DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Share
    avatar
    WM3

    Posts : 457
    Join date : 2011-07-14

    SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  WM3 on Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:50 am

    PAT BROWN
    @ProfilerPatB
    I was totally sickened by #HungerGames. That adults should let their children watch children slaughter children is simply appalling.

    Profiler Pat Brown
    5 hours ago.I actually cried at the end of Hunger Games, not because I felt for the characters, but because I was so sad that our society would think a movie about teens killing teens with no moral or ethical compass is something to rave about and let children go see. Hunger Games is nothing but a slasher film for our youth, a mass thrill kill reality-style show in which the viewing audience is no better than the one in the film that cheers on the child murderers. I won't be a bit surprised when the next teen school mass murderer says he wanted to kill twenty-three teens so he could be the winner. I am thoroughly sickened by this movie's popularity.

    Profiler Pat Brown
    And the moral of The Hunger Games is, "It's all right to murder 23 innocent children as long as you are doing it for your sister."

    Two rational comments by people who have seen the film.

    The book is a classic fight of good against evil - with a degenerated, corrupt and materialistic society being the evil. The protagonist is a good and heroic young woman who takes a stance against this. Her values are all in the right place. Some critics are hailing Katmiss as a decent role model for young girls "at last". The baddies are a caricature of everything that's wrong in our society just now.

    Brown has now likened this to her writing a children's book about babies being repeatedly raped and justifying it on the grounds that children need to deal with these issues....

    It's remarkable how her mind works.

    Pat Brown is so outraged at young people seeing this film and makes her sarcastic comment about writing a story about raping babies because that's an issue children need to face...

    Yet she thinks nothing of putting her utterly sick McCann theory out there where the McCann twins can come across it some day. A theory about their father having so little love and regard for his children that he would think nothing of dumping their body immediately in the event of their sudden tragic death.

    Unbelievable hypocrasy.
    (STOP THE MYTHS/JAYELLES)





    Last edited by WM3 on Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:46 pm; edited 6 times in total
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  coco on Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:07 pm

    shes the one what thought a teeneage girl was askin for a beating , right ?
    avatar
    WM3

    Posts : 457
    Join date : 2011-07-14

    Re: SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  WM3 on Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:52 pm

    coco wrote: shes the one what thought a teeneage girl was askin for a beating , right ?

    Yes, said the girl deserved all she got. The woman's a menace and a heartless b!tch.

    Monday
    Guest

    Re: SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  Monday on Fri Apr 06, 2012 2:11 pm


    Has she run out of real people to make false statements about?
    avatar
    WM3

    Posts : 457
    Join date : 2011-07-14

    Re: SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  WM3 on Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:07 pm

    A little reminder of her earlier rantings.

    Pat Brown Picks Up On Kate McCann's Absurd Explanation For Sedating The Children.

    Kate McCann has a new book out, Madeleine, an incredible self-serving propaganda piece which leads me to believe she must have read my letter (below from October 4, 2007). But, as can happen to people who may have a narcissistic personality disorder, they just don't know when to SHUT UP. For, in the book, Kate's explanations further lead me to doubt the McCanns' claims of innocence in the disappearance of their daughter. One simple example is the most peculiar speculation of Kate that all her children may have been drugged by Madeleine's 'abductor' both the night she went missing and the previous night. First of all, Kate, this would serve no purpose to the 'abductor' except to waste time and it would be difficult to accomplish. You must know that. So the only rational reason you are claiming the children might have been drugged would be to explain away the fact that, indeed, if it ever is proven they were, you have covered that issue by explaining you were concerned about the children's lethargy and someone else is responsible. However, the only ones likely to have given the children drugs would be you and Gerry.

    Any good lawyer will tell you to SHUT UP, but, no, you keep talking, Kate, and we thank you for it.

    OPEN LETTER TO KATE MCCANN

    Yes, Kate,

    It isn’t your breast size or weight that is causing your problems. It is you and your narcissist evaluation of the situation and your PR team’s equally stupid assessment of the situation that is making you look so bad in the public eye.

    I am a criminal profiler with years of experience dealing with parents of murder victims and missing relatives. Your behavior and the behavior of your husband fall far outside or the norm for grieving parents. Now, this may be because you are just terribly narcisstic folks who had nothing to do with your child going missing (outside of neglecting your children and putting your needs to party before their needs for comfort and safety, a narcissistic behavior if I have ever seen one). You and Gerry may simply be so narcissistic you have no understanding of how other people view your behaviors and your PR team may share your narcissism so that no one on your team has a clue to normal human behavior.

    But, SHUT UP! Every time you open your mouths you do more damage to yourselves. You seem guiltier by the day. Your attempt at “damage control” is so obvious and so very much a day late and a dollar short, everything you do or say seems a cover up and a transparent attempt at proving your innocence.

    Let me make clear what I think is weird about what you say and do:

    You choose words about Madeleine’s disappearance which make it appear you know there is no abductor and that Madeleine is dead.

    Both you and Gerry state your only guilt in the matter is not being their when Madeleine “was taken.” This statement makes no sense for abduction as Madeleine could not be taken if either of you were with Maddie when an abductor would have shown up. It makes more sense in the context that Maddie died while you were not in the apartment.

    Your statements and attitude about Madeleine being alive do not square with parents who really believe their daughter is in the hands of a pedophile or pedophiles who are brutally raping and torturing her daily.

    Your attempts at “finding” Madeleine do not represent the manner most parents would choose if they were actively searching for a live child but appear more to be the actions of parents trying to prove after the fact of a child’s death that they “cared” (not care) about her.

