DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Share
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 08, 2015 9:52 pm

    From Myths with thanks to tigerloaf.

    tigerloaf » Sun Feb 08, 2015 7:51 pm

    I see the shrieky harridan, Sonia Poulton, with the thuggish looking boyfriend, Lee Ryan, who has a penchant for trying to appear macho is now upset that I am asking pertinent questions about her and about the way Sky News has recently used her.



    Her problem is that absolutely every single thing I have said about her is the truth. Every question I have asked about her is relevant. And the twit who has given her a name to follow up is as well-informed about my identity as Hutton is about legal cases the McCanns are involved in, ie completely wrong.

    Perhaps this shrieky, foul-mouthed woman would, instead of trying to pursue some kind of vendetta against the wrong person, be better occupying her time with answering some of the pertinent questions posed to her.

    Incidentally I do have video evidence of her being very shrieky at people if she requires it. And I have already posted full proof of just what an obscene woman she is in a post above this. Perhaps Sonia Poulton thinks it clever and big to use foul comments in her tweets? Perhaps she thinks doing so makes her look more like a journalist? Or perhaps she still hankers after approval from those rapping hoodlums she used to hang around for titbits of information to pad her fluffy anecdotal articles?

    When Sonia Poulton gives us a few examples of genuinely researched articles by her then I might consider removing the "so-called" from my comments when referring to her as a "so-called" journalist. Journalism does not consist of submitting anecdotal fluff which is all I can find in her listed portfolio.

    Stories such as this which is absolutely typical of the Sonia Poulton ouvre would be far better suited to the £30 for your shocking story pages of cheapo magazines than a newspaper which clearly was having a slow day in this case.

    When Sonia Poulton explains why she shamelessly uses her own child as the subject of many of these fluff anecdotal articles, on one occasion leaving no doubt that her own selfish actions may well have damaged the child then she might garner some respect from me.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1290135/I-admit-I-smoked-500-cigarettes-I-pregnant--Sonia-Poulton-reveals-dark-secret.html

    ...
    Like a zombie I walked into an unknown newsagents - I couldn't deal with the questions from my friendly local - and I purchased a pack of ten Silk Cut. Then, I went home, checked I was alone, and lit one up. The high was tremendous and so, for that matter, was the low minutes later. I tried to rationalise my actions.

    It wasn't my fault. It was an addiction. My mum had done it and I was alright (wasn't I?). And yet the nagging in my brain told me that my actions were reprehensible. I couldn't escape that. You might think this would stop me. Sadly no.

    From that point onwards I had two cigarettes almost every day of my pregnancy, which amounted to my unborn child being subjected to more than 500 cigarettes.
    ...

    When Sonia Poulton explains satisfactorily the hypocrisy of her position that she is allowed to doorstep the McCanns and their children when two police forces have found no evidence of any crime by them because it is a justifiable tool of journalism but Martin Brunt is a figure of hate and an evil man for having doorstepped extremely politely a person who was a proven online abuser and troll and who had previously been in contact with him, then I might find it a bit easier to take her seriously.

    When Sonia Poulton openly accepts that her dalliance with the nutcase/fruitloop, Icke, who believes the Queen is a lizard was ill-advised not for financial reasons but for the simple reason that no serious journalist would ever get in bed with such a fantasist then I might take her more seriously.

    When Sonia Poulton owns up to Rosalinda Hutton whose vulnerable mental state she was perfectly aware of before handing her over to Murdoch's empire to be chewed up and spit out and exposed to seven million people as a troll and apologises for putting her in this invidious position then I might take her more seriously. After all, were Hutton to do the unthinkable and take her life after the horrendous battering she has received from other sick anti-McCanns then who would be ultimately responsible? Personally, I think Sonia Poulton would be because she knew the state of mind of Hutton, she knew about her mental problems and her reliance on drugs to control them.

    When Sonia Poulton stops using the idiotic Lee Ryan with his macho posing as a Jack the Lad with big guns (everybody knows that the bigger the car or gun that a man poses with the smaller a certain part of their anatomy is likely to be) as her thuggish sidekick on Twitter and in real life, then perhaps some people might start to see her as a more serious candidate for the title of journalist. Personally I think her latching onto this serial petty criminal (proven fact) and big-time loser (proven fact) shows that she has a personality deficit but no doubt she will shriek that in this world of free speech I am not allowed to say such nasty things about her and her latest bed mate. Tough, free speech doesn't only apply to shrieky women. I have the right to make a judgement and express it too.

