DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Share
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:07 pm

    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton24 October 2015 at 15:35
    15:00. Bennett always follows in the path of Kate and Gerry, he now believes he can use the strong arm of law to force people to like him. He hasn't been able to silence me with his campaign of libel, smearing and harassment, so he is now claiming to be the victim, in the hope that my blog will be shut down and I will be arrested.

    Well my conscience is clear, so too my blog and my words elsewhere. My spam box however is full to bursting with abuse and threats, all of which I am happy to hand over to the police, I've kept all of them and I am sure the police will have the means to track them all and get their addresses. Bring it on, say I.  

    If the police want to pursue this, that's fine by me. I have never been 'done' for stalking or harassing anyone - can Bennett say the same thing? I'll be sure to point out to them all Bennett's past misdemeanours and Court cases, if they are not already aware of them.

    I wonder what the police will make of Bennett's stalking and harassment of witnesses in a high profile crime that is currently under investigation by Scotland Yard? Is it legal for him to publicly call them Liars? Is it legal for him to publish their personal and financial details on his forum?

    I actually welcome the intervention of the police and find it quite amusing that Bennett has called them. Well done him!
    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton 24 October 2015 at 15:59
    For information, I have let Andrew respond here , but I want no part of the Andrew/Bennett conflict and won't be publishing anything further that goes along those lines.
    Anonymous24 October 2015 at 11:07
    I see bennett has reported you to the police Ros.

    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton24 October 2015 at 13:43
    11:07. Yeh, good luck to him with that, lol. The King of Stalkers and Malicious Communications is complaining that others don't like his thousands of pages of libel and smears against others. I am sure they will be nothing but sympathetic
    Anonymous24 October 2015 at 17:27
    It may be a good idea to remove anything about bennett that you cannot prove - whether you posted it or someone else did.


    Last edited by Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:43 pm; edited 1 time in total


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:22 pm

    Anonymous24 October 2015 at 10:20
    Can Cristobell explain why she asserts she will not publish insults on her blog but does so, joins in and encourages such in regard to Tony Bennett and members of cmomm? I am truly interested to hear an explanation but won't hold my breath

    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton24 October 2015 at 13:37
    10:20 Childish I know, but as CMoMM has hundreds of pages devoted to my 'mental health' problems and to what an evil, despicable person I am supposed to be, it is a small act of retaliation.

    These self righteous pillars of the community are not quite as they seem, and to be fair, as they keep dishing it out, they can hardly squeal like stuck pigs when they get a little bit back.
    jeanmonroe Today at 4:17 pm
    With regards to SP and her 'troll' agenda will SP be 'disassociating' herself, anytime soon, from RH?

    SP's 'moral' high ground, on 'disgusting trolling', will be pdq 'eroded' when people 'find' out her 'bosom buddy' is being investigated, by Essex and Kent Police, for, 'trolling' (Malicious Communications Act) a pensioner.

    As RH, prophetically, as it turns out, said, 'let the truth be known!'

    The 'truth' is NOW 'known'! (it seems)

    Will SP be 'tweeting' about her 'mate' being investigated under the Malicious Communications Act for 'trolling' a pensioner?

    Don't think so, do you?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 6:10 pm

    Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 6m6 minutes ago
    So King of Stalkers and Malicious Communications Bennett is now claiming he is the victim. Too funny. #McCann #bringiton
    Sadly for Hutton, everyone can see who started this - her. It's been going on ever since she spat her dummy because she was suspended from not-Bennett's because of her bizarre behaviour when she was having one of her 'episodes'. And it's been all downhill since then.

    Her lies and malicious, false accusations about anyone she decides to target are all a matter of record. Who can forget this load of sh*t from her?






    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 6:53 pm

    MMM (Candyfloss's forum):
    One worrying thing to come out of this morning's debacle was Jill's statement that PeterMac had stepped away from both forums. Have the Mods here been advised of this by PeterMac and if so, do we know why?

    PeterMac's huge input to the truth of the case will be missed by all posters both on here and on CMoMM and his absence from both forums is a big loss.

    Hope he returns.
    Or it has nothing to do with this handbag fight, but the Gonzo fund is under scrutiny?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:13 pm

    He's having a go at JCL now.
    One thing the screenshots make abundantly clear is that when JillyCL said that hardly anyone reads CMOMM, she deliberately lied.

