Pat Brown's latest blog = frothing at the mouth
She thinks that a new book about the McCann case by a pair of award-winning journalists is going to be a whitewash and that part of the proof for this (incredibly) is because SHE wasn't interviewed.
She is very upset that she is going to be portrayed in the book as a conspiracy nut ( I would say that would be an accurate depiction).
Now why would any serious investigative journalist want to include her as a source for their book? She is a blogger who calls herself a profiler. She has done no serious research on the case whatsoever. Her "research" has been to hang out with known conspiraloons and McCann haters on social networking sites. She published a hastily cobbled together pamphlet about the case which was packed full of early tabloid misinformation (like Calpol being a sedative). It wasn't even one cohesive theory but rather a series of disjointed "maybe"s which depended upon the assumption that all of the witnesses were mistaken.
The only fact about Brown's involvement in the McCann debate is that she isn't very good at what she claims to do.
Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan have a proven track record of meticulous researching and their reputation is that they are not afraid to tackle controversial subjects. I suspect Brown realises this and this is why she is so rattled. Her blog article is a pathetic attempt to pre-empt it. Indeed, it is one which will fail miserably given that she has only a handful of fans left and that any major book written by an award-winning third-party about the case is likely to be an international best-seller which will make headlines in all the "serious" newspapers.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]