DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Share
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:32 pm

    darthvodka wrote:Blimey! When hounders fall out they make a good job of it, don't they? Which side will win? Pitchberg? Forkerville? Do we now have the  entry of Houderchester in the fray?

    I've got a little reminder for them, a blast from the past for them: Madeleine McCann, remember her vultures?
    It seems dead as a dodo over there, I know it's a bank holiday but it seems so desolate. Mind you, I should care - not.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Mon Aug 25, 2014 8:27 pm

    Spoke too soon, a handful of conspiraloon posts have appeared.
    Anonymous25 August 2014 01:38
    anon@12:55

    troll element or free thinking members not prepared to accept TB lies and rants?
    pm banned now for weeks and will continue not a temp thing.

    had to ban them because they don,t have the manpower to read them all.
    .
    they spend all their time looking to see if a new poster has a banned
    internet service number(isp) such is their paranoia

    Anonymous25 August 2014 11:30
    Anonymous @ 25 August 2014 01:38

    Rollocks! You can be a free thinker and express yourself without being banned, providing your conduct yourself with a degree of decorum.

    The PM moderation is applied to new members, I believe until they can prove themselves to be genuine members and not shills or trolls or whatever else you like to call them, i.e. temporary suspension of the facility.

    Horatio

    Anonymous25 August 2014 11:32
    Anonymous @ 24 August 2014 15:01

    If you are telling the truth, who's to say it wasn't the recipient of your PM that revealed the content?

    I recall (in more recent times) the subject of trolls operating from internet cafes was mentioned on JH but it wasn't Bennett. I believe it was either the forum owner or admin. Whoever, why do you think it such a crazy idea? I'm not a technical wizard so can't offer any other explanation but somehow these people manage to find their way back onto the forum when banned, using a different name/s and there are other indicatives that suggest behaviour akin to trolling.

    To be fair, it must be extremely difficult trying to keep law and order on a forum, it is not only open confrontation that needs to be curtailed but also moderation of such issues as unexeceptable foul language when directed at another member. It seems to me no matter what they do, they just can't win.

    I can't accept that members are banned purely for disagreeing with Bennett. I can however understand why some like to give that impression, particularly if on an alternative board where anything goes!

    Horatio

    Thomas Baden-Riess25 August 2014 12:11
    Horatio, I agree with most of what you say, and I certainly wouldn't dispute the bans I got, (and moreover I was happy to be out of there.)

    But if someone as tranquil as Chateleine was banned then what does that tell you? If they have proper evidence that she's working for team Mccann, shouldn't they really reveal it. There's others as well: WLBTS, Curioser.

    Meanwhile shit-stirrers like Aquila remain. So how can you be totally sure the site hasn't been taken over/manipulated by people with ill-intentions?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    HAS BENNETT BEEN OUTED YET AGAIN AS A FOREIGN SOCK OR AS A BRIDGE-HOLDER?

    Post  Sykes on Tue Aug 26, 2014 7:29 am

    Having 'outed' the JATYK crew, now they are suggesting various posters are bennett.   (The bridge-holder reference in the title is to Horatio who held the bridge for the Romans against the Etruscans - kind of a last chance stand story).    I wonder if they have sussed out who other Anonymous posters are?    Question
     Anonymous25 August 2014 13:21

    http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t4188p10-the-madeleine-mccann-case-impossible-coincidences
    Reply
    Anonymous25 August 2014 13:22

    It's obvious Horatio is TB.
    The man is very sick.
    Reply
    Anonymous25 August 2014 13:31

    Markus 2 = TB
    Reply
    Anonymous25 August 2014 13:38

    http://eotp.org/2008/11/08/2008-ukip-m-e-p-jeffrey-titford/

    Cranks and Gadflies: The Story of Ukip page 82
    Reply
    Anonymous25 August 2014 13:53

    Grow up Kaya

    Horatio.
    Reply
    Anonymous25 August 2014 15:01

    I would agree that it is looking like this Horatio person is in fact Tony Bennett.
    Tony was always going to end up frequently posting on Cristobell's blog under an alias. The guy is extremely predictable.
    Tony please get yourself some medical help. Must be some sort of medication you can take for your disorders. You are clearly not a well man. It's very sad to see really.
    Reply
    Anonymous25 August 2014 15:38

    Cristobell,

    Any chance you can lay out some censorship ground rules? It's a bit irritating when something is posted but not published.