    Sonia Poulton is the big "I am" when shouting the questions at people. I saw her on video shouting daft questions at coppers outside the PM's country house. I saw her shouting daft questions in London and chasing round to ask cop after cop who she should be directing questions at. And I saw how upset when her questions were fobbed off she became. She was livid.

    But she is the pathetic little wimp when others asked questions for her to answer. She runs away calling the questioner a troll.

    So I do not expect Sonia Poulton the so-called journalist to answer anything.

    But I think it worth my while pointing out what a hypocritical woman she truly is.
    ETA: I have just edited the post I made above to make my points clearer.

    But this final thought for the night deserves a post all to itself.

    When Sonia Poulton finally dredges up even the tiniest bit of skill at investigative journalism she might realise just how bloody stupid she is going to look pursuing entirely the wrong person in her desperate and sickeningly hypocritical attempt to "out" me.

    But as her only sources for this home movie that she is making with her latest bedmate and the chap whose claim to fame is that he filmed pimples being squeezed, are the self-confessed insane anti-McCanns like Hutton, the patently obviously insane anti-McCanns like Synonymph and Rothleypillow, the proven liars like Bennett, the complete nutjobs like Birch, vile criminals like Deborah Butler/Carlisle and so on then I can be pretty certain that they are not going to come up trumps with anything that might actually help her get anywhere near the truth. Not one among them has managed it on any aspect of the McCann case so far so why should this endeavour be the exception. I look forward to watching her and her "researchers" spinning around in vain.

    It is hard to find a single article that she has written anywhere which is not simply autobiographical fluff like the two I linked to above. Subject matter for cheapo mags and not real journalism.

    And yes, you are right the fact of the matter is that she cannot control herself in many ways.

    She could not control her addiction to cigarettes even though she knew she was probably harming her unborn child.

    She cannot control her dependence on a certain type of man (the emotionally deficient and frequently abusive type). Even the fact that her father frittered away his inheritance has been mirrored in this latest bedmate who frittered away his lottery win.

    She cannot even control her foul mouth even when trying to persuade the world that she has the right to be seen as a real journalist.

    She admits to being (and certainly presents as) a very emotionally deficient person with many psychological problems that have never been fully dealt with.

    In other words she fits in very well with the anti-McCann haters, large numbers of whom have also described their own psychological and emotional problems.

    Such a shame that these people cannot get the medical help they need and instead have to get their buzz from being outrageous online or from resorting to addictive substances. It doesn't surprise me at all that Hutton and Poulton get along so well.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  coco on Mon Feb 09, 2015 12:44 pm

    Poulton seems to like thieves , what with her horrible boyfriend and now Butler .
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Mon Feb 09, 2015 12:49 pm

    coco wrote:Poulton seems to like thieves , what with her horrible boyfriend and now Butler .
    It is a well-known fact that like clings to like or, as a friend of mine once said, sh*t sticks to sh*t. Sykes


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    coco

    Posts : 1276
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  coco on Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:39 pm

    she can 't complain if people judge her by the company she keeps , lie down with dogs , get up with fleas and all that .
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Mon Feb 09, 2015 2:29 pm

    coco wrote:she can 't complain if people judge her by the company she keeps , lie down with dogs , get up with fleas and all that .

    This shows exactly the kind of sh*t she associates with:



    Just found out who Dannythefink is. Ooooooops!!
    Daniel 'Danny' William Finkelstein, Baron Finkelstein OBE (born 30 August 1962) is a British journalist and politician. He is the Executive Editor of The Times, where he is also Chief Leader Writer and a weekly political columnist. Finkelstein is Jewish; his mother was a Holocaust survivor. https://twitter.com/dannythefink
    Ryan's twits about anti-semitism:   https://twitter.com/LeeTaylorRyan/status/564740397696839680


    Last edited by Sykes on Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:43 pm; edited 2 times in total


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:08 am

    From another forum  with thanks.

    Why she is being hailed by the haters as their new queen?

