Do they actually believe this garbage, or do they just regurgitate it to comfort themselves? Hutton should have stopped at 'I think', though evidence suggests 'thinking' is something they are incapable of.R.V. Hutton Author @RosalindaHu
@umweltbuerger @dr_frasiercrane I think libel trial has collapsed. Met clearly not looking for a live 10yr old, no appeals on CW #mccann
5 posters
HUTTON HAS TOTALLY AND UTTERLY LOST IT
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
e: Game over?
Post Cristobell Today at 8:22 pm
There are people on the net, I met 7 years ago when we all began posting about the Madeleine McCann case. They are still around now, and can substantiate my claims, OK?
Now can we return to topic?
funny how no- one had heard of her till she hopped on the bandwagon a couple of years ago .
Post Cristobell Today at 8:22 pm
There are people on the net, I met 7 years ago when we all began posting about the Madeleine McCann case. They are still around now, and can substantiate my claims, OK?
Now can we return to topic?
funny how no- one had heard of her till she hopped on the bandwagon a couple of years ago .
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
Didn't she nick someone's name as well?
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
yoyo:
Cristobel, You do like listening to yourself don't you....going on and on and on and on.... ?
Why not answer question to the point instead of being defensive by attacking ?
As you pointed out correctly this is "Game Over" thread, NOT Cristobel "Take Over' thread if I may be permitted to say so.
P.S. You started this.
newintown:
You obviously didn't read my post Cristobell, which is typical when you're so tied up with yourself. Yes, I know the post is called Game Over, but the whole forum should be renamed "Game Over, because Cristobell's word is final and nobody else can have an opinion".
You are getting very boring and pretentious.
candyflossmod:
I expect many here are getting tired of threads being disrupted - everyone here is entitled to have their say, you may or may not agree, but please discuss the posts and not the poster. As to how many posts people make, what has that got to do with anything? Some days some posters seem to be more prolific than others, doesn't mean they are taking over the forum.
Back to topic please!! No more of this disruption........thanks.
newintown:
I'm distrupting the thread, duhhhhhh!!!!!
Have a word with Cristobell; haven't you noticed she's taken over the whole forum, and is stopping anyone having an opinion other than her own.
I think aiyoyo will agree with me, or haven't you being keeping up to date with the previous pages on this topic, if not read through them.
yoyo:
How convenient of you to evade the question by trying to digress the issue !
You are evading the your claim aren't you ?
Posting about Madeleine case is not the same as 7-long year of campaigning as you put it !
I don't care who you said can come out to substantiate your claim, and until I see them coming out to support your claim showing evidence where and how you campaigned for 7 years, I see this as fob-off-the-question nonsense.
You made the claim you substantiate it ! If you can't, stop misleading people, it's as simple as that.
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
Broho wrote:Didn't she nick someone's name as well?
oh yes , so she did .
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
If she was actively around from 7 years ago she wouldn't have used someone else's name.
How confusing is that.
How confusing is that.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
I wonder if Bennett's put yoyo up to this.
Some minor hounder to yoyo:
are you and newinromley on the mccann payroll,it seems you just want to stop the discussion about what happended to maddie
yoyo:
mariola, you are talking out of your bum !
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Post Newintown Today at 8:09 pm
Cristobell wrote:
aiyoyo wrote:
Cristobell wrote:
I have spent 7 years campaigning for justice for Madeleine. ...........
Really ? How ?
Stay on topic Aiyoyo please, these personal attacks are becoming tedious.
From the posts I've read over the past week or so you seem to have made yourself the administrator of this forum Cristobell. Well in actual fact you seem to have taken over the whole forum with your numerous postings putting people in their place.
I'm not very good at posting and I find it quite daunting, but for any new members I think your attitude over the past week or two would put any new member off from posting.
I think it's about time that admin stepped in and had a word with you before you completely wreck the whole forum with your dogmatic views.
Aiyoyo:
Attack ? WTF!
It was only a question. So you refused to answer a simple question by going in attack mode instead?
Don't mislead people into thinking you were campaigning if you cannot substantiate you claim.
Hutton:
There are people on the net, I met 7 years ago when we all began posting about the Madeleine McCann case. They are still around now, and can substantiate my claims, OK?
Now can we return to topic?
Re: Game over?
Post aiyoyo Today at 9:40 pm
Candyfloss,
Where the fairness ? Are you slipping behind on your role ?
If mariola is allowed to accuse me and another poster of being on mccanns payroll then by virtue of my freedom of expression I should be allowed to defend myself, so why are you deleting my reply to mariola, when you've ignored time wasters who attacked me ?
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
no wonder shes bitter .
Eleanor1- Posts : 38
Join date : 2013-10-26
Who is she? Am I supposed to know?
coco- Posts : 1276
Join date : 2011-07-17
thats the Hutton woman , the one that writes books about how horrid people are to her and claims to have been campaigning against the McCanns for 7 years . Only thing is , no- one had heard of her till a couple of years ago when her book came out .
Eleanor1- Posts : 38
Join date : 2013-10-26
coco wrote:thats the Hutton woman , the one that writes books about how horrid people are to her and claims to have been campaigning against the McCanns for 7 years . Only thing is , no- one had heard of her till a couple of years ago when her book came out .
Oh, Mutton you mean? So she thinks that everyone abuses their children, does she?
But I thought she had a shocking childhood, and her mother was a Drug Addict. Like her.
PS. Did Mutton abuse her own children?
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From that I assume she has been issuing accusations - again.Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE 2h
@RosalindaHu @umweltbuerger & don’t forget you are liable for the accusations you make.
R.V. Hutton Author @RosalindaHu 53 secs
@JimGamble_INEQE @umweltbuerger I've retweeted you Jim, lets keep this out in the open, I haven't made any accusations. #mccann
Broho- Posts : 798
Join date : 2013-08-15
Sounds like it but she would be better off keeping her trap shut.
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE 3m
@parapono @RosalindaHu @umweltbuerger they would need 2 b 2 protect the authors. Problem for them is they are not.
Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More
R.V. Hutton Author @RosalindaHu 3h
@JimGamble_INEQE @parapono @umweltbuerger Once again, I haven't made any accusations, so not sure why threatened? #mccann
Sykes- Posts : 6835
Join date : 2011-07-17
From Mythsd, with thanks.
Good point Clocker! It would be bizarre for him to be publicly repeating the thesis that is the subject of the trial.
I personally think the McCanns have cut and run. We are rapidly approaching the 7th anniversary (no marathons and triathlons this year) - a deadline where a missing person can be pronounced dead for the purposes of probate, although I am not sure if the family have to apply for this or if they can leave it open. And of course this case is further complicated because Madeleine is a Ward of Court, so that decision may rest with the Court rather than the parents.
It is of course ridiculous for the parents to be claiming £250k for a child who hasn't been seen in 7 years but it is a stretch of the imagination to believe it is this issue that is holding everything up. If it were a simple technical issue, the Writ could be amended but if the claim was fraudulent, then it would be a different matter altogether.
Further to the point you made Clocker, it is not only Amaral who is saying publicly that Madeleine is dead, it is has now also been said by DCI Redwood - and its obvious they are not looking for a live child.
Given all the revelations since the libel trial was adjourned, what on earth will the barristers say during their summing up? How can Isabel push forward the claim that Goncalo Amaral's book hindered the search for Madeleine if the parents are now suspects for her murder? And this eerie silence gives us very good reason to believe that they are arguidos and judicial secrecy is in place. Announcing what has happened to the missing trial, may at this point infringe on the judicial secrecy.
|
|
|