    Thank you. Horatio

    Anonymous25 August 2014 16:21
    Horatio
    Dont kid yourself CB is going to play by the rules?
    Don't you get it yet,she is heavily censoring on her site.
    What an irony.

    She wont publish what she does not like to hear,
    She will publish every anti TB comments but dont expect her to publish criticism of her.

    Come on, I dare you to publish this!

    Rosalinda Hutton26 August 2014 00:29
    Difficult to impose rules Horatio as this is not a forum.

    But for the members of JATYK and STMs who are lifting my blog to fill the pages of their own, I'm not publishing comments that address me as 'Mutton'. I know changing the 'H' in my name to an 'M' is probably the wittiest thing you have ever done but neither I nor anyone on here is the least bit interested in your playground insults.

    Should one of you manage to put together a coherent, intelligent couple of sentences without the childish name calling, I might consider it, but as you have not managed it in 7 years, I won't hold my breath.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:43 am

    Anonymous25 August 2014 13:22
    It's obvious Horatio is TB.
    The man is very sick.

    Anonymous25 August 2014 16:05
    Yeah, and I am Gerry McCann. Get a grip people!
    fekcing idiots shit stirrers hijacking here.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:21 am

    what a pathetic loser she is lol!
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:31 am

    Anonymous26 August 2014 02:35
    I think it is wise to heavily censor these comments actually, to save the discussion from the gutter. CB is more than capable of distinguishing reasoned argument from 'muck stirring' (to coin the phrase of one regular poster.   I would rather censorship enabling some in depth exchanges than a free for all 'nah nah nanah nah' playground taunt. Would probably advise against a forum for these reasons CB.

    Anonymous26 August 2014 02:55
    She wont dare show face on the forum world after what she had done.
    She is finished in the forum world and she has only herself to blame.
    She blame others because it is easier on her conscience.

    OWN GOAL.

    Don't think Hutton wrote that one....


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:22 pm

    Anonymous26 August 2014 03:24
    Will you be opening a new forum Cristobel? You were sure of it a couple of days ago. Have you had any luck with applications for the Admin position?

    Rosalinda Hutton26 August 2014 03:55
    I will, its in the planning stages just now, but it won't be a Madeleine forum.

    Meanwhile, there are exciting plans afoot and there will indeed soon be a place where we can pick up where we left off Smile Watch this space!
     Why on earth would anyone 'apply' to be her admin.....? Lord, she's thick.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:26 pm

    is she so thick she doesn't know she has to be admin ? oh , no need to answer .
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:45 pm

    The loonies have woken up - tinfoil hats on, everyone!
    JJ26 August 2014 11:54
    TBs statement 3 May 2013 onJH 7.00a.m.

    The Macs have agreed to reduce their overall claim against Tony by 93%

    On 6 Mar Carter Ruck wrote to me without prejudice saying the Macs would be prepared to limit their claim against me.

    I (TB) instructed my solicitor to conduct negotiations with the Macs as a result of which a new offer was put to me ......

    Tony Bennett believes the court costs were the Macs to waive and he should know!

    Carter Ruck work under instruction from their client who in this case is the MACS

    Old Spanish proverb: Always follow the squirrel

    Anonymous26 August 2014 11:45
    Exactly. They had TB by the short and curly's and he has been working for Team Mccann ever since, assisted by the ever helpful Jill of course (among a few others).
    Choice of losing his house and prison or just sell your soul and work with them.
    If you can't beat them then you join them don't you Tony.
    The above is a FACT.

