DAVID BRET, HIDEHO AND OTHERS .... THE WORST HATER TROLLS


    ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Share
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:42 pm

    Hutton's blog:
    Anonymous31 January 2015 at 10:56
    you have stunted our cause and are a disgrace to everyone. how do you think that this has helped in anyway,you have set us back years in what we have tried to achieve for Madeleine McCann, i would advise you to keep your head under your blankets for a while, some people are really pissed off.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:51 pm

    Facebook antis:
    Leanne Baulch I am not seeing this as a good thing at all, totally pointless and if anything has done more harm than good! Gutted as this could have been a great opportunity

    Maxine Hales Oh my good Lord surely she can't have said those things?

    Amelia Black Headline im the vilest troll and proud yet it was supposed to out pro trolls ...backfired x
    4 hrs · Like · 2

    Ben Thompson Sorry, but as Leanne's screenshot proves, she's not that unhappy with the article. Glorified and self promoting spring to mind, and I'm not concerned if I'm shot down for not backing her to the hilt. That's the way I see it.

    Amelia Black No and sorry but Sonia should have known better too! Its bad enough we're branded anti Madeleine! Im not even anti mccann its taking the wrong road, and stinks x

    Sue Venus Curtis Makes us all look like vicious nasty catfighting hooligans with nothing better to do than bitch online. And when reading it, I got the impression it was aimed at women online....
    3 hrs · Like · 13

    Emma Surgenor Yes Me too sue. Very disappointed about this article.
    2 hrs · Like · 7

    Claire Welsman Certainly makes you wonder if Sonia Poulton is writing a "pro" documentary rather than an honest investagative one... whose to say her documentary isnt going to be on the "hateful antis"...
    2 hrs · Edited · Like

    Cath Mitchell I'm lost for words

    Ben Thompson I agree Rebecca, it has been used, but as Linda said, she knew the Sun would do that, so she should have been more mindful of what she said. She has painted us all in a bad light, and not for the first time.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    RALLY THE TROOPS WHATEVER YOU MAY THINK OF HUTTON AND POULTON!

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:56 pm

    Oh, how funny, they've been given their orders to back Hutton and Sonia, whatever they actually think:
    Lorraine Holden Spoke to Linda and Sonia on Twitter they stand by the article and would like us to get behind them and not play into pro hands I'm certainly not going to allow #McCann pro's to belittle us in anyway they have a good point tbh let's be more positive x
    Yes, that's what to do, rally the troops, can't have people thinking for themselves, can we? Not when 'Linda and Sonya' have given the underlings their orders.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Broho on Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:08 pm

    They are only being seen as the rest of the world sees them.
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    MORE BY TIGERLOAF OF MYTHS ON HUTTON

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:25 pm

    tigerloaf» Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:17 pm
    I was just sent some more quotes from Rosalinda Hutton from this evening.

    The woman is seriously delusional or is desperately trying to put a brave face on a total balls-up on her part.

    Cristobell Today at 6:31 pm

    It wasn't a matter of choosing which newspaper CI, life isn't like that. The Sun opportunity was presented, and I took it. I knew the risks, but I also knew that there was a good chance snippets would get through that would make people question what the McCanns are doing and what their trolls are up to.

    Well you didn't get lucky there dear. There is absolutely nothing about what the McCanns have done anywhere on that page. It is entirely about the activities of Trolls and looky there - whose picture is right on that page big and brash - why its none other than Rosalinda Hutton, the very definition of a troll as expressed in her own words.

    Significantly the public have not turned on me, I have had nothing but sympathy, they are rightly appalled at what the trolls were doing and now have an idea of what Brenda, and indeed many of us, have to put up with in our endeavours to get justice for Madeleine. That is the story that is getting through, not my mental history or past internet activity.

    And just what public reaction is this delusional woman referring to? There are people on her own forum, never mind general members of the public tearing a strip off her for her abject stupidity in the way she has portrayed the anti-McCann hate campaigners. There is no reaction in the Sun and there is no other public reaction. Just twitter twits - that's not the public though, thats other trolls dear.

    What people are appalled by is the fact that not only does Rosalinda Hutton demonstrate that she is a vile and objectionable troll herself, one who enjoys putting the boot in as it saves kicking the dog, one who is hooked on the buzz and the excitement of being outrageous because it feeds her attention seeking, her desperation for an audience and her need to provoke a reaction from others (the very definition of trolling) but she goes further to say that other anti-McCanns were far worse than her, that there were a few evil ones amongst her online friends.  

    Cristobell Today at 7:00 pm

    Cheers CI. I was pretty astounded when I saw a couple of the quotes attributed to me, but even with them, the rebound hasn't come from the public at large, I have had messages of sympathy and encouragement all day.

    There has been no rebound from the public at large or can this delusional woman prove me wrong. Where is this public reaction. The truth is - other hounders have supported her (in the main) but even many of them are appalled at what she has said.

    I gave my reasons for becoming involved in the Madeleine case and that was the line of questioning he was following. I have no shame about being ill for several years, I was a hermit, I shut myself away and spent 14/16 hours a day researching stuff I was interested in, and the McCann case fell into that bracket. I haven't even had time to read the article properly, but they have changed ' I was attacked' to 'I attacked' - quite a big difference! But all that stuff I will deal with in the cold light of day.

    Rosalinda Hutton has already been challenged to post up the article she agreed to which she claims bears little resemblance to this published one. For some reason she has not done so. That is highly suspicious if she is genuinely trying to prove that Daubney has misquoted her. She has the proof in her hand but doesn't want to use it. Most odd. So will she post up the approved text and show Martin Daubney to be a liar who deliberately altered her words or will she choose not to post up the original and be suspected for ever of telling yet another lie?