    At any one time, there are usually 200 people online here, and as the forum-owner's stats counter proves, over 20,000 come here to view every day.

    This forum is not perfect. But it is seen as a valuable resource on matters relating to Madeleine, along with mccannfiles, pamalam's site and many others.

    So some questions must be asked of JillyCL. Like:

    1. Why did she deliberately lie about CMOMM?

    2. Why did she publicly call this forum a 'cesspit'?

    3. Why does she routinely 'bad mouth' CMOMM on Twitter? - also...

    4. What was her real role, along with Isabelle McFabulous/QUEENdePORTUGAL, in the still unsolved 'Soustergate' affair?

    5. Exactly how long had she and Isabelle McFabulous known Mark Souster? - in JillyCL's case it was at least one year

    6. Why does she defend Robert Murat to the hilt and paint him whiter than white, when it is obvious at the very least that all is not right about his involvement in the case after 1st May?

    7. Why does she not allow any criticism of Murat on 'Maddie Case Files', where she is part of the Admin Team?

    8. Why did she take part, so it's reported, in excluding Joana Morais from Maddie Case Files?

    and perhaps the most important two questions of all about JillyCL are these two...

    9. Who exactly is she? - and

    10. Who is she really working for


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:15 pm

    Re: Sonia Poulton 'Teaser Trailer' out now (4 Oct 2015)
    Post Verdi Today at 7:47 pm

    To whom it may concern..

    @ Andrew

    As the Essex police has taken the claim seriously, you can be sure that evidence to support the claim has been submitted by Mr. Bennett. You can write what ever you wish on the internet but your authenticity hangs in the balance until you can prove Mr Bennett's accusation to be false. Can you do that? Meanwhile perhaps you should take a back seat and at the same time drop the attitude.

    @ Rosalinda Cristobell, Hutton

    This is not a playground, when a claim has been submitted to the police for investigation, you can't use the excuse 'you did it because he did it' as your defence. Nor can you counter claim using information unconnected with the charge against you. As regards your good self, should you intend to lodge a complaint of some description against Mr. Bennett, I think you will find it very difficult to produce evidence that Mr Bennett has slandered, abused or threatened you whereas social networkings is littered with your slander, abuse and threats against Mr Bennett (and others) - so I think you should drop the bravado.

    @candyfloss

    Sorry to hear of your sad personal circumstances, life can be tough at times - to add insult to injury at the same time as your forum needs you most. Still, an internet forum pales into insignificance when compared to family matters, you certainly don't need the truck do you.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:11 am

    CMoMM:
    Verdi Yesterday at 11:05 pm
    @Get'emGonçalo wrote:
    @Verdi wrote:
    To whom it may concern..
    @ Rosalinda Cristobell, Hutton

    This is not a playground, when a claim has been submitted to the police for investigation, you can't use the excuse 'you did it because he did it' as your defence.  Nor can you counter claim using information unconnected with the charge against you.  As regards your good self, should you intend to lodge a complaint of some description against Mr. Bennett,  I think you will find it very difficult to produce evidence that Mr Bennett has slandered, abused or threatened you whereas social networkings is littered with your slander, abuse and threats against Mr Bennett (and others) - so I think you should drop the bravado.

    Ah, but, Cristobell has said she only posted the kiddi diddler accusation under a # on twitter so I guess that doesn't count (even though thousands of people could see it and would retweet it to their thousands of followers)?

    Well that makes is OK then!  Clearly she forgets all the other insults she's been spreading across social networking.
    sallypelt Yesterday at 11:41 pm
    Oh dear! What HAS been going on while I have been away? Just catching up with the latest information on the forum. I can see the lies are flowing like wine on Ms Bossy's blog. Take this, for example:

    Anonymous23 October 2015 at 14:28
    Not only Aquila,Havern as well.She must fear losing traffic and therefore cash if he goes.
    Sallypelt and Pennylane can't make a post without praising Bennett.Are they scared of being banned or concerned about their"investment"?
    So, I "can't make a post without praising Bennett" according to "Anonymous". Well, take a look at all my posts, and it's there for all to see, that I rarely mention Tony in my posts. Two pet hates of mine are liars and hypocrites, and what I have read on other forums make me wonder how low can these people sink. "Afraid of being banned" Don't make me laugh.