    Anonymous26 August 2014 11:46
    "Did Tony do a deal with the devil?" I first became aware of the JH forum when the Birch stuff was news. Then we had Tony's trial and he stopped posting for some time after that and when he did post he was very careful in what he said.
    When the Smith sighting was raised and he started attacking the Smiths, I sensed that he may have been turned and made a cryptic post to that effect


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:17 am

    Anonymous27 August 2014 01:24
    I cannot reveal my name for obvious reasons but back in May last year Bennett confided in me (I had pretended for a long time to be a supporter and friend of his) that he had indeed done a deal with an MI5 handler (he even gave me the name, he is too trusting for his own good sometimes) who had 'arranged' for his payments to Carter-Ruck to cease, so long as when the time came, he did all in his power to wreck a certain sighting that was going to be heavily promoted by Op Grange later in the year. MI5 tell him what to write and help him to make it look as though it's just his own thoughts


    wot a bunch of nutters lol! lol! lol! lol!
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:21 am

    Anonymous27 August 2014 02:13
    Now do you really believe this....Well do ya now ?
    http://paulorebelononeglect.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/philip-edmonds-hodge.html
    Maybe another fantasy email ???

    When TB tells you a theory is nothing but fantasy or lies, then its best to keep looking in those areas...

    http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/mossads-links-to-filthy-britain/
    I have no doubt that Israel are somewhat involved in this coverup...
    Keep digging, and no matter how crazy it sounds or looks, just dig and dig. Remember, everything Mainstream is Israel...

    CH

    JJ27 August 2014 02:38
    Richard D Hall cannot acknowledge TB's involvement in the dvd's or that he has spoken directly to TB about the case due to TB's conviction for contempt, it would return TB to Court.

    Some of the information in the dvd's can only have come from TB as a source. Any investigative reporter would obviously check their sources so there would be, if investigated, evidence of phone calls and e-mails between TB and Hall

    TB as an honourable man would obviously have told Hall he was not allowed to comment on the case, or repeat his questionable facts and there the matter would rest.

    By not doing so it would be possible to involve Hall in furthering Contempt of Court by publishing material.

    I do not believe we will hear very much from Richard D hall on the matter.The Macs are content as long as Murat and the Smiths are in the firing line.

    The hope will be that Justice Tugendhat doesn't mind that his judgement is being ignored and his Court held in contempt.

    Anonymous27 August 2014 02:43
    How many emails are pure fantasy ? Do we ever get to see the actual original emails. It seems we are told they are just a copy and paste......Why ?

    http://rosaleen-thewhistler.blogspot.co.uk/2009/08/latest-message-from-michael-shrimpton.html

    What is really going on ? Is TB painting a smokescreen about something ?
    Why is Christopher Story a fantasist like Shrimpton and also Birch ?
    What is going on ????
    I agree, they may sound like fantasy, but wouldnt you just simply ignore them if they were. Why do you knock these theories ? Whats in it for you to knock them ?
    Have you ever answered the question about how you got the information that the Naomi Corlett was a Secret Service Boat ?
    Is it all Controlled Opposition....

    CH

    Reply

    Anonymous27 August 2014 02:45
    Im stepping back now until the forum opens....Keep up the good work all

    CH



    BONKERS lol! lol! lol!
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:15 pm

    more conspiracy drivel from Mad Mutton today .

    THE BEGINNING OF THE END - Part V
    I feel a little bit like Adrian Mole, although I am an academic, I'm not very clever. I had no idea of the can of worms that would be opened up by questioning the antics of Tony Bennett and CMoMM and it seems I am far from alone.

    I have now been doing the research I should have done before committing so freely to the JH Forum, and I am shocked at the murky history that lies beneath. I'm not going to libel anyone, but I strongly suggest readers use their google facility to do some digging of their own, beginning with Tony Bennett and Jill Havern. I had no idea for example about the battles between the ex members of the 3 Arguidos, which seem to be ongoing.