    The McCann supporters were horribly cruel to me when I was looking after my terminally ill mother, but I was far from the only one being abused by them. To this day, people are terrified of their real names being known in the McCann case, and for good reason! How can it be right that ex suspects can use thuggery to have this sort of power over the internet?

    Are you so delusional, Rosalinda Hutton, that you actually believe that the thuggery you speak of has been largely directed at anti-McCann hounders? I have watched now for some time the ongoing interactions between the pros and the antis and the general reaction of the pros is to bellow with laughter at the insanity of the hounders such as yourself and the vile Deborah Butler, your online colleague and friend. The real thuggery and abuse has come from anti-McCanns among whom you proudly stand with their pornographic images, their death threats, their physical stalking, their leafletting, their obscenity and their lies. Were that to cease there would be nothing for the pro McCanns to challenge.

    But crucially, today, there is no talk of the pro McCanns on that page other than your description of them annoying you with one possible phone call and a few choice words about your parents. That tiny comment coming from someone who openly admits to enjoyment from trolling will by 99% of readers be taken with the pinch of salt it deserves. By describing yourself as a bitch, other anti-McCanns as evil and by highlighting your self-gratification, your need to get ever more outrageous, your desperation for the audience and the attention and the need for a buzz you have simply shown what a shower of trolls anti-McCanns truly are.


    In my opinion, anything that gets the message out there, in whatever publication, the bigger, the better, is good because the message being conveyed - and the evidence thus far supports it - is the appalling behaviour of the McCann supporters, if they could make hoax calls etc to a person in distress, what the hell did they do to Brenda?

    This is pure delusion or absolute desperation to try to find something good in the article for the haters and hounders which really isn't there. You say the message being conveyed is the appalling behaviour of McCann supporters. You are having a laugh. Who do you think is really going to believe somebody who is boasting that they are a vile troll, getting a kick out of having an online war, being a needy attention seeker, being a bitch etc? Do you think anybody genuinely believes your story now you have openly admitted to being a vile troll? If you do you are a sadder person than I believed or maybe you have been smoking to help you cope with the trauma of being exposed so widely today? After all it was you who told us of your dirty drug habit.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Broho

    Posts : 798
    Join date : 2013-08-15

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Broho on Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:37 pm

    I still don't know what the McCann supporters are supposed to have done to make themselves look bad.
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:45 pm

    Another Hounder tears her a new one!
    I will not turn this into a propaganda tool and say you rose awareness for the greater good, because you didn't. You gave us another label to add to the ones we have acquired already, you made us all out to be lonely thrillseekers who don't wish to kick dogs so we violently tap at our qwerty's.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    TIGERLOAF OF MYTHS ISSUES A FURTHER CHALLENGE

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:50 pm





    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:27 pm

    victoriaisangry ‏@snook1111pie 12m12 minutes ago
    @RosalindaHu No, you've mad us all look like self centred idiots who love to scream 'victim', @PickieHolden @SoniaPoulton ##mccann

    Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 6m6 minutes ago
    @snook1111pie @PickieHolden @SoniaPoulton Well thanks for electing me, I thought I was speaking for myself, I'll check iin future : )#mccann

    victoriaisangry ‏@snook1111pie 4m4 minutes ago
    @RosalindaHu You elected yourself.aided and egged on by >
    @SoniaPoulton < @PickieHolden I suggest you read your own words again. #mccann

    Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 2h2 hours ago
    @snook1111pie @SoniaPoulton @PickieHolden I know more than you do, live with it. #mccann
    Looking at the sheer charmless arrogance and delusion of that remark, does anyone still doubt the Sun reported her boastings accurately?

    They seem to have decided that getting the forkers to agree that Hutton was a veritable La Passionaria of forkerworld was impossible, too many people would happily run her out of town on a rail.

    This is funny:
    Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 2h2 hours ago
    @jontait42 @SoniaPoulton Does indeed. A lot of people desperate to shut myself and Sonia up, I wonder why? #mccann
    Does anyone here want Hutton to shut up? Heavens to Betsy, no! We would like her to provide a debacle like this more often, we just LOVE it when McCann-haters show themselves up so publicly.

    To over SEVEN MILLION PEOPLE.

    It's her own 'side' that want her to STFU for once and stop causing disasters.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:39 pm

    A very good point from one of the forker groups:
    Natalie Jayne Charlesworth She's asking for it retweeting, why would she do that if its not what she said or had been embellished ?  
    Yes, I'd forgotten she was bursting with pride about her performance when the article first appeared. She didn't start the 'misquoted' stuff until it became clear that so many people on her own 'side' were beside themselves with anger at what she'd done and said.
    Truth ‏@PJ_Files 1 min1 minute ago
    @RosalindaHu @SoniaPoulton You can shut the feck up, acting like you never fucked a fellow anti over, my ribs hurt #mccann
    SafariSara ‏@SafariSara 2h2 hours ago
    So have we been able to work out WHICH version of Hutton's "when the story broke" is true & which is a LIE? #McCann
    A question from as hounder:
    Why would Hutton not have passed a copy of the 'script' to be published in the Sun, to the Admin at the forum which she is a part, as whatever she had signed up to with the Sun was clearly going to have a huge affect on them, their reputation?


    Last edited by Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:07 am; edited 3 times in total


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 7:43 am



    Tony Bennett Yesterday at 11:22 pm

    plebgate wrote:
    Many of us here cottoned on to Cristobell early on...

    Does anybody know how many books the Authoress has written, what they have been about and how many have been sold?
    Hutton has written two books.

    One, she published on Kindle recently, for £1.99 I think, and is called 'The Reluctant Dieter' or something like that, and is a weight loss book which documents how she lost three stone in weight last year.

    The only other book she has written, I know quite a lot about, as I've read it all.