    There, I have said my piece about these lying pieces of dog turds, so I won't be lowering myself further to make any other comments about them. I will take head to the saying "never argue with idiots, because they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:15 am

    Anonymous24 October 2015 at 18:47

    I would like to make a second and last post, if you would be so kind to publish it Cristobell.

    I am sick to death all this rubbish that coincides with trying to find the truth and seeking justice for Madeleine. It's absolutely bizarre and crazy.

    Read some of the comments over on the Tony/Jill forum and it's nuts. He's reported us both to the police, I see. Funny that, as had an interesting conversation with Essex police myself earlier (who know the name quite well and very much disliked by all accounts - but will say no more just yet). He's libeled me for best part of 2 years now, making up all sorts of nonsense so his sheep will follow and applaud or what ever they do. Although most of his sheep are his own socks which is even more ridiculous.

    Yes, I have stood up to him in the past. I got kicked off the Tony/Jill forum ages ago because of his bullying nonsense. I have never actually spoken to the guy, but yes I have rang him up several times to ask him to stop saying malicious rubbish about me. Although he will never speak. All for giving it the blue ink online and threatening old ladies etc, but when it comes to actually talking like a man, then no, he is a coward. A ridiculous one at that.

    There must be hundreds if not thousands of people out there who dislike the lunatic. He posts his address and number all over the net. However it's very convenient to accuse me of whatever. Apart from the mods on MMM, then I've been the most prolific poster on the forum. The very forum that he has been trying his best to get shut down.

    Now why would that be.

    The truth will all come out eventually.

    To all friends on MMM. Take care and fight for justice.

    Regards,

    Andrew


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:17 am

    Get'emGonçalo Today at 5:40 am



    Post Cristobell Today at 00:40
    I have now spoken to Essex Police - having come home and found my name being sullied all over the internet - and they have confirmed there is NO investigation into me, and the crime number put up by Tony Bennett is completely fictitious. The police have made a note of my call and advised me to contact all the social networks where this slander is posted to clarify the situation and they have also advised me to contact a solicitor.

    The matter has been referred to Kent police, Cristobell.

    If it was all a lie, why you be advised to get a solicitor?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:18 am



    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 October 2015 at 00:31
    Yeh, I have just got in from having dinner with friends to find all sorts of threats to me all over the internet because Bennett has implied that I am to face criminal charges.

    I'm getting a bit pissed off now, because this is feeling like the Brenda Leyland scenario all over again. Tell an innocent woman that the police are going to 'charge' her, then all dive in with the hobnail boots.

    To whom it may concern (Verdi/Bennett), I haven't heard a word from these two police forces who are supposedly investigating me on Bennett's behalf. Nor have I seen any Wanted Dead or Alive posters in the local vicinity. I am not sure what I am to be charged with; being a far more interesting and informed writer than Anthony Bennett perhaps? Is that really a criminal offence?

    Since writing the above, I have now spoken to Essex Police. The crime number Bennett has put up on his forum has nothing to do with me (or him), it is completely fictitious! Once again Bennett, you have been proved to be an out and out liar!
    As far as I understand it, the original complaint was made to Essex Police as Bennett lives in that jurisdiction, but Hutton lives in Kent so I assume the complaint was passed over to Kent Police, which seems confirmed by the screenshot at the top of this post. Sykes


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:48 am

    From CMoMM, the members of which must be laughing fit to bust. I sure as hell am! Sykes Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
    snook Today at 10:31 am
    And again Ms Hutton demonstrates her expertise in every subject under the sun

    So if I understand correctly. She returns from an evening with friends to find the internet ready crash so awash with libellous content regarding herself. She, on the advice of friends contacts the police ( well gone midnight) who inform her the crime number is false and confirm her opinion that she has committed no criminal crime, her shall we say faux pas is a civil matter .
    Ever helpful Essex police do however advise her to consult a solicitor.
    So accusing someone of being a child abuser on social media is not a criminal offence (I think lord McAlpine would disagree) however to suggest someone is subject to police investigation is and what's more she has good grounds should this information remain or be repeated.

    I wonder which solicitor told her this, out of hours and at the weekend. Did the police direct her to one of their duty solicitors so heinous was the crime against her?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:55 am

    Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 11h11 hours ago
    @Coco_4711 Its my name being sullied on the internet, I have the right to defend myself. #mccann
    But she can make malicious, false allegations about anyone she decides to target, can call people 'vermin' and child molesters, and it's all supposed to be just girly banter?