    A rabid anti, becomes a pro, and the most vociferous anti campaigner is now doing his utmost to destroy the evidence for the prosecution. One thing I do know is, that the McCanns are very persuasive and have a way of getting people to do their bidding.

    I was asked to do a summary of all the comments that have come in. It has certainly been an enlightening few days for many of us, we are now seeing all the comments that would never have got through the censorship on CMoMM and indeed the other half of the story. Commenting at the moment however would be impossible because I haven't got a clue what is going on.

    Throughout the 7 years I have been commentating on this case, I have always been an independent, I have never belonged to any groups or teamed up with anyone. I believed I was an 'independent' while posting on CMoMM, but clearly I wasn't, the forum had an agenda and I was unwittingly part of it.

    Much as I would like to drop this and get back to my real interests, I feel that I, and indeed many others, have been deceived and I want to know why. If anyone knows the answers, please use the anonymity here to let us know. Oh and please use this blog (Part V) to respond.


    think we should respond .
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Wed Aug 27, 2014 5:03 pm

    Anonymous27 August 2014 08:16
    I find it disgusting and quite upsetting that I've wasted the past few years of my life reading and posting on the JH forum even staying up to the early hours of the morning to read posts if I've been out all day, as have hundreds of other people, thinking that we were making a difference in finding out what happened to MBM. We've all now had that illusion shattered by finding out we've all been betrayed, not only by the very people running the forum but most likely by MBM's parents who may have a noose around the necks of TB, Sharoni and anyone else on their admin staff, to be forced to blame everyone and anyway for MBM's disappearance except the very two people who were responsible for MBM’s welfare.

    The skills of K & G McCanns' lawyers hold no bounds, WHO IS PAYING THE LAWYERS is a question many people would like answered

    Reply

    Anonymous27 August 2014 08:41
    I may be wrong but I don't think JH is in the Mcs pocket. She just dances to Bennetts tune. Had I been that close to TB for so long, I'd be wondering what he had stored in his dossier on me.
    What these people have stored doesn't have to be anything serious, but opinions and parts of our life that we wouldn't want to be known. After four years of McCann discussion behind the scenes they could be quite significant. He's paid his price, she hasn't and he will be well aware of that.
    She can't get rid of him even if she wanted to.



    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Broho on Wed Aug 27, 2014 5:52 pm

    That lot are too thick to understand the explanation to the lawyers question. It's been told to them over and over ad nauseam.
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:59 pm

    jkh27 August 2014 09:58
    The forum has recently cost me £20.54 to keep the googleads off for the next two years. I think I can come up that amount without Tony's help. Forumotion is free otherwise. It's just a personal choice for me to keep the adverts off.


    lol!

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Broho on Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:16 pm

    Did she do that because Bennett didn't know how Paypal works? *cough*

    lol! lol! lol! lol!

    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:22 pm

    Thomas Baden-Riess27 August 2014 13:17
    So the Evening Standard is now calling it Cristobel as well? Is this a coded message by Clarence Mitchell and MI5 to tell us all they're watching. They could have used HAARP to create it.


    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/hurricane-cristobel-heading-for-the-uk--bringing-temperatures-of-25c-to-london-9692870.html


    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:41 am

    Rosalinda Hutton27 August 2014 15:51
    Ha ha ha, the narcissist in me is loving the name and the timing, though clearly others are not quite so amused. Perhaps its a sign and a new name for an anarchist blog!

    Anonymous27 August 2014 16:06
    I used to dip in and out of JH. Dipped out quite a bit actually - it could get a bit circular... I haven't been there in months - since around the last strange banning of wlbts and the references to PMs possibly being read. I only realised there was something odd going on again, from Blacksmith.

    So...I came over here to see what had occurred and am way behind on the antics and am wondering whether I need to go back and find out what the squirrel was. Not sure I do.

    Cristobell, I PMed you initially at the end of last year - mainly re the nit-picking of your posts, the inner circle, the pack mentality etc..