    And thereby hangs a bit of a personal tale which I will share with you all. In the light of all that Hutton has said and done to me in the past year or so, it is slightly painful to recall, but here goes anyway.

    Hutton first approached me soon after news broke about my contempt of court summons.

    She told me she had legal experience and was a published author, was extremely sympathetic to me, and wanted to help me write out my defence. She told me she was good at writing and 'how to put things'.

    I was desperate for some help at the time and arranged to meet her at a pub near her home in Kent, which was conveniently on the route to see my mother, who by then was in a care home in Sussex. I paid for the drinks.

    In the end, I decided not to accept her offer (that's a story for another day perhaps).

    But I did end up agreeing to write a book review for her, for a small circulation Christian newspaper I write for from time to time.

    I believed that all I read in the book was a true account. Now of course I am not so sure.

    Having done this for her, and helped her on one or two other things, it was a shock when she turned against me so vehemently on this very forum during the early part of last year - and now of course blazes one curse or another on me on candyfloss's forum and all over the internet.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:10 am

    Re: THE SUN NEWSPAPER TODAY - Cristobell Interview 31.1.15
    Post Cristobell (Rosalinda Huitton)cToday at 11:00 pm

    So the demand is that I place all details of my conversations, emails, drafts, etc, ie. the entire extent of my evidence, should a libel trial ever arise, on an open public forum? Indeed, get myself involved in a detailed discussion about what if any action I should take, what my proposals are and how I should go about it.

    That the publishing of such materials and the discussion of the evidence will immediately rule out any possibility of my getting an apology, a retraction or a withdrawal of said offending statements, matters not - it will give us all something to talk about.

    Goodnight


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:14 am

    From another forum with thanks to the poster for permission to copy over to here.
    I have to say that from the first day I looked in on the #McCann tag on Twitter it was obvious that some of the anti McCanns were stupid. But there is stupid and then there is Mrs Hutton.

    I've not seen any of the hate squad do anything quite so funny before as Mrs Hutton did sitting down with a Sun journalist to describe in flowing language just what a needy but horrible person she really is. Could any journalist have ever wished for a more attention-seeking idiot to interview?

    I can imagine the questions leading her into opening up about herself, about her anger and about the way she felt while she was becoming the latest anti-McCann trollop to be outed in the media as a nasty piece of work.

    What kind of fool when trying to prove that other people are nasty describes herself as a bit of a bitch who loves waging war on the internet because it saves her kicking the dog? Well Hutton did. And she went on to tell us that depression was her route into the hate camp. She needed others who were bored and lonely and needed an outlet for her sick fantasies. The McCanns became that outlet. Ever since then Mrs Hutton has got a buzz from being online and fighting and fighting other people in some sick kind of computer game.

    I despair that this woman isn't in a mental institution of some sort. Deprived as a kid, locked up when her mother abandoned her, she tried taking her anger out on the nuns and home that looked after her. When that failed and the Judge told her to take one she needed another target and up popped the McCanns who have been the subject of her sickness ever since.

    At least we all know now just how she sees her role in the game. Its a game she needs to feed her cravings for attention, for an audience and for company in her loneliness. It is a drug to her, giing her a buzz when she has kicked somebody where it hurts (well its better than kicking a dog). Where is the woman's family? Have they become estranged I wonder as Brenda Leyland's had? Is that why Rosalind Hutton needs her online fantasies and hate friends to console her?
    I remember seeing the clumsily be-wigged Mrs Hutton performing like a lamb being led to the slaughter on her Skype interview with Sonia Poultice. Mrs Hutton could not cope with the questioning from one of the least competent journalists in Britain on that day. How did she imagine she could have coped with a top notch journalist from the Sun who has years of getting to the nub of a person's beliefs and ideas by asking the right questions?

    It is so obvious that all he needed to do with Mrs Hutton was start her on the track of those nasty people supporting Kate and Gerry and her wig would have been bouncing up and down with the steam being let off as she poured out her hate for the supposed wrongs what they done to poor her and how she used her powers of internet trolling to fight back. What a buzz that must have been?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:19 am

    The Facebook groups are not happy, btw. Some of them even think that for some bizarre reason she should sue Carter Ruck.
    "I also have read Linda's response and I am in agreement with Ben.
    If as Linda says she was presented with something entirely different, she must sue Carter Ruck!! The McCann's have sued almost every newspaper I can think of and got COMPENDATION"
    God almighty, not only are they thicks as a brick, they can't even spell!!!    And what the bl**dy hell has CR to do with this?  




    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Hutton's in full passive-aggressive whine this morning

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:09 am

    Hutton: To all those protesting or who may have wanted to do the interview themselves, would they have come across any better than I did? Would Sun readers for example empathise with Tony Bennett, Rothley Pillow, Ben Thompson, Zora or indeed any of the more extreme activists who campaign for Maddie? Would they have portrayed 'you all' in a good light?
    NONE of them could have done a worse job than she did. Even Stuck Record wouldn't have come out with such an egotistical, ME ME ME ME ME piece.

    She'd better face the fact that she's caused more damage to her own cause in one day than Evil Carter Ruck have managed in years.

    The article was by Martin Daubney, NOT Sonia Poulton. He approached Sonia because he knew she was working on a McCann documentary and knew several people who, as campaigners, could be classed as trolls and he wanted someone who was willing to be identified.
    And still the penny doesn't drop with dimwit Hutton. lol! lol! lol! lol!



    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:14 am

    Anti pontificates rubbish, as usual.

    I never imagine any of the prolific 'pros' are actually voicing their own, uninfluenced opinions as individuals, like us, who truly believe what they say.

    I have this mental image of them all assembled every morming in a room for a de-brief and given their agenda for the day, before collecting their pay-packets at the end of the month.  
    What an absolute clown. lol! lol! lol! lol!

