )

For some reason I can't host/post my picture sad

I have sent another email to LCC as per Portia's post.