    Maybe they didn't notice, but she fed Hutton to the Murdoch group's Sun, with results which have been catastrophic for the We Love Gonzo brigade.

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton ·
    #AdviceForYoungJournalists in any campaign look for 'me, me, me' character. S/he will be narcissist or infiltrator. Either way, note them.
    That would be Hutton, then. Now she is supposedly bessie mates with the Nelly character, when the entire world knows that 'Daft Nelly' is none other than the vile thief, Deborah Butler.
    Is Poulton too naive for her own good? Or is she stitching up the haters for her own ends?

    Says me, me, me, me, me, Hutton:
    What harm can Sonia Poulton's documentary possibly do?  
    To Madeleine McCann and her family, very little. To the Gonzo fan club, socks, hydras and haters, immense damage.

    Hutton's clearly too up herself to see the carnage she caused by starring in the Sun talking about herself and her fondness for trolling and squishing.

    More of the same would be most excellent.

    How on earth does me, me, me, me, me, Hutton get her swollen head through doors? I doubt if onlookers have ever come across ANYONE quite so obsessed with themselves, their own genius, and how wonderful they are.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:00 pm



    CHALLIS???? Bl**dy hell, she's illiterate as well! And that calls itself a journalist? For anyone bemused at my comment, challis is a light woven fabric. I assume it means chalice which is a goblet or footed cup. Sykes


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    She's not had a good morning

    Post  Sykes on Wed Feb 11, 2015 2:45 pm

    Spitting Wand ‏@SpittingWand 5h5 hours ago
    “@KTHopkins “@ExxCee this is excellent: http://youtu.be/Htvmu2IUkbg ””

    Well said, Katie. @soniapoulton is just another typical leftie prof victim

    Spitting Wand ‏@SpittingWand 4h4 hours ago
    @SoniaPoulton the reason I left the Left (after 45 yrs staunch supp) is b/c it has become a cesspit of prof whiners & victims, just like u.

    lol!  lol!  lol!  lol!

    She is a professional whiner and complete fake, I doubt if she's ever done a job that involved getting her hands dirty in her entire life.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Fri Feb 13, 2015 12:40 pm

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 2 hrs 2 hours ago
    TY for all lovely comments #Skydebate #50Shades Not my personal cup of tea but if a woman chooses to submit that's her prerogative, right!?
    Poulton endorses soft-porn muck about young woman manipulated into 'enjoying' being abused.

    Disgusting - some feminist she is.

    Refuge ‏@RefugeCharity  14 mins14 minutes ago
    Remember if your partner tries to control what you wear, who you see & where you go these are warning signs http://www.refuge.org.uk/get-help-now/help-for-women/recognising-abuse/ … #50Shades
    Exactly. It's horrifying to see how easily some women are manipulated. It's probably no surprise that Ms Pointy Shrieker is one of them, considering her appalling, self-destructive taste in men.
    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton
    TY for all lovely comments #Skydebate  #50Shades Not my personal cup of tea but if a woman chooses to submit that's her prerogative, right!?
    She's no feminist.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:11 pm

    From another forum with thanks for the comments.
    Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton
    @MrMRiley thank you Matt. Fair to say public have never seen this evidence-based version before from MSM. I think we're all sick of PR now.
    Well, no, not if it's 'evidence' from Queen Hoho, Rees the multi-headed hydra troll, Butler the Thief, Hutton the attention-seeker, Kiki/McFadden and the rest of the wingnuts.

    With very good reason.

    It's shaping up to be a comedy classic, though.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    UNBIASED? YOU HAVE TO BE JOKING!

    Post  Sykes on Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:07 pm

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 3h 3 hours ago
    @JBLittlemore @JudeMcKew to be fair, I generally block the pro-abductor pack anyway because they are not here for Madeleine but to obfuscate
    No danger of bias there, then.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    POULTON AND HER BULLY BOY NOW ATTACKING TIGERLOAF

    Post  Sykes on Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:52 pm

    This has been passed to me by a source:
    So who is the prolific and notorious troll @Tiger_Loaf?