    Do they actually believe sh*te like that? It explains a lot if they do, and that's a sample of their belief system. Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

    Does it ever occur to them that people who support Madeleine and her family are NOT crazed, attention-seeking, mendacious drama queens - unlike them?


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    TAKE COVER! HUTTON AND BENNETT ARE AT WAR, TIN HATS AND FLAK JACKETS AT THE READY!

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:35 am

    http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/the-knives-are-out.html
    THE KNIVES ARE OUT
    The speed with which some of you have bought into the McCanns and Tony Bennett's malevolent publicity has left me shaken if not stirred.  In order to cling onto and indeed promote the negativity of what is being said, you have grasped onto the negative aspects of the article and disregarded the positive in its entirety.  I was concerned the Sun readers may not have been able to read between the lines, I didn't expect it from people I thought were on the same side.

    The article was about TROLLS, I was an interviewee, I had no control whatsoever over what was published, yet some have assumed that I ALONE wrote it, edited it and placed it under a sensational headline.  The article was by Martin Daubney, NOT Sonia Poulton.  He approached Sonia because he knew she was working on a McCann documentary and knew several people who, as campaigners, could be classed as trolls and he wanted someone who was willing to be identified.  I was asked to do it and I accepted because imo, ANYTHING that gets the message out there is worth a try, and lets face it, having used my own name and face this past 8 years, my reputation has already been torn to shreds.  All you honourable and anonymous people have been spared the threats and abuse that myself and a handful of others have had to put up with, yet when I get an opportunity to defend myself you are first in the queue with the knives. Live and learn.

    I do hope that when the dust settles, people will begin to see the bigger picture.  Whether I or indeed any of us are trolls matters not one iota to the case of missing Madeleine.  The public are now beginning to see the light as far as the McCanns' chosen form of campaigning is concerned, the death of Brenda Leyland hit hard.  How many Sun readers do you think will agree with McCann trolls phoning a distressed woman in the middle of the night saying (dead) 'Mummy here' and 'why don't you kill yourself'?

    To all those protesting or who may have wanted to do the interview themselves, would they have come across any better than I did?  Would Sun readers for example empathise with Tony Bennett, Rothley Pillow, Ben Thompson, Zora or indeed any of the more extreme activists who campaign for Maddie?  Would they have portrayed 'you all' in a good light?

    And then there are those who have taken the moral highground. 'How could you?' they shriek, The Sun, of all tabloids?  Couldn't you have found a small clean living publication where the proprietors and journalists are pillars of the society and their readership hold clean CRB's?  The only way to get the news out there is honourably, even if it only reaches 10 people and a couple of goats. Failing that, just go back to discussing the ins and outs of the case for next 8 years and tear viciously into anyone who dares to step out of line putting your (anonymous) reputations at risk.

    The McCanns are desperate to stop Sonia Poulton's documentary whatever the cost and the knives are well and truly out.  Of course, they don't have to worry too much about the cost at the moment, what with so many anti's jumping onboard to fight their corner.  In the case of the McCanns, they prove again and again how easy it is to manipulate public opinion.  Create an enemy and all join in for the kill, it brings people together in a way that nothing else can.

    So many anti's now using lines directly from the death dossier compilers site JATYK2, it is almost impossible to tell them apart, I'm getting a real taste of how Brenda must have felt when she went off to that hotel room on her own.  I have a good idea behind the reasoning for this call for blood, but I won't be phased by it.  I will continue to do the same as I have for last 8 years, I will keep asking those questions, and I will keep trying to get the truth out to a wider audience.

    As for the Sun article, we should be discussing trolling, what is a troll?  Who are they? Should there be 'trolling laws'?  Should people like myself be allowed to post on the internet?  Look at the bigger picture.  The article raises questions that need to be asked, or before we know it, we will have legislation that will swiftly bring an end to any future discussions like these.

    The article in the Sun was yesterday's news, lets hope it leads to the very thing the McCanns do not want.  More questions.
    A Response to Ms Hutton  http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t10940-a-response-to-ms-hutton

    Post  Smokeandmirrors Today at 9:55 am
    The speed with which some of you have bought into the McCanns and Tony Bennett's malevolent publicity has left me shaken if not stirred.

    Really? For several months now you have barely written a word that is not attacking Tony. You have written whole blogs slandering Tony and your hypocrisy is staggering. Grow up.

    In order to cling onto and indeed promote the negativity of what is being said, you have grasped onto the negative aspects of the article and disregarded the positive in its entirety. I was concerned the Sun readers may not have been able to read between the lines, I didn't expect it from people I thought were on the same side.

    The article was about TROLLS, I was an interviewee, I had no control whatsoever over what was published,

    You had EVERY control over the words that poured out of your own mouth. Don't try and play the victim here, it simply won't wash. You alone were responsible for the words you chose, if there was any manipulation of your words it is proof enough that you were careless with your words.

    yet some have assumed that I ALONE wrote it, edited it and placed it under a sensational headline. The article was by Martin Daubney, NOT Sonia Poulton.He approached Sonia because he knew she was working on a McCann documentary and knew several people who, as campaigners, could be classed as trolls and he wanted someone who was willing to be identified. I was asked to do it

    Sonia clearly asked for volunteers and you probably broke the land speed record in order to offer up your services. I doubt you were asked to do it.

    and I accepted because imo, ANYTHING that gets the message out there is worth a try, and lets face it, having used my own name and face this past 8 years, my reputation has already been torn to shreds. All you honourable and anonymous people have been spared the threats and abuse that myself and a handful of others have had to put up with, yet when I get an opportunity to defend myself you are first in the queue with the knives. Live and learn.