    I wouldn't be surprised if there's a way for admin to read PMs and I'm sure one of my PMs (to a mod) was deleted before it got to the mod. I have my suspicions re a certain someone having taken the reigns of admin, one eventful evening.

    Re researching JH - I did a bit of surfing for info a while back and found an amount of interesting stuff, but what truth there is in it all, I don't know.

    Anyway - good to see some of the more sensible commentators having their say or with words of support here. I noticed RussianDoll and The Rooster - who experienced a Piggy of Lord of The Flies type episode I was quite shocked by.

    kh27 August 2014 22:39
    Private messages cannot be read on the forum but I can see the statistics of any member which includes how many private messages they have sent. One of the now-banned trolls sent a private message to another member which was then forwarded to me and that is how I know about what they were doing on my forum and that is why I've now disabled private messages for new members.

    Reply

    Anonymous27 August 2014 15:30
    Theres nothing like some good old fashioned sexism to make an old man feel powerful again eh!

    Reply

    Anonymous28 August 2014 01:52
    Are MI5 blackmailing JKH I think so

    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:04 pm

    Anonymous28 August 2014 03:34
    jkh @ 27 August 2014 22:39

    Just as I thought. I have tried to explain this probability a few days ago but it was ignored. Why? Because that is not what they want to hear and your explanation will also fall on deaf ears.

    Horatio.

    Anonymous28 August 2014 04:17
    You are not telling the truth.
    Please provide the pm that shows that posters were trolls operating out of internet cafes.
    I know what went on because it was my pm that was read and taken out of context and used to fuel a feeding frenzy amongst the delude followers.
    What I had said to another poster who was about to be banned(WLBTS) that it was easy to register in another name if you go to an internet café and use a different isp.
    Why do you need to lie about this matter JKH?

    Anonymous28 August 2014 04:21
    The other member would have to have been WLBTS.
    No Way.
    JKH if you are going to tell porkies you will have to do better than that.

    Anonymous28 August 2014 04:14
    Blimey Cristobell - you ain`t `alf gettin` some right divvies on `ere.
    Woofer


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:46 pm

    Woof at least you can post freely here unlike the pravda style propaganda
    emanating from the lapdogs on the cesspit.Are you really that dim?

    Anonymous28 August 2014 06:10
    Woofer. I think it's fair to say that the divvies are on the JH forum. No offence to you as your a good poster which are few and far between these days.

    Anonymous28 August 2014 07:25
    Woofer @ 28 August 2014 04:14

    Is that your contribution or have you got something more constructive to offer?

    Horatio

    JJ28 August 2014 10:13
    I hope she doesn't go back because it's much quieter there now without all the trolling and infighting. It's like as soon as she left all the trouble went aswell. Think about it. Just saying.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sykes on Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:56 pm

    Oh, my, look what I've just stubbed my toe on.   xxxxhttp://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/forum   Remove xxxx to access link.   I make no comment - yet.

    ETA I looked at the membership list - how very interesting that members of the JH forum have joined, some of those who had flounced and those who had been banned. But what is also interesting are the others.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    PART V1 - MORE ATTACKS ON TONY BENNETT AND THE MYTHS AND LEGENDS OF THE MCCANN CASE

    Post  Sykes on Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:18 pm

    Part VI - MYTHS AND LEGENDS
    Many thanks to JJ for challenging the myths and legends that have sprung up surrounding this case.

    post JJ

    My first interest is, I would like to know the truth of Madeleines fate and my second is how the myths and legends concerning the case, have grown up.

    In the early days many of the myths can be found to lead back to Clarence Mitchell, and the reason is, a basic of life.He was paid, he did it for money the Macs are his clients.

    But now a strange phenomenon, most of the myths of the last 18 months emanate from TB. So what is his reason? is somebody offering him money, a deal, or is it his ego?

    There are many myths we can explore some absolutely crucial to the case where TB has deliberately lied informing anyone who would listen. But we need to begin somewhere that is simple to understand.

