DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Share
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:41 pm

    Feel free to say what you like.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  coco on Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:53 pm

    no sign of any debating from mutton yet , just a load of bleating for attention .

    Neeley

    Posts : 55
    Join date : 2013-10-06

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Neeley on Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:43 pm


    It won't happen. Tigerloaf would eat her alive!

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Broho on Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:53 pm

    Tigerloaf would eat her alive!

    And she knows that.

    Big mouthed coward that she is.
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:16 pm

    From Myths, with thanks.
    Hutton revealed what she is really up to with a post on Havern's hellhole where she admits her aim is to 'expose' McCann supporters - she wants to know who we are and who we are related to.

    Well she can go swivel if she seriously thinks that any of us for one moment would expose ourselves and our families to the sort of prurient exposure that others have been subjected to.

    On the site owned by Pamalam there is a whole, creepy stalkerish section where she catalogues every person she can find who can even loosely be termed a friend of the McCanns. Them, their partners and even their children.

    Collected like beetles, pinned to Pamalam's card, and distributed to weirdos across the interwebz.


    Thanks but no thanks Hutton. If you can't debate with an anonymous person then you clearly cannot debate at all and it's just an excuse.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:56 pm

    I don't think Cristobell would be abused, she,s not stupid as she know it will never happen,but it was worth a try to get at least one of the pro,s to tell us all why the mccanns are innocent in their eyes


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:34 am

    From Myths with thanks.

    R.V. Hutton Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3m
    @Jayelles1 @RothleyPillow You have my terms. Via my blog, or live TPV or radio. Your friend is anonymous troll. #mccann

    I take that means Hutton is willing to use her blog to post her evidence to prove her claims made on TPV. That seems fair enough. I look forward to seeing them. Maybe she could start with the alleged 24 libel cases. What could be more simple?

    No, I think she means Tiger should post on her blog so she can get the IP address? Or edit/alter Tiger's posts?


    Tigerloaf: Yes it is clear one of her aims was to "draw then out and expose them" and with the history of Bennett and others on Havern's site, stalking people that is not something any sensible person would expose him or herself to.

    This business of identity is merely a very flimsy excuse. It has no bearing on the content of her claims, the content of my posts or anything else. She has shown herself up now by refusing even to read two very short posts and replying to them on her blog. The most obvious conclusion is that she can't because you would have expected her to be extremely keen to demonstrate to everyone her expert knowledge and complete grasp of the case.

    Actually, it is the perfect case of her lying to everyone yet again.

    Among her ramblings from the Poulton show this one stands out as a shining example of her inability to tell the truth.

    I’m accused of making up this, and accused of making up that. Well, you know, which is all absolute rubbish. You know I could disprove what they say a hundred times over…

    But eveybody can see that she lied. She can't do anything of the sort. Instead she retorted with a refusal to read the questions and a tirade of coarse language which identifies her as nothing better than a fishwife. That isn't a term of abuse by the way. It is simply an accepted term for so-called ladies who show their real lack of standards by using the kind of language she did. The real Rosalind / Rosalinda / RV / Linda / Cristobell Hutton was seen in those shameful outbursts.

    She still has the chance to redeem her reputation as expert on the case as the questions still stand.

    Can she answer them? It is looking ever less likely.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Post  Sykes on Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:31 pm

    R.V. Hutton Author ‏@RosalindaHu
    @Jayelles1 STMs is like Fritzle's bunker, dirty, seedy and skin crawlingly evil. #mccann

    Comment: That tweet says far more about her, as for this forum there are no p.a.e.d.o.philes residing on here sadly the same can't be said about Haverns forum.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Broho on Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:01 pm

    She is dreadfully transparent. The only person she seems to be fooling is herself.
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:14 pm

    Ftrom Myths:
    How did Tiger's perfectly reasonable questions here (for her to answer on HER blog) translate into this?

    R.V. Hutton Author ‏@RosalindaHu 2h
    @mikeywomble A troll by the name of Greenink, wants me in STMs so he can abuse me in front of his mates. Nowt to do with case. #mccann


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Broho on Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:21 pm

    Her response shows how her mental capabilities have left her.

    Another one who needs specialist treatment.
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:42 pm

    R.V. Hutton Author ‏@RosalindaHu 2h
    @mikeywomble I am not responding to greenink'sG abuse Michael, no-one would, that is not debating. #mccann


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Rachel Granada

    Posts : 1089
    Join date : 2013-08-08

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Rachel Granada on Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:10 pm

    Hutton has made a complete and utter fool of herself.

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Broho on Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:22 am

    Rachel Granada wrote:Hutton has made a complete and utter fool of herself.

    That is quite an understatement of the reality. Rachel.  

    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:47 pm

    Jayelles on Myths, with thanks.
    Don't want to disrpupt the debate thread with this comment, but wanted to pick up on Tiger's point about Hutton's tendency to exaggerate.

    1. Earlier in the year, she accused me of writing "poison pen letters" to her publisher. This is a pretty serious accusation as it is a potential criminal act. Not only that, but she actually accused the lady in Glasgow who was wrongly identified as me of committing this heinous act.

    I pushed her for proof of these "poison pen letters" and she did her usual ducking, diving, deflecting, disappearing.. Eventually she elaborated and admitted that what she was terming "poison pen letters" was me tagging Randomhouse in a reply I made to her on Twitter!

    2. With regard to her claim that her jaw had been broken by a member of staff at the Children's home where she stayed, there is NO mention of any such injury in the book which she wrote after she lost her lawsuit against the home/Catholic Church. She does describe one beating which she received in the home after she sat in the Housefather's chair and told him to "F Off" when he asked her to move. She said she knew she would be beaten for this, but that she "didn't care". She claims she was then beaten about the face and body and that she was "stunned" (whether literally or metaphorically is unclear).

    She describes a "kerfuffle" where one of the nuns got whacked in the jaw when she tried to pull Hutton's mother off another member of staff (whom Hutton claims she had by the throat). Hutton says she was "pleased" at the nun being whacked.

    3. She certainly seems unable to differentiate between the McCanns and people who are vocal in their support for them (most of whom don't have any connection with the family whatsoever). She often attributes the actions of supporters to the McCanns themselves. On one occasion, she tweeted that the McCanns were trying to ban her book. I have no idea where this came from, but suppose it may have stemmed from someone tagging Randomhouse in a response to her. I'm not alone in doing this so it may or may not have been me.

    She claims not to hate the McCanns, but her derogatory comments, snipes and snide remarks about them and their efforts to find their daughter tell a different story. You don't have to be told that someone hates you, to get a sense that they really don't like you! Hate is an emotion which is characterised by behaviour and attitude. Words are pretty meaningless under the circumstances - i.e. you can say I love you till your heart is content, but if you are mocking then, slagging them off, high-fiving people who are being cruel and making hateful comments and literally just attacking EVERYTHING the person says and does, then it's hard to imagine that what you feel is anything less than hatred.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6824
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sykes on Thu Dec 19, 2013 8:49 pm

    R.V. Hutton Author ‏@RosalindaHu 2h
    @Tiger_Loaf @Josephodriscoll @Jayelles1 @SoniaPoulton You have my replies, now go away. #mccann

    Tigerloaf ‏@Tiger_Loaf 2h
    @RosalindaHu Why should I go away? I am just showing you can't back up the claim you made on @SoniaPoulton show. #McCann I was right.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Sponsored content

    Re: COMMENTS ON THE TIGERLOAF/CHRISTOBELL DEBATE

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:58 pm