    Your reputation may be torn to shreds, but that would be because of your terrible blogs and uninformed input to the case. As for the knives Ms Hutton, your hypocrisy AGAIN is quite shocking. You can dish it out in spadefuls, but cannot take your own medicine.

    I do hope that when the dust settles, people will begin to see the bigger picture. Whether I or indeed any of us are trolls matters not one iota to the case of missing Madeleine. The public are now beginning to see the light as far as the McCanns' chosen form of campaigning is concerned, the death of Brenda Leyland hit hard. How many Sun readers do you think will agree with McCann trolls phoning a distressed woman in the middle of the night saying (dead) 'Mummy here' and 'why don't you kill yourself'?

    To all those protesting or who may have wanted to do the interview themselves, would they have come across any better than I did? Would Sun readers for example empathise with Tony Bennett, Rothley Pillow, Ben Thompson, Zora or indeed any of the moreextreme activists who campaign for Maddie? Would they have portrayed 'you all' in a good light?

    I expect there are hundreds, if not thousands who would have done a far better job. There are people out there, you know, who actually have a much better working knowledge of the case, who are far more articulate and less egotistical. In fact ANYONE would have been better for the job.

    And then there are those who have taken the moral highground. 'How could you?' they shriek, The Sun, of all tabloids? Couldn't you have found a small clean living publication where the proprietors and journalists are pillars of the society and their readership hold clean CRB's? The only way to get the news out there is honourably,

    Let's be clear, there has been nothing honourable about your bullying and harassing of Tony lately, and you got no news out there. You haven't even got a working knowledge of the case, so what did you think you could add to the discussion?

    even if it only reaches 10 people, at least your conscience is clear. Failing that, just go back to discussing the ins and outs of the case for next 8 years and tear viciously into anyone who dares to step out of line putting your (anonymous) reputation at risk.

    Quite honestly Ms Hutton, it's time you put your keyboard away and took up knitting, for the sake of all our sanity. Writing really isn't your field to be honest, and you'll save yourself a lot of heartache in the long run once you realise you've crossed a line and thrown away any shred of credibility you believe you once had.

    And no, this is not an attack on you, it is a genuine response to the nonsense you choose to parade in the public arena. YOU admit yourself that you want attention and lots of it, so don't be all offended when people respond to your publicity seeking. Quid pro quo........


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:49 am

    I am putting this here as again she has again traduced innocent possters.
    So many anti's now using lines directly from the death dossier compilers site JATYK2, it is almost impossible to tell them apart,

    From JATYK2:  

    This site had NOTHING to do with that 'dossier'. This site observes and comments, it does NOT meddle in the real world. Unlike her and her attention-seeking chums. This site does not get involved in bunfights on twatter, we just laugh at them from a safe distance.

    It's an outright lie. And if she can make malicious, false accusations so easily, then she can't complain if we consider that EVERY SINGLE THING SHE SAYS AND CLAIMS IS ALSO A LIE.

    Hutton seems to have forgotten something.


    The REAL police do know who compiled that 'dossier' and have known all along. - is she too dumb or stoned to grasp that? It is, therefore, a matter of legal record with the REAL police that it is nothing to do with us.
    I will add to this:  JATYK2 are NOT the compilers, earlier STOPTHEMYTHS was accused of having compiled it.    Because no-one can actually point the finger accurately in the right direction, idiots like Hutton etc accuse anyone they hate.  However, they are barking up the wrong tree, believe me.   I would merely add a true saying "Hide in Plain Sight."    Oh, and why is it now called a 'Death Dossier?'   There's nothing about killings or murder in there - is it an attempt to link it with the sad troll who died last year?     Sykes


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:18 pm

    The Spectator™ ‏@TheSpectator7 21 mins21 minutes ago
    @RadicalFeminist  
    We are all sick of reading about internet trolls & then one of our own goes & paints us all with the same brush. #mccann

    The Spectator™ ‏@TheSpectator7 6 mins6 minutes ago
    @RosalindaHu @RadicalFeminist @SoniaPoulton
    We aren't pushing any books Linda. If we want to be anonymous, then thats our right.
    Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 42 mins42 minutes ago
    @RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu that's not correct. It's about freedom of speech and Ros is fighting for that.

    Radical Feminist ‏@RadicalFeminist 41 mins41 minutes ago
    @SoniaPoulton @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu I thought she was fighting for Madeleine McCann

    Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton 39 mins39 minutes ago
    @RadicalFeminist @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu the piece was not about Madeleine McCann it was about free speech.

    Radical Feminist ‏@RadicalFeminist 37 mins37 minutes ago
    @SoniaPoulton @TheSpectator7 @RosalindaHu Free speech is under attack. One way of doing that is by portraying critics as nasty trolls
    Exactly, and Poulton and the Sun did that magnificently.

    Let's remind ourselves of how it was originally touted.  

    Sonia Poulton‏@SoniaPoulton #journorequest am looking for a passionate #mccann anti, prepared to be identified for a newspaper feature. Chance to put case forward.  
    Anyone see anything about 'free speech' there? No, me neither. Poulton was looking for a gobby hater that could be relied upon to make an ar@e of herself - and her cause. And Hutton obliged.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:10 pm

    I haven't seen such as neat shafting of a 'friend' for a very long time.    It's an exercise in how to enmesh a self-immersed wannabe in three easy stages, and also cause much grief among her fellow trolls and, of course, do a hatchet 'divide and rule' job on them.    I don't like Poulton but I think what she has done is a good scenario for a Hollywood blockbuster.     Sykes



    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:38 pm

    A query posted on Myths, with thanks.
    Rosalinda Hutton says that after she lost her mother, a pro McCann rang her up and pretended to be her mother. Now I don't know if that is true or not, she says she found it very disturbing.

