The sock puppet calling itself Avril Farrell pens a load of insults and misinformation to the Sun


    Posts : 6835
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    The sock puppet calling itself Avril Farrell pens a load of insults and misinformation to the Sun Empty The sock puppet calling itself Avril Farrell pens a load of insults and misinformation to the Sun

    Post  Sykes on Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:39 am

    After the tirade of abuse from the Sun Online towards Goncalo Amaral, I decided to put my anger and disgust to good use and make a formal complaint. This is the email I sent to The Sun and I will not be silenced!
    Dear Sir or Madam,
    I am sending this email as a formal complaint about your online newspaper; The Sun on Sunday dated 16 April 2017 at 3.39am Updated 16 April 2017 at 3.56am.
    Firstly I have to say that the article seemed to be written in a very unprofessional manner, and was an almost childlike rant. I noticed it was written by Sunday staff, so this would explain it and the lack of an author's name suggests embarrassment on the Sun's part, almost as if you were letting an apprentice 'have a go'.
    The article was a particularly nasty and vicious onslaught on Dr Goncalo Amaral the lead Detective in the investigation of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. I refer you to the word 'odious' that you used and I took the trouble to look up the definition of the word on Google and the meaning is as follows: revolting, repulsive, repellent, repugnant, disgusting, offensive, objectionable, vile, foul, abhorrent, loathsome, unspeakable, poisonous, noxious, obscene, base, hideous, grisly, gruesome, horrendous, heinous, atrocious, awful, terrible, dreadful, frightful, obnoxious, unsavory, unpalatable, unpleasant, disagreeable, distasteful, dislikeable, off putting, displeasing, ghastly, horrible, gross, putrid, sick making, yucky, god awful, beastly, skanky, skurvy.
    I am at a loss as to why you have used such a word to describe a highly intelligent and educated man which is not only libelous but seems to be what can only be described as a personal attack on the man's good character. You have also stated that Dr Amaral is a 'grubby individual'? Again a libelous personal attack and go on to describe him as 'shameless' and 'vindictive' If you actually know anything about Dr Amaral you would find that he is anything but 'vindictive' as he has absolutely nothing to be vindictive about. He won both court appeals, why should he feel vindictive?
    You have stated that you find it incredible that the Portugal’s legal system overturned the McCann's libel win against Dr Amaral for his 'libel slurs' on them. Really? I was unaware that The Sun was such an expert in the Portuguese Legal System. The fact of the matter is, the McCann's lost 2 appeals on the grounds of Dr Amaral's legal right to freedom of expression over the McCann's 'hurt feelings' otherwise known as a right to a good name. Ironically, which is what you have just done in your vicious attack towards Dr Amaral. Furthermore he was cleared, yes cleared of any libel remarks as the book, The Truth of the Lie was based on facts, yes facts of the case using evidence, yes evidence gathered during the investigation of the disappearance, have you got that, disappearance, not abduction, of Madeleine McCann. So for the avoidance of doubt let me spell it out to you what that actually means; Dr Amaral is at liberty to sell is book where ever he chooses and in whatever language he chooses, despite what the McCann's threaten, there is not a thing they can do about it. Incidentally, the Portuguese Supreme Court also ruled that the McCann's have not been declared innocent in the involvement of the disappearance of their daughter, another reason for your spiteful rant towards Dr Amaral I think.
    Anyway moving on. You have also insulted one of the finest Police Forces in the world by referring to Dr Amaral's 'men' as 'rookies' who made 'rookie errors' stating it as one reason that no trace of Madeleine was ever found! No trace of Madeleine has ever been found, just think about that for a minute, 10 years and £13 million of UK taxpayers money spent on the investigation, and they have found nothing. Perhaps they are looking in the wrong place, perhaps Operation Grange need to start looking at the prime suspects who have been sitting under their noses all along instead of searching for a patsy to pin it on. It is not the Police Judiciary who are at fault here, who incidentally are on a par with our own Scotland Yard, so would you also refer to SY as 'rookies' too. The investigation was severely hampered by the UK Government, which I think you know only too well. You have stated the phrase 'baseless suspicion' I suggest you read the Police Judiciary files before you speak of 'baseless suspicion' its a real eye opener, full of fairy tales, inconsistencies and well quite frankly, blatant lies.
    Now we come to the statement. 'How might her life and Kate and Gerry's been different had fate put a decent cop in charge' The audacity of that statement makes me laugh out loud or I would do if a 3 year old child was not at the centre of this tragic case. I suggest that you refer to Dr Amaral's qualifications and past police record so that you might get an insight on just how decent a man he really is, despite what the McCann's and their PR machine would have us believe.
    You refer to Dr Amaral 'cashing in' on a 2nd 'more fanciful' book to 'clean out' the McCann's; first of all he is not cashing in. Dr Amaral is retired and spends his retirement writing, he has published 4 books in all and I expect he will publish many more as authors tend to do. The fact that he has material due to the case to publish is irrelevant and where do you get the notion of 'fanciful'? Have you actually seen a draft copy of the book? You have no idea what his 5th book will contain, have you? no, so just another slur on Dr Amaral's character. May I remind you that Kate McCann also 'cashed in' by writing a book about madeleine, she couldn't even give her a capital M at the beginning of her name, but then again the book was about her and Gerry and said very little about Madeleine. You go on to say that Dr Amaral is going to 'clean out' the McCann's, what a ridiculous statement that is. The court case brought by the McCann's was purely vexatious, they took a chance to gain financially to swell the coffers of their Ltd Company,- I refuse to call it a fund and lost, end of, and now they have to pay Dr Amaral's court fees as well as their own, this is how the legal system works and in actual fact it will cost the McCann's nothing. They will use the money from the Ltd Company, which was set up as a 'fighting fund to pay for their legal fees' from day one. Look it up on You Tube, courtesy of Uncle Brian. Do you think that somehow they had an inkling that they would be needing 'legal fees' at some point?
    And your last comment, 'It turns the stomach' well I have to agree with you there. I'll tell you what turns my stomach; no evidence whatsoever of an abduction yet you newspapers still insist on printing incorrect nonsense, the enormous amount of evidence stacked against the McCann's including evidence of 2 highly trained cadaver and blood dogs, lies and inconsistencies in statements are all blatantly ignored, threats to sue everyone and anyone who doesn't go along with their fairy tale, a Ltd Company set up in record time which received over £4 million donated by the public who thought it was going to be used for a 'search' for Madeleine which has been used mainly for legal expenses amongst other things. But the thing that really turns my stomach is the mainstream media, the Government, and Scotland Yard who are blatantly ignoring the evidence uncovered in the investigation by Dr Goncalo Amaral and the willful injustice for a little girl who went away on holiday and never came back, which begs the question, why.
    I look forward to your reply.

    Truth is the Daughter of Time

      Current date/time is Thu Aug 22, 2019 12:44 pm