    February 8, 2015 trollpatrol2015
    Tiger Loaf

    Ongoing investigation to bring this persistent troll and coward out in to the open. Our suspicion is that it is someone very close to Gerry and Kate McCann. If you can shed any light on the subject please feel free to email Troll Patrol. trollpatrol@writeme.com Thanks!
    Oh, poor little thing, nobody telling you who it is?   Fancing trolling the Tiger, do you?   Tough, you have more chance of being taken for a real journalist, flower.    Sykes


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Poulton endorses her ex-jailbird boyfriend's threats to other people

    Post  Sykes on Sat Feb 14, 2015 1:03 pm



    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Sat Feb 14, 2015 1:20 pm

    Lee Ryan @LeeTaylorRyan · 40m 40 minutes ago
    Happy Vilification Day!!! x @SoniaPoulton



    I'm loving this, Sykes,    


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:22 pm

    Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 49m49 minutes ago
    @parapono @MrsWaspie @martin_liz anyone who knows me knows I am anti-violence. My history is online to see.
    What a liar, see post no 38 above^^^^^^
    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 3h 3 hours ago
    @parapono @MrsWaspie @martin_liz Lee's tweet is metaphorical. When he says do not possess ammo to defeat he doesn't mean guns but ability
    'Ability'? That thicko?  lol!  lol!  lol!  lol!

    There is NOTHING 'metaphorical' about her pet thug clutching a large firearm whilst making threats about ammunition to other people.

    The intention to frighten and intimidate is clear for all to see.

    If she lies down with dogs, she can't complain if she picks up a few fleas.




    Being metaphorical when he posted this, was he? Could have fooled me.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:22 pm

    From Myths with thanks.
    tigerloaf » Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:20 pm

    Truthiness2 wrote:From JAT:

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 3h 3 hours ago
    @parapono @MrsWaspie @martin_liz Lee's tweet is metaphorical. When he says do not possess ammo to defeat he doesn't mean guns but ability



    Ignoring the fact that this 'man' has so much 'ability' that he managed to get himself arrested and convicted some 88 times :rolleyes:, she could almost get away with that BS if:

    a) he wasn't holding some type of machine gun
    b) he hadn't used the word 'coward'
    c) didn't have 88 convictions
    d) he hadn't admitted in the Daily Mail that he once threatened his girlfriend with a shotgun.
    e) he hadn't admitted in the Daily Mail "At the time of the lottery win, he claimed, he was in the advanced stages of planning an armed robbery – ‘a really big job’ – in Belgium.He said he had planned to carry a loaded gun, adding: ‘If they [the robbery victims] wanted to play silly b*****s, they’d get it in the knees at the very least.’
    f) Poulton hadn't replied to his tweet with the words 'I've told you about this one, Lee, he thinks he's anonymous but we know different, eh? #smileforthecamera


    There was a brief moment - very brief, some time ago when I read somewhere that somebody or other was coming to the conclusion that Poulton is playing a smart game of reeling in trolls and McCann Haters and will turn on them in some kind of MSM coup.

    As I say, the moment was brief. Poulton doesn't have the brains for that kind of work. Poulton doesn't have the influence for that kind of role. Poulton, putting it simply is too thick to have come up with that kind of idea.

    It is as clear as a bell now that Poulton is just a very stupid woman who thinks she is doing some good with her idiotic internet campaigns supporting everybody whose lost cause catches her eye, chasing round after policemen to ask them inane questions, being ignored by every significant commentator and believing the most ridiculous tales because they suit her agenda.

    There is no deep hidden meaning to Poulton's actions. She latches onto those like her whose research on issues is atrocious, whose understanding of issues is appalling and whose attitude to the law stinks. Those she has trusted as her sources in the McCann case are less convincing than Icke on the Lizard question. Birch is insane. Hutton is a self-confessed, drug-abusing, bitch and troll. Shrimpton invents his own reality which instantly convinces Poulton that he is a genius. What kind of home movie can Poulton concoct with sources such as these fools as the basis of her script? I really cannot wait to see.


    Postby urcrazy » Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:07 pm
    Tiger, I only finally realised how monumentally thick she is yesterday. It was a revelation.

    I stumbled across a clip of her on Youtube, accosting Caroline Lucas when she was head of the Greens.

    She announced her intention to force Lucas to 'answer questions' about the lack of Green policy on geoengineering. Wow I thought, now that's a weighty and important subject, and one that we might reasonably expect the Greens to have something to say about.