    Yet Bennett wrote a letter pretending to be Madeleine from the grave, to her parents. When I read that letter that Bennett had written, I thought it was the most disgusting, cruel, disturbing thing I had ever read from an anti McCann to do with the McCann case. It played on my mind, that someone could write something like that for the parents of a missing child to read, was to me so utterly void of any compassion for another human being, to bring suffering and pain to an already broken couple and their family.

    I didn't see anything from Rosalinda Hutton to Bennett on the Jill Havern forum, which she was a member of at the time, telling him what a disgusting letter it was, asking him how he could write such a letter. Especially after the phone call she said she had received.

    Strange that.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:43 pm

    They are really narked that they can't blame the McCanns for this debacle
    Zora @gryzellda
    @NettyCox possibly. Some suggestion of pro #mccann orchestration & organisation would have had some merit. Sadly absent


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 5:10 pm

    Cristobell31 January 2015 at 23:23
    He did indeed, Bennett and the McCann supporters egging each other with favourites and retweets of the nastiest stuff they can think up, they have become as one in their quest to keep the truth hidden.

    The speed with which they accepted and indeed promoted the McCanns negative publicity about this article was breathtaking, the McCanns hardly need their own media monitor unit, some of the anti's have been doing it so very well for them this past 8 years.
    Did anyone see 'the McCanns' promoting any sort of publicity about Hutton's appearance in the Sun?

    No, me neither. The only person doing any 'promoting' was Hutton herself, rushing round demanding people read it, retweet it, and generally talk about how wonderful Hutton is.

    That Pinocchio habit of hers is going to get her into bad, bad trouble one of these days.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    TIGERLOAF OF MYTHS PULLS ALL THE THREADS TOGETHER

    Post  Sykes on Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:29 pm

    From Myths with thanks to tigerloaf.
    tigerloaf » Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:03 pm
    Yesterday morning began with Rosalinda Hutton proudly and brazenly opening a new thread on the forum which is not hers
    THE SUN NEWSPAPER TODAY - Cristobell Interview 31.1.15

    Post Cristobell Yesterday at 7:56 am
    Well the interview I did has been published today in the Sun. It is an article about trolls and trolling and I am expecting to be torn to shreds, but I have managed to get the worst of the McCann trolls appalling behaviour out in the public arena.
    She seemed to be proud of the piece, suggesting she had managed to show pro McCanns up and expecting that those people would tear her to shreds.

    However before the morning was half done there was criticism not from the pro McCanns (who were too busy roaring with laughter at her stupidity and naivety) but from her own so-called friends. Rosalinda Hutton then began to suggest that Martin Daubney had changed her words and made it look like she had not said what we all know she had said.

    Cristobell Yesterday at 10:39 am
    I agree the article hasn't shown me in a great light, I did not say 'I attacked the McCanns' and I certainly didn't say I abused them! As if! They have sexed it up, to flog the trolling aspect.
    However, the article does reveal that there is a dark, sinister side to the McCanns media campaign, and I hope that people will understand that we are not vile abusers, just ordinary people. It opens up debate, and that can only be a good thing.
    Actually, the article didn't reveal any such thing. It showed a confirmed troll suggesting that a single person had chosen to troll her for her "attacking of the McCanns". The article is clear that the attacking of the McCanns by Hutton came first. And the article is perfectly clear that Rosalinda Hutton is herself a vile troll whose online activity feeds a need for attention and helps her get a buzz when she can get down and dirty fighting with others online. In other words that Rosalinda Hutton is a very sick troll attacking the McCanns.

    Others were realising just how bad this made the anti McCanns look, especially as Rosalinda had told the journalist that there were other anti-McCanns far more evil than she is. So she tried to defend herself again by blaming the Sun for changing what she had said.
    Popcorn Yesterday at 10:41 am
    Did you make a recording of the interview Cristobell? It would be interesting to compare what you told them with what they published.

    Cristobell Yesterday at 10:49 am
    I did the interview via Skype and asked Martin to record it. The text that they have put is not the same as the text Martin sent to me for approval, they have added the bits about my attacking and abusing the McCanns! I most definitely did not say that, and I haven't done that, its not my style and I think everyone who reads my stuff knows that.
    The problem is that while she might not see nastiness as her style, everybody else does. And her weasel words about "they" having changed her words just did not ring true even with her friends. Putting it bluntly, nobody believed her and there was a request from those on her own forum to post the two versions alongside each other so that people could actually see what Daubney (or his editors) had changed. A simple task you might think and one which would be easy as Rosalinda told us she still had the original as well as the new version.

    But nothing was forthcoming.
    Popcorn Yesterday at 10:58 am
    It's not my business, but I think a blog from you detailing the 'sexed up' aspects of the piece, comparing the copy-approved version and the final published one, would be worth doing, just to have it out there and on the record.

    Mimi Yesterday at 11:02 am
    I agree with Popcorn - how sneaky of them to send you the text for approval, then alter it - libellous isn`t it?
    Publish the correct version on your own blog IMO.

    canada12 Yesterday at 11:04 am
    I agree - if, for no other reason, than to show how what someone has said can be manipulated by the journo to promote their own agenda.
    And so it went on all day. Requests from forum members for her to post the two versions so that people could see the changes made.
    Beanie Yesterday at 10:19 pm
    I totally agree Margaret this is not looking good. I admire that Cristobell has taken the McCanns and their team on head to head but, if The Sun have completely misprinted what was taped during said interview then please Christobell post the full transcript here so we can all make up our own minds. Surely a good move because it gets what you really did say out there.
    And on this forum early in the evening I posted the challenge so that she could not miss it.

       tigerloaf » Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:33 pm
       

    But there was no movement from Rosalinda Hutton at all. She made no effort whatsoever to publish the two versions so that people could see that she was telling the truth.