    I don't think so - it's way past time her lying and bullying was stopped.


    Isn't it called comeuppance?    Having been targeted by her a few weeks ago I am loving every minute of this.   I don't like Bennett one bit, but in this instance .... go for it, Essex Man!    Sykes   Laughing Laughing


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    HUTTON NOW THREATENING JILL HAVERN

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:08 am

    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 October 2015 at 10:52
    I have now spoken to Kent Police. Tony's complaint was passed to them on 15th October. It is not a CRIMINAL investigation, they have received a complaint and they will contact me regarding my side of the story, sometime next week, possibly. No Wanted Dead or Alive posters have been put out and I'm not expecting a dawn raid anytime soon.

    Tony has lied by saying that I am being criminally investigated by Essex and Kent police, the Essex police crime number he put up is fabricated and Jill Havern is libelling me by implying that I am facing criminal charges. Both Tony and Havern are doing exactly the same thing that was done to Brenda Leyland, they are lying about criminal charges and they have plastered these lies all over social media. This is a serious libel matter and one that I will not tolerate.

    Implying that I am guilty of a criminal offence all over social media when I have not even been contacted by the police is LIBEL. Havern's forum is of course full of libel and smears, not only of myself, but many others, including the witnesses in a high profile criminal case.

    I have a clean CRB, I have NEVER been in trouble with the police in any way, shape or form, and I am taking this libel very seriously indeed. You have been warned Havern.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:25 am

    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 October 2015 at 11:09
    To all those ugly hags on CMoMM jostling to insert themselves in Tony's rectum, you sound like a gaggle of embittered old crones regurgitating your bile daily because you have handed all your worldly possessions over to a two bit conman who isn't even attractive. I'm laughing at you.


    One plot, lost.
    Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 7m7 minutes ago
    So Ladyinred, which part of Tony's rectum do you occupy? I'm guessing you are stuck in the anus. #mccann


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:41 am

    aquila Today at 11:30 am

    Ladyinred wrote:

    aquila wrote:

    Ladyinred wrote:

    hentie wrote:
    Those agreeing with her every word, in effect backing her, are doing her no favours IMO.
    She has either a mental condition or is pretty evil (I put 'pretty' evil as it seems less harsh)
    Either way she is not being honest, either to her readers or herself.

    If there was someone who cared for her (difficult in view of her attitude) they should take her to one side.
    She's got too much time on her hands, allowing her craziness to spiral out of control.  Why doesn't she get a job instead of sitting at a computer all day spouting bile.

    She has a job Ladyinred, she's an author, playwright and journalist.

    Specializing in fiction and fantasy.

    Today's general theme for Ms Hutton is anatomical - anus and rectum, along with calling Tony Bennett a 'two bit conman'.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:16 pm

    From Myths with thanks.
    Rob1 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:52 am

    Cristobel should remove her malicious lies and stop making fake accusations of pedophilia against men she finds differences with. I think Tony Bennett is neither a great man nor a good one, but there is no excuse for treating pedophilia as a weapon to injure an opponent in arguments. I would support his perspective on this.

    Some people will never accept defeat, especially if they are wrong. Instead of gracious acceptance, they experience anger at their opponent and a desire to crush them for being right.

    I think a psychologist would advise that it is best to ignore Cristobel completely. Unless a cease and desist instruction is possible.
    Rob1 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:04 pm
    If it is true that Tony Bennet has fabricated police reference numbers, perhaps he will explain why? It seems a stupid thing to do because it is easily proved as a lie and reveals dishonesty.

    Why would any victim wish to present the abuser with a reason to call them a liar? If someone accuses another of making an abusive telephone call threatening to kill them and then invents a police reference number, I think the court would find it difficult to accept the accuser as a credible witness. Unless the telephone call was recorded.
    Truthiness2 » Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:11 pm
    Well, 'Andrew' has confirmed his crime ref no. given by Bennett is correct.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:54 pm

    Antonia Today at 12:42 pm
    I don't know whether to laugh or cry over all this.

    My children used to fight a lot and this would include making outrageous claims about the other and accusations of lying.

    But they were never as bad as Mr Bennett, Cristobell and others.