    After all, geoengineering when I was at uni meant:

    'the application of geosciences, where mechanics, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and geology are used to understand and shape our interaction with the earth'

    although more recently it's come to mean more specifically

    ' the deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming'.

    This can range from mass tree planting to seeding the oceans with iron to promote sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide. So far it's largely computer modelling and very small scale trials. Climate scientists know their ignorance about the systems involved is too vast for anything else.

    I should add that many scientists are not thrilled with this shift in terminology.

    However, such short hand is not short enough for Poulton. What she really wants to collar Caroline about is CHEMTRAILS.
    In the strange circles in which she moves, it's an article of faith, impervious to scientific reason, that we are being sprayed every day with climate-altering chemicals. The thousands of aircraft, both civil and military, which throng the skies above her home leaving jet trails ( which she points at dramatically - look at that!! she squeals) are expected to leave nothing behind them despite the massive quantities of fuel they are burning.

    Bedazzled as Poulton is by this unscientific woo, when she pounces on Lucas the latter is understandably bemused and amused. As she walks away, she raises her hand and makes a particular gesture. Poulton thinks she is pointing at the sky, whereas I fancy it is actually that time honoured circling finger to the head which signifies ' she's fekin crazy'.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Sat Feb 14, 2015 9:21 pm

    From Myths with thanks.
    tigerloaf » Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:20 pm

       Truthiness2 wrote:  From JAT:

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 3h 3 hours ago
    @parapono @MrsWaspie @martin_liz Lee's tweet is metaphorical. When he says do not possess ammo to defeat he doesn't mean guns but ability
    Ignoring the fact that this 'man' has so much 'ability' that he managed to get himself arrested and convicted some 88 times , she could almost get away with that BS if:

    a) he wasn't holding some type of machine gun
    b) he hadn't used the word 'coward'
    c) didn't have 88 convictions
    d) he hadn't admitted in the Daily Mail that he once threatened his girlfriend with a shotgun.
    e) he hadn't admitted in the Daily Mail "At the time of the lottery win, he claimed, he was in the advanced stages of planning an armed robbery – ‘a really big job’ – in Belgium.He said he had planned to carry a loaded gun, adding: ‘If they [the robbery victims] wanted to play silly b*****s, they’d get it in the knees at the very least.’
    f) Poulton hadn't replied to his tweet with the words 'I've told you about this one, Lee, he thinks he's anonymous but we know different, eh? #smileforthecamera

    There was a brief moment - very brief, some time ago when I read somewhere that somebody or other was coming to the conclusion that Poulton is playing a smart game of reeling in trolls and McCann Haters and will turn on them in some kind of MSM coup.

    As I say, the moment was brief. Poulton doesn't have the brains for that kind of work. Poulton doesn't have the influence for that kind of role. Poulton, putting it simply is too thick to have come up with that kind of idea.

    It is as clear as a bell now that Poulton is just a very stupid woman who thinks she is doing some good with her idiotic internet campaigns supporting everybody whose lost cause catches her eye, chasing round after policemen to ask them inane questions, being ignored by every significant commentator and believing the most ridiculous tales because they suit her agenda.

    There is no deep hidden meaning to Poulton's actions. She latches onto those like her whose research on issues is atrocious, whose understanding of issues is appalling and whose attitude to the law stinks. Those she has trusted as her sources in the McCann case are less convincing than Icke on the Lizard question. Birch is insane. Hutton is a self-confessed, drug-abusing, bitch and troll. Shrimpton invents his own reality which instantly convinces Poulton that he is a genius. What kind of home movie can Poulton concoct with sources such as these fools as the basis of her script? I really cannot wait to see.
    urcrazy » Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:07 pm
    Tiger, I only finally realised how monumentally thick she is yesterday. It was a revelation.

    I stumbled across a clip of her on Youtube, accosting Caroline Lucas when she was head of the Greens.

    She announced her intention to force Lucas to 'answer questions' about the lack of Green policy on geoengineering. Wow I thought, now that's a weighty and important subject, and one that we might reasonably expect the Greens to have something to say about.

