DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    WIKIPEDIA COMMENTS

    Share
    avatar
    Bosie

    Posts : 215
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    WIKIPEDIA COMMENTS

    Post  Bosie on Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:04 pm

    User talk:David Bret
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Please do not write an article about yourself , as you did at David Bret. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged - see our guideline Writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Hello David Bret. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rudolph Valentino, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
    editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
    participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
    linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
    Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
    For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] We cannot tolerate legal threats here

    You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
    You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
    --Orange Mike | Talk 18:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Change {{unblock}} to
    This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
    David Bret
    Request reason:
    I was threatening the poster, not Wikipedia, which I should not have done. I am not taking legal action against Wikipedia. Please accept my apologies.

    Accept reason:
    Thank you for being reasonable and in retracting your threat. Remember to stay civil when in heated arguments with other users, don't resort to threats. –MuZemike 18:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: WIKIPEDIA COMMENTS

    Post  coco on Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:44 pm

    threatening the poster not wiki ? makes it alright then , does it ? brat aint half fond of hisself , suppose someones got to be .
    avatar
    Bosie

    Posts : 215
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: WIKIPEDIA COMMENTS

    Post  Bosie on Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:39 pm

    I don't know the ins and outs, coco, your guess is as good as mine. However, I had an email today, from a very reputable source, saying that a post had been seen on a forum, couldn't remember which one, or it might have been on facebook/twitter, that bret had been told by Trading Standards to take down the word 'profiler' from his blog banner, as it was an unsubstantiated claim. Understand, I'm not accusing, just asking, but dos anyone on here know anything about this?

    Sponsored content

    Re: WIKIPEDIA COMMENTS

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:42 pm