    The police have better things to do I would have thought than to deal with a clash of egos.

    maybe the mental health authorities/counsellors would be more relevant than the police to sort this out?
    Post parapono Today at 12:48 pm

    Cristobell decides which posts are being published on her blog.
    The unpublished ones end up in her spambox.
    Same spambox which she insists on offering to the authorities,
    to Sonia Poulton, to MSM, to research the IP addresses.
    All in order to expose the real names of the posters.

    Imo she can be held accountable for the comments on her blog.
    As well as for her tweets.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 1:19 pm

    Verdi Today at 12:39 pm
    To knock all this into some sort of perspective, parapono made a very pertinent point over yonder early this morning which has been conveniently ignored, so I'm posting here because I think it deserves a more discerning audience (hope that's OK parapono). Remember it is weekend - snipped..
    Things must really work differently in the UK.

    Here in the Netherlands the police doesn't give private
    information by telephone.
    Police stations aren't open 24/7 for information about official
    complaints possibly made against you.
    Certainly not on a Saturday night.
    If you went in during office hours to ask about this,
    after showing your ID,
    the answer would be that you just have to wait.
    They'll act on a complaint against you in their own time.
    They wont even tell you whether any complaint was made.
    I've been involved with a few criminal cases in the UK in the past (the right side of the law of course!) and can confirm that the above applies in the UK as well as the Netherlands - unless procedures have changed dramatically in recent years. If, as a member of the public, you visit a cop shop and start asking questions about a complaint made against you, or anybody else for that matter, the duty desk will merely tell you that if a complaint has been made it will be looked into and they will contact you when/if necessary - they certainly won't give out information about case detail.

    I'm sure late Saturday night, the night shift duty officer that Ms Hutton spoke to over the phone, was more than sympathetic. Perhaps she told him/her tales of manic depression, child abuse, institutionalized brutality and being the victim of internet trolls - she may have even give the long awaited documentary a bit of a plug?

    As aiyoyo wrote up-thread, you would think a long serving award winning top legal secretary would understand basic policing procedures.
    aquila Today at 12:46 pm
    I'm not posting on this thread again. I'm sick to the back teeth with Cristobell rants and the cry for freedom of speech whilst censoring her own blog to spew vitriol at anyone who takes her fancy. There will no doubt soon be martyrdom, threats of suicide and all manner of 'Brenda Leyland' type stuff. I'm not buying tickets to the panto.

    Posting up accusations of paedophilia against Tony Bennett from an anonymous poster is sick.

    Posting up '#kiddie fiddler' is sick.

    Everyday the McCann hashtag is increasingly occupied by nutcases - each one calling the other a paid shill or resorting to personal insult, threats etc not to mention the pornographic nonsense. All this in 140 characters per post.

    CMoMM is a good forum. Cristobell tried to wreck it, she's done the same thing to MMM. There is now only a 'are you in my camp' or 'are you in Tony Bennett's camp' left. CMoMM has never been about that imo.

    Cristobell, I wish you well but I rather doubt you'll stop your antics.
    Verdi Today at 12:51 pm

    Agreed, I think it's been working up to that for quite some time. Remember many moons ago she said that she wished to follow in Brenda Leyland's footsteps?
    snook Today at 12:57 pm
    Oops! Too late. She's already comparing herself to Brenda.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:19 pm



    parapono Today at 1:59 pm
    Cristobell wrote:
    Freedom wrote:
    Please don't slagging off the Smiths, Cristobell!

    There are definitely times when one needs to walk away from aggravating situations.

    Let's all do our best not to aggravate this one for the time being. If it's in the hands of the police, let them sort it out.

    Indeed Freedom.  I honestly don't know why I am concerned by all these anonymous cowards discussing my mental health issues.  Not one of them has the guts to say anything in their own names and using their own identities.  I have no time for gutless people in the real world and on the internet, they are even more spineless. They pity my family, well I pity theirs.  What their kids tell their school pals, my mum/dad spends all his/her days writing anonymous poison pen letters to strangers on the internet?  They must be sooooo proud.  
    I am as anonymous as you are Cristobell. It's parapono for me here, as you are Cristobell.
    Real names are in both cases easily found. Yours on your blog, mine on my site.
    So don't point the finger in my direction.
    And I did not discuss your issues.

    parapono
    Cristobell Today at 2:11 pm

    Freedom wrote:
    I do wonder Cristobell if the really spiteful venom-spitting harpies (not just relating to this case) are like that in the real world. Heaven help their families if they are.

