From Myths with thanks to tigerloaf and also for other posters' comments.
Comment 1: Wasn't he a police superintendent though? I have a feeling that you don't have to be a police officer to get made superintendent. I think they can bring in civilian managers and make them superintendents. Anyone else know anything about that or have I got it wrong?
The idiot keeps going on about the shutters not being jemmied, yet the video shows him jemmying the shutters open very easily (I use the word jemmied to mean forced & the idiot has to OK now that is very common).
He blames the authors of the dossier for Brenda Leyland's death, but the authors are the antis. Reporting threats and stalking of children is the moral thing to do, the legal thing to do. Trying to intimidate people into not reporting threats to the police is wrong, yet this is what they are doing. Not only that but they are using it as an excuse to stalk the McCanns again.
Comment 2: ................ why does that damn fool think he has 'proved' it's Philomena McCann in the Sky clip?
Does he really think she would actually appear on camera if she was the dossier compiler?
I see the dumbest ex-cop in history has done a 'bennett'.
That Peter Macleod of Finca La Guzmana in Spain has made a categorical statement but his evidence is even being challenged by members of the forum who can see what a plonker he really is.
He claims categorically that the Sky news video proves it is Philomena McCann. No competent cop, not even a competent ex-cop would ever make such a claim based on evidence that even others "devoted to the same cause" can see is too flimsy.
But Peter Macleod of Finca La Guzmana in Spain is so stupid he thinks that he can pronounce such rubbish and it will simply be accepted. This is the plonker who after years of Anti McCann haters claiming the shutters could not be lifted, went along with the pretendy profiler and proved on camera that their dogma for so long was nothing but poppycock.
He must have been booted out of Notthinghamshire police for being thick judging by his incompetent and idiotic contributions to the Anti McCann cause over the years. He didn't know anything about custody rules. His level of knowledge of DNA has been shown to be bordering on zero and his level of understanding of the use of dogs and they way they are handled is even less than that.
He still advertises his B&B on the Notts Retired Police site though there is no rule that you have to be an ex Nottingham cop to advertise there so it doesn't prove he ever was.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
"Fons et origo" indeed!
Perhaps instead of pretending to be educated this twerp should take a lesson from his avatar and learn how to judge evidence without showing bias?
I know which of these two I would trust the most (clue: he's not acting the fool with some shutters).
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Comment 1: Wasn't he a police superintendent though? I have a feeling that you don't have to be a police officer to get made superintendent. I think they can bring in civilian managers and make them superintendents. Anyone else know anything about that or have I got it wrong?
The idiot keeps going on about the shutters not being jemmied, yet the video shows him jemmying the shutters open very easily (I use the word jemmied to mean forced & the idiot has to OK now that is very common).
He blames the authors of the dossier for Brenda Leyland's death, but the authors are the antis. Reporting threats and stalking of children is the moral thing to do, the legal thing to do. Trying to intimidate people into not reporting threats to the police is wrong, yet this is what they are doing. Not only that but they are using it as an excuse to stalk the McCanns again.
Comment 2: ................ why does that damn fool think he has 'proved' it's Philomena McCann in the Sky clip?
Does he really think she would actually appear on camera if she was the dossier compiler?