    Till very late in the evening when this appeared.
    Cristobell Yesterday at 11:00 pm
    So the demand is that I place all details of my conversations, emails, drafts, etc, ie. the entire extent of my evidence, should a libel trial ever arise, on an open public forum? Indeed, get myself involved in a detailed discussion about what if any action I should take, what my proposals are and how I should go about it.
    That the publishing of such materials and the discussion of the evidence will immediately rule out any possibility of my getting an apology, a retraction or a withdrawal of said offending statements, matters not - it will give us all something to talk about.
    Goodnight.  
    Absolute garbage from Rosalinda. Total, utter bilge designed to get her out of having to do what should (if she has told the truth) be an easy task to post up the two different versions of the interview.

    Nobody had asked her for all the stuff she listed. And as for the ridiculous notion that she should be taking Murdoch to court for libel, well that is pure delusion. Perhaps though, she is secretly afraid they might prosecute her for lying about there having been two versions? Now, that's a possibility.

    It was Rosalinda Hutton herself who told us of the two distinct versions. She did so because she realised that she was being trashed by her own so-called friends. She wanted to demonstrate that she had been hard done by in the media. But nobody can take her word for anything any more. There have simply been too many blatant lies from her. I have been told another place is listing her lies one after another in a very public place. I wonder if they have included that ridiculous lie she told on her Skype interview on Icke TV when she claimed the McCanns had 24 legal cases on the go. When challenged about that she fled and refused to detail these cases. The fact is she was lying.

    I am now stating quite openly that I do not believe Rosalinda Hutton has told us the truth about the two versions of this interview with Daubney and the way she claims she has been misrepresented. And I repeat my challenge for her to post them so that they can be compared side-by-side. If I am wrong it will take her just a few minutes to prove that, though I shall, of course, submit the two versions to Daubney directly in order to check that she isn't simply making things up.


    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time
    avatar
    Sykes

    Posts : 6811
    Join date : 2011-07-17

    TIGERLOAF OF MYTHS WITH MORE OBSERVATIONS ON HUTTON - SEE POST 49 ABOVE

    Post  Sykes on Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:23 am

    tigerloaf » Mon Feb 02, 2015 5:59 am
    I see Rosalinda/Linda/Rosalind Hutton has chickened out of posting up the two copies of the article side-by-side (the one she claims to have approved with her corrections to it in red and the one eventually published).

    Did anyone expect anything else from this self-confessed troll and proven liar? Just as Sonia Poulton has chickened out of the challenge put to her, so her disciple has followed.

    Instead of posting up the two copies she seems to have passed one to a single person, the mod called Freedom. This mod on the forum which isn't hers could even be herself for all anyone actually knows. She does, after all, have a penchant for playing with names.

    Hutton has failed to provide evidence for any of her claims, either those related to the content of the article or those described in the article. Indeed the latter are in direct contradiction to the claims she has previously made.

    The one criticism she makes of those who were challenging her "attacking of the McCanns" is that they supposedly phoned her about the death of her mother. There is no evidence offered by Hutton of this at all, no reference for example to any comment she made online at the time or to any complaint she made at the time. Indeed, the entire story she told Martin Daubney contradicts what she was telling people at the time and in the intervening years.

    Which of the two tales is the blatant lie because they cannot both be correct?

    Yesterday in Daubney's article she is perfectly clear that her mother, father and best friend had died before Madeleine went missing.

    Previously (last August - http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/2014/0 ... aving.html ) she told us about the conversations she was having with her mother about Gerry and Kate McCann some time after Madeleine went missing.

    I simply do not believe that Hutton has forgotten when her mother died. She has used the poor woman (who she publicly abuses with her phrase that she was "as mad as a hatter" to exaggerate the situation with Daubney. She has lied.

    But that is what trolls do. They lie, they abuse, they exaggerate for effect, they are in it for the buzz and they get their kicks from their activities. And we know for certain that Rosalinda/Rosalind/Linda Hutton is a troll. She has told us that she is one.

    The Twitter request from Sonia Poulton to which Hutton presumably responded gleefully was a request for a passionate anti-McCann troll to be interviewed.

    Sonia Poulton‏@SoniaPoulton #journorequest am looking for a passionate #mccann anti, prepared to be identified for a newspaper feature. Chance to put case forward.
    And Hutton tells us herself that she knew it was an article about TROLLS (her emphasis).
    The article was about TROLLS, I was an interviewee, I had no control whatsoever over what was published, yet some have assumed that I ALONE wrote it, edited it and placed it under a sensational headline. The article was by Martin Daubney, NOT Sonia Poulton. He approached Sonia because he knew she was working on a McCann documentary and knew several people who, as campaigners, could be classed as trolls and he wanted someone who was willing to be identified.  
    http://cristobell.blogspot.co.uk/

    She knew full well that she was being interviewed as a TROLL for an article about trolling. That is why everything she talks about in the article is about her actions as a TROLL.

    In her own words she describes how she needs an audience and gets a buzz from being the centre of attention. That is why she did the interview.

    She told us yesterday on FB about the fact that she was so excited she spent three days preparing for the interview but having known the subject at hand it is clear that her preparation was flawed. It was never going to be about the McCann case (even if Poulton had lied about that to her).
    If I may explain. I prepared for 3 days for the interview and went into it with a concise list of the important flaws in the missing Madeleine case and I ticked them off as we spoke. The article however is about trolls and trolling, it was never going to be about the McCann case specifically. I gave Martin examples of the worst of troll behaviour in the McCann case, which is what he wanted, their media monitors were trying to persuade me to committ suicide ffs, everyone seems to have overlooked that. Martin wishes to bring the issues around trolling out into the open with the public asking questions. And its an important issue and one we would do well to keep our eyes on, because before we know, discussions such as these will no longer be permissible.
    We know from her own previous writing that the single example of what she ludicrously describes as "the worst of troll behaviour in the McCann case" is based on a complete a lie. Her mother had not died at the point in time she told Daubney. The date of one's mother's death is not something one would forget easily. Why, having spent three days (at least) preparing for this interview would the only example she could give Daubney of what she claimed was pro-McCann trolling be a lie? I suggest the reason is obvious. She has no other examples. She was trying to exaggerate the way in which her "attacking of the McCanns" was being challenged by those supporting the McCanns. She was trying to suggest that their actions were the equal of hers and the other anti-McCanns who she openly tells us were far more evil than she was.

