Random questions for Sonia Poulton! Tigerloaf and other members of Myths seek answers.

Postby tigerloaf » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:47 pm
As the cowardly Sonia Poulton has so far failed abysmally to come up with any kind of answer to the two challenges I have posed for her (presumably because she has no answers) I thought it would be a good idea to post other relevant questions for her in an open list so that people can see the kind of things she is failing to answer.  

tigerloaf » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:56 pm

Question 1
How thick would somebody have to be, Sonia, to win £6,500,000 tax free and then find themselves living on the streets just a few years later? Even if a person was too stupid to understand the concept of investment - simply banking the money would give you a lifetime salary of £100,000 a year for 65 years - more than enough for most people to avoid having to live on the streets. Would you countenance a relationship (business or personal) with somebody this stupid, Sonia, because most intelligent people wouldn't?

Question 2
Whatever the problems might be, Sonia, can you please reassure us that this Home Movie will see the light of day before the summer? My reason for asking is that I really want to have a chance as soon as possible to have the pleasure of seeking each and every flaw in it and I may be away with family for a lengthy period over the summer.

Question 3
Can you confirm, Sonia, that Rosalinda (Linda/Rosalind) Hutton, the woman whose mind is so addled that she forgets her own name, will have a starring role in your movie? A positive reply to this will make me really happy.

Question 4
Please make everybody happy, Sonia, and confirm that you will be including Deborah Butler, the thieving liar who left her parents in penury and misery for her own gain, in your movie?

catkins » Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:36 am

Question 5.....

Have you yourself ever read ALL of the statements (witnesses, PDL neighbours, holidaymakers), OR... the Final Conclusion of the Portuguese Attorney General and the Forensic Services Final Report......(Stating NO EVIDENCE AGAINST THE MCCANNS)...

Question 6......

Have you ever actually read the Official Files yourself Sonia.....and not just absorbed hearsay and twisted tales from the loony trolls?

Question 7.....

Do you really think that anyone will take this mockudocu seriously?

Chinagirl » Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:42 am

Question 8:

What do you hope to achieve with your home movie?

Vee8 » Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:57 pm

Question 9.

What size audience, in rough dozens, do you expect for your home movie?

scoobydoo » Wed Apr 22, 2015 11:13 pm

Q 10 if this is about madeleines disappearance why are you interviewing people like Hutton who have nothing to do with the case?

Q 11 what did Brenda Leyland's suicide have to do with the disapearence?

Q12 if you only started working on this after October 2014 why did you start asking the missing child's mother for an interview in February 2014?

Q13 have you interviewed any actual experts about aspects of the case I.e forensic scientists

Q14 does any expert you interviewed have the adjective self styled applied to them like pat brown?

Q15 have you read the entire police files or just the ones available to the public?

Q16 will you include the defamatory and untrue claims you made against randomleigh at the coronors office?

Q17 do you think its a good idea to take a convicted criminal who claims anti McCann conspiracy theorists are actually soldiers in a war to interview vulnerable victims of crime?

Q18 do you think demanding interviews which are then refused means you have free reign to libel people?

Q19 can you prove any inference a reasonable person might make from any claims made in your documentary?

Q20 can any inference be disproved?

Q21 how much experience do you have in missing people investigations?

tigerloaf » Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:23 am

Chinagirl wrote:
   
   Good questions, TL, but you're not expecting Poulton to reply, are you?

   ETA: At the time of this post there are four guests online, one of them in this thread, so she'll be made aware of your questions.  

I have zero expectation of responses from this so-called 'journalist'. The reason being that she cannot answer the questions truthfully without revealing that she is ill-informed, and acting maliciously.

I am reassured though that the questions themselves without any attempt on her part to respond do in fact expose her weakness, lack of relevant expertise and actual ignorance of the facts.

Whiterose » Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:26 am
Question 22 Which is it Sonia, Conspiracy or Credibility?

scoobydoo » Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:36 am
Q23 can sonia poulton prove that randomleigh went to the inquest to gloat?

Q24 can she explain why sending printouts of public abusive messages to police is wrong?

Q25 can she prove people who showed abuse to police were involved in making of sky troll segment?

Q26 can she explain what sky showed that was out of context?

Q27can she prove that randfomleigh has form for abusive behaviour?

Q28 what has randomleigh got to do with the disappearance of madeleine mccann, why is she IN A documentary about the disappearence?

Q29 does she think it was acceptable for antis to claim a witness tweeted support to family of missing child, then claim witness was a prostitute and in pay of McCann's, then post her work and contact details then tweet that the witness was scared, then add a lot?

Q30 do you think it was acceptable for Brenda Leyland to send tweets addressing twins by their full names and telling them nasty untrue things?

scoobydoo » Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:48 pm
Q31 is she going to correct the mistakes she broadcast in her interview with Hutton on ickes blog TV?

Q32 is she going to correct the antis on their myths such as the DNA in car being a match for madeleine when the truth was only alleles were found, the alleles came from up to five different individuals and they matched the entire McCann family.