    At least here we can switch off literally from them.
    Oh well, I suppose while they are trying to push me towards suicide they are at least leaving CF and this forum alone, whilst of course establishing that I got what I deserved and it was my own fault anyway. Nice people.

    And no, I am not suicidal, but I can see what they are trying to do. They think the balance of my mind is disturbed at the moment and they might strike lucky (again). Justice? That's not what they are here for. They are nothing more than a gaggle of grim reapers who get off on trying to destroy those they are jealous of.
    Am I reading this right? Is Hutton comparing herself with some kind of martyr? She really is a suitable case for treatment. Sykes Laughing Laughing


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:53 pm

    aiyoyo Today at 14:46
    Civil or criminal, up to the Police and the law to determine surely ?

    Can't tell me a self professed legal secretary does not know the simple basic such as that ?

    But then IIRC she said she hasn't been able to stick to one job so maybe a rolling stone gathers no moss applies here. And the reason for her multiple job changes ? Impression given was she cannot keep her mouth shut thus cannot keep her job safe, dislike authority likes to do the exact opposite of what is expected of her, and always has been like that ever since young, boasting all these giving the impression she's proud she stood out (even for all the wrong reasons).

    How can it be up to individual to decide how they want to be charged? Ludicrous !


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 3:45 pm

    aiyoyo Today at 3:23 pm

    She has flaming cheek to whinge people posting using screen names are gutless.
    Ahem...what about those gutless that slag off and libel members here on her blog that she let through uncensored?

    Does she not realise she's a hypocrite of the highest order letting those that are afraid even to use their screen names to say on forum what they said on her blog. Those that slag off people preferring to hide as "anonymous" on her blog.
    Imagine, gutless even to use screen names, and yet these kinds she has no qualms encouraging and supporting by letting them slip through her censorship.

    Say it all really, and she wonders why she came in for criticism.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    WAY TO GO TIGERLOAF!

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 4:03 pm

    Postby tigerloaf » Sun Oct 25, 2015 2:43 pm
    No matter what absolute drivel Rosalind/Rosalinda/Linda Hutton might scribble on her disgusting and increasingly degenerate blog she cannot deny the basic fact that she has posted (and personally chosen to allow to be posted by anonymous commentators) vile and malicious accusations against others.

    She has no defence against that and could well be the subject of either criminal (depending on precisely what crimes she is being reported for) or civil action regarding such behaviour. The evidence is on the internet for all to see. It would probably take a jury a matter of seconds to convict her should they be asked to ponder the matter.

    It would be absolutely no defence whatsoever for her to claim she was responding to other people's intimidation of her. Not only could a lawyer very easily prove this to be untrue as could anyone who has followed the saga of her online activitiy, it simply would not wash with the Judge who would be very forceful in reminding this so-called former legal-secretary (Does she really mean s.tamp-licker?) that it is no defence in law and she should take personal responsibility for her own actions.

    She should also be reminded that her reliance on cannabis or other drugs for personal comfort will not wash with the Judge either as an excuse for her malicious online behaviour. However, if she can prove the mental illness she has written of which supposedly affects her by submitting to tests then maybe that will prove to be a mitigating factor.

    I read a few hours ago that Hutton is angry that people are actually not just accusing her but condemning her as guilty of malicious online activity, of posting heinous statements about named individuals without furnishing (or having the ability to furnish) any proof whatsoever. She seems to think it demands a court case before people can proclaim their belief that she is guilty.

    She is fundamentally wrong in this. If you witness an event (as I have personally witnessed the depraved activity of Rosalind Hutton on her Cristobel blog) and as I witnessed a road incident the other day, then you are expected to state who you believe is at fault, who was the guilty party. There are hundreds of people who can testify that they have witnessed her and know her to be guilty of posting and allowing to be posted malicious lies on her blog and that she is carrying out a sustained series of articles harassing and defaming others. Her guilt is blindingly obvious. Whether this brings about civil or criminal conviction is another matter but it is foolish of her to try to suggest she is not guilty of the actions.

    Put simply, this woman acts appallingly online. She has admitted to a national newspaper that her malicious online behaviour and nasty online abuse is done for the fun and the enjoyment she gets from it (the "BUZZ").

