Long piece, so just the link this time, it's harsh but oh so true.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Long rambling post, but he does make a few pertinent points - namely:-
1. Her calling what she does "profiling" when it is actually just armchair detective work same as many others amongst us
2. Her using media misinformation/opinion for her sources instead of primary sources
3. Her imprecision of data
A while back I commented on how Brown contradicts herself when it comes to theory and practice. She is on record as saying that the media report misinformation and are unreliable sources - but then proceeds to form her "profiles" based upon them nevertheless. She is also on record as saying that you cannot judge a person's behaviour post-crime until you have compared it to their behaviour pre-crime. I believe this came from an article she wrote about Kate McCann wearing earrings and being generally well groomed. She was saying that Kate could not be judged for this if it was part of her instinctive, natural behaviour to groom and put earrings on when she got dressed. But then Brown proceeded to judge her anyway.
She doesn't practice what she preaches.
Her latest retirement blog piece is a real "woe is me" about how her life didn't pan out the way she'd hoped and how her career and everything has gone down the tubes. She said she thought she'd find a partner and spend her retirement travelling etc. But then said she'd never met anyone who was right for her, never been in love (not even with her ex-husband). I may be wrong, but isn't this another indicator in the list of narcissism/psychopathy? She has one almighty massive ego and strikes me of possibly being incapable of loving anyone more than she loves herself.
She STILL doesn't get that she is the cause of her own downfall. She may have a tiny and loyal fan base, but an awful lot of people cannot stand her nasty, egotistical and "I am always right" ways.
James Arbuthnot Yes, Susie - although what I wrote was based entirely on what she wrote and not in any way on her personally.
I never cease to be amazed what people say. What might astonish you, however, is that JillyCL (Jill Clements, reputedly once implicated in an arson attack on her husband's business) wrote on Twitter that I criticised Pat Brown because I am anti-American (news to me) and because I am what she calls a "McCann shill" and a "5th column". She has previously stated that I am also at least a dozen other people and that I am paid by McCann to infiltrate the "antis". The same woman also claims that I must be a "McCann shill" because I debate openly with pro-McCann people and even agree occasionally with their comments.