    Even during the actual interview she was getting a buzz, she was exaggerating, she was getting down and dirty and she was bigging herself due to her attention-seeking personality in front of the biggest audience she would ever get in her miserable lonely and depression-riddled life. She was living the life of a TROLL.

    It is interesting to see how Daubney has reacted to the article on Twitter. Has he defended Hutton. Well, she probably thinks he has but has he really? Let's read his tweets and look at them carefully.
    561535510439804928|Sat Jan 31 14:44:33 +0000 2015|Is trolling addictive? Champions of free speech or cruel losers? I ask @Holbornlolz &amp; @RosalindaHu @TheSunNewspaper http://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8r5kd5CEAA-Yx9.png

    561536578003435520|Sat Jan 31 14:48:47 +0000 2015|@xklamation I don't label anybody, nor does the newspaper. It's two v different interviews. Readers free to make own minds up, as are you

    561544845744160768|Sat Jan 31 15:21:38 +0000 2015|@xklamation Yes, all trolls have been labelled that. You could equally say people in piece called that, but I didn't. I don't take sides

    561790982820483073|Sun Feb 01 07:39:42 +0000 2015|For the record I never called @RosalindaHu a "cruel loser" I merely reiterated the proposition the article put forward about trolls

    561791152056434688|Sun Feb 01 07:40:22 +0000 2015|Also @RosalindaHu and her supporters do not consider themselves trolls. That's the interesting thing about the psychology of it all

    561791373679292416|Sun Feb 01 07:41:15 +0000 2015|It seems everybody sees only those who disagree/attack them on the "other side" as trolls. In fact, the term troll almost meaningless

    561792278357098496|Sun Feb 01 07:44:51 +0000 2015|On the contrary I found @RosalindaHu to be a warm, kind and driven lady. It's not my job to take "sides". Just tell stories.  
    561792591659040768|Sun Feb 01 07:46:06 +0000 2015|So I'd like to personally apologise if @RosalindaHu is offended. Was never intention. I had a day off Twitter yesterday - hence late comment
    He's a clever writer. That presumably is why he makes a good living from writing and Hutton is an unpaid trolling blogger who is grateful for the few shillings she presumably got for this interview.

    He is clear that neither he nor his paper said outright that Hutton is a troll. But he tells you to make up your own mind and based on what Hutton herself said about herself, giving every classic descriptor of a troll then she is a troll.

    He tells us he didn't personally call Hutton a "cruel loser" but admits that was the intent of the content of the article.

    He says that Hutton doesn't see herself as a troll but then reminds us that that denial and inability to recognise the reality is one of the interesting psychological factors of those doing the trolling.

    He re-iterates that trolls only think of their opponents as trolls, suggesting that the term is meaningless. I would agree and prefer to describe the actions of these people as online abusiveness and nastiness.

    He then tells us that Hutton is "warm, kind" and (crucially) "driven", that he didn't take sides, just told the story and we can all see from the story told about Hutton in her own words that she is a clear TROLL.

    He then apologises to Hutton "if she was offended" suggesting that however much she may be whingeing for the attention, she might not actually be offended. The fact that from her own blog and FB posts we know she was fully aware that she was being interviewed as a TROLL does suggest he might be right in this and that her whingeing is for effect and for the buzz rather than being genuine. After all what can she be offended about if she knew the score in advance?

    My take, for what its worth, is that she is simply upset at being seen now as no better than the other trolls who she thought she was a cut above. She isn't though. She is a lonely, depressed old woman who admits that she goes on the Internet to get a buzz from being outrageous and from getting down and dirty. As she told us, if she wasn't kicking people online she might well be kicking the dog. It would appear to be a similar buzz that she gets when she abuses drugs as she admits she does. She is the perfect example of the troubled person who has turned to the Internet and grasped the McCanns as people she feels she can take out her woes on with like-minded drug abusers, depressives and evil nasty people.

    She has brought contempt and ridicule on herself by naively subjecting herself to this interview and laying out her psychological problems and needs in this way. She has explained the nature of the anti-McCann troll in ways which others among that number cannot handle because they see more clearly now their own defects. And though she pretends she has revealed something about pro McCanns and indeed the McCanns themselves she is completely deluding herself because no casual reader of that article is going to see anything between the lines of her self-confession as a TROLL and no more knowledgeable reader is going to accept her lie about her own mother's death as evidence of anything at all other than her own personality defects.

    We have Sonia Poulton to thank for introducing Rosalinda/Rosalind/Linda Hutton to Martin Daubney in the first place. Those who challenge the attacks on the McCanns by TROLLS such as Hutton are genuinely grateful for this action which has demonstrated just how evil and nasty anti-McCann trolls truly are. Your collusion, Sonia, with the Murdoch empire has been fruitful beyond what you expected. Some believe you were also naive while some believe you actually knew what you were doing? The truth of the matter will soon be revealed won't it?



    _________________
    Truth is the Daughter of Time

    Sponsored content

    Re: ROSALINDA HUTTON TRASHED IN THE MSM (BY HERSELF) PART 1

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Jun 24, 2017 4:30 pm