    There are people whose capacity to behave decently online, to refrain from obscenity and goading, suggest they have no place in online society. (You only have to look at the latest depraved posts from this woman to see what I mean.) In the real world such behaviour is controlled more effectively. People are prevented from going into places where they are known to be unable to control themselves. Banning from shops for shoplifters, pubs for violent alcoholics, neighbourhoods for uncontrollable teenagers, town centres for beggars and so on. People like Hutton should be banned from all social media and blogs by law if they cannot control their outbursts there.

    There is one good thing to come out of this online fighting, though.

    The reputation of Sonia Poulton has yet again been trashed not by those who oppose her appallingly simplistic and badly-researched views on the McCann case but by one of the people her home movie about the case is actually most reliant on.

    What kind of publicity storm will this spat between a star of the home movie and Bennett, the convicted liar, bring at the time of its premiere (if it ever gets released of course)?

    On the issue of Poulton, a woman who seems to be totally off her trolley, it has been suggested to me that a full report

    of this spat between Hutton (who tells malicious lies on the net for fun),
    of the home movie and the doorstepping of Kate McCann with previously answered questions,
    of the behaviour of this so-called journalist at the inquest of Brenda Leyland,
    of the use of Brenda Leyland's name without the permission of the family,
    of the lies she has told about being commissioned over this movie,
    of her ongoing relationship with the online, gun-toting, nasty boy,
    of her disastrous stint on Lizard TV and the acrimonious arguments with Icke,
    of her public relationship and support for certain online abusers,
    of her strange online connections with other journalists


    would make a nice little email to be sent to various producers of morning shows. Perhaps they are aware of some of the nastiness of this woman whose services they still rely on when even louder mouths are unavailable but do they realise what kind of person she is in the round? In particular are they aware just what kind of troll she is herself and just how much she supports proven and self-confessed online abusers such as Hutton?

    I know I have asked Poulton previously to answer some simple questions about her behaviour and she has pointedly failed to answer any.

    But I will ask two more here today just to set the record straight and so that she knows she has had the opportunity to reply.

    Ms Poulton -

    Firstly, do you have any comments on the points I will be making shortly to various producers about your movie, your use of the Leyland name for publicity, your online behaviour, your interaction with online abusers etc? I am perfectly prepared to consider any such comments before sending my concerns about the MSM using a person such as yourself to comment on matters which I believe (and have evidence to show) you are actually involved in.

    Secondly, and this is rather more tongue-in-cheek, do you ever lash out at the gun-toting nasty boy you have become so enamoured with about the fact that just a tiny proportion of that lottery win could have kept you and him in home-movie making for the rest of your lives? You might have even found a camera man who does not wobble so much and an editor whose cuts/dubs are not so badly done. What a mug he was to throw it all at the wily Kazakhstanis? Still, he has you to keep him now so he isn't so worried is he?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 5:44 pm

    sallypelt Today at 4:49 pm
    If any proof is needed that this woman doesn't know what day of the week it is, just read two of the statements snipped from her blog on the mentioned dates, below:
    Saturday, 16 August 2014

    "BURIED BY THE ANTI'S - Banned for having an opposing view"
    25 October 2015

    "I actually left CMoMM because I was appalled at the stalking and harassment of this innocent [Smith] family"
    The question is, was she banned or did she leave?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:03 pm

    Rosalinda, Cristobell Hutton25 October 2015 at 13:58
    For information, the 'your mad you are' form of abuse is a common ploy used by bullies the world over. It is rife on the Jill Havern forum and of course on JATYK2 and Stop the Myths. Haverns adding the very helpful addition that if I am driven to suicide, it was my own fault anyway. Nice people eh?
    Perhaps if she hadn't lied about so many people, made so many false, malicious accusations about people, done so much sh*t-stirring, thrown so many hissy fits, caused so many melodramas, been so desperate for attention, got herself plastered all over the Sun as Queen Squisher Troll.....


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sykes on Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:33 pm

    Re: Conversation with Essex Police re libel claim
    Post Freedom Today at 6:14 pm

    We all react differently to provocation, Chatelaine.

    Telling people to shut up is not exactly tactful.

    Once again, let's leave this topic until there is a development from it.
    Does she never get tired of locking threads involving Hutton?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Sponsored content

    Re: DISSENTION IN THE RANKS ON CANDYFLOSS'S ANTI-FORUM? BENNETT RATCHETING UP THE ANTE?

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:49 am