Re: News editors take note.
thor Today at 12:13 am
thor Today at 12:13 am
juliet wrote:
I don't agree sallypelt. I do not see evidence of a loved and cared for child. I can't imagine why you are so sure of this. Apart from the lack of "happy Madeleine with her doting parents" pictures, the parents seem unable to evoke their child with any real feeling. They claim bizarrely that she was a mini-me, a best mate, a fan of Harry Potter and Dr Who and the Pussycat Dolls. They seem unable - even in that book - to describe her as a real child.
sallypelt wrote:
Where did I say "I am sure". Are you sure that the child WAS neglected, before she went to Portugal? Every photograph of MM is either "photo shopped" or "fake". I have seen photographs of MM with KM on a pony, on the swing etc. and they are no different to the photographs I have in my photo album of my child when she was young.
What I have read of the last few posts on this thread,. is something one would expect from a few gossiping people at a coffee morning, where there's no substance to what they are saying, but it makes them feel good to say it. Why don't we stick to what we know? I believe, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, that the McCann's have lied, and are being protected by the establishment. But if what I have read here, in the last few posts, is what it has sunk to, then I want nothing more to do with it. What is being said is absolutely disgusting, and without substance and it's driving decent people away.
thor: Sallypelt in the interest of honesty, which you hold so dear, can you please confirm or deny that you are lazzeri of "lying in the sun" fame.
No research required on this one sall just a plain yes or no.