    After all, geoengineering when I was at uni meant:

    'the application of geosciences, where mechanics, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and geology are used to understand and shape our interaction with the earth'

    although more recently it's come to mean more specifically

    ' the deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming'.

    This can range from mass tree planting to seeding the oceans with iron to promote sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide. So far it's largely computer modelling and very small scale trials. Climate scientists know their ignorance about the systems involved is too vast for anything else.

    I should add that many scientists are not thrilled with this shift in terminology.

    However, such short hand is not short enough for Poulton. What she really wants to collar Caroline about is CHEMTRAILS.
    In the strange circles in which she moves, it's an article of faith, impervious to scientific reason, that we are being sprayed every day with climate-altering chemicals. The thousands of aircraft, both civil and military, which throng the skies above her home leaving jet trails ( which she points at dramatically - look at that!! she squeals) are expected to leave nothing behind them despite the massive quantities of fuel they are burning.

    Bedazzled as Poulton is by this unscientific woo, when she pounces on Lucas the latter is understandably bemused and amused. As she walks away, she raises her hand and makes a particular gesture. Poulton thinks she is pointing at the sky, whereas I fancy it is actually that time honoured circling finger to the head which signifies ' she's fekin crazy'.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:30 am

    From Myths with thanks to tigerloaf.

    tigerloaf » Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:31 am


    Leaving aside the effect that this criminal is clearly having on her attempts to become a genuine journalist, that Twit is just so sad.

    It is one of the least attractive definitions of romance that I have ever seen: a woman admitting that she is so addicted to her role as Mrs Nasty that instead of someone to love her and cherish her and live a normal family life with her, she sees romance as having a bodyguard to look out for the people she has so angered that they might wish her harm. That is not romance. That is the equivalent of the gang culture that she so admired, the minions in the gang doing the bidding of and taking the punches for the biggest bully and biggest coward among them. And that is precisely how she is using this criminal. She reinforces his threatening behaviour and condones it in her own posts just as the gang leader would remind people that he has a bunch of thugs minding his back.

    That twit is the proof that Poulton has a desperate need for security in her life. Her own fluff and filler writing in the past describes that need clearly but that twit shows that the need has never been satisfied. What a terrible way to live, what a terrible example to set? What kind of home life must this person have when on Valentine's Day the best compliment she can offer about her partner is that he has her back against the people she has provoked?

    I genuinely pity her for such a sad statement and I am very glad that you cannot get criminals such as Lee Ryan off the shelf in Hallmark. What an awful society it would be if thugs and criminals were available in that way even if only to mind the backs of shrieky women who lack self control! Needing a man to be your bodyguard is a long way from a normal view of romance in Britain. Even in the parts of the world such as Afghanistan and Iraq where having a bodyguard is more normal it is not seen as a romantic attachment but an unavoidable necessity. It almost defies belief that Poulton sees it as romantic.

    As for her pathetic need to 'out' me, well her definition of 'trolling' and mine clearly differ. Poulton and Hutton have very deliberately made (or at least attempted to make) themselves public figures by attacking the McCann family. Both have used false information in doing so. Both deliberately ignore the official Police of both Portugal and the UK in doing so because it suits their anti-establishment stance.

    It is not 'trolling' to use freedom of speech to point out the lies, the idiocies, and the atrocious 'research'/lack of 'research' of these individuals. Indeed I see it as a duty to expose the fact that such people don't have the honesty or decency to even attempt to find the truth before making public statements. Poulton has tweeted only recently that she is totally biased in her views of the McCann case. That's not the attitude of a journalist let alone an investigative journalist, but then with every day that goes by Poulton shows us more and more that her claim to such a role in society is less and less valid.

    Every comment I make about this pair of harridans and shrieking fools is based on evidence garnered from their own words and actions. There is not one single illegal or misleading statement in anything I have posted here or on Twitter. I find it quite hilarious that Poulton and her minions should believe otherwise and should attempt to 'out' me for posting the truth. This recent post on that pathetic blog, together with the screenshot which Poulton posted showing herself logged in as admin there (before she hastily reposted a different version thus proving her fear of being caught out even if it was too late) have been saved as yet more proof of just how stupid this woman truly is.

    I note that she has not been able to answer my simple challenge to her.

    Why does she need to know the name of the dossier compiler? What will she do with that information other than harass the individual concerned whose name is already available to the authorities?