    After CW in October 2013, TB has taken every opportunity to dismiss the Smiths as liars. Why, we can only guess but he wrote a piece on CMOMM on October 25th 2013 entitled Smithman 17 Remarkable Similarities between Smithman and Tannerman and listed the 17.

    Certain people checked and although it sounds damming, there are not 17 similiarities. Miuch discussion followed but he blasted anyone who pointed out his errors, many were banned.

    To keep this short, one example. JT said the child was blonde.THIS IS NOT TRUE.

    If TB can produce any police statement by JT stating the childs hair colour, let him produce it.  
    He has lied but 17 remarkable similiarities have gained credence on the internet.
    Several other statements on this one posting alone, are also untrue and that is just the start.

    The errors cannot be genuine mistakes, as he has been shown his statements are false by many different posters. He could recheck his facts and admit his error, we all make them, but does he do so?.

    No, he does not, he blindly keeps pushing the blame in the direction of Murat and the denigration of the Smiths, strangely away from the Macs and the Tapas 7. Why would anyone do that?

    TB has stated on the Smithman thread that it could not be Gerry the Smiths saw, as a number of witnesses testify Gerry was seen around the Tapas between 9.30 and 10.30pm.

    TB states among the witnesses who can confirm Gerrys presence are:
    Gerry Mccann, Kate Mccann, Matt Oldfield ,Rachael Oldfield, Fiona Payne, David Payne, DW, RO'B, JT.........

    As John McEnroe famously said "you cannot be serious"
    Too many people believe his research, too few check it and if they do they will be shocked.    


    Last edited by Sykes on Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:32 pm; edited 1 time in total


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  coco on Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:37 pm

    they' re obsessed with Bennett , maybe Hutton didn' t get to be one of the 6 mistresses Butler said he has lol! lol! lol!

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Broho on Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:58 pm

    lol! lol! lol! lol! That's it.
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6821
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    JAYELLES' ON HUTTON'S CLAIMS TO BE A SCHOLAR OR TEACHER AT A UNIVERSITY

    Post  Sykes on Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:22 am

    Not only is she currently neither scholar or teacher at a university, she never has been and most certainly never will be.

    Her lie that she is an academic reminds me of her lie about being a journalist. On that issue I was able to determine with evidence that she was no such thing. She had a few letters published in her local (very small circulation) newspapers and a couple of these letter style comment pieces were featured as stand-alone articles. Having less than half a dozen very small pieces in the local rag does not a journalist make. To claim to actually be a journalist as Linda (Rosalinda, Rosalind or whatever name the pot she smokes leads her to believe is hers) claimed relies on some training, some professional articles, or at least some journalistic ability. Hutton demonstrated none of those things and her claim to be a journalist was more than simple exaggeration. It was a blatant lie to make herself look important in the eyes of the other hounders. It failed when she was exposed as a liar.

    Both her journalistic and academic lies reinforce the fantasy world that this woman lives in. She even had the gall to call her catastrophically hilarious appearance on Icke TV with the shrieky interviewer who has disappeared into the ether with Icke TV itself as a media event or some such nonsense. It was nothing more than a very nasty and appallingly ill-prepared blogger rocking on the arm of her chair via Skype.

    Hutton is simply one of the frogs croaking and bouncing at the bottom of the very deep box of such frogs. All of them as mad as each other.

    Incidentally, why does Linda (Rosalind, Rosalinda) Hutton think it so clever to frequently declare that she is a pot head, high on her favourite drug? Does this mad woman think that makes her look cool and down with the kids, or does she think that all "celebs" (as she fantasises her blogging and skype interview has made her) do it so she has to join in? Does her family approve of her drug habit? Thankfully the majority of society still understand that pot heads are people to be pitied or despised. Certainly society does not think that people high on drugs are in a position to preach to others.
    Says it all, good one, Jayelles.  


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Sponsored content

    Re: HUTTON RANTS ABOUT BEING BANNED

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:06 am