    Your behaviors of “keeping a normal routine” and “keeping up one’s appearance” is admirable, but extremely bizarre. I don’t know any other parents of missing children who can appear so together and cheery. When my daughter cooked our kittens by accident in the dryer, I cancelled Christmas.

    Gerry’s blog creeps people out. It is too upbeat. Terrified and distraught parents of missing children are rarely able to jog and play tennis and go to park with their other kids and have a fun time. Over a long period of time, maybe, but this is usually years after the nightmare begins. Some parents never recover from the trauma and it is common for marriages to fail and the brothers and sisters to feel their parents went absent after their sibling went missing.

    Your ability to sleep at night after the first five days, Kate, is beyond belief. It is the behavior of one who already knows the answer and even then, is quite a narcissistic trait. If you believed your daughter was being raped as you lay in bed at night, sleep would be very hard to come by. I guess you finally realize this and your mother is saying that NOW you can’t sleep and Madeleine comes to visit you in the night. What changed, Kate?

    Your PR team coming up with an answer to every accusation, answers that are ludicrous in themselves, makes you seem awfully defensive, and, if there is no way you or Gerry had anything to do with Maddie’s disappearance, you have nothing to defend. Furthermore, if all you care about is finding Maddie, you shouldn’t be wasting your time on such silliness. After all, as Gerry said, Maddie is the only important thing, right?

    So, SHUT UP, Kate. SHUT UP, GERRY. Fire your PR team as they are totally worthless. If both of you really are innocent and your think Maddie is alive, return to Portugal. Start searching for real (and it took six months to set up a hotline?). Cooperate with the police. Take the polygraphs as you have zero to hide and, with competent polygraph examiners, the questions are so simple you can’t screw them up. I will even give you the four questions that should be asked:


    “Did Madeleine die while you were present?”
    “Did you return to the apartment and find Madeleine dying or dead?”
    “Did you move Madeleine’s body at any time?”
    “Did your spouse move Madeleine’s body at any time?"

    These are simple questions. The answer to all of them should be “No.” There is no ambiguity in these questions (unlike a question such as “Do you feel responsible for the disappearance of Madeleine?” which you could if you acknowledge leaving her without an adult caretaker is irresponsible; an affirmative answer to such a question would be useless to the detectives as it could falsely indicate that you had something to do with Maddie going missing when you are only feeling guilty over leaving her unattended. Also, an affirmative answer could mean you simply do not feel responsible for what happened to Maddie no matter what happened to her as a total narcissist might).

    The above four questions are simple and unambiguous and even a narcissist can’t misconstrue the meaning of the questions. The answers will be a simple “Yes” or “No.” Have the polygraph session videotaped so the police will be unable to do any underhanded scare tactics or interrogation that might distort the results of the tests.

    Quite frankly, Kate, you and Gerry had everything going for you as parents of a missing child if you hadn’t left your children unattended night after night to go out partying. THIS is what made people dislike you. It was to your advantage that you are both relatively attractive people because IF you had big breasts and a porky physique and were not well-heeled professionals, you would have become suspects right off the bat and you would have not had the incredible monetary support you have been blessed with nor all those kindly letters. You would have been viewed as just a pair of slobs who probably abused their children as well as neglected them and you wouldn’t have gotten the phenomenal amount of publicity worldwide concerning Maddie’s disappearance. Other parents have gone public, run campaigns, and had web sites, but your fortune with publicity and support has been unprecedented. And, you complain, Kate, that people are treating you badly because you are fit! It was being fit and professional and well-off that got you so much attention. It was you and Gerry’s fitness as parents and your peculiar behaviors that got you the negative attention.

    I have a final suggestion. Ask the PJ if I can come analyze the case. My organization will send me pro bono. As a criminal profiler I can analyze the actual evidence to advise the investigators as to the best investigate strategy. I have no problem determining this crime as an abduction and finding the creep that took Madeleine if the evidence points that way. I don’t have to like you and Gerry as people to view the evidence in an objective and professional manner. No one should be convicted of a crime simply because of personality and because people don’t like the individual’s personality. Solid physical and circumstantial evidence must exist to the point where there is no question as to who committed the crime. I would work very diligently to assist the PJ with the evidence and the facts and do a thorough crime scene analysis that would move the case forward.

    Furthermore, if you and Gerry get charged in Madeleine’s disappearance and must truly defend yourselves, my services are available to you and your lawyers. I will be more than happy to analyze the evidence and, if you are innocent, do all I can to serve in your defense.

    Good luck, Kate. May the truth be brought to light soon and you and Gerry get the justice you deserve in the case of your missing daughter.

    All the best,

    Criminal Profiler Pat Brown

    Note: Some people have misinterpreted sarcasm as seriousness in some of my wording in the post. My reference to Kate having written the book" because she read my letter" is just a general nod to her reason for writing this book; to do damage control and "clear up" the questions people have asked about them and the things they have said about them. I am not actually saying that letter specifically was the reason for her book. Also, my offer to come profile the case, while something I would be happy to do, was more in jest than a serious request to be brought in. Obviously, Kate and Gerry are unlikely to be calling me anytime soon.
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  coco on Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:29 pm

    dont think they need amatuers like her when theyve got the yard lookin for Madeleine .

    Sponsored content

    Re: SHE'S BACK, THIS TIME WITH HER TAKE ON 'THE HUNGER GAMES'

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:33 pm