    Her complete and utter failure to give an answer to that challenge suggests to everyone that she has no other reason for wanting the information. Had she got another reason I have no doubt at all that she would have been unable to resist throwing it in my face as that is her usual MO.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:50 am

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton
    @MeVoscl2014 @rawtothecore1 but a blog about what we have seen happening. I understand how people misunderstand but I am not enemy.
    1. Yes, she is actually. The internet doesn't do 'forgetting'. Nor do any of the abuse survivors she's exploited and then turned on, along with her horrible cronies.

    2. No-one is 'misunderstanding' anything.

    Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton
    @rawtothecore1 wolf in sheep clothing pic was put up by my partner and it pertains to the people observed in this fracas, not your dad.
    She seems unaware that screenshots were taken of that vile blog, showing SHE is admin, and she's just letting her pet thug carry the can.

    Anyone who trusts that woman is an utter fool, and will come to bitterly regret it, as so many others have.

    Father Jack@urcrazytoo
    @MeVoscl2014 There is a screenshot of SP logged in as admin to that attack blog which allegedly belongs to Ryan. Just for the record.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Tue Feb 17, 2015 7:21 am



    Lee Ryan  @LeeTaylorRyan
    Satirist, camera carrier and general gopher for truth. Graduated from the University of NSC. Masters degree in Assholeogy. *My views belong to my dog.

    He certainly earned that degree - I don't know who is worse, him or Poulton.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:39 am

    DR Laverty. ‏@drlavertyx 2h2 hours ago
    hahahaha didn't you get a valentines day card sonz?xxxxhttp://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&sid=4470b629362766d8e2b8a93dd9f60668&start=450 …
    0
    ‏@just_standing3
    @drlavertyx she does have a lousy taste in men, I mean her step son accused with murder, his dad, her daughters dad, member of gang!
    But she's broken that mould with Ryan.  


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Thu Feb 26, 2015 7:41 am

    Good observation from Myths with thanks.
    Poulton admitted she started trying to interview Kate McCann eight months before Brenda Leyland appeared on sky. Given her association with sky it wouldn't surprise me if poulton had something to do with the dossier or knew of it. She was quick off the bat to use it as a springboard for her documentary which she presented as seeking justice for Leyland. But her recent confession means she misled the antis about that, it was nothing to do with Leyland and had been worked on four at least eight months prior to her death. She fed Hutton to the lions too. Not just that but the article presented Hutton as one of a group of lonely older women, very easy to associate with Leyland.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Fri Feb 27, 2015 10:32 am

    Kelly Rose Bradford ‏@kellyrose 14m14 minutes ago
    @SoniaPoulton hi sonia - your email appears to have been hacked. dodgy message from you just now! xx

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 9 mins 9 minutes ago
    Thank you for informing me that I've been hacked. Some people, eh? This message is not from me - should you get it.



    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:20 pm

    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 47 mins 47 minutes ago
    Thank you all for notifying me that my various email accounts have been hacked. We have all details including times, IP & location.
    She's still spinning that old rubbish about IPs giving locations.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6831
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sykes on Fri Feb 27, 2015 3:44 pm

    Sykes wrote:
    Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 4h 4 hours ago
    @UKinNigeria Hello my email was hacked today. Here are details in Nigeria. Hacker approached my contacts for money.


    Comments from another forum with thanks.

    I think Nigeria has rather more pressing problems right now than some scammer supposedly 'hacking' her emails. You know, civil war, hundreds of schoolchildren being abducted by islamic crazies, that sort of thing.

    Oh wait, silly me. It's Sonia Poulton, so OF COURSE she is more important than any of that! The Nigerian police must drop everything, and track down this scoundrel.  


    It's absolutely hilarious. She must have woken up this morning and thought, How can I make myself look like an attention-seeking tw@t today? I know, some Nigerian scammer has been mucking about with my twitter email addie, so I will carry on as if it's the crime of the century, has never happened to anyone else, and is a heinous crime worthy of a gunboat being sent to Nigeria to sort the scoundrels out! Because NOTHING is more important than MEEEEEEEEEEEE!



    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Sponsored content

    Re: SONIA POULTON EXPOSED PART 4

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:47 am